scholarly journals Pembibitan Ternak Sapi Potong dalam Sistem Integrasi Tanaman – Ternak di Kawasan Pantai Selatan Kabupaten Bantul

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Soeharsono Soeharsono ◽  
Sinung Rustijarno ◽  
Kurnianita Triwidyastuti
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Breeding System ◽  
Organic Fertilizer ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Rice Crop ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
Record Keeping ◽  
Cage Group ◽  
Farm Ownership ◽  
Livestock System

<div class="Section1"><p><em>This research aimed to know the management effort beef cattle breeding in the integrate crop - livestock system in  south coastal area Bantul regency of Yogyakarta Special Region. Farm Record keeping conducted livestock farmer group Andini Mukti of Poncosari village, Srandakan countryside,  Bantul regency. A number of 20 farmers grouped by as according to farming system : 1) Beef cattle breeding farming system and 2) Integrate rice crop–livestock system. Management farming and livestock noted and tabulation. Data analysed with the distribution frequency and discription. This results of research indicate that the beef cattle breeding system by ownership 2,36 cows/farmer. Beef cattle looked in group individually cage area. Hay from weste rice crop given ad libitum added consentrate mean 1,5 kg/head. Insemination system conducted with the artificial insemination made in </em><em>with the S/C 2,39. Labour effusing in livestock management 114,06 work day person/farmer/year.  This result of effort in the calf and organic fertilizer. Effort income beef cattle breeding system equal Rp 3.013.000 (R/C 1,64). Integrate rice crop – livestock  with the pattern plant the paddy - paddy – crops planted. Farm ownership 1000 m<sup>2</sup> /farmers and 2 cows which looked in cage group area. Using produce in the form of seed 45,83 kg/ha; fertilize 395,52 kg/ha and family labour 43,06 work day person and external labour 15,03 work day person every season plant. The productivity of unhulled paddy dry harvest 6,88 ton/ha. Income farming system integrate rice crop – livestock  equal to Rp 5.592.310 (R/C 1,82).</em></p></div><p><em> </em></p><strong><em>Key words             : management, breeding, beef cattle, integration</em></strong>

scholarly journals Pembibitan Ternak Sapi Potong dalam Sistem Integrasi Tanaman – Ternak di Kawasan Pantai Selatan Kabupaten Bantul

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Soeharsono Soeharsono ◽  
Sinung Rustijarno ◽  
Kurnianita Triwidyastuti
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Breeding System ◽  
Organic Fertilizer ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Rice Crop ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
Record Keeping ◽  
Cage Group ◽  
Farm Ownership ◽  
Livestock System

<div class="Section1"><p><em>This research aimed to know the management effort beef cattle breeding in the integrate crop - livestock system in  south coastal area Bantul regency of Yogyakarta Special Region. Farm Record keeping conducted livestock farmer group Andini Mukti of Poncosari village, Srandakan countryside,  Bantul regency. A number of 20 farmers grouped by as according to farming system : 1) Beef cattle breeding farming system and 2) Integrate rice crop–livestock system. Management farming and livestock noted and tabulation. Data analysed with the distribution frequency and discription. This results of research indicate that the beef cattle breeding system by ownership 2,36 cows/farmer. Beef cattle looked in group individually cage area. Hay from weste rice crop given ad libitum added consentrate mean 1,5 kg/head. Insemination system conducted with the artificial insemination made in </em><em>with the S/C 2,39. Labour effusing in livestock management 114,06 work day person/farmer/year.  This result of effort in the calf and organic fertilizer. Effort income beef cattle breeding system equal Rp 3.013.000 (R/C 1,64). Integrate rice crop – livestock  with the pattern plant the paddy - paddy – crops planted. Farm ownership 1000 m<sup>2</sup> /farmers and 2 cows which looked in cage group area. Using produce in the form of seed 45,83 kg/ha; fertilize 395,52 kg/ha and family labour 43,06 work day person and external labour 15,03 work day person every season plant. The productivity of unhulled paddy dry harvest 6,88 ton/ha. Income farming system integrate rice crop – livestock  equal to Rp 5.592.310 (R/C 1,82).</em></p></div><p><em> </em></p><strong><em>Key words             : management, breeding, beef cattle, integration</em></strong>

scholarly journals The Analysis on Income of Beef Cattle Breeders in Various Crop Patterns in Umbulsari District, Jember Regency

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Noer Soetjipto ◽  
Zaenal Fanani ◽  
Nanang Dwi Wahyono
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Organic Fertilizer ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Sampling Frame ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
Integrated Farming ◽  
High Production ◽  
Cattle Breeders ◽  
High Production Cost ◽  
The Cost

The objective of research is: (1) to analyze the cost incurred at integrated farming involving beef cat-tle breeding and various crop patterns; (2) to estimate the revenue received from the integrated farm-ing involving beef cattle breeding and various crop patterns; (3) to find out the income obtained from the integrated farming involving beef cattle breeding and various crop patterns; and (4) to acknowledge the balance of revenue and cost of the integrated farming involving beef cattle breeding and various crop patterns. Research was located in Umbulsari District, Jember Regency, starting from 16 June 2016 to 28 September 2016. Sampling frame technique used in this research is Two-Stage Cluster Sampling. Both sampel and location of research are determined with purposive sampling. The analytical model of research is the analysis on cost and revenue of livestock-crop farming. Research indicates some results. (1) Crop Pattern 5, which cultivates sugarcane only, and beef cattle breeding have produced the heaviest cost of all combinations observed, especially if measured in terms of per hectare and per livestock unit. The cost for this crop pattern is IDR 96,750,000.- while the cost for beef cattle breeding is IDR 10,865,000.-. Total cost of both works attains IDR 107,615,000.-. The reason behind this huge cost is that Crop Pattern 5 involves high production cost to cover the costs of land processing, land lease, and organic fertilizer; (2) Crop Pattern 5 has produced the highest reve-nue. The revenue of this crop pattern per hectare is IDR 110,450,000.- while beef cattle breeding per livestock unit gives revenue at IDR 14,900,000.-. Total revenue then is around IDR 125,350,000.-; (3) The income obtained from Crop Pattern 5 is IDR 13,700,000.- whereas beef cattle breeding deliv-ers income around IDR 4,035,000.-. Total income is then IDR 17,735,000.-. (4) The highest balance between revenue and cost is 1.82 and it is found at Crop Pattern 4.

scholarly journals ANALISIS USAHA TANI TERPADU SAPI POTONG DAN PADI SAWAH KELOMPOK TANI “KEONG MAS” KECAMATAN SANGKUB, KABUPATEN BOLAANG MONGONDOW UTARA (STUDI KASUS)

ZOOTEC ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Judi M Tumewu ◽  
V V.J. Panelewen ◽  
A D.P. Mirah
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Cost Efficiency ◽  
Organic Fertilizer ◽  
Minimum Cost ◽  
Rice Paddy ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Local Resources ◽  
Integrated Farming ◽  
Business Profit

ABSTRACT ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM BETWEEN BEEF CATTLE AND RICE PADDY IN FARMERS GROUP OF KEONG MAS AT SANGKUB DISTRICT, NORTHBOLAANG MONGONDOW REGENCY (CASE STUDY). Integrated farming system of beef cattle and rice paddy is a combination of beef cattle fattening and rice paddy managed by “Keong Mas” Farmers Group. Feces and urine of beef cattle were materials to produce an organic fertilizer and paddy rice straw can be used as feed for beef cattle. The combination of fattening beef cattle and rice paddy straw has a purpose to create minimum cost and using of potential local resources. This research purpose was to evaluate the business profit and cost efficiency of “Keong Mas” integrated farming system. Research method used was study of case and observation as the information for collecting data. The result showed that profit of un-integrated fattening beef cattle were Rp. 9,780,000,- per 8 cattle  per year. Un-integrated rice paddy gave Rp. 12,745,000,- profit per ha per year. The profit of integrated fattening beef cattle was Rp. 83,457,108 per 12 cattle per year and rice paddy was Rp. 90,517,250. Cost efficiency of un-integrated farming system was only 1.16 while integrated farming system gave cost efficiency of 1.49. Therefore, it can be concluded that the integrated farming system of fattening beef cattle and rice paddy in “Keong Mas” Farmers Group was profitable and efficient. Keywords : integrated farming system, profit, cost efficiency

scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN SAPI POTONG DI KABUPATEN RAJA AMPAT BERDASARKAN KARAKTERISTIK WILAYAH DAN TERNAK

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Rajab Rajab ◽  
Mochammad S. Soltief
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
Lower Body Weight ◽  
Productivity Factor ◽  
Land Condition ◽  
Beef Cattle Production ◽  
Bali Cattle

As beef cattle, Bali cattle which rearing by the breeder in Raja Ampat regency most in the traditional extensive system. There are many factors to support beef cattle development in this region such as widely land condition with grass forage and feed concentrate as feed for cattle. The objectives of this study were to identification and analysis beef cattle development in Raja Ampat regency base on region and breed potential. Using survey method by interview to 218 of respondent and field observation were done in Sakabu, Kalobo and Waijan Village which tended as the center of beef cattle breeding. The result showed that beef cattle development reach out for 17,792.55 UT, but in productivity factor, Bali cattle in Raja Ampat was small in body weight. To increase beef cattle production and population can be done by reduced beef productive selling and by using an integrated farming system. Based on the potential of territory, the capability of beef cattle development in Raja Ampat regency can reach 17,792,55 ST, so from that number, the research location is potential to be directed to be the beef cattle development area. However, when viewed from the aspect of productivity, beef cattle are maintained have a lower body weight than other regions, indicating a decrease in performance and genetic quality. Reduction in the number of livestock sales in the population and the application of crop-livestock integration systems can be the solution.

The theoretical background for the effective development of beef raising

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1738-1749
Author(s):  
N.L. Titov ◽  
M.M. Nizamutdinov ◽  
G.S. Klychova
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Economic Efficiency ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
Cattle Industry ◽  
Effective Development ◽  
Cattle Husbandry

Subject. This article explores the theoretical basis of the economic efficiency of production and classifies the performance figures of beef cattle husbandry. Objectives. The article aims to define a system of indicators of beef cattle husbandry economic efficiency. Methods. For the study, we used a comparative analysis. Conclusions and Relevance. To assess the economic efficiency of agriculture production, it is necessary to use a set of indicators by beef cattle breeding sub-sector. The system of economic performance indicators of production needs to be transformed into a summarizing indicator. The results of the study can be applied in the theory and practice of determining the economic efficiency of the beef cattle industry.

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FAMILY FOR GENEALOGICAL STRUCTURE OF VOLYN BEEF OF CATTLE

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 82-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ye. Pochukalin
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Breeding Value ◽  
Farm Families ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
Reproductive Ability ◽  
The Family ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Related Group ◽  
Economic Use

One of the ways of increasing level of animal economically useful traits is selection work with farm families. In pedigree cattle breeding of Ukraine families are a statistical component of breed genealogy. Among the main scientific works on working with families, it should be noted minimum number of female ancestors, proposed by D. T. Vinnichuk, to determine the breeding value, different categories, classification and techniques for evaluating related groups of females. The aim of our research was to analyse importance of farm families for genealogical structure of the breed. The research was on basis of data of primary breeding records at the herd of Volyn Beef cattle of “Zorya” breeding farm, Kovel district, Volyn region. Akula 102, Galka 37 and Galka 1537 families belonging to Krasavchyk 3004 bloodline, Smorodyna 613, Korona 2382 and Visla 1016 families – Tsebryk 3888 bloodline, Kalyna 212, Verba 1536 and Garna 536 families – Yamb 3066 bloodlines, Kazka 433, Galka 421 and Bystra 1124 families – Buinyi 3042 bloodline, Rozetka 1313, Arfa 599 and Bulana 943 families – Sonnyi-Kaktus 3307-9828 bloodline, and Palma 275, Desna 870 and Veselka 444 families – Mudryi 9100 bloodline were characterized. Belonging to a bloodline was determined by the father's side of female ancestors. Structural units of families: branches, branching with identifying the best individuals on breeding traits were submitted to identify the best combinations and successful use of closely related breeding. Comparing assessment of related groups of females on the main breeding traits belonging to Krasavchyk 3004 bloodline, it was noted that the cows of Akula 102 family predominated in live weight at 5 years’ age, milk ability and economic use duration, whereas the cows of Galka 1537 family – on traits of reproductive ability. Smorodyna 613 family of Tsebryk 3888 bloodline had high duration of economic use and cows’ live weight at 5 years’ age compared with Korana 2382 and Visla 1016 families with equal values of the exterior traits (height measures) and coefficient of reproductive ability. The families of Mudryi 9100 bloodline in terms of reproduction (calving interval, coefficient of reproductive ability) had the highest figures of cows’ milk ability and live weight. The cows of Bulana 943 family had a considerable predominance over representatives of Rozetka 1313 and Arfa 599 families of Sonnyi-Kaktus 3307-9828 bloodline by main economically useful traits. High indices of reproductive ability were noted in these families. Heifers of the families of Buinyi 3042 bloodline had high live weight at 18 months’ age at average values of milk ability and cows’ live weight at 5 years’ age. More equal figures of growth rate, exterior and economic use duration were observed in the cows of Kalyna 212, Verba 1536 and Garna 536 families of Yamb 3066 bloodline. Breeding by families in beef cattle breeding is an important element of selection, because it allows to evaluate not only related group of female ancestor, but also to analyse a successful combination with lines and purposeful use of closely related breeding by the best representatives of a breed.

INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING WITH STATE SUPPORT

2018 ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alikhan Yakovlevich Kibirov ◽  
Nadezhda Valerevna Litvina
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
State Support ◽  
Cattle Breeding

СОСТОЯНИЕ МЯСНОГО СКОТОВОДСТВА В РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ: реалии и перспективы

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.M. DUNIN ◽  
S.E. TYAPUGIN ◽  
R.K. MESHCHEROV ◽  
V.P. HODYKOV ◽  
V.K. ADZHIBEKOV ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Comprehensive Assessment ◽  
Sales Volume ◽  
Cattle Breeding ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Further Development

Рассмотрены состояние и перспективы развития мясного скотоводства в Российской Федерации. Проведен мониторинг численности поголовья, породного состава и продуктивности мясного крупного рогатого скота во всех категориях хозяйств, изучены масштабы и объемы бонитировки скота за 20102018 годы. По данным Минсельхоза России, в 2018 году поголовье крупного рогатого скота в стране составило более 18 млн голов, в том числе численность животных специализированных мясных пород во всех категориях хозяйств достигла 2,26 млн голов. Комплексная оценка 711,16 тыс. голов, или 34,1 от общей численности мясного скота, в том числе 389,8 тыс. коров, принадлежащих к 15 породам и типам, разводимым в 57 регионах Российской Федерации показала, что наибольшее подконтрольное поголовье имеют абердин ангусская порода (417545 гол.), калмыцкая (137262 гол.), герефордская (87278 гол.) и казахская белоголовая породы (52563 гол.). Все подконтрольное поголовье животных является чистопородным и IV поколения, в том числе 99,7 быков-производителей и 99,3 коров. Анализ живой массы пробонитированного поголовья выявил тенденцию к ее повышению у коров всех возрастов в среднем на 54 кг, быков производителей на 39 кг, или на 16,7 и 5,2 за последние 9 лет, соответственно. Живая масса коров по итогам 2018 года в среднем составила 546 кг, быков-производителей 791 кг. По состоянию на 1.01.2019 года, племенная база мясного скотоводства страны представлена 270 племенными стадами, в том числе 46 племенными заводами и 224 племенными репродукторами. В 2018 году в различные категории хозяйств из племенных предприятий было продано 35517 голов племенного молодняка, в том числе 6388 ремонтных бычка с классами элита и элита-рекорд (85,3). В 2018 году было продано племенного молодняка в расчете на 100 коров галловейской породы 33,0 головы, казахской белоголовой 29,1 герефордской 28,0 калмыцкой 22,2 лимузинской 15,5 абердин ангусской 8,8 русской комолой 8,2 и симментальской мясной 4,7 голов. На основании мониторинга состояния мясного скотоводства страны за 20102018 годы были намечены перспективы дальнейшего развития.The article considers the state and prospects of development of beef cattle breeding in the Russian Federation. The number of livestock, breed composition and productivity of beef cattle in all categories of farms was monitored, the scale and volumes of bonding of cattle for the studied 9-year period (20102018) were studied. According to the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia, in 2018 the number of cattle in the country amounted to more than 18 million heads, including the number of cattle of specialized meat breeds in all categories of farms reached 2.26 million heads. A comprehensive assessment of the number of livestock in the amount of 711.16 thousand animals or 34.1 of the total number of beef cattle, including: cows 389.8 thousand heads belonging to 15 breeds and types bred in 57 regions of the Russian Federation, showed that the largest controlled livestock are: Aberdeen Angus breed 417545 animals, Kalmyk 1372726 animals, Hereford 87278 animals and Kazakh white-headed breed 52563 animals. Almost all of the controlled livestock of animals is purebred and IV generation, including: respectively 99.7 of bulls producers and 99.3 of cows. The analysis of live mass of a livestock revealed a tendency to its increase at cows of all age on average on 54 kg, bulls on 39 kgor for 16.7 and 5.2 for the last 9 years respectively. The live mass of cows following the results of 2018 averaged 546 kg, bulls 791 kg. As of January 1, 2019, the breeding base of beef cattle breeding in the country is represented by 270 breeding herds, including: 46 breeding plants and 224 breeding reproducers. In 2018, 35,517 heads of pedigree young animals were sold to various categories of farms from pedigree enterprises, including 6,388 repair bulls with elite classes and an elite record record for appraisal (85.3). An analysis of the sales volume of pedigree young animals in the context of farmed meat breeds showed that in 2018 pedigree young animals per 100 cows were sold in the country: Galloveian breed 33.0 goals, Kazakh white-headed 29.1 goals, Hereford 28, 0 goals., Kalmyk 22.2 goals., Limousin 15.5 goals., Aberdeen Angus 8.8 goals, Russian kolola 8.2 and Simmental meat 4.7 goals. Based on the monitoring of the state of beef cattle breeding in the country for the study period (20102018), prospects for further development were outlined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document