scholarly journals KEMANDIRIAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Agus Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
State System ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Corruption Case ◽  
Constitutional System

<p align="center"><strong><em>A</em></strong><strong><em>b</em></strong><strong><em>s</em></strong><strong><em>t</em></strong><strong><em>r</em></strong><strong><em>a</em></strong><strong><em>c</em></strong><strong><em>t</em></strong></p><p><em>P</em><em>urpose of this study is to find out the independence of the judiciary of corruption in the state system in Indonesia. The method used is a normative legal research methods (legal research), with the approach of the statute .Data sourced from legislation, library materials, and interviews. Qualitative data was analyzed in such a way and set out in writing a descriptive analysis. The results of this study illustrate that the independence of the corruption judiciary is determined from the independence of its institutions, the courts, and the judges. The intervention against corruption court decision is not aimed at her agency or the judicial process, but addressed to the judge overseeing the corruption case, in the form of feedback, criticism and even censure which was published in a newspaper that has led to contempt of court.</em></p><p><strong><em>Key words: </em></strong><em>Independence </em><em>of corruption court, and constitutional system.</em></p><p align="center"><strong>A</strong><strong>b</strong><strong>s</strong><strong>t</strong><strong>ra</strong><strong>k</strong></p><p>Tujuan Penelitian ini ialah untuk mengetahui kemandirian pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di  Indonesia.  Metode yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif (<em>legal research</em>), dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (<em>Statute approach</em>) .. Data yang  bersumber dari perundang-undangan, bahan pustaka, dan hasil wawancara. Data kualitatif kemudian dianalisis sedemikian rupa dan dituangkan dalam bentuk tulisan secara diskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian ini memberi gambaran bahwa bentuk kemandirian pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi ditentukan dari kemandirian lembaganya, proses peradilannya, dan hakimnya. Adanya intervensi terhadap putusan pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi bukan ditujukan terhadap lembaganya atau proses peradilannya, tetapi ditujukan kepada hakim yang menangani perkara korupsi, berupa tanggapan, kritik dan bahkan celaan yang dimuat dalam berita surat kabar yang sudah mengarah pada <em>contempt of court</em>.</p><p><strong>Kata kunci: </strong>Kemandirian Pengadilan Tipikor, dan sistem ketatanegaraan.</p>

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum terhadap Penggunaan Air Bawah Tanah tanpa Izin

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-186
Author(s):  
I Gusti Agung Gede Catra Artawan ◽  
I Nyoman Budiartha ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Underground Water ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Groundwater Exploitation ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences

Underground water is water that is contained in a layer of soil or rock below the soil surface. This study aims to determine the government's authority in regulating groundwater permits and what are the legal consequences of violating unlicensed groundwater use. The research was conducted using empirical legal research methods, source of the data which was used are primary and secondary sources of legal materials, methods of collecting legal materials using documentation studies and field research, and analyzing legal materials using descriptive analysis methods. The results of this study indicate that the Government's authority in permitting groundwater is regulated in the Bali Governor Regulation Number 5 of 2016 concerning Groundwater Permits, particularly in Article 3 paragraph (1), it is explained that the Governor has the authority to manage groundwater in CAT in the province. In Article 3 paragraph (2), the authority of the Government (Governor) is reaffirmed, including several things, namely: granting permits for groundwater drilling; give permission to extract groundwater; grant permits for the use of groundwater; granting permits for groundwater exploitation; grant permits to groundwater drilling companies; provide guidance, supervise technical investigations and use of Groundwater. As a result of violations of the use of groundwater by violating the parties in accordance with Article 15 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 of 1974 concerning Irrigation, it is stated that anyone who deliberately runs water and / or water sources business without permission from the Government is punishable by imprisonment. 2 (two) years and or a maximum fine of Rp. 5,000,000 (five million rupiah).

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 11-017/PUU-I/2003 TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK DIPILIH

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Ketut Ngastawa
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Body ◽  
State System ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Right

Paper that had the title: "Juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the Legal Protection for the Rights to be Eelected." This explores two issues: 1) how the legal protection of the settings selected in the state system of Indonesia ; 2) what are juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected. To solve both problems, this paper uses normative legal research methods. Approach being used is the statute approach, case approach, and a conceptual approach. Further legal materials collected were identified and analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. Legal protection for the right to be elected in the state system of Indonesia can be traced from the 1945 opening, the articles in the body of the 1945 Constitution, Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D (1) and paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (3) 1945 Second Amendment, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1998, Article 43 of Law Number 39 of 1999, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 25 of the International Covenant  on Civil and Political Rights. Discussion of the juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected have been included: a) only on the juridical implications of representative institutions no longer marked with specified requirements as stipulated in Article 60 letter g of Law Number 12 Year 2003 in Law Number 10 Year 2008; b) juridical implications of the political field for the right to be elected is the absence of any discriminatory treatment in legislative product formed by the House of Representatives and the President as well as products of other legislation forward.

scholarly journals INFRA PETITA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG MENEROBOS KETENTUAN PEMIDANAAN MINIMUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Anshar Anshar ◽  
Suwito Suwito
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Corruption Case

ABSTRAKPenanganan perkara tindak pidana korupsi menganut sistem pemidanaan minimum bagi pelaku yang diputus bersalah oleh pengadilan. Istilah ketentuan pidana minimum khusus secara normatif diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999, sebagaimana telah diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada tataran praktiknya terdapat fenomena adanya putusan pengadilan yang menerobos sistem pemidanaan minimum yang dianut tersebut. Salah satu contoh putusan pengadilan yang ditelaah dalam tulisan ini adalah Putusan Nomor 2399 K/PID.SUS/2010. Permasalahan yang timbul adalah apa saja yang menjadi landasan infra petita hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan yang menerobos ketentuan pemidanaan minimum dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi tersebut. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Penulis berkesimpulan bahwa putusan pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi yang menerobos ketentuan pemidanaan minimum dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada dasarnya diperbolehkan. Sepanjang putusan hakim yang infra petita tersebut memiliki esensi ratio legis yang kuat dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan, atas dasar alasan pertimbangan nilai keadilan dan pertimbangan judex factie sebagaimana pada perkara a quo.Kata kunci: putusan, korupsi, pemidanaan minimum. ABSTRACT In the handling of a corruption case, mandatory minimum penalty is adopted in the criminal justice system for the offender who was found guilty by the court. The term ‘mandatory minimum penalty’ is normatively regulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999, as amended to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Eradication. In practice there is a phenomenon of a court decision breaching the adopted mandatory minimum penalty. One example of a court decision analyzed hereon is the Decision Number 2399 K/PID.SUS/2010. The arising problem is what the consideration of the judge is for infra petita in imposing decision which breached the mandatory minimum penalty provision in that corruption case. This research uses normative legal research method with legislation approach. It can be concluded that it is basically permissible in the corruption court’s decision to breach the minimum penalty provisions as stipulated in the Corruption Eradication Law. Provided that the judge’s decision of infra petita, is based on strong legislation ratio and can be accounted for, on the basis of justice value and judex factie considerations as in the a quo case. Keywords: court decision, corruption, minimum penalty.

scholarly journals PEMBEBANAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PERDATA KEPADA KEPALA DAERAH AKIBAT WANPRESTASI OLEH KEPALA DINAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Bachtiar Bachtiar ◽  
Tono Sumarna
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
State Administration

ABSTRAKWanprestasi dalam perjanjian konstruksi kerap ditemui dalam praktik, baik yang dilakukan oleh pemberi pekerjaan, maupun pihak pelaksana pekerjaan. Konsekuensinya, pihak yang melakukan wanprestasi dibebankan memulihkan kerugian yang timbul dari pelaksanaan perjanjian. Hal demikian tercermin dalam Putusan Nomor 72/PDT.G/2014/PN.TGR, di mana Kepala Dinas Kesehatan Kota Tangerang Selatan selaku pihak pemberi pekerjaan proyek terbukti melakukan wanprestasi. Menarik untuk dicermati, majelis hakim dalam putusannya justru membebankan Walikota Tangerang Selatan untuk bertanggung jawab secara keperdataan. Isu hukum yang hendak dijawab dalam tulisan ini, terkait apakah penafsiran hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 72/PDT.G/2014/PN.TNG tentang pembebanan tanggung jawab perdata kepada kepala daerah akibat wanprestasi yang dilakukan oleh kepala dinas telah sesuai dengan ajaran hukum administrasi negara, dan ajaran hukum perdata. Untuk menjawab isu hukum tersebut, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan bersandar pada data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim telah keliru dalam menafsirkan konsep pertanggungjawaban kepala daerah. Menurut ajaran hukum administrasi negara, walikota selaku kepala daerah tidak dapat dimintai tanggung jawab secara perdata akibat wanprestasi yang dilakukan kepala dinas. Demikian pula dari perspektif Pasal 1340 KUHPerdata, walikota bukanlah merupakan pihak dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian yang dibuat oleh kepala dinas, sehingga tidak dapat dibebani tanggung jawab secara keperdataan.Kata kunci: tanggung jawab perdata, kepala daerah, wanprestasi. ABSTRACT Breach of contract in construction agreements is often found in practice, whether carried out by the employer, or the implementing party. As a consequence, the defaulting party is charged to recover losses arising from the implementation of the agreement. This was reflected in Court Decision Number 72/PDT.G/2014/ PN.TGR, which is the Head of South Tangerang City Health Office, as the project employer, has been proven in breach of contract. It is interesting to note that the panel of judges in its decision actually charged the Mayor of South Tangerang with a contractual liability. The legal issue in this paper is whether the interpretation of judges in Court Decision Number 72/PDT.G/2014/ PN.TNG concerning the imposition of civil liability to the regional head due to default committed by the head  of office is in accordance with the teachings of the law of state administration and civil law. To answer these issues, the author uses normative legal research methods based on secondary data obtained through literature studies. The results of the analysis show that the panel of judges has erred in interpreting the concept of regional head accountability. According to the teachings of the state administration law, the mayor as the head of the region cannot be privately liable for the default committed by the head of office. Likewise, from the perspective of Article 1340 of the Civil Code, the mayor is not a party to the implementation of the agreement made by the head of office, therefore civil liability cannot be burdened to him. Keywords: civil liability, regional head, default.

scholarly journals INTERNAL CONTROL FOR MANAGING INFORMATION USING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Case Study Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Kab. Madiun)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suryo Setiyo Kardono
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Maturity Level ◽  
Data Collecting

This  research  trying  to  develop  a  model  for  managing  information  using information  technology  that  can  be  used  to  create  regulation  of  monitor  and evaluate internal control in information technology using tools COBIT versi 4.1. Research  methods  that  use  in  this  thesis  research  is  Mixed  Methods  with  approaching of Sequential Transformative Strategy. There is difference in the stage of data collecting that qualitative data and quantitative data was collect together  in  the  same  time.  Qualitative  data  are  the  documents  relate  to  the regulation of information technology in Dinas Komunikasi Infomatika Kabupaten Madiun. Quantitative data are collected from questioner survey I (management awareness), questioner survey II (maturity level), and internal control questioner survey. Key  words:  Mixed  Methods,  COBIT  Framework  4.1,  Managing  Information,  InternalControl, Information Technology

scholarly journals Legal Research- Descriptive Analysis on Doctrinal Methodology

2019 ◽  
pp. 95-103
Author(s):  
Pradeep M.D.
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Social System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
The Social ◽  
Legal Mechanism ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Stock Of Knowledge

Human beings possess instinct of inquisitiveness in cases of confronting with the unknown aspects of life which probe to attain greater understanding on such uncertainty. This inquisitiveness is the method which man employs for obtaining knowledge is termed as research. It is the art of scientific enquiry into new facts conducted in any branch of knowledge. Generally, Research is the movement from the known towards the unknown to be called as the voyage of discovery. It originally contributes to the existing stock of knowledge facilitating its advancement. Truth is pursued with the help of study, observation, comparison and experiment. Systematic study of the law through doctrinal and non-doctrinal research methods considers to be the socio-legal studies aiming to analyze the impact of legal mechanism on the social system. This paper introduces into the fundamentals of legal research, socio-legal studies, conceptual framework on doctrinal research, steps of doctrinal studies, limitations and differences between doctrinal and non-doctrinal legal research methods.

scholarly journals Indonesia's Selective Policy Against Illegal Immigrants In The Framework Of Asean Cooperation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105
Author(s):  
Respati Triana Putri ◽  
Nanda Bayu Pamungkas
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Transnational Crime ◽  
Illegal Immigrants ◽  
Standard Of Living ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Asean Countries

The chaos that has occurred in several countries has resulted in population displacement aimed at finding new safe and conducive places to live. For example, this chaos is like war, bloody conflict, genocide, and so on. So that many people from conflict countries migrate to other countries to achieve a better standard of living. However, sometimes they do the migration without following the procedure or they are called illegal immigrants. Indonesia is one of the developing countries and transit countries where the geographical condition of Indonesia which is in the form of an archipelago makes access to and out of the country more freely and open. With this, the potential for transnational (transnational) crime increases. The potential of the Indonesian state in the occurrence of transnational crimes is an interesting matter to discuss. In this paper, the authors use normative legal research methods with qualitative data collection juxtaposed with descriptive analysis techniques so that the existing problems regarding transnational crimes can be presented comprehensively and informatively. So to deal with this problem, countries in ASEAN are demanded to be able to play an active role in taking preventive steps to prevent and minimize transnational crime in ASEAN countries and Indonesia.

scholarly journals TIDAK DINAMIS NAMUN TERJADI DINAMIKA DALAM HAL UJI KONSTITUSIONAL NORMA ZINA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Iskandar Muda
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Qualitative Data Analysis ◽  
Constitutional Review ◽  
New Ideas

ABSTRAKPutusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUUXIV/2016 menyatakan "menolak perrmohonan para pemohon seluruhnya" pada uji konstitusional pasal-pasal KUHP terkait norma zina yang diajukan para pemohon, yang pada intinya berkeinginan adanya "pembaruan" norma tentang perzinaan. Putusan a quo tidak juga disepakati secara bulat, ada empat hakim konstitusi yang mempunyai pendapat berbeda. Artinya pula putusan a quo dapat dimakna tidak dinamis namun ada dinamikanya. Untuk itu penulis perlu mengkaji bagaimanakah makna pemahaman tidak dinamis namun ada dinamikanya dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016 terkait uji konstitusional pasal-pasal dalam KUHP terkait norma zina. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, sedangkan analisis data dilakukan secara normatif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa makna pemahaman putusan a quo tidak dinamis karena tidak menghasilkan ide baru. Sedangkan makna pemahaman ada dinamikanya adalah sebagaimana adanya empat hakim konstitusi yang mempunyai pendapat berbeda dan pendapat berbeda tersebut sejalan pula dengan sebagian besar permohonan para pemohon terkait adanya permohonan "pembaruan" norma zina, akan tetapi ketika "masuk" ke ranah pemidanaannya tidak sependapat.Kata kunci: makna tidak dinamis, dinamika, norma zina. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUUXIV/2016 rejecting the request of the petitioners in its entirety, in a constitutional review of the articles of Criminal Code regarding adultery norms filed by the petitioners, which essentially wish for "renewal" of the norms. Decision a quo was also not agreed upon unanimously considering that there were four constitutional justices having different opinions. It can be said that decision a quo is undynamic, although it still has dynamics within. Therefore, it needs to be elaborated on what is meant by undynamic but there is a dynamics in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUUXIV/2016 related to the constitutional review of articles in the Criminal Code regarding adultery norms. This is a normative legal research done through normative qualitative data analysis. The results show that the sense of undynamic decision quo is understood for it does not generate new ideas. While what is meant by occuring dynamics is that there are four constitutional court justices having different opinions, which is consistent with the petitioners in major terms related to the request for "renewal" of adultery norms, but dissent when it comes to penalizing.Keywords: undynamic meaning, dynamics, adultery norms.

scholarly journals PENGAWASAN NOTARIS OLEH MAJELIS PENGAWAS NOTARIS DAERAH PASCA PUTUSAN M.K.NO. 49/PUU-X/2012

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 783
Author(s):  
Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra ◽  
Sagung Putri M.E Purwani
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Force

Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) No 30 Tahun 2014, pengawasan notaris dilakukan oleh Menteri, dan kata pengawasan di dalamnya termasuk juga mengenai pembinaan. Untuk melaksanakan tugas dimaksud oleh menteri, dalam hal ini Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dibentuk Majelis  Pengawas Notaris, yaitu suatu badan yang mempunyai kewenangan dan kewajiban untuk melakukan pengawasan dan pembinaan terhadap notaris. Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN menentukan: Untuk kepentingan proses peradilan, penyidik, penuntut umum, mengambil fotokopi minuta akta dan/atau surat-surat yang dilekatkan dalam minuta akta atau protokol notaris, serta pemanggilan notaris untuk hadir dalam  pemeriksaan berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya, atau protokol notaris, dengan persetujuan MPD. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam putusan nya Nomor 49/PUU-X/2012,  menyatakan frase “dengan persetujuan Majelis Pengawas Daerah” pada Pasal 66 UUJN, adalah bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum. Permasalahan yuridis nya adalah: Apa saja wewenang MPD pasca putusan MK No. 49/PUU-X/2012 ? dan Bagaimana mekanisme pemeriksaan notaris oleh MPD? Dengan jenis penelitian hukum normatif permasalahan tersebut terjawab, bahwa Tugas dan wewenang  MPD pasca Putusan MK. No. 49/PUU-X/2012 hanya untuk melakukan pemeriksaan berkala dan/atau jika dipandang perlu, serta melakukan pemeriksaan notaris jika ada pengaduan dari masyarakat. Tugas dan kewenangan notaris sebagaimana Pasal 66 UUJN, berdasarkan No. 2 Tahun 2014 sebagai UU Perubahan atas UUJN dilakukan oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris. Mengenai mekanisme pemeriksaan Notaris harus dilakukan sesuai dengan UUJN Nomor 30 Tahun 2004, UU Per UUJN No 2 Tahun 2014, Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia  Republik Indonesia Nomor M.02.PR.08.10 Tahun 2004 Tentang Tata Cara Pengangkatan Anggota, Pemberhentian Anggota, Susunan Organisasi, Tata Kerja, Dan Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Notaris; dan Keputusan Menteri  Hukum  Dan Hak Asasi Manusia  Republik Indonesia No. M.39-PW.07.10 Tahun 2004 Tentang  Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Majelis Pengawas  Notaris. The Law on Position of Notary (UUJN) No 30 Year 2014, the supervision of a notary is conducted by the Minister, and the supervisory word in it also includes the guidance. To carry out the duties referred to by the minister, in this case the Minister of Justice and Human Rights established the Supervisory Board of Notary, which is an agency having the authority and obligation to conduct supervision and guidance on the notary. Article 66 Paragraph (1) UUJN determines: For the purposes of the judicial process, investigators, prosecutors, taking photocopies of minas deeds and / or letters embedded in minority deed or notary protocols, and notarial notes to be present in the examination relating to the deeds they make , Or notary protocol, with the approval of the MPD. The Constitutional Court in its decision No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012 states that the phrase "with the approval of the Regional Supervisory Board" in Article 66 UUJN, is contradictory to the 1945 Constitution and has no legal force. The juridical issue is: What are the powers of the MPD after the Constitutional Court's decision No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012? And What is the mechanism of notary examination by MPD? With this type of normative legal research the problem is answered, that the task and authority of the MPD after the Constitutional Court Decision. No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012 only to conduct periodic and / or deemed necessary inspections and to conduct a notary examination if there is a complaint from the public. Duties and authorities of a notary as referred to in Article 66 UUJN, based on No. 2 of 2014 as Law on Amendment of UUJN is conducted by the Honorary Board of Notary. Regarding the mechanism of inspection of a Notary must be done in accordance with UUJN Number 30 Year 2004, UU Per UUJN No 2 Year 2014, Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.02.PR.08.10 Year 2004 About Procedures for Member Appointment, Dismissal of Members, Organizational Structure, Work Procedures, and Procedure of Notary Inspection; And Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. M.39-PW.07.10 of 2004 on Guidelines for the Implementation of Duties of the Notary Supervisory Board.

scholarly journals Analisis Tentang Wewenang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Sebagai Penegak Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-212
Author(s):  
Yunan Andika Putra ◽  
Lauddin Marsuni ◽  
Abd Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Research Initiatives

Penelitian betujuan mengetahui penegakan hukum persaingan usaha yang dilakukan oleh KPPU di Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa : (1) Kewenangan Penyelidikan yang dimiliki oleh KPPU adalah atribusi melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dan telah dikuatkan melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/PUU-XIV/2016, yang dalam pelaksanaanya, Komisi memberikan mandat Penyelidikan kepada Investigator Pemeriksaan untuk mendapatkan alat bukti yang cukup, tetapi hambatannya KPPU tidak mempunyai upaya paksa seperti penggeledahan dan penyitaan untuk mendapatkan dokumen/surat yang dapat menjadi alat bukti; (2) Hukum persaingan usaha dapat berjalan dikarenakan telah memuat norma primer yang bersifat larangan dan norma sekunder tentang tata cara penanganan perkara yang dilakukan melalui empat tahapan, yaitu pertama, klarifikasi terhadap laporan atau penelitian inisiatif, kedua, penyelidikan untuk mendapatkan alat bukti yang cukup, ketiga, pemeriksaan Majelis Komisi untuk membuktikan dugaan pelanggaran, dan keempat, penjatuhan Putusan Komisi. The research aims to find out the enforcement of business competition law conducted by KPPU in Indonesia. The research method uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that: (1) The Investigative Authority possessed by KPPU is attribution through Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and has been strengthened through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85 / PUU-XIV / 2016, which in its implementation, the Commission mandates Investigation to Investigate Investigators to obtain sufficient evidence, but the obstacle is that KPPU does not have compelled efforts such as searches and confiscation to obtain documents / letters that can serve as evidence; (2) The law of business competition can run because it contains primary norms that are prohibited and secondary norms concerning the procedures for handling cases which are carried out in four stages, namely first, clarification of reports or research initiatives, second, investigations to obtain sufficient evidence, third, examination of the Commission Council to prove the alleged violation, and fourth, the imposition of the Commission's Decision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document