Monitoring Dynamic Water Injection to Improve Oil Recovery Efficiency

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al Hamad ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Ahmad AlZoukani ◽  
Bilgin Altundas ◽  
Wael Abdallah

Abstract Dynamic water, also known as smart water, injected at the end of conventional water flood by seawater, is known to show significant improvement in recovering additional oil. Different mechanisms have been proposed and lab measurements were conducted to understand the underlying process of additional oil recovery through dynamic water injection in lab conditions. In this work, we study the effects of different dynamic water injection scenarios on oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs based on reservoir simulations using representative fluid and rock properties with relative permeability curves obtained from core studies. To quantify the changes in measurable multiphysics properties due to dynamic water injection and reconcile multiphysics interpretation with additional oil recovery at field scale, a petrophysically consistent multiphysics effective property modeling is conducted. Based on the simulation results, dynamic water injection is shown to be effective in additional oil recovery at field scale post seawater injection. In addition, saturation changes caused by dynamic water injection result in detectable time-lapse contrast in the corresponding conductivity profiles, suggesting feasibility of the resistivity measurements to monitor dynamic water injection. This paper shows the advantages and benefits of petrophysically consistent multiphysics effective property modeling for a successful fluid monitoring design for quantifying the efficiency of dynamic water injection on additional oil recovery post seawater flood.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 6652-6668

Historically, smart water flooding is proved as one of the methods used to enhance oil recovery from hydrocarbon reservoirs. This method has been spread due to its low cost and ease of operation, with changing the composition and concentration of salts in the water, the smart water injection leads to more excellent compatibility with rock and fluids. However, due to a large number of sandstone reservoirs in the world and the increase of the recovery factor using this high-efficiency method, a problem occurs with the continued injection of smart water into these reservoirs a phenomenon happened in which called rock leaching. Indeed, sand production is the most common problem in these fields. Rock wettability alteration toward water wetting is considered as the main cause of sand production during the smart water injection mechanism. During this process, due to stresses on the rock surface as well as disturbance of equilibrium, the sand production in the porous media takes place. In this paper, the effect of wettability alteration of oil wetted sandstones (0.005,0.01,0.02 and 0.03 molar stearic acid in normal heptane) on sand production in the presence of smart water is fully investigated. The implementation of an effective chemical method, which is nanoparticles, have been executed to prevent sand production. By stabilizing silica nanoparticles (SiO2) at an optimum concentration of 2000 ppm in smart water (pH=8) according to the results of Zeta potential and DLS test, the effect of wettability alteration of oil wetted sandstones on sand production in the presence of smart water with nanoparticles is thoroughly reviewed. Ultimately, a comparison of the results showed that nanoparticles significantly reduced sand production.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Hussain Ali Baker ◽  
Kareem A. Alwan ◽  
Saher Faris Fadhil

Smart water flooding (low salinity water flooding) was mainly invested in a sandstone reservoir. The main reasons for using low salinity water flooding are; to improve oil recovery and to give a support for the reservoir pressure. In this study, two core plugs of sandstone were used with different permeability from south of Iraq to explain the effect of water injection with different ions concentration on the oil recovery. Water types that have been used are formation water, seawater, modified low salinity water, and deionized water. The effects of water salinity, the flow rate of water injected, and the permeability of core plugs have been studied in order to summarize the best conditions of low salinity water flooding. The result of this experimental work shows that the water without any free ions (deionized water) and modified low salinity water have improved better oil recovery than the formation water and seawater as a secondary oil process. The increase in oil recovery factor related to the wettability alteration during low salinity water flooding which causes a decrease in the interfacial tension between the crude oil in porous media and the surface of reservoir rocks. As well as the dissolution of minerals such as calcite Ca+2 was observed in this work, which causes an increase in the pH value. All these factors led to change the wettability of rock to be more water-wet, so the oil recovery can be increased.  


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaina Kelly ◽  
◽  
Ron J.M. Bonnie ◽  
Micheal J. Dick ◽  
Dragan Veselinovic ◽  
...  

Matrix wettability is a key driver in relative permeability and, hence, a critical factor controlling imbibition and drainage at UR fracture-matrix interfaces as well as enhanced oil recovery (EOR). In this study, we (1) adapt and apply the NMR-based wettability index (NWI) methodology of Looyestijn et al. (2006) to a variety of unconventional twin samples undergoing, respectively, spontaneous imbibition with oil-displacing-water and water-displacing-oil and (2) compare the robustness of this method among a variety of samples pairs and also to other NMR-based wettability methods. The samples analyzed cover a range of rock types, major formations, maturity and content of organic material. All displayed unique time-lapse wettability profiles and steady state NWI values. This work advances our previous works (Dick et al., 2019; Kelly et al., 2020) on this subject, where the viability of the methodology was established on end-member pilot samples, towards applicability as a UR SCAL method. The NWI methodology predicts T2 spectra using linear combinations (mixing) of “end-point” T2 spectra. The mixing ratios yielding the closest match to the measured spectra are then used to compute a wettability index. These mixing ratios were validated against (1) mass-balance calculations, (2) repeat experiments with heavy water (D2O) instead of H2O and (3) measured T1-T2 maps, enhancing confidence in the robustness of the method. Our comparisons show that alternative approaches representing the T2 spectra through a single mean T2 value or T2 peak-fit, fall short, especially in tight rocks where fast relaxation rate components tend to skew harmonic mean T2 values and also in samples where oil and water peaks are not clearly resolved. Full spectrum-based methods, akin to Looyestijn’s, appear more robust and stable over a much wider range of reservoir conditions. Repeated NMR acquisition throughout our long-term imbibition experiments shows that time-lapse NWI methodology probes the effects of rock properties, saturation changes, and injected fluid chemistry (enhanced oil recovery strategies) on wettability alteration. Additionally, this NWI study quantifies the wide variation in wettability among unconventional samples.


2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (04) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kewen Li ◽  
Kevin Chow ◽  
Roland N. Horne

Summary It has been a challenge to understand why recovery by spontaneous imbibition could both increase and decrease with initial water saturation. To this end, mathematical models were developed with porosity, permeability, viscosity, relative permeability, capillary pressure, and initial water saturation included. These equations foresee that recovery and imbibition rate can increase, remain unchanged, or decrease with an increase in initial water saturation, depending on rock properties, the quantity of residual gas saturation, the range of initial water saturation, and the units used in the definitions of gas recovery and imbibition rate. The theoretical predictions were verified experimentally by conducting spontaneous water imbibition at five different initial water saturations, ranging from 0 to approximately 50%. The effects of initial water saturation on residual saturation, relative permeability, capillary pressure, imbibition rate, and recovery in gas/water/rock systems by cocurrent spontaneous imbibition were investigated both theoretically and experimentally. Water-phase relative permeabilities and capillary pressures were calculated with the experimental data of spontaneous imbibition. Experimental results in different rocks were compared. Introduction Spontaneous water imbibition is an important mechanism during water injection. Prediction of recovery and imbibition rate by spontaneous water imbibition is essential to evaluate the feasibility and the performance of water injection. For example, is water injection effective in the case of high initial water saturation in reservoirs? Answers to such a question may be found by investigating the effect of initial water saturation on spontaneous water imbibition. It has been observed experimentally that initial water saturation affects recovery and production rate significantly (Blair 1964; Zhou et al. 2000; Viksund et al. 1998; Cil et al. 1998; Tong et al. 2001; Li and Firoozabadi 2000; Akin et al. 2000). However, the experimental observations from different authors (Zhou et al. 2000; Cil et al. 1998; Li and Firoozabadi 2000; Akin et al. 2000) are not consistent. On the other hand, few studies have investigated the effect of initial water saturation on recovery and imbibition rate theoretically, especially in gas reservoirs. Using numerical-simulation techniques, Blair (1964) found that the quantity and the rate of oil produced after a given period of imbibition increased with a decrease in initial water saturation for countercurrent spontaneous imbibition. Zhou et al. (2000) found that both imbibition rate and final oil recovery in terms of oil originally in place (OOIP) increased with an increase in initial water saturation, whereas oil recovery by waterflooding decreased. Viksund et al. (1998) found that the final oil recovery (OOIP) by spontaneous water imbibition in Berea sandstone showed little variation with a change in initial water saturation from 0 to approximately 30%. For the chalk samples tested by Viksund et al. (1998), the imbibition rate first increased with an increase in initial water saturation and then decreased slightly as initial water saturation increased above 34%.Cil et al. (1998) reported that the oil recovery (in terms of recoverable oil reserves) for zero and 20% initial water saturation showed insignificant differences in behavior. However, the oil recovery for initial water saturation above 20% increased with an increase in initial water saturation. Li and Firoozabadi (2000) found that the final gas recovery in the units of gas originally in place (GOIP) by spontaneous imbibition decreased with an increase in initial water saturation in both gas/oil/rock and gas/water/rock systems. The imbibition rate (GOIP/min) increased with an increase in initial water saturation at early time but decreased at later time. Akin et al. (2000) found that the residual oil saturation was unaffected significantly by initial water saturation. In this study, equations, derived theoretically, were used to study the effect of initial water saturation on gas recovery and imbibition rate. The equations correlate recovery, imbibition rate, initial water saturation, rock/fluid properties, and other parameters. Experiments of spontaneous water imbibition in gas-saturated rocks were conducted to confirm the theoretical predictions. The effect of rock properties on gas recovery and imbibition rate was also studied. An X-ray CT scanner was used to monitor the distribution of the initial water saturation to confirm that the initial distribution of the water saturation was uniform. In this study, we only focused on cocurrent spontaneous imbibition. It was assumed that there were no chemical reactions or mass transfer between gas and liquid.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alibi Kilybay ◽  
Bisweswar Ghosh ◽  
Nithin Chacko Thomas

In the oil and gas industry, Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) plays a major role to meet the global requirement for energy. Many types of EOR are being applied depending on the formations, fluid types, and the condition of the field. One of the latest and promising EOR techniques is application of ion-engineered water, also known as low salinity or smart water flooding. This EOR technique has been studied by researchers for different types of rocks. The mechanisms behind ion-engineered water flooding have not been confirmed yet, but there are many proposed mechanisms. Most of the authors believe that the main mechanism behind smart water flooding is the wettability alteration. However, other proposed mechanisms are interfacial tension (IFT) reduction between oil and injected brine, rock dissolution, and electrical double layer expansion. Theoretically, all the mechanisms have an effect on the oil recovery. There are some evidences of success of smart water injection on the field scale. Chemical reactions that happen with injection of smart water are different in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. It is important to understand how these mechanisms work. In this review paper, the possible mechanisms behind smart water injection into the carbonate reservoir with brief history are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas. M. Hassan ◽  
Mohammed Ayoub ◽  
Mysara Eissa ◽  
Hans Bruining ◽  
Abdullah Al-Mansour ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1539-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moein Jahanbani Veshareh ◽  
Shahab Ayatollahi

Abstract In upstream oil industry, microorganisms arise some opportunities and challenges. They can increase oil recovery through microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) mechanisms, or they can increase production costs and risks through reservoir souring process due to H2S gas production. MEOR is mostly known by bioproducts such as biosurfactant or processes such as bioclogging or biodegradation. On the other hand, when it comes to treatment of reservoir souring, the only objective is to inhibit reservoir souring. These perceptions are mainly because decision makers are not aware of the effect microorganisms’ cell can individually have on the wettability. In this work, we study the individual effect of different microorganisms’ cells on the wettability of oil-wet calcite and dolomite surfaces. Moreover, we study the effect of two different biosurfactants (surfactin and rhamnolipid) in two different salinities. We show that hydrophobe microorganisms can change the wettability of calcite and dolomite oil-wet surfaces toward water-wet and neutral-wet states, respectively. In the case of biosurfactant, we illustrate that the ability of a biosurfactant to change the wettability depends on salinity and its hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance (HLB). In distilled water, surfactin (high HLB) can change the wettability to a strongly water-wet state, while rhamnolipid only changes the wettability to a neutral-wet state (low HLB). In the seawater, surfactin is not able to change the wettability, while rhamnolipid changes the wettability to a strongly water-wet state. These results help reservoir managers who deal with fractured carbonate reservoirs to design a more effective MEOR plan and/or reservoir souring treatment strategy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document