AbstractCoatings are used as practical solutions against the intrusion of corrosive ions into concrete structures, particularly, in the harsh marine environment. In the present study, the effectiveness of using cement-based and geopolymer-based coatings produced using by-product materials has been evaluated. Silica fume and GGBFS at their optimum dosages were incorporated into mortar mixtures as a cement replacement, and mixtures of NaOH or KOH and sodium silicate solutions were used in the alkali-activated mortars. Shrinkage test, RCMT, and capillary absorption test as common experiments for durability analysis, as well as tests related to the mechanical and bonding properties including compressive strength test, pull-off test, and shear bonding strength test were carried out on the specimens. According to the results, both geopolymer and cement-based mortars improved the compressive and bonding strengths, and chloride diffusion resistance of coatings compared to the OPC mortar. Silica fume was found to be more effective in the strength development of mortars at young ages, while GGBFS was more responsible for acting as a filler and producing further gel in the older ages. The major drawback with geopolymer mortars is the high rate of water absorption and shrinkage coefficient in the early hours, which shows the importance of curing of these mortars at young ages. Overall, the mix design produced with 30% GGBFS and 7.5% silica fume showed the highest durability and mechanical properties and proved to be more compatible with the harsh environment of the Persian Gulf.
Mechanical and durability assessment of cement-based and alkali-activated coating mortars in an aggressive marine environment
