scholarly journals INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH IN THE STUDY OF MARITAL LAW (STUDY OF THE DETERMINATION OF CHILD COSTODY)

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-230
Author(s):  
Silfa Afriyani

An interdisciplinary approach is an approach that uses various scientific fields in solving a problem. The determination of child custody is usually decided by considering the age of the child. Children who are not yet mumayiz are taken care of by the mother, but when the child is an adult, they are given the choice to live with the mother or father. Through this study, the author examines the determination of child custody according to Islamic law and the Marriage Law and by using psychology and economics. That the custody of children in care must be assigned to the right person. From this paper, the author concludes that according to Islamic law, the determination of child custody takes into account the age of the child. According to Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, the determination of child custody before adulthood is decided by a local court judge. In psychology, the determination of child custody takes into account the mental or psychological aspects of the child. Especially in terms of the child's emotional closeness, closer to the mother or father. So that way, the child's condition will be better in living their daily lives and not getting pressure. Meanwhile, by using economics, the determination of child custody is seen from the financial stability of both parents, both from the mother and from the father. Because in carrying out child care requires financially established, so that the needs of children can be met properly. So, in determining child custody, it can not only be seen from the age of the child but can use other considerations. Keywords: Child custody, Mother, Father

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (08) ◽  
pp. 467-472
Author(s):  
Zaini Nasohah ◽  
◽  
Wafaa Yusof ◽  
Zuliza Mohd Kusrin ◽  
Muhammad Nazir Alias ◽  
...  

In the process of trial in court, evidence disclosure is essential to uphold justice. Basically, every party is qualified to provide evidence before the judge decides. In the case of child custody disputes, besides the statements by the mother and the father, statements from the child involved can help the court in making the right decision. According to Islamic law, children who have attained the age of mumayyiz can be given the opportunity to choose. In addition, their views can also be taken as a support evidence to help the court make a decision. This article will analyse childrens rights to express their views, particularly in the determination of child custody disputes. The debate also looks at current legal provisions and practices in the Sharia Court. The analysis found that judges approach in accepting childrens evidence varies. There are still no specific procedures that can be used as a guide by the Sharia Court. The differences include the methods of interviewing or taking recorded statements, the procedures applied and the location where statements are recorded.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Adawiyah Nasution

<h1>The purpose of this study is to assess the legal provisions of the children under Law No. 23 of 2002 and to explain the consequences of the child's adoption law. In addition, to know the legal protection of adopted children under the Child Protection Act is reviewed from Islamic Law Preformance law Practice in Indonesia. To examine the matter, a descriptive study was conducted with a normative juridical approach that was conducted only on the written rules. The collection of data is derived from the literature research and supported field research studies on the appointment of Court and Civil registry office. Primary data collection tools are informant with the interview guidelines whereas data analysis is done with a qualitative approach using the logical and inductive thinking logic in the field of law. In the content of this article shows that, firstly, the consequences of child adoption generally arise with the appointment of a court by not deciding the adoption of adopted children with their biological parents, which switching is the right of custody. In the case of inheritance, the appointment of children based on the determination of the Court of Justice is entitled to the inheritance of his adoptive parents based on wills. Thirdly, with the determination of the adoption of children from the courts, the consequence is the protection of adopted children can be assured of the custody of the law and the inheritance of its adoptive parents.</h1><h1> </h1>


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iffaty Nasyiah

The Law No. 8 of 1999 about Consumer Protection Article 4 letter b said that one of consumer rights, namely the right to select and obtain goods in accordance with the exchange rate. Not found in authentic explanation regarding this exchange rate, if the exchange rate is the exchange rate that is in accordance with the agreement between the seller and the buyer, or in accordance with the production values or the exchange rate that corresponds to the price market, this then raises the question of free interpretation among the businessmen that the exchange rate is determined only by the desire of businessmen and weighing of benefits desired by businesses alone, so that entrepreneurs are allowed to set the exchange rate goods many times from the value of its production. In Islamic law is not found the rules regarding the determination of the limits of this exchange rate, but Islam is a tolerant religion, including in determining the exchange rate as the words of the Prophet Muhammad: "May Allah have mercy to a tolerant person (easy) when it sells, tolerant when buying, tolerant when fulfilling the obligation and tolerant when claiming its rights”. (HR. Bukhari from Jabir)


AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-98
Author(s):  
M. Ghufron ◽  
Moh. Ali

One of the causes of divorce which was decided by a Religious Court judge was because of the apostasy of one of the spouses. Divorce due to apostasy leaves problems in parenting. To whom the child custody will be given must be considered by the judge. This research is empirical research (field study) with fiqh and family psychology approach to get an understanding of the basic considerations of judges in establishing child custody in the case of an apostate partner. Through interviews and documentation, the study found, that the consideration of judges based on three things: first, normative basis, which is based on the consideration of Constitution No. 1 of 1974, Compilation of Islamic Law, Constitution No. 7 of 1989 Jo. Constitution Number 30 of 2006 concerning Childcare, and Number 23 of 2002, Supreme Court jurisprudence Number 210 / K / AG / 1990. Second, fiqh basis, which refers to the requirements of the Hadhanah which are in line with fiqh and the provisions of the Hadhanah based on Syafii's Madzab. Third, the psychological basis, which considers all psychological problems related to children. By using this integrative analysis the judge considers that the requirements for Muslims to care for children are in line with psychological values, that the family must provide Islamic education to shape the child's mental spirit.


Author(s):  
Syahrizal Abbas Sitti Mawar Muhammad Habibi

In a family sometimes painful actions arise from involuntary causes (not intentionally), not on the wishes of the husband, such as because the husband is poor or poor so he does not have a living to fulfill his wife's rights in the form of food, clothing and home at a certain time, which makes the wife ask to part with her husband through the divorce (fasakh) path. Regarding the problem of the wife asking for fasakh (carrying out divorce) by reason of a poor husband there are differences of opinion between the Syafi'iyyah Ulama and Positive Law in Indonesia concerning the provisions that must be fulfilled by both. This study wants to answer the question of how the provisions of fasakh marriage are based on the reasons of poor husbands according to Syafi'iyyah Ulama and Positive Law in Indonesia. To get answers, the author uses primary data sources and secondary data. The research method that I use is Descriptive Comparative method that is research by analyzing and comparing opinions, reasons and interpretations of the arguments used as the opinions of the two groups. The results of the study indicate that the fasakh of marriage on the grounds of a poor husband according to the Shafi'iyyah Ulama is permissible and validly carried out on condition; 1) A wife who is married between being patient and divorced, 2) Judge's decision, in the form of; a. determination of poor status according to the provisions, b. giving an opportunity to a husband to work for a living, c. Fasakh implementation period three days after the wife reported. 3) Separated by reciting fasakh instead of divorce, and still having three times the right of divorce if in the future you want to remarry with a new contract. Whereas according to Positive Law in Indonesia fasakh marriage by reason of poor and permissible husband with conditions, 1) occur shikak between wife and husband, 2) wife make a divorce letter, 3) Decision judge namely proof of poor husband in a literal manner, 4) Court decision drop one bain sughra talak. From the explanation above, it can be concluded that the provisions of the fasakh of marriage by reason of poor husbands in the opinion of the Syafi'iyyah clerics are better and fair because they are supported by a strong foundation and are most in accordance with the soul, basis and principles of Islamic law. Therefore in Indonesia requires more explicit rules about fasakh (divorce) with the excuse of poor husbands.Keywords: Fasakh and Poor. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-140
Author(s):  
Ahmad Arief
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  

Al-Ta'assuf in the use of rights is a terminology in Islamic law which by the experts usul al-fiqh used as one of the indicators in doing istinbat al-hukm (the determination of the law). The method of settling the use of rights is the most obvious evidence that Islam is not a religion of terror. The fulfillment of the right and anticipation of misuse on every human right has been established in the method since the time of the Prophet, reinforced by the results of the legal examination of the four Imams of the Mazhab when they performed a law.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-317
Author(s):  
Emy Eliamega Saragih ◽  
Mustamam Mustamam ◽  
Mukidi Mukidi

Islamic teachings determine that the Koran and the Hadith are the main references in resolving every problem faced by mankind, especially Muslims. Likewise in solving inheritance problems, the Koran and Hadith have explained clearly and in detail. Whereas for matters that have not yet been regulated or there is no agreement on the ulama, such as inheritance for a transvestite. The problem in this study, regarding the position of girls in the distribution of inheritance law according to Islam, concerning inheritance rights of siblings of fathers who leave a daughter in the perspective of Islamic law and on the basis of judges' consideration in determining the determination of heirs in the decision of case register No. 40/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mdn. This research is a normative juridical approach with a case approach by analyzing Decision No. 40/Pdt.G/2017/PA. Mdn). The data source of this research is secondary data obtained from the results of library research. Data analysis used in this study is qualitative data analysis. Based on the research results obtained, that the position of girls in the distribution of inheritance law according to Islam is the same as that of boys, namely both have the right to inherit the inheritance of their parents or relatives. It's just that, the male portion is bigger than the female part, which is two parts of the two girls. The inheritance rights of the father's siblings who leave a daughter in the perspective of Islamic law are based on bi ghairihi asabah, because they inherit from men and women together. The basis of the judge's consideration in determining the determination of the heir in the decision of case register No. 40 / Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mdn, is Article 174 paragraph (2) KHI and Al-Quran Letter of Examination verse 176. The panel of judges has mistakenly interpreted the substance of the Examination paragraph 176 and also interpreted the provisions of Article 174 paragraph (2) KHI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
R. Jangkung Surya Waspada ◽  
Dona Budi Kharisma

<p>Abstract<br />This research aims to acknowledge child custody arrangements in terms of the breakdown of a marriage due to divorce which one party is a citizen of Indonesia (WNI) and the other one is a foreign citizen (FOREIGNERS). This research is a descriptive empirical law with a qualitative approach. The data collection technique used is an interview on the Sleman State Court Judge and documents or references review. Based on the research and discussion, we know that issues that arise from mixed divorce are the place that divorce lawsuit was filed, fighting for child custody, and about child nationality. In resolving disputes over child custody, the judge uses Indonesian national law about child custody which tends to give children the right to choose who they want to be cared for. The Judge’s guideline is the priority of the child’s needs. About children nationality, Indonesian national law recognizes limited dual citizenship to children under 18 (eighteen) years old or unmarried children. When children turns 18 (eighteen) years old or after marriage, children must choose one nationality from their parents.<br />Keywords: Mixed Marriage; Mixed Divorce; Child Custody; Limited Dual Citizenship.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan hak asuh anak dalam putusnya perkawinan karena perceraian yang dilakukan antara suami isteri dimana salah satu pihak adalah Warga Negara Indonesia (WNI) dan pihak yang lain adalah Warga Negara Asing (WNA). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah dengan melakukan wawancara pada Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Sleman dan studi dokumen atau bahan pustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat diketahui bahwa problematika yang muncul dalam perceraian campuran yaitu tempat diajukannya gugatan perceraian, perebutan hak asuh anak, dan kewarganegaraan anak tersebut. Hakim Indonesia dalam menyelesaikan masalah hak asuh anak dari perceraian campuran menggunakan hukum nasional Indonesia dimana  cenderung memberikan anak hak untuk memilih dengan siapa ia ingin diasuh. Hakim berpatokan pada  kebutuhan anak yang diutamakan. Anak juga memperoleh kewarganegaraan ganda terbatas selama ia berumur dibawah 18 (delapan belas) tahun atau sebelum menikah. Anak yang telah berumur 18 (delapan belas) tahun atau sudah menikah mereka harus memilih salah satu kewarganegaraan dari orang tua mereka.<br />Kata kunci: Perkawinan Campuran; Perceraian Campuran; Hak Asuh Anak; Kewarganegaraan Ganda Terbatas.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-210
Author(s):  
Iin Mutmainah ◽  
Muhammad Sabir

This study discusses about the testament wajibah to differently religious heirs (an Analysis of Supreme Court decision number: 368 K/AG/1995). The purpose of this study are to know about the principle of inheritance under islamic law, and to understand the status of testament to differently religious heirs , and to analyze the constitute of consideration and the legal basis used in deciding the rights of differently religious heirs. The result show that the testament wajibah given to differently religious heirs become a problem because of the status of differently religion, these heirs cannot get inheritance rights. Through the decision of supreme court, judge ruled that differently religious heirs have the right to get inheritance with some consideration. Although there is no rule on testament wajibah to differently religious heirs, the judge have succeeded in ijtihad, finding and exploring the value of existing law. This decree shows that the judges actually carry out duties as a legislator who receive, examine, and decide cases such a new through benefit consideration based on the Qur’an and Hadith


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nita Triana

This study aims to describe and analyze the Judge Progressiveness in the case of a �divorce �related �to domestic violence. The principle of law governing civil judges is passive, in reality this principle creates difficulties for women (wives) victims of domestic violence to achieve justice. The research method used is �non-doctrinal tradition with a socio-legal approach, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study illustrate. Religious Courts Judges as one of the law enforcers are very potential to seek justice for victims of domestic violence, the majority of whom are women, because many cases of domestic violence ended in divorce cases in the Religious Courts. But the consideration of the religious Court Judge in deciding the case of a divorce petition �is not yet progressive, the Judge still adheres to the principle of law, that the Civil Judge is passive. So that when the Plaintiff (Wife) does not demand income and compensation from her husband. The Plaintiff (Wife) as a victim of domestic violence will not get a living idah, mut'ah, maskan, kiswah and any compensation from the Defendant (Husband). Religious Court Judges have not yet explored other relevant legislation, including progressive religious texts that favor women as victims of domestic violence to strengthen the building of their arguments. Whereas in the case of divorce by talak, the Judge views the law in book in his legal considerations �by giving protection to the wife, namely by giving the wife the right to earn a living Idah, Mutah (a living for one year to entertain the wife divorced by her husband), maskan and kiswah, according with what is stipulated in the Marriage Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law. The paradigm of the operation of the Judge in a country with a pluralistic culture such as Indonesia, it's time to change to a more progressive direction, Judge is no longer limited to the existence of a mouth that sounds the sentence of the law ( le judge est uniquenment la bouche qui pronance le most de lois) Judge also not tools designed to be logical and work mechanically, but whole people who have sensitivity to humanitarian and social concerns. Progressive judges learn and are good at making interpretations that are not literal (connotative), and have a high sense of empathy to be able to catch social norms that contextually support each prescription of the Act. The holistic understanding of the judges has the potential to provide justice for women victims of domestic violence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document