scholarly journals Traditional Criminal Law Existence in the Settlement of Criminal Action in the Environmental Field in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1467-1478
Author(s):  
Mohamad Syarhan, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, Bambang Hartono
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Illegal Logging ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Fish Poisoning ◽  
Fish Poison

Many cases of environmental pollution and illegal logging have caused alarming damage to the environment. In the Law regarding Environmental Protection and Management, tools to protect the environment have been regulated. One of which is the application of criminal sanctions, but in Indonesia, some laws live in society, one of which is customary criminal law which can also solve criminal acts in the environmental sector. This research aims to analyze the existence of customary criminal law in the settlement of crimes in the environmental sector. This research is legal research with normative juridical research. The results of this study will be presented in descriptive form. The results showed that Hulsman said the criminal justice system had caused suffering because it could not work according to its objectives and did not carry out the principle of accountability. This judicial system had innate defects. In settlement of criminal acts in the environmental sector, examples of customary criminal law are the settlement of fish poisoning cases committed by some Paya Village Village residents. They use fish poison from plants (tuba), Lannet in the form of flour, Bistox in liquid, and Decis, which is liquid.

scholarly journals Discreet Discretion and Moderate Moderation in Judicial Sentencing: A commentary on Kenya’s Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-112
Author(s):  
Harrison O Mbori
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Cultural Development ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Sentencing Guidelines ◽  
Criminal Sentencing ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
Sentencing Policy

Criminal sentencing is an integral part in any judicial system for the fair administration of justice. The process of sentencing and the standards applied by judicial officers has, however, been a notoriously difficult component in many criminal law systems. In Kenya, sentencing has been blamed as one of the sources of ‘popular dissatisfaction with the administration of justice’ to borrow from Roscoe Pound. This was the impetus for the Kenyan Judiciary to introduce the Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016 (SPGs). This paper is a general commentary, critique, and analysis of the SPGs. The author argues that SPGs come at an instructive epoch in Kenya’s economic, socio-political, and cultural development. This contribution is not a polemic on the Kenyan SPGs. The commentary makes sideglances to various jurisdictions that have had a longer experience with sentencing guidelines. The article forecasts that Kenyan SPGs will, despite its few shortcomings, nevertheless, prove to be important for all judicial officers involved in Kenya’s criminal justice system.

scholarly journals Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-378
Author(s):  
I Ketut Eka Yoga Juliantika ◽  
I Made Sepud ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Trafficking In Persons ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Child Trafficking ◽  
Procedure Code

Children are often victims of child trafficking crime. There are a lot of factors that support the crime of child trafficking, one of which is the lack of regulation on child trafficking. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the regulation of child trafficking and how the criminal law policy against child trafficking. This research was designed using a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicated that the regulation of child trafficking is regulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, the Criminal Code (KUHP), namely Article 297, Article 301, Article 324, Article 328, and Article 330, RI Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law No. 35 of 2014 on Amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Furthermore, the criminal law policy against child trafficking is regulated in the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Law no. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, and Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement against Children's Criminal Action Based On Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning Children Criminal Justice Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (06) ◽  
pp. 226-235
Author(s):  
Feddy Hantyo Nugroho ◽  
Rodliyah ◽  
Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Objective Interpretation ◽  
The Law

This research was conducted to analyze and find out how criminal law policy is in the effort to apply criminal sanctions against children facing the law in terms of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children and whether the concept of Diversity can be applied in the process of law enforcement against children involved in Narcotics Crimes. This research is a normative study, to analyze the legal material related to the problem under study, the author uses the Interpretation, Subjective and Objective Interpretation instruments, after that the authors process these legal materials by deductive thinking. The results obtained from the study that the drafting of Law Number 11 of 2012 is a replacement to Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning juvenile justice conducted with the aim of establishing a judiciary that truly guarantees the best protection of the interests of children facing the law as nation's next generation. The concept of Restorative Justice is one of the important things in Law Number 11 of 2012 where restoring the situation as it used to be the main goal and also no less important is the form of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on Children where criminal sanctions that are harsh and miserable are used as ultimum Remedium is not as a premium remedium especially as a maximum remedium. The concept of diversion that should be applied in Indonesia in the future, should be a combination of the concept of diversion that is applied in Australia, namely Police Diversion which is combined with the process of handling cases with the diversion prevailing in Indonesia today.

scholarly journals PENINGKATAN PEMAHAMAN JAKSA TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN

2021 ◽  
pp. 991
Author(s):  
Ade Adhari ◽  
Neysa Tania ◽  
Hans Poliman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Coal Mining ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Service Activity

In the criminal justice system in Indonesia, there are Public Prosecutors who run applications for various types of criminal acts, including crimes in the mineral and coal mining sector. This community service activity is useful for providing understanding to prosecutors about criminal law policies in the mineral and coal mining sector. This activity was carried out boldly by using a virtual zoom meeting. The implementation of this activity involves prosecutors in various prosecutors' offices in Indonesia. Lectures were chosen as a method of implementing community service. The results of this activity indicate that prosecutors gain an increased understanding of how the policy of tackling violations of criminal provisions in the Minerba Law by using the means of criminal sanctions. Dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia, terdapat Jaksa Penuntut Umum yang menjalankan kewenangan penuntutan terhadap berbagai jenis tindak pidana termasuk di dalamnya tindak pidana di bidang pertambangan mineral dan batubara. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini berguna untuk memberikan pemahaman kepada para jaksa tentang kebijakan hukum pidana di bidang pertambangan mineral dan batubara. Kegiatan ini dilakukan secara daring dengan menggunakan virtual zoom meeting. Pelaksanaan kegiatan ini melibatkan jaksa di berbagai kejaksanaan di Indonesia. Ceramah dipilih sebagai metode pelaksanaan pengabdian kepada masyarakat. Hasil kegiatan ini menunjukan bahwa para jaksa mendapatkan peningkatan pemahaman terkait dengan bagaimana kebijakan penganggulangan pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan pidana dalam UU Minerba dengan menggunakan sarana sanksi pidana. 

scholarly journals Criminal Sanctions On Illegal Logging Crime In State Court Of Semarang

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 463
Author(s):  
Muslich Ashari ◽  
Amin Purnawan ◽  
Achmad Sulchan
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Forest Area ◽  
State Court ◽  
Research Use ◽  
Illegal Logging ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions

The formulation of the problem discussed in this study were (1). How settings Criminal Law on Illegal logging?, (2). How Judges consideration in decisions on Illegal logging in State Court of Semarang?. (3). Are the constraints faced by the judge in deciding the case of Illegal logging?.This research used socio-juridical legal research, research data was taken by interview with the respondent judges handling crime of Illegal logging State Court of Semarang. This research use Qualitative analysis techniques.Conclusion of this study is illegal logging is a special crime and therefore their specific legislation governing of illegal logging, in Act No. 18 of 2013 on Combating And Preventing The Destruction Of Forests set of sanctions for Illegal logging in the form of punishment imprisonment for the perpetrators in the form of a sentence of imprisonment and fines, consideration of Judges in deciding the case of Illegal logging legally is appropriate that the elements are there that the perpetrator does not have a valid license from the clerk to do cutting trees in the forest area of Silayur, Judge obstacle in deciding the case of Illegal logging in the form of difficulties in distinguishing between illegal logging carried out by individuals and corporations, lack of special education for judges to handle crime of Illegal LoggingKeywords: Criminal Sanctions; Penalty; Illegal Logging.

scholarly journals CAUSES OF RADICALISM BASED ON TERRORISM IN ASPECT OF CRIMINAL LAW POLICY IN INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Fitri Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Counter Terrorism ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Many

The phenomenon of radicalism based on terrorism in Indonesia shows a frightening symptom. This can be seen from a number of events that took place in several cities in Indonesia which took action in the name of acts of terror or terrorism such as the 2nd Bali Bombing which killed 22 people and 102 injured. The JW Marriot and Ritz Calton Hotel bombings in 2009 killed nine people and 50 people were injured and the Sarinah Plaza Bomb Jl. MH Thamrin Jakarta on January 14, 2016. With the many actions in the name of terrorism, it is necessary to take steps to anticipate similar actions not being repeated back. This study wants to examine and analyze further about efforts to counter terrorism-based radicalism in Indonesia through criminal law policy. The research method used is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary legal material while the problem approach is carried out using a legal approach and conceptual approach. The policy in counteracting terrorism in Indonesia is carried out through criminal law policies, namely criminal law policies through means of reasoning and non-reasoning. Penal means in the form of granting criminal sanctions for perpetrators of terrorism with the threat of imprisonment to the most severe threat in the form of capital punishment. But this effort has not provided a deterrent effect for the perpetrators. In criminal law, punishment is not an end in itself and is not the only way to achieve criminal objectives or objectives of the criminal justice system. Therefore another effort is needed which in criminal law is known as a non-reasoning effort.

scholarly journals The Best Interest of The Child Principle in The Juvenile Justice System

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 490
Author(s):  
Sasmita Adika Candra ◽  
Rodliyah Rodliyah ◽  
L. Parman
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Setting ◽  
Police Station

Children are Nation Assets who have limitations in understanding and protecting themselves from the various influences of the existing system, therefore protection efforts are needed. Research Objectives analyze the concept of the best interests of children in the juvenile criminal justice system, the application of the principle of best interest for children in sexual abuse cases in the Central Lombok Police Station. Empirical legal research methods. Results of research Setting the principle of best interest for children in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Judicial System in the provisions of Article 2 letter d. The application of the principle of best interest for children in the Central Lombok Resort Police, suspects are not treated the same as adults, given the opportunity to go to school, be examined in a special room that is a PPA unit room, a PPA special investigator and dressed non-official.

scholarly journals THE REGULATION URGENCY OF CHILDREN UNDER 12 (TWELVE) YEARS OLD IN THE ACT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 233-241
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Minimum Age ◽  
Age Limit

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime.. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the urgency of regulating teenager under the age of 12 in the constitution of Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as well as children in conflict with the law.This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the urgency of regulating children under the age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as well as children in conflict with the law. Many cases of crime that occur under the age of 12 years. So that special attention is needed regarding the minimum age limit for children who can be given criminal sanctions related to Article 1 letter 3 and Article 21 paragraph 1 of Act Number 11 of 2021 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System without ignoring the psychological aspects of the child, whether acting as perpetrators, witnesses or victims. The purpose of punishing children is relatively not just to retaliate against people who commit criminal acts but has a useful purpose.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Alternative Solutions

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan sanksi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan permasalahan penelitian, Pertama, Bagaimana penerapan Sanksi Pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak? Kedua, Bagaimanakah hambatan-hambatan apa yang ditemukan dalam penerapan Sanksi pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empirik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Pertama, Penerapan sanksi pidana menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradila Pidana Anak bahwa Penegak mencari alternatif penyelesaian terbaik bagi kepentingan anak. Kedua, Hambatannya yaitu belum adanya persamaan persfektif dalam penanganan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum di antara para penegak hukum serta hambatan dari faktor masyarakat yaitu banyak masyarakat yang belum mengerti tentang peraturan undang-undang yang berhubungan dengan anak. This study aims to analyze the application of sanctions based on the Child Criminal Justice System Law with research issues, First, How is the application of Criminal Sanctions and Actions According to Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning the Child Criminal Justice System? Second, what are the obstacles found in the application of criminal sanctions and actions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. The research method uses normative legal research and empirical legal research. The results showed, First, the application of criminal sanctions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children that the Enforcement Seekers seek the best alternative solutions for the interests of children. Second, the obstacle is the lack of equality in the perspective of handling children in conflict with the law among law enforcers as well as obstacles from community factors, namely that many people do not understand the laws relating to children

THE POSITION OF QANUN 6 OF 2014 ON JINAYAT LAW TOWARD ACT 11 OF 2012 ON JUVENILE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM RELATED TO CHILD CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Justice System ◽  
National Level ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Track System ◽  
Double Track ◽  
Rule Out

This paper aims to describe the differences and the position of the legal rules for juvenile crimes between Qanun 6 of 2014 and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.  This research is descriptive qualitative research. The results show that Qanun Number 6 of 2014 also regulates criminal sanctions for children, which are normatively regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012. In addition, Qanun, as Aceh Islamic criminal law legalizes canning punishment for children, as well as the double-track system adopted by The Law of Juvenile Criminal Justice System is not explicitly accommodated in Qanun. Qanun at the level of a Regional Regulation is part of the hierarchy of laws and regulations that should be in line with what generally applies at the national level. Law Number 11 of 2006 is being the basis of the authority to make Qanun, as long as there is no court decision invalidates it, Qanun Number 6 of 2014, which is a derivative of Law Number 11 of 2006, can be declared as "lex specialis" of The Juvenile Criminal Justice System law which regulates child crime. However, it does not rule out the possibility that in the future, the judicial review of the article can be conducted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document