scholarly journals Normative and individual acts as tools of public administration activity in the field of television and radio broadcasting

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
A. Kalimbet ◽  
M. Sidor
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Repeated Application ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Radio Broadcasting ◽  
Life Circumstances

Normative and individual acts as tools of public administration activity in the field of television and radio broadcasting The article highlights the essence of normative and individual acts of subject of public administration used in the field of television and radio broadcasting. Emphasis is placed on the need to take into account current trends in national legislation and the views of European scholars on the transformation of the institution of forms of government in the institution of tools of public administration. It is noted that the administrative actions of subject of public administration aimed at ensuring the public interest can take a variety of external forms, and thus take the form of tools of public administration. The general features of public administration tools are singled out, among which: competence of subject of public administration, standardized form, possibility of appeal; as well as a comparative characterization between normative and administrative acts as tools of public administration, the main difference of which is determined by the range of persons covered by the act and the possibility of its repeated application. It is necessary to issue regulations by subjects of public administration in the field of television, which is a by-law that aims to decipher the abstract provisions of laws and give them a specific and holistic content. It was found that the issuance of regulations is an effective operational way to regulate the dynamic legal relations in this area. It is determined that the result of consideration and resolution of administrative cases in a certain order, which arise during the implementation of the relevant subjects, public administration in the field of television and radio broadcasting is the adoption of individual acts, which in turn are the basis for the emergence, change and termination of administrative legal relations in the field of television and radio broadcasting. Attention is paid to the fact that administrative law enforcement as a form of activity of subject of public administration in the field of television and radio broadcasting is aimed at individualization of legal norms in relation to specific subjects and specific life circumstances. Such activity is characterized by the issuance of individual acts, which is the result of consideration and resolution of administrative cases opened in a certain order.

scholarly journals Administrative Law Aspects of Bringing Employees of Prosecution Authorities to Disciplinary Liability

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 59-61
Author(s):  
Vladilen V. Strelnikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Documents

The scientific article analyses issues related to the practical implementation of legal norms governing the procedure for disciplinary liability of prosecutors. A theoretical analysis of the interpretations of disciplinary responsibility in the public service formulated by leading legal scholars was carried out. A comparative legal analysis has been carried out of the regulations governing the procedure for the imposition of disciplinary penalties in State bodies, including law enforcement agencies and the legal documents governing these issues in the prosecutor’s office.

scholarly journals Public interest in administrative law

2021 ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
Mykhailo HALAI ◽  
Ihor KOSIAK
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Interests ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Definition Of

Today the concept of “public interest” plays a significant role in public law. It would then be important to define the concept for better understanding and application in administrative law. The paper is devoted to the analysis of the definition of «public interest». The uncertainty of the concept in the legislation is noted. The questions of genesis of concept of «interest» in law; division of right into private and public; division of interest into private and public interest. Considered views on the definition of interest in law. The exercise of public interest by organs of public administration by issuing administrative acts is specified. The meaning of public interest has been defined. The role of public interest in the activities of public administration bodies has been established. The importance of balancing individual and collective interests was emphasized. The types of public interest are defined, and the concept of public interest in administrative law is enshrined in domestic legislation. The ambiguity of the legal acts defining the types of public interest that are laid down in the legislation is indicated. Special features of public interest have been formed. It is further stated that the public interest is the content of the legal relationship between citizens and the public administration. The importance of State guarantees for the possibility of realizing a public interest has been established. With the help of the powers of the local State administrations, signs of public interest were examined. It has been established that it is possible for public authorities to define the concept of public interest. The use of types of public interest in legal proceedings, the safeguarding and realization of public interest by administrative law and the importance of a legislative definition of public interest have been proved. The opinion defines the concept of public interest in administrative law as a set of private interests in administrative legal relations which (aggregate) It is provided by appropriate legal means and is implemented through executive administrative acts. In addition, the report indicates the main features of public interest.

The Missing Piece: The Case for Administrative Law in the MSPA Curriculum

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 616-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Caiden
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The United States ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Academic Education ◽  
Public Servants ◽  
The Public ◽  
Democratic Administration

Why is administrative law so neglected in the curricula of graduate public administration in the United States? In the light of professed adherence to democratic administration and rule of law, this gap in the academic education of public service professionals seems surprising and somewhat disconcerting. Public servants are not only empowered but obligated by law to use the power of the state to make decisions and take actions in the public interest. Yet, study of the theory, processes, and practices of administrative law seems to play little or no part in their preparation for these tasks.

scholarly journals EFFICIENCY OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL PROTECTION: THEORETICAL ASPECTS

2019 ◽  
pp. 174-178
Author(s):  
O. M. Pravotorova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Four Levels ◽  
Legal Entities

In the article, the key aspects of the effectiveness of administrative and legal protection are researched on the basis of current legislation and opinions on this issue of scholars in the field of administrative law. The author notes that administrative-legal protection is an institution of administrative law consisting of uniform rules of administrative law whose legal effect is directed at the prevention of offenses (crime prevention) and the restoration of violated rights, freedoms and legal interests of individuals and juridical persons carried out for using administrative tools – forms of administrative activity of public administration, administrative coercion and administrative enforcement. The steady development of social relations in administrative law, the improvement of modern technologies, as well as the formation of an information society, could not but affect the state of efficiency of modern administrative and legal protection. The author states that the effectiveness of administrative and legal protection is an integral part of the theory and practice of such protection. Effectiveness of administrative and legal protection is the ability of public administration based on the norms of administrative law to qualitatively and timely restore violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of non-authorized individuals and legal entities, public interest of the state and society. Four levels of effectiveness of administrative and legal protection have been formed: sufficient, when the tasks of the public administration in restoration of violated rights of non-authorized persons are generally fulfilled in the normative-legal acts; insufficient, characterized by frequent cases of non-renewal of violated rights and freedoms of man and citizen, but not characterized by systematic; crisis, when there are systematic violations of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, they do not receive from the state through the indirect activity of the public administration of protection, and dissatisfaction of citizens acquires a significant social weighty protest; is ineffective when the violated rights and freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities are practically not restored, and the law-enforcement system is full of corruption, while the norms of administrative-legal protection change their humane and fair essence and themselves become factors of the destabilization of social relations. It is concluded that administrative-legal protection exists through a system of administrative-legal norms, and at the same time it is proved that it can not, from the point of view of epistemology of law, exist in such narrow limits as the state determines, it reflects objective social relations, protects the most important values, Which during this period of time may not yet find the formal registration in the sources of administrative law, is provided on the basis of administrative law and simultaneously governed by the norms of administrative law, which will establish not only the state, although it primarily. Four levels of effectiveness of administrative and legal protection have been formed: sufficient, when the tasks of public administration set forth in normative legal acts in relation to the restoration of violated rights of non-authorities as a whole are fulfilled; insufficient, characterized by non-isolated cases, not the restoration of violated rights and freedoms of man and citizen, but not characterized by systematic; crisis, when there are systematic violations of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, they do not receive protection from the state through the indirect activity of the public administration; the dissatisfaction of citizens acquires significant social protest; is ineffective when the violated rights and freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities are practically not restored, and corruption penetrates the law-enforcement system, while the norms of administrative-legal protection change their humane and fair essence and they themselves become factors of destabilization of social relations.

scholarly journals ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 22-37
Author(s):  
H. Bachrul Amiq
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Pollution ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Better Than

Enforcement of administrative sanctions is part of the enforcement of administrative environmental laws. Law enforcement of the administrative environment itself can be done in a preventive and repressive manner. Administrative law enforcement that is preventive is done through supervision, while repressive law enforcement is done through the application of administrative sanctions. Supervision and application of administrative sanctions aims to achieve the adherence of the public to the legal norms of the administrative environment. Good supervision as part of preventive environmental law enforcement will prevent the violation of administrative law norms. Thus, environmental pollution resulting from such breaches can be avoided. This is better than the enforcement of repressive administrative sanctions after the offense. However, it does not mean that the review of enforcement of administrative sanctions is unimportant.

Case Study #4: Star Trek by Gene Roddenberry

Public Voices ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
Ken Nichols
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Star Trek ◽  
Government Organization ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Third ◽  
Gene Roddenberry ◽  
Common Goals

Star Trek began as a 1960s television series led by a swashbuckling starship Captain, an intellectual off-world first officer, and a multicultural, heart-of-gold crew. In the third of a century since its appearance on our home screens, the series Gene Roddenberry created has become a world-wide phenomenon.Star Trek is also a rich treasure trove of administrative literature: The setting — usually a starship, sometimes a planetary government organization. The characters are clearly delineated, colorful, share common goals, distinguish between their personal and professional roles and concerns, and serve well as archetypes for distinct organizational personalities. And the missions are clear, benevolent, in the public interest, and frequently controversial.As you watch an episode of one of the four Star Trek series, how many of these facets can you observe?That’s public administration, all right, but in a very different wrapper

Fuzzy Lines: Using the Best-Selling Novel to Illustrate the Blurring Boundaries of “Public”

Public Voices ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Nolan J. Argyle ◽  
Gerald A. Merwin
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Contracting Out ◽  
The Public ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Civic Community ◽  
Additional Area ◽  
Do So

Privatization, contracting out, and a host of other current trends blur the line between public and private—they create what at best is a fuzzy line. This study examines yet one additional area where the lines between public and private have gotten even fuzzier—the best selling novel. It uses the writings of Tom Clancy and Clive Cussler,two authors whose names on a novel guarantee best-seller status. It will do so in the context of what a civic community and civil society are, and how they relate to the public-private question, a question that has renewed life in public administration.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Interest

Information ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Peter Cihon ◽  
Jonas Schuett ◽  
Seth D. Baum
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Nonprofit Organizations ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Department Of Defense ◽  
The Public ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Media ◽  
The U.S

Corporations play a major role in artificial intelligence (AI) research, development, and deployment, with profound consequences for society. This paper surveys opportunities to improve how corporations govern their AI activities so as to better advance the public interest. The paper focuses on the roles of and opportunities for a wide range of actors inside the corporation—managers, workers, and investors—and outside the corporation—corporate partners and competitors, industry consortia, nonprofit organizations, the public, the media, and governments. Whereas prior work on multistakeholder AI governance has proposed dedicated institutions to bring together diverse actors and stakeholders, this paper explores the opportunities they have even in the absence of dedicated multistakeholder institutions. The paper illustrates these opportunities with many cases, including the participation of Google in the U.S. Department of Defense Project Maven; the publication of potentially harmful AI research by OpenAI, with input from the Partnership on AI; and the sale of facial recognition technology to law enforcement by corporations including Amazon, IBM, and Microsoft. These and other cases demonstrate the wide range of mechanisms to advance AI corporate governance in the public interest, especially when diverse actors work together.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document