scholarly journals Kwestia Rzezi Wołyńskiej w kontekście kryzysu ukraińskiego — między rosyjską propagandą, ukraińskim poszukiwaniem tożsamości narodowej a polską racją stanu

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 83-100
Author(s):  
Jakub Bornio
Keyword(s):  
National Identity ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Specific Activities ◽  
Raison D’État ◽  
Ukrainian Crisis

Niniejszy artykuł traktuje o Rzezi Wołyńskiej analizowanej w kontekście kryzysu ukraińskiego. Badanie skupia się na interpretacji instrumentalnego wykorzystywania przez Rosję, Ukrainę i Polskę zagadnień związanych z eksterminacją polskiej ludności cywilnej przez ukraińskich nacjonalistów. Opracowanie podzielone zostało na trzy części. Pierwsza odnosi się do polityki propagandowej Federacji Rosyjskiej. Ta część pokazuje w jaki sposób Kreml używa kwestii związanych z Rzezią Wołyńską do tworzenia korzystnej dla siebie narracji. Druga część poświęcona jest próbom budowy ukraińskiej tożsamości narodowej na dziedzictwie ukraińskiego nacjonalizmu. Autor analizuje w niej także konkretne działania elit ukraińskich, związane z tematem artykułu. Trzeci fragment natomiast analizuje sprawę Rzezi Wołyńskiej w oparciu o polską raison d’État. W tej części autor przedstawia nie tylko polskie spojrzenie na Rzeź Wołyńską w kontekście kryzysu ukraińskiego, lecz także odnosi ją do geopolitycznego znaczenia Ukrainy dla Polski. Poszczególne wątki są ze sobą połączone i stanowią spójną całość.The issue of the Volhynian Slaughter in the context of Ukrainian crisis — between Russian propaganda, Ukrainian seeking for the national identity and Polish raison d’ÉtatThe present article is devoted to the Volhynian Slaughter in the context of Ukrainian crisis. Research focuses on interpretation of intentional using by Russia, Ukraine, Poland of issues related to the extermination of Polish civilians carried out by Ukrainian nationalists. The article is divided into three parts. The first part refers to the propaganda policy of the Russian Federation. In this part author presents how the Kremlin uses issues related to the Volhynian Slaughter to create narrative favorable for itself. The second part is devoted to the process of building of Ukrainian national identity on the legacy of Ukrainian nationalism. In this part the author analyses also specific activities of Ukrainian authorities, which are linked to the subject matter of the article. The third part includes analysis of the Volhynian Slaughter in the context of Ukrainian crisis through the prism of Polish raison d’État. This part depicts not only the Polish perception of the Volhynian Slaughter but also explains links between subject matter and the geopolitical significance of Ukraine for Poland. All three parts of research are interconnected and belong together.

scholarly journals Ironia i nihilizm. Figura bibliotekarza w Posłuchaniu u Lucypera Józefa Sękowskiego

2019 ◽  
pp. 83-94
Author(s):  
Jarosław Ławski
Keyword(s):  
National Identity ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Short Story ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Absolute Power ◽  
Polish Literature ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject

The subject matter of the present article is the image of library and librarian in a forgotten short story by a Polish-Russian writer Józef Julian Sękowski (1800−1858). Sękowski is known in Polish literature as a multi-talented orientalist and polyglot, who changed his national identity in 1832 and began to write only in Russian. In the history of Russian literature he is famous for Library for Reading and Fantastic Voyages of Baron Brambeus, an ironic-grotesque work, which was precursory in Russian prose. Until 1832 Sękowski was, however, a Polish writer. His last significant work was An Audience with Lucypher published in a Polish magazine Bałamut Petersburski (Petersburgian Philanderer) in 1832 and immediately translated into Russian by Sękowski himself under the title Bolszoj wychod u Satany (1833). The library and librarian presented by the author in this piece are a caricature illustration proving his nihilistic worldview. Sękowski is a master of irony and grotesquery, yet the world he creates is deprived of freedom and justice and a book in this world is merely a threat to absolute power.

Markteintritt in Russland

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Popov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Market Entry ◽  
Russian Market ◽  
Legal Situation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Political Conditions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Developments ◽  
High Degree

This book offers detailed explanations and useful advice to many questions related to entering the Russian market, as the Russian Federation is a worthwhile country for profitable investments. The relevant areas include economic and political conditions, market entry options, taxes, personnel matters, customs, and certification. The high degree of topicality is based on the latest Russian legislation and international political and economic developments. In this way, investors are given both the breadth of the subject matter at hand and the depth by structuring the legal situation and providing clear summaries.

scholarly journals 10 lat „Tawriczeskich cztienij” w Sankt Petersburgu. Naukowa działalność Centrum Historii Parlamentaryzmu (2007-2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-71
Author(s):  
Roman Jurkowski
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
The State ◽  
State Council ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Meetings

This article is an analysis of the nine yearbooks containing the scientific materials from the conferences “Tawriczeskije Cztienija”, organized annually since 2007 by the Center for the History of Parliamentarism. This institution is located in St. Petersburg, in the Tauridic Palace, which is the historic seat of the State Duma. These conferences are the most important scientific meetings in the Russian Federation devoted to the history of parliamentarism in Russia. The nine editions of the same name as the conferences, include 303 scientific articles, 281 of which concern the history of the State Duma and the State Council, and 22 texts are devoted to the contemporary parliament of the Russian Federation. The article discusses, in the form of tables: the subject matter of all texts, with particular reference to studies on Polish issues.

scholarly journals On amendments to the Third Chapter of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: what is new?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Svetlana Sergeevna Gorokhova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Third ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Positive Assessment ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the novelties in constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation, namely legal provisions that supplemented the main law of the country in 2020. Alongside the renewed constitutional norms, the author analyzed the related articles of the current Russian legislation, as well as separate regulatory provisions of constitutional nature of the foreign countries. The scientific novelty of this work is substantiated by the objective factors associated with recent amendments to legal matter of the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993, and thus, practically full absence of scientific legal research on this topic. The author also notes the primary importance of studying the renewed basic constitutional provisions for academic community, as well as the entire Russian society.  In conclusion, it is noted that the Third Chapter of the Constitution of the Russian Federation dedicated to federative structure undergone significant changes. Despite the fact that there are certain questions to revision and location of some newly accepted constitutional norms, the results of the Russian Constitutional Referendum of July 1, 2020 give an overall positive assessment of the new version of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Problems of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-45
Author(s):  
Viktoriya Viktorovna Kalinkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is a set of legal norms that regulate relations in the sphere of challenging of transactions of the debtor, as well as the law enforcement practice. The object of this research is the social relations that develop in the context of challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case. The article discusses the problems faced by the arbitration and financial executives at the stage of claim preparation for challenging of transactions of the debtor, i.e. formation of evidence, as well as at the stage of execution of the corresponding court ruling. The purpose goal of this article lies in articulation of the problem, substantiation of the need for legislative regulation, and formulation of recommendation for the improvement of current legislation on the subject matter. The scientific novelty consists in addressed the issues that have not previously become the subject of separate research; as well as in the author’s conclusions and recommendations aimed at the improvement of the Federal Law No. 127-FZ of. October 26, 2002 “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and other normative legal acts regulating this field. The acquired results can also be used in the Russian legal science for further elaboration on the issues related to the effectiveness of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor, and as well  as improvement of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and law enforcement practice that regulate this field.

The Subject Matter of Criminal Evidence Relating to the Disclosure of Information on Security Measures Applicable to Law Enforcement or Control Officials

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Zajcew ◽  
Aleksander Yepikhin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Disclosure Of Information ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article analyses the characteristics of the subject of evidence (Article 73 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation) of objective and subjective characteristics of crime, which are listed in Article 320 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. Considerable attention has been given to the establishment of criminal sanctions for the disclosure of information on security measures towards law enforcement or control officials as an important guarantee of the stability of the Russian management system and legal protection activities. The characteristics of the subject-matter of the evidence in criminal matters under investigation are expressed in the need to establish objective and subjective grounds for disclosing information on security measures in the course of criminal proceedings against law enforcement or control officials. The state protection measures themselves are defined by separate regulations and are applied in the process of criminal proceedings and in the presence of evidence. However, this complex and multifaceted security process could be seriously undermined by the‘leak’ of classified security information. In case of such illegal disclosure, the penalty is defined in Article 320 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The authors draw attention to the existence of a direct or indirect relationship between the unauthorised activity and performing state service in legal protection bodies, as well as the need to prove the intention to commit this crime and the awareness of not disclosing secret information to unauthorized persons who do not have formal access to the above information. The authors conclude that the implementation of criminal evidence proceedings for the criminal case of the offence under Article 320 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation needs to be improved at this stage in order to increase the effectiveness and security of the protection of judges, law enforcement and control officials in Russia.

scholarly journals ON CLARIFYING THE SUBJECT OF PENITENTIARY OVERSIGHT BY THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE ON A RANGE OF ACTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Oleg V. Voronin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Additional Function ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The subject matter of the penitentiary oversight of the Prosecutor's Office in terms of the range of acts includes: Universally recognised (i.e. recognised by the vast majority of states) norms (principles) of international law in terms of establishing basic natural (inalienable) human rights, including in relation to persons held in places of detention and (or) serving measures of detention, which are part of the Russian Federation legal system and are directly incorporated into Russian national law: Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966. Constitution of the Russian Federation. Duly ratified international treaties and agreements, which may be divided into two groups A) duly ratified multilateral international treaties and agreements (conventions). B) bilateral treaties and agreements on international legal assistance (cooperation) in terms of defining the procedure and conditions of extradition (transfer) of convicts for serving the sentence and other measures of compulsory isolation, as well as application of measures of preliminary isolation from society to those suspected or accused of committing a crime. Some 60 such treaties have now been ratified. At the national legislative level, the Office of the Procurator-General also supervises implementation of and compliance with federal laws, in addition to the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The laws may be conventionally divided into two groups. The first includes laws directly regulating the execution (serving) of penitentiary isolation measures. The second group covers laws that regulate activities directly related to compulsory isolation, as well as the activities of state bodies and institutions for which the execution of sentences serves as an additional function to the main activity. The next set of laws and regulations that form the subject matter of the penitentiary over-sight of the Public Prosecutor's Office are the subordinate laws and regulations. The subject is covered by by-laws of both general and departmental nature. The main peculiarity of deter-mining the scope of supervision in relation to departmental acts is that, on the one hand, the prosecutor supervises the implementation and compliance with the requirements contained in these acts, on the other hand, they themselves serve as a subject of supervision in terms of their compliance with the legislation in force. In this regard, the adoption of key ones usually requires the approval of the Prosecutor's Office, represented by the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation or relevant subordinate prosecutors.

scholarly journals Organizational and economic mechanisms for designing the development of the digital economy in developing countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 10006
Author(s):  
Saule Rakhimova ◽  
Lyudmila Goncharenko ◽  
Sergey Sybachin ◽  
Kymbat Kunanbayeva ◽  
Alina Fatkullina
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Activity ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Government Contract

The present article was prepared as part of the government contract as requested by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation on the subject formulated as «Structural changes in economy and society as a result of achieving the target indicators of National projects, which provide opportunities to organize new areas of social and economic activity, including commercial, both in Russia and abroad» (project No. FSSW-2020-0010).

scholarly journals CASE “UKRAINE V. RUSSIAN FEDERATION”. DETERMINATION OF THE DISPUTE SUBJECT-MATTER AND JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (20) ◽  
pp. 167-174
Author(s):  
O. M. Polivanova
Keyword(s):  
Racial Discrimination ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
International Court Of Justice ◽  
International Convention ◽  
International Court ◽  
The Crimea ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism

The article deals with the case “Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. The Russian Federation)”, initiated by the Application of Ukraine of 16 January 2017. On November 8, 2019, as a result of the preliminary objections raised by the Russian Federation on September 12, 2018, on the Court’s jurisdiction and the admissibility of the claim, the UNs International Court of Justice rejected the preliminary objections of the Russian Federation in favor of Ukraine. In the judgment, the Court identified the subject-matter of the dispute between the parties and established its jurisdiction in accordance with art. 24.1 of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and art. 22 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. In the article, particular attention is paid to both the analysis of the findings of the ICJ on the determination of the dispute subject-matter (disputed issues that will form the basis of the case merits) and the examination of the Court’s jurisdiction in the case. Ukraine v. Russia case has been brought by Ukraine after the events that have taken place in the east of our state and in the south – in the Crimea since the spring of 2014 and on which parties have different views. The Court noted that issues of purported “aggression” of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, or “unlawful occupation” of the territory of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, as well as the proclamation of the status of the Crimea by the Court are not within the subject-matter of dispute in the present case. In respect of the events in eastern Ukraine, the applicant initiated proceedings only under the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism. In Crimea, Ukraine’s claims are based solely on the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Based on established jurisdiction, the Court will be able to make a final determination solely on whether by its actions (inaction) the Russian Federation has breached its international legal obligations under the conventions mentioned above – within the limits set out in the claim of Ukraine. In view of the subject-matter determined by the Court, the ICJ deciding on the merits of the case will, first, establish whether under the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism the Russian Federation was required to take measures and cooperate in the prevention and suppression of alleged terrorism financing in the context of events in eastern Ukraine and, if so, whether the Russian Federation has breached such obligations. Secondly, the Court will determine whether the respondent violated its international legal obligations by discriminatory measures applied, based on Ukraine’s position, against the Crimean Tatar and Ukrainian communities in the Crimea. The Court’s finding on the violations of the abovementioned international treaty rules will result in the Russian Federation being held liable, including in the forms of immediate termination of these violations, the resumption by the Russian Federation of the fulfillment of its international obligations under the discussed conventions, as well as compensation for losses, including those of financial kind – as it was claimed by Ukraine. Keywords: Ukraine, Russian Federation, United Nations International Court of Justice, the subject-matter of the dispute, jurisdiction, convention, terrorism financing, racial discrimination, eastern Ukraine, Crimea.

scholarly journals Exercise of Personal Non-Property Parental Rights and Duties: Judicial Protection in the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Nadezhda S. Nizhnik ◽  
◽  
Natalia A. Burdanova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Parental Rights ◽  
Place Of Residence ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The exercise of personal non-property parental rights and responsibilities in modern Russia is ensured by the possibility of judicial protection and the application of sanctions for non-performance or improper performance. Failure by the parents of the child and other persons to reach agreement on the issues of upbringing, education and child’s place of residence leads to litigation on the exercise of personal non-property parental rights and responsibilities. The regulatory grounds for litigation related to the exercise of personal non-property parental rights and obligations and the possibility of judicial resolution of a dispute related to the exercise of parental rights and obligations have been considered by the author on the basis of the analysis of legislation and judicial practice. The classification of disputes related to the exercise of personal parental rights and obligations has been made according to various criteria (according to the subject composition and content of disputes). The rules of subject matter jurisdiction and court jurisdiction of disputes related to the exercise of personal parental rights and responsibilities have been characterized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document