The Dynamics and Meaning of the Constitutional Economic Articles in 1948

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 61-79
Author(s):  
최선
1941 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 343
Author(s):  
Lewis Corey

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Samico Júnior

<p><strong>O APLICATIVO UBER: UM ESTUDO DE CASO BASEADO NOS PRINCÍPIOS E FUNDAMENTOS DA ORDEM ECONÔMICA NA CONSTITUIÇÃO FEDERAL DE 88 </strong></p><p><strong>Resumo:</strong> Os princípios da ordem econômica são positivados na atual Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil com o escopo de conferir segurança jurídica na economia brasileira. Considerando que o Estado delimita em sua Lei Fundamental quando e como pode interferir no mercado, bem como esclarece quais princípios norteiam sua política econômica, o presente estudo propõe-se a tecer uma preocupada análise acerca da proibição equivocada do serviço de transporte de passageiros na modalidade privada no Brasil. Uma prestadora desses serviços, a Uber do Brasil Tecnologia LTDA, tem sido alvo de questionamentos da legalidade de suas atividades. O presente trabalho problematizará a questão das novas tecnologias no direito, mormente quando a prestação do serviço ou o exercício da atividade afrontam a legislação atual, um direito administrativo engessado e a doutrina clássica em desafinação com o tempo presente. O objetivo deste artigo é demonstrar que o transporte individual de passageiros em sua modalidade privada está em consonância com o atual ordenamento econômico da Constituição, a Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana, e o posicionamento do Ministério Público Federal, resguardando, assim, a autonomia do particular no exercício legal de sua profissão e contribuição com a economia do país.</p><p><strong>Palavras-chaves:</strong> Ordem econômica constitucional; princípios econômicos; transporte privado; Uber; mobilidade; novas tecnologias; atividade econômica; serviço público.</p><p><strong>THE UBER APPLICATION: A CASE STUDY BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES AND FOUNDATION OF ECONOMIC ORDER IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 88</strong></p><p><strong>Abstract:</strong> The principles of economic order are implemented in the current Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil with the aim of providing legal certainty to the Brazilian economy. Whereas the State delimits under its Basic Law when and how to intervene in the market, and clarifies what principles should guide its economic policy, the purpose of this monograph is to offer a concerned analysis on the mistaken prohibition imposed on private passenger transport service in Brazil. A supplier of such services, Uber do Brasil Tecnologia LTDA, has been undergoing some questioning regarding the legality of their activities. This paper will question the matter of new technologies under the Law, particularly when the service performance or the exercise of the activity is against current legislation, a plastered administrative law, and the classical doctrine in disagreement with present time. This controversy will be addressed in an exclusive chapter and will be present throughout this study. With all this exposure, the objective is to show that the private individual passenger transport is in line with the current economic order of the Constitution, the National Urban Mobility Policy and the position of the Federal Prosecution Service, and, consequently, protecting the autonomy of private parties in the lawful exercise of their profession and contribution to the Brazilian economy.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Constitutional Economic Order; economic principles; private transport; Uber; mobility; new technologies; economic activity; public service.</p><p><strong>Data da submissão:</strong> 29/10/2016                   <strong>Data da aprovação:</strong> 01/12/2016</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-106
Author(s):  
Marcelo Cesar Guimarães

Purpose – This study aims to demonstrate that companies are not free to operate in the e-commerce field, notably with regard to geoblocking and geopricing practices, since they must duly respect constitutional economic order principles. Methodology/approach/design – The methodology of the paper is based on Mike Feintuck’s public interest theory, according to which there are values beyond those of market economics that should be preserved, often to the detriment of private interests. Furthermore, the Decolar.com case is used as an empirical case study. Findings – It has been identified that geoblocking and geopricing practices can effectively violate constitutional principles and that consumer and antitrust microsystems can suppress those conducts, shaping the performance of economic agents to the public interest. Practical implications – The results of this article indicate that consumer and competition agencies can act more actively to curb the harmful geoblocking and geopricing practices.


Author(s):  
Владимир Мазаев ◽  
Vladimir Mazaev

23 years have passed since the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993, but the question of the place and the role of the category of constitutional forms of ownership remains debatable. The article discusses the purpose of the form of ownership in the constitutional regulation of economic relations, an analysis of the main approaches to the evaluation of the legal significance of this category, argues that a formal stance on ownership’s nature gives a distorted view of the methods of legal influence on the economy. Despite the denial of the form of ownership’s ideological aspects in modern democratic constitutions this category has social elements. It is shown that an assessment of the constitutional form of ownership should be carried out by economic and social and legal aspects. Based on the texts of various states’ constitutions the analysis of the basic dimensions of the form of property exercise is undertaken, including also other aspects such as promoting advanced management methods, provisioning traditional economic structures and protecting particularly important property. The article demonstrates the interconnection of the constitutional form of ownership with organizational-legal forms of business. In this connection the nature and the purpose of the private and public forms of ownership are taken into account. Otherwise it is difficult to mark the necessary boundaries and ways of state participation in the economy. The conclusion defines that the constitutional ownership is an essential tool for building the optimal model of economy by means of supporting the most promising and traditional ways of economic management.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (100) ◽  
pp. 881
Author(s):  
Elviro Aranda Álvarez

Resumen:La estabilidad presupuestaria y los límites a la deuda pública se han convertido en los principios referenciales de la política económica de la Unión Europea tras el paso por la crisis económica de los últimos años. La aplicación de estos principios supone hacer grandes recortes en el Estado del Bienestar que puede afectar sustancialmente a los derechos sociales e, incluso, el modelo de Estado de nuestro país. El presente artículo pretende dejar constancia que tanto la interpretación de esos principios como el nuevo artículo 135 de la CE deben ser interpretados de conformidad con las reglas económicas constitucionales que aseguran la vigencia del Estado social y democrático deDerecho.Summary:Introduction 1. Constitutional economic rules in the Spanish Constitution of 1978: the lack of a definite economic model and the diffuse reference to budget stability 2. Public spending as a key instrument in welfare state economic policies. 3. Justice principles regarding public spending contained in article 31.2 of the Spanish Constitution. 3. Budget stability in european law. evolution and goals. 4. The tense balance between economic and social rights and budget stability. Conclusions.Abstract:Budget stability and public debt limits have become key economic policy factors in the European Union in the wake of the recent economic crisis. The application of these principles involves major cuts to the Welfare State that may substantially affect social rights and even the model of State in our country. This article argues that both these principles and the new article 135 of the Spanish Constitution must be interpreted in accordance with constitutional economic rules that ensure the continuing validity of the social and democratic Statebased on the rule of law.


Antiquity ◽  
1939 ◽  
Vol 13 (49) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
R. R. Darlington

The accumulation of specialized work and the publication of more texts calls for the constant modification of current conceptions of the history of medieval England. Of the means of achieving this readjustment the most satisfactory is probably the lecture, which affords scope for the individual interpretation of development over a wide field and yet does not lose its flexibility or arrogate to itself an authoritative character to which, owing to its very nature, no general survey can rightly lay claim. It is not suggested that the twentieth-century medievalist should ignore the printing-press altogether, but there is much to be said for concentrating on the printing of such works-in the main, editions of texts-as may possibly be of some value to future generations of scholars. To the demand for ‘brighter’ history it is we11 to turn a deaf ear, but the exigencies of time to some extent justify the publication of re-interpretations by those competent to undertake them, whether such text-books assume the form of the co-operative work with almost every chapter from a different pen, the many-volumed history with an expert in charge of each century or so, or a general survey of one or other of the compartments into which history is commonly divided. Of these the last might be deemed the least satisfactory, for the treatment of ‘constitutional’, ‘economic’ or ‘ecclesiastical’ history as a self-contained entity may seem a vicious and outworn practice, leading inevitably to distortion.


Author(s):  
Noah Benezra Strote

This chapter looks at the rise in prominence of the Institute for Social Research, a small academic center whose work became a lodestar for left-wing politics among secular West Germans in the 1960s. That an institution which had previously been forced into exile because of its Marxist politics had returned in the form of a quasi-state agency in an age of extreme anticommunism was remarkable in itself. Still more impressive, perhaps, is the fact that the Institute for Social Research has come to represent West Germany's shift from the Christian conservatism of the Adenauer era into the multicultural era of present-day Germany. The chapter then examines the institute's role as a left-wing entity whose members were deeply disappointed with how the constitutional, economic, educational, and cultural reconstruction had played out in West Germany, and yet accepted the new liberal democracy's legitimacy, actively endorsing it against the alternative of the communist German Democratic Republic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document