scholarly journals GOOD GOVERNANCE (TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK) DALAM PEMBERIAN IZIN OLEH PEMERINTAH DAERAH DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Oheo K Haris
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Concrete Action ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
Mining Law ◽  
The Government

Instruments in terms of the provisions of the mining law has been regulated by law No. 11 of 1967, in which the government's legal position is not comparable to the investors. granting it is the government or ruling authority in order to protect the interests of citizens in order to establish a concrete action even if it deviates from the provisions that are prohibited. Good governance or good governance is closely related to human rights. Thus, that one of the bases existence of a support or foundation of a discretion in this case the nature of the license by the government especially the mining sector is the presence of good governance or Good pemeritahan Governancne so as to create a harmonization as state officials

scholarly journals Challenges Posed on The New Mining Act and Its Regulations in Tanzania

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Marwa ◽  
Isabela Warioba
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Local Communities ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Mining Law ◽  
The Relationship

<p>This paper assesses the challenges that are posed to the new mining law and other Regulations that govern the mining sector in Tanzania. The main issues discussed in this paper include the conflicts between the local people and the mining companies regarding land ownership, compensation and forced eviction, conflicts between Small Scale Mining (SSM) and Large Scale Mining (LSM).</p><p>The findings obtained by the authors, intimates that the major problems in the mining sector are due to lack of law enforcement and good governance in the sector as well as lack of awareness of the laws governing the sector by the local communities.</p>Lastly, the authors concludes and recommend that, until and unless the laws are adhered to and kept into practice, the problems in the mining sector will not be easily resolved. Hence in order for the mining sector to benefit the indigenous and the investors, there should be enhancement of sustainable development;, people should be educated on the laws and the effects of mining on the environment and the relationship between SSM and LSM be improved.

The Effectiveness of Initiatives to Promote Good Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Extractives Sector in Zimbabwe

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tumai Murombo
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Legal Reforms ◽  
Official Policy ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Government ◽  
Global And Local ◽  
Governance Transparency ◽  
Transparency And Accountability

AbstractThe regulation of the extractives sector in Zimbabwe has recently come under scrutiny due to the uncertain social, economic and political environment. Zimbabwe's mining sector was under colonial legislation for a long time and that legislation has recently been reviewed. Existing extractives sector laws do not adequately promote transparency and accountability, an issue recognized by stakeholders throughout the mining sector. The advent of the new constitution and law reform processes indicates Zimbabwe's intention to incorporate good governance, transparency and accountability provisions in the mining sector. State driven reforms have been inspired by global and local civil society initiatives. Analysis shows that, for various reasons, the government does not readily embrace such initiatives, which are important drivers of official policy and legal reforms. Zimbabwean environmental civil society groups have been exceptional in this regard.

scholarly journals GOOD GOVERNANCE PERSPEKTIF MAQAASID ASY-SYAARI’AH KONTEMPORER

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Muhammad Iqbal Juliansyahzen
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Business Sector ◽  
Good Communication ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government

AbstractGood governance is a concept for governance that should be run. Theoretically, the discourse of good governance reaps its pros and cons since it had been firstly introduced. However, as a concept and a strategic offer it deserves to be appreciated and re-examined. There are principles in good governance that are compatible with Islam such as accountability, transparency, deliberation, and others. Good governance will be achieved when it involves a good communication among the government, civil society, and the business sector. The author uses the perspective of contemporary maqaasid asy-shari'ah to view the discourse with more emphasis on development and right. The perspective is different from the old maqasid which emphasizes more on the protection and preservation. The result of the study shows that good governace needs  harmonious relationship among the followers of religion, social justice, organized and equitable education, human rights protection, and the development of civilized law.Keywords : Good Governance, Maqâsid asy-Syaari’ah, DevelopmentAbstrakGood governance merupakan sebuah konsep tata kelola pemerintahan yang seharusnya dijalankan. Secara teoritis, diskursus good governace menuai pro-kontra sejak awal kemunculannya. Meskipun demikian, sebagai sebuah konsep dan tawaran strategis patut untuk diapresiasi dan dikaji kembali. Terdapat prinsip-prinsip dalam good governance yang berkesesuaian dengan Islam diantaranya akuntabilitas, transparansi, musyawarah, dan lainnya. Upaya mewujudkannya tidak hanya dilakukan oleh satu pihak saja, tetapi komunikasi antara pemerintah (goverment), masyarakat sipil, dan sektor dunia usaha. Dalam melihat diskursus ini, penulis menggunakan perspektif maqaasid asy-Syaari’ah kontemporer dengan lebih menekankan pada development (pembangunan; pengembangan) dan right (hak-hak). Berbeda dengan maqasid lama lebih pada protection (perlindungan) dan preservation (penjagaan; pelestarian). Berdasarkan hasil kajian tersebut bahwa dalam mewujudkan good governace diperlukan pembangunan dalam berbagai aspek seperti membangun hubungan harmonis antar pemeluk agama, mewujudkan keadilan sosial, penyelenggaran dan pemerataan pendidikan, perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia, pembangunan hukum berkeadaban.. Kata kunci: Good Governance, Maqaasid asy-Syaari’ah, dan Pembangunan

scholarly journals CONCEPTS AND APPLICATION OF GOOD GOVERNANCE IN THE GOVERNMENT OF OMAR BIN ABDUL AZIZ

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-132
Author(s):  
Zul Karnaini
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
The State ◽  
Umayyad Dynasty ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
The Government ◽  
Good And Evil ◽  
Islamic Values

The term Good Governance (an-Nizam al-Siyasah) is an Islamic concept in the implementation of good governance according to the Qur'an and Hadith. This concept was re-emerged by UNDP in 1990 which was implemented by Umar bin Abdul Aziz during the Umayyad dynasty, in balancing a synergistic and constructive relationship between the state, the private sector and society, through the principles of good governance applied by Umar bin Abdul Aziz: 1. tawhid, 2. Trust, 3. Deliberation, 4. Justice and Law Enforcement, 5. Equality, 6. Brotherhood, 7. Human Rights (HAM), 8. Effective and Efficient, 9. Social Supervision. Umar bin Abd Aziz's principles of good governance are in line with Islamic values, such as: Allah as the highest caliph, trustworthiness, deliberation, justice, equality, brotherhood, human rights, and commanding good and evil. In comparison, UNDP and LAN Good Governance have the following principles: participation, law enforcement, transparency, equality, responsiveness, effectiveness, professionalism, supervision. The principles of good governance of Umar bin Abdul Aziz associated with maqasid sharia are; the principle of tawhid according to maqasid shari'ah in the field of muhafazah ad-din (maintaining religion), the principle of trustworthiness and effectiveness and efficiency, including the category of muhafazah al-mal (protection of property). The application of deliberation, including the category of muhafazah al-aql (preservation of reason) and brotherhood is included in the category of muhafazah al-nasl (maintaining offspring). Human Rights (HAM) are included in the category of muhafazah al-nafs (protecting the soul). in line with the maqasid shari'ah al-Syatibi. If tawhid is connected with Imam Malik's istislahi theory, then this principle includes daruriyyah (principle), while justice and law enforcement, deliberation, trust, equality, brotherhood are included in the hajiyyah category. effective, efficient, social supervision is included in the category of taksiniyah. Then how is good governance implemented and how is it related to UNDP good governance. This is the study of this treatise as material to add to the treasures of knowledge in the state Abstrak: Istilah Good Governance (an-Nizam al-Siyasah) merupakan konsep Islam dalam pelaksanaan tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik sesuai al-Qur’an dan Hadits. Konsep ini dimunculkan kembali oleh UNDP pada 1990 yang pernah dilaksanakan Umar bin Abdul Aziz pada masa dinasti Umayyah, dalam menyeimbangkan hubungan yang sinergis dan konstruktif antara negara, sektor swasta dan masyarakat, melalui  prinsip  good governance yang diterapkan Umar bin Abdul Aziz: 1. tawhid, 2. Amanah, 3. Musyawarah, 4. Keadilan dan Penegakan Hukum, 5. Persamaan, 6. Persaudaraan, 7. Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), 8. Efektif dan Efisien, 9. Pengawasan Sosial. Prinsip-prinsip Good governance Umar bin Abd Aziz  sejalan dengan tata nilai Islam, seperti: Allah sebagai khalifah tertinggi, amanah, musyawarah, keadilan, persamaan, persaudaraan, HAM, dan amar makruf nahi munkar.  Sebagai bandingannya adalah Good Governance UNDP dan LAN memiliki prinsip sebagai berikut: partisipasi, penegakan hukum, transparansi, kesetaraan, daya tanggap, efektif, profesionalisme, pengawasan. Prinsip-prinsip good governance Umar bin Abdul Aziz diakaikan dengan maqasid syariah adalah; prinsip tawhid sesuai maqasid syari’ah bidang muhafazah ad-din (menjaga agama), prinsip amanah dan efektif serta efisien termasuk ketagori muhafazah al-mal (penjagaan harta). Penerapan musyawarah, termasuk kategori muhafazah al-aql (penjagaan akal) dan persaudaraan  termasuk kategori muhafazah al-nasl (menjaga keturunan). Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) termasuk kategori muhafazah al-nafs (menjaga jiwa). sejalan dengan maqasid syari’ah al-Syatibi. Jika dihubungkan  tawhid  dengan teori  istislahi Imam Malik maka prinsip ini termasuk daruriyyah (pokok), sementara keadilan dan penegakan hukum, musyawarah, amanah, persamaan, persaudaraan termasuk tingkatan kategori hajiyyah. efektif, efisien, pengawasan sosial termasuk kategori taksiniyah. Lalu bagaimanakah good governance ini diterapkan dan bagaimana hubungannya dengan good governance UNDP. Inilah kajian risalah ini sebagai bahan untuk menambah khazanah ilmu pengetahuan dalam bernegara. Kata Kunci: Tata Kelola, Konsep dan Aplikasi yang Baik, Pemerintahan Omar Bin Abdul Aziz

Good Governance and Property Rights of the State: The Dubovets Case before the European Court of Human Rights and the Russian Constitutional Court

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-304
Author(s):  
Grigory Vaypan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
European Court ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Government

This contribution discusses the recent Dubovets case before both the European Court of Human Rights and the Russian Constitutional Court, and its implications for the changing design of Russian property law as increasingly shaped by international human rights law and good governance principles. Communicated in December 2016, the application in Dubovets v. Russia continues the line of the European Court’s cases against Russia on the protection of good faith private owners of real estate against property claims by the government. Prompted by this case law, the Russian Constitutional Court in its Judgment of 22 June 2017 No 16-P struck down Article 302 of the Russian Civil Code as unconstitutional insofar as it entitled the government to reclaim possession of state property that had been previously alienated due to the government’s own negligence. This judgment manifests the increasing interdependence between private and public law – of classical property law, on the one hand, and international human rights law and good governance principles, on the other hand. It also contributes to ongoing evolution in the understanding of the state’s property rights in Russia: from the superior status of public property in Soviet times – to formal equality between public and private property rights in the landmark legal instruments of the 1990s – and now to the growing need for special protection of individual property rights vis-à-vis the state, in light of the latter’s double role as both the largest owner and the (quite unrestrained) regulator.

scholarly journals Evaluation of E-Government Using COBIT 5 Framework Case Study of Sistem Database Pemasyarakatan Implementation in Ministry of Law and Human Rights in the Special Region of Yogyakarta

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Fanny Novianto ◽  
Maria Ulfah Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Electronic Government ◽  
Organizational Goals ◽  
Governance Strategies ◽  
Strategic Policy ◽  
The Government ◽  
Special Region

Information technology in the government or called by the electronic government (e-government) is an absolute necessity and must be continuously developed as an acceleration tool in strategic policy and decision-making. Utilization of e-government aims to improve performance and productivity, budget efficiency, transparency and accountability. To achieve information technology good governance, strategies are needed in developing existing e-government. The first step is to evaluate the implementation of e-government. Evaluation is done by measuring the level of Capability of e-government that has been applied. The scope of this research is e-government, which has been implemented in the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The research method used is a quantitative method using a questionnaire instrument and using the 5th edition of the COBIT framework model. From the gap analysis based on the level of Capability, it can be seen that the gap between the current level of Capability and the expected level of Capability is not so large. This means that it is not so difficult for the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Special Region of Yogyakarta to continuously develop and improve SDP to achieve organizational goals and for future needs.

The Ombudsman Act 1980: redressing administrative grievances in Bangladesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-184
Author(s):  
Sheikh Mohammad Towhidul Karim
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Confidence ◽  
Operational Effectiveness ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Organizations ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
The Government

Purpose It is recognized worldwide that an ombudsman system makes the public administration more transparent and accountable to the public. This paper aims to examine the provisions of the Ombudsman Act 1980, as well as the position, role and necessity of the Office of the Ombudsman in Bangladesh. It also evaluates how the ombudsman institution can act as a gateway for citizens of Bangladesh to resolve complaints against the maladministration of public administration in the country. Design/methodology/approach The study is basically qualitative in nature where both primary and secondary sources have been used. As well, a combination of analytical methods and current legislative methods, together with future legislative techniques, was used in the study. Findings This study finds that the ombudsman is a vital institution for Bangladesh to eliminate maladministration, nepotism and abuse of human rights, as well as abuse of the power of the public administration. Going forward, Bangladesh needs to amend the existing Ombudsman Act 1980 and then take proper steps to firmly establish the Ombudsman Office to ensure and increase public confidence, operational effectiveness and good governance and human rights throughout the country. Research limitations/implications The main implication of this study is that it will play an important role for the development of the rule of law and human rights in Bangladesh. This study will make its readers and particularly the citizens of Bangladesh aware of the importance of the “Office of the Ombudsman” in Bangladesh and the existing loopholes in the current Ombudsman Act 1980. This research also provides a new avenue for scholars to contribute their knowledge and wisdom toward nation-building by further researching the Office of the Ombudsman in Bangladesh. In this way, scholars in this field can share their experiences of the role of the ombudsman to a wider audience. Practical implications The study will facilitate policymakers and the government to enact an effective new law or to amend the existing law relating to the ombudsman. Originality/value The paper sets out the proposed amendment to the Ombudsman Act 1980. Hence, it will be of interest to policymakers, government, organizations of civil society and those developing countries that have not taken steps toward forming an ombudsman institution.

The Changing Politics of Foreign Aid — Where to Next?

Politics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Burnell
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Foreign Aid ◽  
Poverty Alleviation ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Political Research ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Government

The 1990s have seen the most systematic attempt yet to influence directly the government and politics of sovereign aid receiving states Aid's conditionalities now include political as well as economic dimensions The proclaimed objectives include democracy human rights and good governance. But the old politics linking aid to donors' security and commercial interests has not disappeared. The future directions are uncertain. Some observers urge additional conditionalities emphasising social objectives of poverty alleviation. Others argue conditionality is bound to be ineffective. Aid's capacity to combat poverty and thereby the contribution it can make indirectly to democratic prospects, is contested anyway. It should remain a durable object of social and political research.

The Principle of Human Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 171-182
Author(s):  
Henk Addink
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
Employment Education ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right

The term ‘human rights’ has different meanings and is used in many academic subjects. It is used by lawyers and politicians, by philosophers and theologians, and, more generally, by the public. The term is used to denote a broad spectrum of very diverse rights, ranging from the right to life to the right to a cultural identity. They involve all elementary preconditions for an existence worthy of human dignity. These rights are ordered and specified in different ways. Often a distinction is made between civil and political rights on the one hand and economic, social, and cultural rights on the other. Some also add collective rights as a third group. The first group is related to restricting the powers of the state in respect of the individual. The second group often requires governments to intervene actively to create good conditions for human development, such as employment, education, and healthcare. When we speak about the right to good governance we must distinguish between the right as such and the underlying norms which are part of the principles of good governance: properness, transparency, participation, effectiveness, and accountability. This means that the underlying norms of the right to good governance are also related to these five principles. The inclusion of human rights as one of these principles here is to make it more explicit that this is not only a subjective right for the citizens but also an obligation for the government. The right and the obligation are two sides of the same coin.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Hukum Kreditor Preferen Pajak dan Kreditor Preferen Buruh dalam Proses Kepailitan

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-166
Author(s):  
Imran Eka Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Public Welfare ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Government ◽  
Process Factors

This study aims to determine the legal position of tax-preferred creditors and labour preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process and to determine the factors that influence the occurrence of disputes between labour preference creditors and tax-preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process. The research method used is a method with the type of normative research using 2 (three) types of approaches, namely the statutory approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The results of this study are based on a conceptual approach and a statutory approach, the authors find that the legal position of tax-preferred creditors and workers' preferences is the same. law, the factor of justice, the factor of increasing public welfare (public interest), the factor of labour rights and human rights. In order to provide certainty about the legal position of tax preferred creditors and labor preferred creditors, it is deemed necessary to improve the bankruptcy law, so that there are no problems between tax preferred creditors and labour preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process. Factors that influence the occurrence of disputes between labour preference creditors and tax-preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process can be input for members of the House of Representatives and the Government to improve the bankruptcy law Abstrak:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum kreditor preferen pajak dan kreditor preferen buruh dalam proses kepailitan dan mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya sengketa antara kreditor Preferen buruh dan kreditor preferen pajak dalam proses kepailitan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode dengan jenis penelitian normative menggunakan 2 (tiga) tipe pendekatan yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah berdasarkan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan penulis menemukan bahwa kedudukan hukum kreditor preferen pajak dan preferen buruh mempunyai kedudukan yang sama, Adapun yang menjadi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya sengketa antara kreditor Preferen buruh dan kreditor preferen pajak adalah faktor kepastian hukum, faktor keadilan, faktor meninggikan kesejahteraan umum (kepentingan umum), faktor hak-hak buruh dan hak asasi manusia. Dalam rangka memberikan kepastian kedudukan hukum terhadap kreditor preferen pajak dan kreditor preferen buruh maka dirasa perlu untuk menyempurnakan undang undang kepailitan,agar tidak terjadi permasalahan antara kreditor preferen pajak dan kreditor preferen buruh dalam prose kepailitan. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya sengketa antara kreditor Preferen buruh dan kreditor preferen pajak dalam proses kepailitan ini bisa menjadi masukan bagi para anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Pemerintah untuk menyempurnakan undang undang kepailitan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document