scholarly journals Pancasila and Islamic Education: The Deradicalization Model of Madrasahs Based on Islamic Boarding Schools in Central Java

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
I. Ihsan ◽  
Ahmad Fatah

<p>The purpose of this study is to review the deradicalization strategy in religion through strengthening the understanding of Pancasila in the context of Islamic Education at Islamic boarding madrasahs in Central Java. This study involved <em>Madrasah-Pesantren</em>/Madrasahs-Islamic Boarding schools (MP) in the North Coast (Pantura) Region of Central Java, including Madrasah Aliyah (MA) al-Wathoniyah Semarang, MA Qudsiyyah Kudus, MA al-Hidayah Kudus, MA al-Hidayat Lasem Rembang, and MA al-Anwar Sarang Rembang. By employing a qualitative approach through interview and observation data collection methods, this study revealed that the government of the Republic of Indonesia's religious deradicalization program requires support from Islamic boarding schools. One of them is the conceptual support that makes the program effective, referring to deradicalization through Islamic Education (PAI). This deradicalization process is carried out through strengthening Pancasila values integrated through PAI. It is based on the style of radicalism, especially among Muslims who question the national principle's validity of Pancasila in the name of Islam. Pancasila is considered a secular ideology and even <em>kafir</em> because it did not depart from God's revelation. Indeed, this judgment is baseless because the first principle is Belief in the Almighty God, reflecting the value of <em>tawhid</em>. With the existence of <em>tawhid</em> in Pancasila, this national principle is religious in nature, even comprising <em>tawhid</em>. This religious dimension introduction is carried out through Islamic Education in <em>Madrasah-Pesantren</em> (MP) to protect students (santri) and students from the radicalism virus.</p>

1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Cobban

By the beginning of the twentieth century, Semarang was a major port city and administrative centre on Java. Attainment of this position was due partly to the expansion of its hinterland during the nineteenth century. This expansion was closely related to developments in the means of transportation and the consequent ability of plantation owners to bring the products of their plantations to the port for shipment to foreign markets. By the end of the century virtually the whole economic life of central Java focused upon Semarang. The city also exercised administrative functions in the Dutch colonial administration and generally had been responsible for Dutch interests in the middle and eastern parts of the island. The importance of Semarang as an administrative centre increased after 1906. In that year the government incorporated the city as an urban municipality (stadsgemeente). In 1914 it had consular representation from the United States, Belgium, Denmark, France, Great Britain, Italy, Norway, Germany, and Thailand. Subsequently, in 1926 it became the capital of the Province of Central Java under the terms of an administrative reform fostered by the colonial government at Batavia. Status as an urban municipality meant that local officials sitting on a city council would govern the domestic affairs of the city. The members of the city council at first were appointed from Batavia, subsequently some of them were elected by residents of the city. By the beginning of the twentieth century Semarang had enhanced its position as a major port on the north coast of the island of Java. It was one of the foremost cities of the Dutch East Indies, along with Batavia and Surabaya, a leading port and a centre of administration and trade. This article outlines the growth of the port of Semarang during the nineteenth century and discusses some of the conflict related to this growth over living conditions in parts of the city during the twentieth century, a conflict which smouldered for several decades among the government, members of the city council, and the non-European residents of the city, one which remained unresolved at the end of the colonial era.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Armen Zulham

hidup nelayan. Salah satu indikator untuk menilai peningkatan taraf hidup nelayan akibat dari subsidi adalah surplus produsen dan total benefit dari eksploitasi potensi ikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan quaterly data 1998 - 2002, pada delapan lokasi pendaratan ikan di Pantura Jawa Tengah. Penelitian ini menghitung surplus produsen berdasarkan: baseline (tanpa subsidi) dan subsidi. Perhitungan surplus produsen dilakukan dengan program Maple dengan memasukkan koefisien yang diperoleh dari pendekatan regresi. Secara umum hasil analisis tersebut menunjukkan subsidi perikanan akan mendorong peningkatan surplus produsen. Pengaruh subsidi perikanan yang meningkatkan surplus produsen dalam jumlah yang relatif tinggi terjadi pada daerah Kabupaten Brebes, Kota Tegal, Kabupaten Tegal, Kabupaten Pemalang, dan Kota Pekalongan. Sementara pengaruh subsidi perikanan terhadap peningkatan surplus produsen di Kabupaten Batang, Kabupaten Pekalongan dan Kabupaten Kendal dapat dikatakan relatif kecil. Peningkatan surplus produsen belum tentu meningkatkan total benefit, hal ini terjadi jika surplus produsen baseline lebih besar dari surplus produsen subsidi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan bahwa pemberian subsidi pada perikanan tangkap perlu lebih teliti dan terarah agartujuan alokasi subsidi tersebut dapat lebih efektif. Tittle: Impact Of Subsidy On Producer Surplus And Total Benefit In The North Coast of the Central Java FisherySubsidy is a fiscal policy; fisheries subsidy proposed by the government intended to support the the standart of living for fishing community. Producer surplus and total benefit could be used as indicators to measured the impact of subsidy on the fishery. The quaterly data from 1998 - 2000 from 8 fish landing centers in Northcoast of Central Java were used in the analysis. The producer surpluses were calculated for baseline and subsidy. The Maple software was used to calculate producer surpluses. In general fisheries subsidy lead to increase producer surplus. A relatively high impact of fisheries subsidy on producer surplus was indicated by Kabupaten Brebes, Kota Tegal, Kabupaten Tegal, Kabupaten Pemalang, and Kota Pekalongan. Meanwhile, the increasing of producer surplus in Kabupaten Batang, Kabupaten Pekalongan and Kabupaten Kendal was indicating relatively low. The increasing value of producer surplus is not necessary follow by the increasing value of the total benefit, particularly when the baseline's producer surplus is greater than subsidy's producer surplus. This research recommends that the fisheries subsidies should be allocated properly to the fishery in order to ensure the effectiveness of the policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Benny Osta Nababan, S.Pi, M.Si ◽  
Tridoyo Kusumastanto ◽  
Luky Adrianto ◽  
Achmad Fahrudi

Arad termasuk dalam kelompok alat penangkapan ikan yang dilarang berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia Nomor. 2/Permen-Kp/2015 tentang larangan penggunaan alat penangkapan ikan pukat hela (trawls) dan pukat tarik (seine nets) di wilayah pengelolaan perikanan negara Republik Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara ekonomi alat penangkapan ikan arad dengan yang dikombinasikan dengan alat penangkapan ikan lainnya di Pantai Utara Jawa Tengah. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan melalui wawancara kepada nelayan arad yang menggunakan kapal berukuran kurang dari 10 GT dengan menggunakan panduan wawancara serta pengamatan lapangan. Pengumpulan data sekunder dilakukan ke instansi pemerintah seperti Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Jawa Tengah dan BPS. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis kelayakan usaha. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sebagian nelayan arad memiliki alat penangkap ikan lain seperti sudu, gillnet dan trammel net. Penggunaan alat penangkapan ikan berdasarkan musim ikan, seperti musim cumi, teri, kakap, belanak, kembung dan lainnya. Penelitian ini mengelompokkan nelayan berdasarkan jumlah alat penangkapan ikan yang dimiliki yaitu satu alat penangkapan ikan (arad), dua alat penangkapan ikan (arad dan sudu), tiga alat penangkapan ikan (arad, trammel net dan gillnet). Nelayan yang memiliki alat penangkapan ikan tambahan selain arad memperoleh keuntungan yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan hanya memiliki satu alat penangkapan ikan (arad). Kombinasi alat penangkapan ikan yang ramah lingkungan menggunakan 3 alat penangkapan ikan yaitu arad, gillnet dan trammel net sesuai musim ikan memberikan manfaat ekonomi yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan penggunaan arad sepanjang tahun.Title: An Economic Analysis of ‘Arad’ Fishing Gear In the North Coast of Central Java Province Arad is an abandoned fishing gear based on the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 / Permen-Kp / 2015 concerning the prohibition on the use of trawls and seine nets in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia fisheries management. This study aimed at economic analysis of Arad capture fisheries (1 tool) compared with the capture using combination of Arad and other fishing equipment on the North Coast of Central Java. The study used primary and secondary data that were collected in the North Coast of Central Java. Primary data were collected through interviews and observation with Arad fishers working on boat under 10 GT. Secondarydata were collected from government agencies such as Marine and Fisheries Agency of Central Java and Statistics Indonesia. The results showed that some of the Arad fishers had other fishing gear such as blade, gillnet and trammel net. The use of fishing gear depended on fish season, such as squid, anchovies, snapper, mullet, bloating and others. This study classified fishers based on the number of fishing gear that fisher's had, namely, one fishing gear (arad), two fishing gear (arad and blade), three fishing gear (arad, trammel net and gillnet). Fishers having additional fishing gear get higher profits compared to those having only one fishing gear (ARAD). The use of 3 fishing gear namely arad, gillnet and trammel net according to fish season provides higher economic benefits compared to Arad only throughout the year.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Benny Osta Nababan, S.Pi, M.Si ◽  
Tridoyo Kusumastanto ◽  
Luky Adrianto ◽  
Achmad Fahrudi

Arad termasuk dalam kelompok alat penangkapan ikan yang dilarang berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia Nomor. 2/Permen-Kp/2015 tentang larangan penggunaan alat penangkapan ikan pukat hela (trawls) dan pukat tarik (seine nets) di wilayah pengelolaan perikanan negara Republik Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara ekonomi alat penangkapan ikan arad dengan yang dikombinasikan dengan alat penangkapan ikan lainnya di Pantai Utara Jawa Tengah. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan melalui wawancara kepada nelayan arad yang menggunakan kapal berukuran kurang dari 10 GT dengan menggunakan panduan wawancara serta pengamatan lapangan. Pengumpulan data sekunder dilakukan ke instansi pemerintah seperti Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Jawa Tengah dan BPS. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis kelayakan usaha. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sebagian nelayan arad memiliki alat penangkap ikan lain seperti sudu, gillnet dan trammel net. Penggunaan alat penangkapan ikan berdasarkan musim ikan, seperti musim cumi, teri, kakap, belanak, kembung dan lainnya. Penelitian ini mengelompokkan nelayan berdasarkan jumlah alat penangkapan ikan yang dimiliki yaitu satu alat penangkapan ikan (arad), dua alat penangkapan ikan (arad dan sudu), tiga alat penangkapan ikan (arad, trammel net dan gillnet). Nelayan yang memiliki alat penangkapan ikan tambahan selain arad memperoleh keuntungan yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan hanya memiliki satu alat penangkapan ikan (arad). Kombinasi alat penangkapan ikan yang ramah lingkungan menggunakan 3 alat penangkapan ikan yaitu arad, gillnet dan trammel net sesuai musim ikan memberikan manfaat ekonomi yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan penggunaan arad sepanjang tahun.Title: An Economic Analysis of ‘Arad’ Fishing Gear In the North Coast of Central Java Province Arad is an abandoned fishing gear based on the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 / Permen-Kp / 2015 concerning the prohibition on the use of trawls and seine nets in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia fisheries management. This study aimed at economic analysis of Arad capture fisheries (1 tool) compared with the capture using combination of Arad and other fishing equipment on the North Coast of Central Java. The study used primary and secondary data that were collected in the North Coast of Central Java. Primary data were collected through interviews and observation with Arad fishers working on boat under 10 GT. Secondarydata were collected from government agencies such as Marine and Fisheries Agency of Central Java and Statistics Indonesia. The results showed that some of the Arad fishers had other fishing gear such as blade, gillnet and trammel net. The use of fishing gear depended on fish season, such as squid, anchovies, snapper, mullet, bloating and others. This study classified fishers based on the number of fishing gear that fisher's had, namely, one fishing gear (arad), two fishing gear (arad and blade), three fishing gear (arad, trammel net and gillnet). Fishers having additional fishing gear get higher profits compared to those having only one fishing gear (ARAD). The use of 3 fishing gear namely arad, gillnet and trammel net according to fish season provides higher economic benefits compared to Arad only throughout the year.


Author(s):  
Arif Sofianto

Masyarakat pesisir merupakan salah satu kelompok termiskin. Kebijakan-kebijakan yang telah dilaksanakan di kawasan pesisir sering mengakibatkan beberapa kondisi berupa perusakan ekologi, kesenjangan dan kemiskinan nelayan tradisional, serta ketergantungan masyarakat terhadap pemodal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami kebutuhan penanggulangan kemiskinan pada wilayah pesisir sesuai dengan karakteristik dan kebutuhan masyarakat. Jenis penelitian adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Lokasi penelitian dilaksanakan di Kecamatan Juwana dan Margoyoso di Kabupaten Pati, serta Kecamatan Ulujami di Kabupaten Pemalang. Informan penelitian ini berjumlah 100 orang terdiri dari unsur pemerintah daerah, lembaga masyarakat, koperasi, nelayan, petambak, pengolah hasil perikanan dan petani. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara, FGD dan Observasi. Teknik analisisdata menggunakan model yang dikembangkan oleh Spradley, yang merupakan kesatuan proses linear yang dimulai dari analisis domain, analisis taksonomi, analisis komponensial dan analisis tema budaya.Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah model penanggulangan kemiskinan pada masyarakat pesisir utara Jawa Tengah berupa konsep pemberdayaan yang mengutamakan prinsip a). Komitmen pada keyakinan, nilai, adat kebiasaan, kepentingan bersama, b). Menciptakan keterbukaan, kejujuran, solidaritas dan pelibatan masyarakat. Tittle: Need For Poverty Reduction In North Coastal Areas In Central JavaThe coastal communities is one of the main groups of the poorest. The policies that have been implemented in coastal areas often result in some circumstances as ecological destruction, poverty gap and traditional fishing, as well as public dependence on financiers. This study aims to understand the need to reduce poverty in coastal areas according to the characteristics and needs of the community. This type of research is qualitative descriptive. The location of research in the Juwana and Margoyoso sub district in Pati Regency, and the Ulujami Subdistrict in Pemalang Regency. The informants of 100 people consisting of representatives from local government, community organizations, cooperatives, fishermen, farmers, fishpond farmers, and fish processors. The technique of collecting data using interviews, focus group discussions and observation. Data were analyzed using a model developed by Spradley, which is the unity of a linear process that starts from domain analysis, taxonomic analysis, componential analysis and analysis of cultural themes. The conclusion of this study is a model of addressing poverty in the north coast of Central Java community a concept that promotes empowerment principle a). Commitment to the beliefs, values, customs, common interests, b). Create transparency, honesty, solidarity and community involvement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-59
Author(s):  
Muhammad Suryadi

This study aims to reveal the portrait of Javanese women in Java in the past. This research was conducted using an associative-diachronic meaning approach. The disclosure of phenomena is carried out by describing each lexicon of traditional household tools based on their associative meaning. The lexicon is analyzed based on its associative meaning based on the local wisdom of Javanese culture. Diachronic studies to explore the wealth of local wisdom stored in traditional household appliances as a legacy from the past. The level of urgency of this research is the shift and replacement of the use of traditional household tools to tools made from plastic and metal. This phenomenon will lead to abandonment of traditional household appliances and being forgotten. The research location is in Kudus Regency which is part of the north coast of Central Java. The data collection methods used were in-depth interviews and document data extraction. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah wawancara mendalam dan ekstraksi data dokumen.  The data analysis method used was to sort out the semantic elements and determine the associative meaning of the lexicon of traditional household appliances. The novelty of the findings lies in the design of descriptions of associative semantic elements in traditional household appliances based on local wisdom.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Sukarman Kamuli ◽  
Basri Amin

Despite the government support for economic development in some coastal areas in Indonesia, the paradigm about women’s agency remains almost the same. This is because women are still marginalized. This paper focuses on looking at agency of women in managing their resources. This study proves that women are active agents in coastal areas of North Gorontalo. Specifically, in the seaweed production, empirical evidences show significantly that women's associations succeeded in gaining economic advantages, participatory leadership, and had adaptability towards changes in technology and seaweed market. Applying a qualitative research approach, this study illustrates a number of policy subjects, organizational patterns, regional opportunity, and actors that support the centrality of women’s organizational capabilities in the field of seaweed production in the north coast of Gorontalo. This study justifies the tendency in Gorontalo, and perhaps in other areas in Indonesia, that women groups have an economic reputation in the seaweed production because they are fully involved in all production processes.


Author(s):  
Tri Muji Susantoro ◽  
Ketut Wikantika ◽  
Lissa Fajri Yayusman ◽  
Alex Tan ◽  
M. Firman Ghozali

Severe abrasion occurred in the coastal area of Brebes Regency, Central Java between 1985 and 1995. Since 1997, mangroves have been planted around the location as a measure intended to prevent further abrasion. Between 1996 and 2018, monitoring has been carried out to assess coastal change in the area and the growth and development of the mangroves. This study aims to monitor mangrove growth and its impact on coastal area changes on the north coast of Brebes, Central Java Province using Landsat series data, which has previously proven suitable for wetland studies including mangrove growth and change. Monitoring of mangrove growth was analysed using the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the green normalised difference vegetation index (GNDVI) of the Landsat data, while the coastal change was analysed based on the overlaying of shoreline maps. Visual field observations of WorldView 2 images were conducted to validate the NDVI and GNDVI results. It was identified from these data that the mangroves had developed well during the monitoring period. The NDVI results showed that the total mangrove area increased between 1996 and 2018 about 9.82 km2, while the GNDVI showed an increase of 3.20 km2. Analysis of coastal changes showed that the accretion area about 9.17 km2 from 1996 to 2018, while the abrasion being dominant to the west of the Pemali River delta about 4.81 km2. It is expected that the results of this study could be used by government and local communities in taking further preventative actions and for sustainable development planning for coastal areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document