scholarly journals Glycaemic control and C- reactive protein levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus -how well they co-relate?: a prospective study

Author(s):  
Velammal Petchiappan ◽  
Nanubala Sivakrishna ◽  
Santni Manickam ◽  
Sujaya Menon

Background: Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus as indicated by elevated glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. C–reactive protein (CRP), an important cardiovascular risk factor, is elevated in diabetics with poor glycaemic control than those with good control. The present study assessed the correlation between HbA1c and CRP levels.Methods: A prospective study was conducted in thirty type 2 diabetic patients irrespective of the disease duration and treatment; those with established target organ damage were excluded. HbA1c and hsCRP levels were measured at baseline; sugars were monitored monthly and medications optimised; at the end of six months HbA1c and hsCRP levels were measured.Results: Mean age of the study subjects was 58.7±8.6 years; At the baseline, all had poor glycaemic control (HbA1c >7%); 15 had hsCRP >3 mg/L. At the end of 6 months, 5 achieved good glycaemic control (HbA1c <7%); 10 had hsCRP >3 mg/L. Baseline median hsCRP was 3.33 mg/L (0.68, 15.9) and at the end of 6 months it was 2.08 mg/L (0.48, 9.12). Mean HbA1c at baseline and end line was 10.6±1.55% and 8.43±1.84% respectively. There was significant reduction in both the mean HbA1c and median hsCRP at the end of 6 months (p <0.001). Positive correlation was observed between HbA1c and CRP at baseline (r=0.32, p=0.10). However, this was not observed at the end of 6 months.Conclusions: There is positive correlation between the level of glycaemic control (HbA1c) and CRP levels; Better glycaemic control results in significant reduction in the hsCRP levels.

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eberhard Standl

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common comorbidities of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and poor glycaemic control can worsen the HF outcomes and increase the risk of hospitalisations. With the entry of several antihyperglycaemic agents for the management of T2DM over the last decade, there has been an increasing concern regarding the cardiovascular (CV) safety profile of these agents. In view of this, FDA mandated the demonstration of cardiovascular risk-benefit profile of these agents through specifically designed CV outcome trials. Although we have several findings from these trials, none of them included HF as a primary endpoint indicating the need of trials focusing on HF. Here, we briefly discuss the results of the CV outcome trials in the context of HF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 687
Author(s):  
T. Doraickannu ◽  
T. Sechassayana ◽  
S. Vithiavathi ◽  
Momin Varisali

Inflammation plays a vital role in accentuating the formation of atherosclerotic plaque in diabetes mellitus. So, the measurements of inflammatory markers provide a method of assessing cardiovascular risk. Among the inflammatory markers, highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is used to detect the low-level inflammation when it is within the normal range. Also, hs-CRP measurement may be useful for assessment of the risk of complication in diabetes patients. So, the present study is conducted to measure plasma hs-CRP level in T2DM and to determine adequate glycaemic control reduces hs-CRP level. The objectives of this study were to correlate HbA1c and hs-CRP in T2DM and predict cardiovascular risk with glycaemic status.Methods: Authors took 50 diabetic patients. The investigation includes FBS, PPBS, hs-CRP and HbA1c. hs-CRP is measured by immunoturbidimetry method. The reports were collected and compared with normal reference range.Results: The correlation between hs-CRP levels and HbA1c level after six months show a significant relationship where mean HbA1c values on day 1 and after 6 months were 8.088±1.219 and 7.518±0.693 respectively. The hs-CRP values were 2.508±1.050 on day 1 and 2.15±0.927 after 6 months proving that better glycaemic controls decrease hs-CRP thereby decreasing cardiovascular risk.Conclusions: hs-CRP values are directly related to HbA1c and better glycaemic control reduces risk of CVD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1312
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Meriga ◽  
Vishnu Anjan Nareddy ◽  
Sriram Venkata Sudha Sai Bhavya ◽  
Challa Sreekeerthi

Background: Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of common metabolic disorders that shares the phenotype of hyperglycemia. Complications of diabetes mellitus involve many organ systems only to play an important role in morbidity and mortality. Poor glycemic control is significantly associated with the development of macrovascular complications. Earlier studies have indicated that C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease as evident from its higher levels in people with diabetes mellitus compared to those without. Not much is known whether CRP is related to the level of glycemic control. The purpose of this study is, to determine the relation between HbA1C, Lipid profile and CRP in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods: Fifty patients with T2DM reporting to Narayana Medical College and Hospital were included in the study, in whom CRP levels were estimated by using commercially available kits and correlated with HbA1C and other risk factors of coronary artery disease. Follow-up was done on 20 patients who were not on statin therapy with repeat HbA1C and CRP.Results: This study showed that both HbA1C and CRP levels had reduced significantly in follow-up patients after putting them on treatment (p<0.05). It was also found that lower the HbA1C, lower was the CRP. A positive correlation was found between HbA1C and CRP (p<0.05).Conclusions: In this study of 50 patients with T2DM, it was found that CRP is significantly correlated with HbA1C level. A positive correlation was found between serum CRP and HbA1C in the initial group and in the follow-up patients, showing that CRP levels lowers with better glycemic control and correlates with dyslipidaemia profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document