Liver Resection of Colorectal Metastases in Elderly Patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Prashant Bhangui ◽  
Rene Adam ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Colorectal Metastases ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Intention To Treat

The ageing population, the specific epidemiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the high incidence of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have all led to a significant increase in elderly patients with CRLM seeking surgical management. Due to physiological and functional changes with advancing age (which may decrease the ability of the elderly to sustain aggressive treatment) and the lack of validated guidelines, surgeons still hesitate to plan surgical resection of CRLM in the elderly. Recently, a few studies have suggested that resection of CRLM in the elderly is feasible and yields good short- and long-term outcomes in the context of an intention-to-treat strategy. This article discusses the relevant literature and tries to put forth possible recommendations for the surgical management of elderly patients with CRLM. No chronological upper age limit should contraindicate curative treatment and well-selected elderly patients with advanced CRC can be offered a similar chance of long-term survival with the use of an optimal onco-surgical strategy.

scholarly journals Liver and Pancreatic Resection in the Elderly

HPB Surgery ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. J. Garden
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Resections

Background: Liver resection, or pancreaticoduodenectomy, has traditionally been thought to have a high morbidity and. mortality rate among the elderly. Recent improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques, an increasing number of elderly patients, and an increasing need to justify use of limited health care resources prompted an assessment of recent surgical outcomes.Methods: Five hundred seventy-seven liver resections (July 1985–July 1994) performed for metastatic colorectal cancer and 488 pancreatic resections (October 1983–July 1994) performed for pancreatic malignancies were identified in departmental data bases. Outcomes of patients younger than age 70 years were compared with those of patients age 70 years or older.Results: Liver resection for 128 patients age 70 years or older resulted in a 4% perioperative. mortality rate and a 42% complication rate. Median hospital stay was 13 days, and 8% of the patients required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Median survival was 40 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 35%. No difference were found between results for the elderly and those for younger patients who had undergone liver resection, except for a minimally shorter hospital stay fortheyoungerpatients (median, 12 days vs. 13 days p=0.003). Pancreatic resection for 138 elderly patients resulted in a mortality rate of 6% and a complication rate of 45%. Median stay was 20 days, and 19% of the patients required ICU admission, results identical to those for the younger cohort. Long-term survival was poorer for the elderly patients, with a 5-year survival rate of 21% compared with 29% for the younger cohort (p=0.03).Conclusions: Major liver or pancreatic resections can be performed for the elderly with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and possible long-term survival. Chronologic age alone is not a contraindication to liver or pancreatic resection for malignancy.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482090470
Author(s):  
Dongni Chen ◽  
Yihuai Hu ◽  
Youfang Chen ◽  
Jia Hu ◽  
Zhesheng Wen
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.

Morbidity and Mortality of C2 Fractures in the Elderly

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1055-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Ren Chen ◽  
Maxwell Boakye ◽  
Robert T. Arrigo ◽  
Paul S. A. Kalanithi ◽  
Ivan Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cord Injury

Abstract BACKGROUND: Closed C2 fractures commonly occur after falls or other trauma in the elderly and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Controversy exists as to best treatment practices for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes for elderly patients with closed C2 fractures by treatment modality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 28 surgically and 28 nonsurgically treated cases of closed C2 fractures without spinal cord injury in patients aged 65 years of age or older treated at Stanford Hospital between January 2000 and July 2010. Comorbidities, fracture characteristics, and treatment details were recorded; primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and complication rates; secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and long-term survival. RESULTS: Surgically treated patients tended to have more severe fractures with larger displacement. Charlson comorbidity scores were similar in both groups. Thirty-day mortality was 3.6% in the surgical group and 7.1% in the nonsurgical group, and the 30-day complication rates were 17.9% and 25.0%, respectively; these differences were not statistically significant. Surgical patients had significantly longer lengths of hospital stay than nonsurgical patients (11.8 days vs 4.4 days). Long-term median survival was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The 30-day mortality and complication rates in surgically and nonsurgically treated patients were comparable. Elderly patients faced relatively high morbidity and mortality regardless of treatment modality; thus, age alone does not appear to be a contraindication to surgical fixation of C2 fractures.

scholarly journals Outcomes and adverse factors for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal polyps in elderly patients

2020 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2019-101294
Author(s):  
Thomas Skouras ◽  
Ashley Bond ◽  
Asimina Gaglia ◽  
Laura Bonnett ◽  
Meng Jiang Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Colonic Polyps ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Tertiary Centre

IntroductionEndoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an invaluable technique, however it is associated with significant risks. In the elderly in particular, the long-term survival benefits of polyp resection with EMR are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes in elderly patients who had undergone EMR and to identify any adverse factors.MethodA retrospective observational study on patients of 75 years of age or greater, who underwent EMR of colorectal polyps, in a single tertiary centre, from 2005 to 2014. Demographics of the patients, including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), endoscopic and histological data, were reviewed to identify potential factors predicting outcomes.ResultsThe patients’ median age was 80 years. In total 239 procedures were performed in 206 unique patients. The complication rate was 1.6%. Mean overall survival was 6.7 years with only one patient dying from metastatic colorectal cancer (0.5%) and 49 dying from non-colorectal cancer conditions (24%). Age more than 79 years and CCI more than 2 were independent predictors of significantly shorter survival (p=<0.01). Gender, size of the removed polyps and total number of polyps were not statistically significantly affecting survival. Patients who had more than two colonoscopies were found to have a survival benefit (p=0.02).ConclusionEMR of colonic polyps is safe even for elderly patients. However, the decision to proceed to complex endoscopic therapy should be individualised considering the patients’ age and comorbidities. CCI can help to objectively assess the comorbid state of a patient prior to such decisions.

scholarly journals Long-term outcome of elderly out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors as compared with their younger counterparts and the general population

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Hiemstra ◽  
Remco Bergman ◽  
Anthony R. Absalom ◽  
Joukje van der Naalt ◽  
Pim van der Harst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
General Population ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Over the past decade, prehospital and in-hospital treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has improved considerably. There are sparse data on the long-term outcome, especially in elderly patients. We studied whether elderly patients benefit to the same extent compared with younger patients and at long-term follow up as compared with the general population. Methods: Between 2001 and 2010, data from all patients presented to our hospital after OHCA were recorded. Elderly patients (⩾75 years) were compared with younger patients. Neurological outcome was classified as cerebral performance category (CPC) at hospital discharge and long-term survival was compared with younger patients and predicted survival rates of the general population. Results: Of the 810 patients admitted after OHCA, a total of 551 patients (68%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation, including 125 (23%) elderly patients with a mean age of 81 ± 5 years. In-hospital survival was lower in elderly patients compared with younger patients with rates of 33% versus 57% ( p < 0.001). A CPC of 1 was present in 73% of the elderly patients versus 86% of the younger patients ( p = 0.031). In 7.3% of the elderly patients, a CPC >2 was observed versus 2.5% of their younger counterparts ( p = 0.103). Elderly patients had a median survival of 6.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0–7.9] years compared with 7.7 (95% CI 7.5–7.9) years of the general population ( p = 0.019). Conclusions: The survival rate after OHCA in elderly patients is approximately half that of younger patients. Elderly patients who survive to discharge frequently have favorable neurological outcomes and a long-term survival that approximates that of the general population.

scholarly journals Surgery Is Underused in Elderly Patients With Left‐Sided Infective Endocarditis: A Nationwide Registry Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurdur Ragnarsson ◽  
Sonsoles Salto‐Alejandre ◽  
Axel Ström ◽  
Lars Olaison ◽  
Magnus Rasmussen
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Registry Study ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Group 12 ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Background Infective endocarditis is associated with higher mortality in elderly patients, but the role of surgery in this group has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of left‐sided infective endocarditis in elderly patients and to determine the influence of surgery on mortality in the elderly. Methods and Results A nationwide retrospective study was performed of 2186 patients with left‐sided infective endocarditis recorded in the SRIE (Swedish Registry of Infective Endocarditis), divided into patients aged <65 years (n=864), 65 to 79 years (n=806), and ≥80 years (n=516). Survival analysis was performed using the Swedish National Population Registry, and propensity score matching was applied to assess the effect of surgery on survival among patients of all ages. The rate of surgery decreased with increasing age, from 46% in the <65 group to 6% in the ≥80 group. In‐hospital mortality was 3 times higher in the ≥80 group compared with the <65 group (23% versus 7%) and almost twice that of the 65 to 79 group (12%). In propensity‐matched groups, the mortality rate was significantly lower between the ages of 55 and 82 years in patients who underwent surgery compared with patients who did not undergo surgery. Surgery was also associated with better long‐term survival in matched patients who were ≥75 years (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24–0.54 [ P <0.001]). Conclusions The proportion of elderly patients with infective endocarditis who underwent surgery was low compared with that of younger patients. Surgery was associated with lower mortality irrespective of age. In matched elderly patients, long‐term mortality was higher in patients who did not undergo surgery, suggesting that surgery is underused in elderly patients.

Clinical outcome and long-term survival following radical esophagectomy in the elderly

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A747-A748
Author(s):  
S DRESNER ◽  
A IMMMANUEL ◽  
P LAMB ◽  
S GRIFFIN
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Radical Esophagectomy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

scholarly journals Impact of Comorbidities, Sarcopenia, and Nutritional Status on the Long-Term Outcomes after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients Aged ≥ 80 Years

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3598
Author(s):  
Ga Hee Kim ◽  
Kee Don Choi ◽  
Yousun Ko ◽  
Taeyong Park ◽  
Kyung Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Background/Aim: We investigated the oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) by focusing on the impact of comorbidities, sarcopenia, and nutritional status. Methods: Between 2005 and 2016, 280 patients aged ≥ 80 years with 289 EGCs underwent ESD at a tertiary care center. The short- and long-term survival outcomes were assessed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with survival, including clinicopathologic factors and abdominal muscle area measured by computed tomography. Results: The rates of en bloc, R0, and, curative resection were 99.3%, 90.0%, and 69.2%, respectively. The rates of post-ESD bleeding and perforation rates were 2.1% and 3.1%, respectively, and no cases showed significant life-threatening adverse events. Over a median follow-up period of 70.5 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.5% and 77.1%, respectively; of the114 patients who died, only four (3.5%) were due to gastric cancer. A total of 173 (61.8%) had sarcopenia, and they had lower rates of 3-year (88.4% vs. 91.4%) and 5-year (73.1% vs. 84.0%; p = 0.046) OS than did those without sarcopenia. In multivariable analyses, prognostic nutritional index (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90–0.98; p = 0.002) and Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.37; p = 0.018) were significant factors associated with overall survival. Conclusions: ESD was a feasible and safe therapeutic method to use in elderly patients, whose long-term survival was significantly associated with nutritional status and comorbidities. These results suggest the need for a possible extension of the curative criteria for ESD in elderly patients with EGC.

scholarly journals Effects of 3-year GH replacement therapy on bone mineral density in younger and elderly adults with adult-onset GH deficiency

2012 ◽  
Vol 166 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam Elbornsson ◽  
Galina Götherström ◽  
Celina Franco ◽  
Bengt-Åke Bengtsson ◽  
Gudmundur Johannsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Marginal Effect ◽  
Adult Onset ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Gh Replacement ◽  
Femur Neck

ObjectiveLittle is known of the effects of long-term GH replacement on bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly GH-deficient (GHD) adults.Design/patients/methodsIn this prospective, single-center, open-label study, the effects of 3-year GH replacement were determined in 45 GHD patients >65 years and in 45 younger control GHD patients with a mean age of 39.5 (s.e.m.1.1) years. All patients had adult-onset disease and both groups were comparable in terms of number of anterior pituitary hormonal deficiencies, gender, body mass index, and waist:hip ratio.ResultsThe mean maintenance dose of GH was 0.24 (0.02) mg/day in the elderly patients and 0.33 (0.02) mg/day in the younger GHD patients (P<0.01). The 3 years of GH replacement induced a marginal effect on total body BMC and BMD, whereas femur neck and lumbar (L2–L4) spine BMC and BMD increased in both the elderly and the younger patients. The treatment response in femur neck BMC was less marked in the elderly patients (P<0.05 vs younger group). However, this difference disappeared after correction for the lower dose of GH in the elderly patients using an analysis of covariance. There were no between-group differences in responsiveness in BMC or BMD at other skeletal locations.ConclusionsThis study shows that GH replacement increases lumbar (L2–L4) spine and femur neck BMD and BMC in younger as well as elderly GHD patients. This supports the notion that long-term GH replacement is also useful in elderly GHD patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document