scholarly journals Advantages of the corporate model of the state sector of the economy of Russia

2018 ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
V. V. Kurchenkov ◽  
O. S. Makarenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Significant Role ◽  
The State ◽  
State Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Integration Effect ◽  
Stable Development ◽  
Corporate Model

At present, the share of the public sector in the Russian economy plays a significant role. The state sector is actively used as a means of regulation to achieve many state social and economic goals, including provision of the stable development of important strategic sectors. The article reveals the features of the formation and development of the corporate model of the public sector of the Russian economy, related, including the creation and functioning of the institution of state corporations. Special features of the formation of the corporate model of the public sector of the Russian economy are identified, by defining its features, principles, advantages and disadvantages of use, including the achievement of the integration effect in the process of interaction of its economic entities. The results could be used in the activities of state structures in the implementation of state policy for the development of the public sector, solving problems of accounting for its boundaries and scales, and in developing and improving strategies for the development of state corporations, and improving the efficiency of their activities.

scholarly journals The Significance and Role of the Public Sector in the Development of the Modern Russian Economy

2020 ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kurchenkov ◽  
Olga Makarenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Economic Security ◽  
The State ◽  
State Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Modern Russian

The article examines the features of the public sector functioning, determines its role and importance in the development of Russian economy. Ensuring the performance of important socio-economic functions, public sector enterprises operate in strategically important sectors of economy, participate in job creation, produce goods and services, and contribute to the GDP growth. State-owned enterprises and corporations provide significant benefits to society, ensure the country’s defense capability. The authors analyze the functioning of the state sector of Russian economy, consider the structure of Russian enterprises and organizations by forms of ownership. The development of the state sector of Russian economy is investigated according to individual indicators, including the share of fixed assets of state property in all fixed assets, the average annual number of employees, the amount of investment in fixed assets of public sector enterprises. It is shown that taking into account only quantitative indicators does not reflect the full scale of the public sector of economy, and does not consider the output of large state-owned enterprises and corporations. An important role in the formation of modern Russian economy is played by the activities of state corporations, the key development indicators of which influenced the functioning of the public sector as a whole. By ensuring the performance of the reproductive, stabilization, innovation and investment functions in economy, state corporations support the development of strategically important sectors of national economy. Based on the results of the analysis of investment activities of large enterprises with state participation, conclusions are drawn about the need for the presence of these economic entities in the structure of national economy. It was revealed that the public sector of economy takes part in maintaining the economic security of our country, individual regions, thereby increasing the competitiveness and the level of well-being of society as a whole.

scholarly journals Reforming the public sector and Parliament - Chris Hipkins' goals

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin James
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
The State ◽  
Specific Time ◽  
Policy Studies ◽  
Public Servants ◽  
Chief Executives ◽  
State Sector ◽  
The Public

Back in the late 1990s senior public servants worried at Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) roundtables that ‘siloisation’ of the state sector was hampering effectiveness. Also at that time an IPS roundtable of chief and deputy chief executives backed posting advice on agency websites when decisions were made or at some specific time after delivery.

THE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 110-114
Author(s):  
N. P. GERASIMOV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
The State ◽  
The Sustainable Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Composition And Structure

The article discusses the features of the formation and development of the public sector of the Russian economy, analyzes the state presence in the most important sectors of the economy, characterizes the role of state corporations in the sustainable development of the country.

Going Public

2020 ◽  
pp. 279-302
Author(s):  
Bryn Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Freedom ◽  
Public Servants ◽  
State Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Apparatus ◽  
Original Survey ◽  
Regime Support

This chapter investigates the political orientations and career aspirations of students who intend to join the state sector in Russia, using original survey data from three elite Russian universities. The analysis focuses on whether and how Russia’s future public servants differ from others in their views of the importance of political freedom, order, national security, and strong economic performance. It finds that Russian youth aspire to work for an autocratic state not because they favor autocratic values nor because they hope to build more democratic institutions. Rather, their preference is based on access to recruitment channels: universities with strong alumni networks in the state apparatus or a parent working in the public sector. These findings suggest that public sector workers’ attitudes are similar to those of others at the start of their careers. Over time, however, public servants’ political attitudes diverge, suggesting that Russia’s large public sector also plays a vital role in securing regime support.

Public Sector in the Transformation Economy of Ukraine: Macroeconomic Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. s296-s317
Author(s):  
Yuliia Samborska-Muzychko ◽  
Iryna Parasii-Verhunenko ◽  
Oksana Pashchenko ◽  
Liubov Budniak ◽  
Oksana Salamin
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
The State ◽  
Global Integration ◽  
Structural Dynamic ◽  
State Sector ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Public ◽  
Macroeconomic Analysis ◽  
Market Relations

The purpose of the article is to study the conditions and prospects for the development of the state sector of the Ukrainian economy and to determine the functions and tasks of state-owned enterprises in a transformational economy. The information base of the empirical research is the data of the official website of the Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine for 2014-2020. The methodological and methodical sources lie in the provisions of the economic code, the Classifier of institutional sectors of the economy. In the course of the research, the following methodological techniques were used as a comparison, modeling, series of dynamics, grouping, structural-dynamic, and coefficient analysis. The necessity of improving the existing regulatory mechanisms of transformation from state institutions and the development of new effective approaches to the functioning of the system of state entrepreneurship, which takes into account the features of the transformational economy and is based on international experience in building modern market relations and mechanisms for increasing the efficiency of the economic system, has been substantiated. The dynamics of the public sector share in the country's economy is analyzed, and the possible causes and consequences of these structural and dynamic changes are characterized. The results of the study are the proposed classification of types from state-owned enterprises, which is the basis for differentiating their functions and tasks depending on the goals of education, the characteristics of the activity, the structure of ownership, and the strategic priorities of the country's development. The necessity of the state-owned enterprises' sector reforming in the context of global integration is substantiated, as well as general directions and tools for implementing the reform of state-owned enterprises. 

Labor Activities in the Field of Internal Financial Audit in the State Sector

Auditor ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 38-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Наталья Парушина ◽  
Natalya Parushina ◽  
Наталья Лытнева ◽  
Natalya Lytnyeva ◽  
Александр Билиходзе ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
The State ◽  
State Sector ◽  
Internal Auditors ◽  
The Public ◽  
Regulatory Documents ◽  
Financial Audit

Th e article considers the prerequisites, patterns and trends in the development of activities for conducting internal financial audits in the public sector. A review of the regulatory documents governing the work of internal auditors is given, the principles of auditing in the public sector are summarized, prospects for the development of internal audits are considered, taking into account the adoption of federal standards.

scholarly journals Statistics on Differences in the Institutional Composition of the National Economy and Issues Related to its Harmonization

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-32
Author(s):  
O. V. Morozov ◽  
A. G. Biryukov ◽  
M. A. Vasiliev
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Economic System ◽  
National Economy ◽  
The State ◽  
Domestic Economy ◽  
The Public ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
State Participation ◽  
Sectoral Composition

This article focuses on the assessment of the size of the public sector, which goes back to the assessment of the degree of state participation in the domestic economy and remains controversial. Such assessments are often carried out without the presentation of threshold criteria and without evaluation of its effectiveness and combination with other institutional sectors. At the same time, it is obvious that the ratio between the public and other (non-state) sectors refers to the issue of strategic importance, to the issue of the effectiveness of the country's economic system in its integrity, and therefore requires theoretical, methodological and practical resolution.The objectives of the research are: (1) to determine the relative scale and efficiency of the public sector functioning in the national economy, to establish minimum necessary and maximum possible values of its scale; (2) to determine the size and establish a measure of harmonious combination of institutional components of the domestic economy aimed at maximizing its efficiency.Materials and methods. Theoretical foundations of the research have been developed on the basis of the authors' preferences regarding the results of conceptual and applied developments of domestic scientists in the field of philosophy, mathematics, economics and sociology, as well as the practice of structural and spectral analysis in their subject areas. The analysis of parameters (indicators) of the state and other institutional sectors of the national economy was carried out (mainly) on the basis of statistical data of ROSSTAT for 2006-2016, materials of official reports and developments of analytical centers. The methodological basis of the research is formed by works on modular theory of society, public sector economy, and structural harmony of systems. Tabular methods of visualization of research results and statistical methods of source data processing were used. Standard packages of Microsoft Office application programs were used for solving research tasks.Results. It is shown that against the background of a decrease in relative resource capacity, the public sector over the period under review does not show an increase in the degree of government participation in the Russian economy. At the same time, performance indicators of the public sector did not show not only worse, but also worsening values, both as compared with the private sector and the economy as a whole. Criteria of minimum required and maximum possible scale of the public sector have been defined and it is shown that as of 2016 the integral indicator of the scale of the public sector of the Russian economy does not reach the minimum required value. A quantitative model for optimizing the sectoral composition of the national economy has been constructed. System solutions are proposed and a method for determining the share of institutional sectors in the structure of the national economy is given.Conclusion. The article deals with the issues of state participation in the economy, defines the scale and efficiency of the public sector in the national economy. It is noted that within the limits of maximally liberal and maximally ethical ideological statements the task of optimization of neither the size of the public sector of the national economy nor the harmonious combination of its sectoral composition find a satisfactory solution. The analysis of institutional composition of the national economy has been carried out and the way of optimization of its structure has been shown, the direction of the state economic policy on optimization of institutional structure of the national economy has been determined. Orientation of economic policy towards achievement of optimal structure (harmony) of economic system (as well as the very movement towards it) will create conditions not only for increase of its efficiency, but also will allow to satisfy economic needs of socially-professional groups to the fullest extent, and society as a whole will successfully develop.

scholarly journals Development of innovation activities in the state sector and business in the post-pandemic period

2021 ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
A.V. Mayakova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
The State ◽  
State Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
Digital Services ◽  
Social Management

Examined are innovative activities that have received a powerful “catalyst” in the development of digital services and technologies in the form of the coronavirus pandemic, and also analyzed are the possibilities of digitalization for solving the problems of social management and innovation in the public sector and business. The author argues that existence outside and without digitalization at this stage of the development of human civilization is no longer possible.

scholarly journals PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND LEGITIMATE INTERESTS OF THE STATE FROM VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY BUSINESS ENTITIES OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR OF THE ECONOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
Andriy Zakharchenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
The State ◽  
Financial Control ◽  
State Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Rights And Interests ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article analyzes the problematic issues that arise in connection with the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the state in case of violation of these rights and interests by economic entities of the public sector of the economy. The state of normative-legal provision and law-enforcement practice concerning realization of protection by subjects of management of objects of state property, as well as of bodies of the state financial control, and also bodies of prosecutor's office are also considered. According to the results of the study in order to improve the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the state from violations by economic entities of the public sector of the economy, it was proposed: 1) to specify the procedure and forms of exercising powers by the subjects of management of state property objects granted to them in order to control the activities of economic entities of the state sector of the economy; 2) to consolidate the obligation of subjects of management of objects of state property to take measures for judicial protection of the rights and interests of the state from violations committed by these entities; 3) to approve methodical recommendations on protection of the rights and lawful interests of the state by subjects of management of objects of state property, including from infringements from the above-stated subjects of management; 4) to take into account the state of implementation by the subjects of management of state property of measures to protect the rights and legitimate interests of the state in conducting a single monitoring of the effectiveness of management of state property; 5) to consolidate normatively the sequence of actions of the bodies of state financial control in case of detection of losses caused to the state; 6) to establish the powers of these bodies to apply directly to the court in the interests of the state with claims for invalidation of contracts concluded by controlled entities in violation of the law; 7) to specify the provisions regarding the protection of the interests of the state by the prosecutor's office.

scholarly journals Evolution of the Development of the Public Sector of Economy: Domestic and Foreign Experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 40-49
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kurchenkov ◽  
Olga Makarenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Corporate Structure ◽  
State Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
Foreign Experience ◽  
Public Corporations ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
History Of

The article examines the process of the formation and development of the public sector of Russian economy in the historical retrospective. The main stages of the systemic transformation of the elements of the public sector in certain historical conditions are highlighted. The features of the formation of a corporate model of the public sector at the present stage of the evolution of Russian economy are determined in the article. The authors pay attention to the substantiation of the growing role of state corporations in the structure of the state sector. Along with the study of evolutionary processes in the public sector of Russian economy, the article examines the foreign experience of leading countries in this aspect. Specifically, the features of the evolutionary transformation of the public sector in countries such as Austria, France, Germany, Greece, etc. are considered by the authors. In the recent history of Russia, three main stages of the systemic evolution of the public sector are identified: formation (1991–2007), transformation into a corporate structure (2007–2014), stabilization (2014–2019). The article explores the characteristics of each stage. The research results can be used in the development of the theory of the public sector, determination of the features of its evolutionary transformation, as well as in practical sense, in the development of concepts and strategies for the growth of public corporations in the long term, increasing the efficiency of leading public sector enterprises, as well as their competitiveness in global competition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document