Application of Real-Time Geomechanical Modeling to Prevent Wellbore Instability While Drilling Horizontal Wells with Extended Reservoir Contact

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Gomez Samuel Gomez ◽  
Raider Rivas ◽  
Ebikebena Ombe ◽  
Sajjad Ahmed

Abstract Background Drilling deviated and horizontal high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) wells is associated with unique drilling challenges, especially when formation heterogeneity, variation in formation thickness as well as formation structural complexities are encountered while drilling. One of the major challenges encountered is the difficulty of landing horizontal lateral within the thin reservoir layers. Geomechanical modeling has proven to be a vital tool in optimizing casing setting depths and significantly increasing the possible lateral length within hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs. This approach ultimately enhanced the production output of the wells. In a particular field, the horizontal wells are constructed by first drilling 8 3/8" hole section to land about 5 to 10’ into the impervious cap rock just above the target reservoir. The 7" casing is then run and cemented in place, after which the horizontal hole section, usually a 5 7/8" lateral, is drilled by geosteered within the target reservoir to access its best porosity and permeability. Due to the uncertainty of the cap rock thickness, setting the 7" liner at this depth was necessary to avoid drilling too deep into the cap rock and penetrating the target reservoir. This approach has its disadvantages, especially while drilling the 5-7/8" lateral. Numerous drilling challenges were encountered while drilling the horizontal lateral across the hard cap rock. like severe wellbore instability, low ROP and severe drillstring vibration. To mitigate the challenges mentioned above, geomechanical modelling was introduced into the well planning process to optimize the 8 3/8" hole landing depth within the cap rock, thereby reducing the hard caprock interval to be drilled in the next section. Firstly, actual formation properties and in-situ rock stress data were obtained from logs taken in previously drilled wells in the field. This information was then fed into in the geomechanical models to produce near accurate rock properties and stresses values. Data from the formation fracture strength database was also used to calibrate the resulting horizontal stresses and formation breakdown pressure. In addition to this, the formation pore pressure variability was established with the measured formation pressure data. The porosity development information was also used to determine the best landing depths to isolate and case-off the nonreservoir formations. Combined with in-depth well placement studies to determine the optimal well trajectory and wellbore landing strategy, geomechanical modelling enabled the deepening of the 8 3/8" landing depth without penetrating the hydrocarbon reservoir. The geomechanical models were also updated with actual well data in real time and allowed for the optimization of mud weight on the fly. This strategy minimized near wellbore damage across the reservoir section and ultimately improved the wells productivity index. Deepening of the 8 3/8" landing depth and minimizing the footage drilled across the hard and unstable caprock positively impacted the overall well delivery process from well planning and drilling operations up to production. The following achievements were realized in recent wells where geomechanical modelling was applied: The initiative helped in drilling more stable, in-gauge holes across the reservoir sections, which were less prone to wellbore stability problems during drilling and logging operations.Downhole drilling tools were less exposed to harsh drilling conditions and delivered higher performance along with longer drilling runs.Better hole quality facilitated the running of multistage fracture completions which, in turn, contributed to increase the overall gas production, fulfilling the objectives of the reservoir development team.The net-to-gross ratio of the pay zone was increased, thereby improving the efficiency of the multistage fracture stages, and allowing the reservoir to be produced more efficiently.

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Jahediesfanjani ◽  
Faruk Civan

Coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs are characterized as naturally fractured, dual porosity, low permeability, and water saturated gas reservoirs. Initially, the gas, water, and coal are at thermodynamic equilibrium under prevailing reservoir conditions. Dewatering is essential to promote gas production. This can be accomplished by suitable completion and stimulation techniques. This paper investigates the efficiency and performance of the openhole cavity, hydraulic fractures, frack and packs, and horizontal wells as potential completion methods which may reduce formation damage and increase the productivity in coalbed methane reservoirs. Considering the dual porosity nature of CBM reservoirs, numerical simulations have been carried out to determine the formation damage tolerance of each completion and stimulation approach. A new comparison parameter, named as the normalized productivity index Jnp(t) is defined as the ratio of the productivity index of a stimulated well to that of a nondamaged vertical well as a function of time. Typical scenarios have been considered to evaluate the CBM properties, including reservoir heterogeneity, anisotropy, and formation damage, for their effects on Jnp(t) over the production time. The results for each stimulation technique show that the value of Jnp(t) declines over the time of production with a rate which depends upon the applied technique and the prevailing reservoir conditions. The results also show that horizontal wells have the best performance if drilled orthogonal to the butt cleats. Long horizontal fractures improve reservoir productivity more than short vertical ones. Open-hole cavity completions outperform vertical fractures if the fracture conductivity is reduced by any damage process. When vertical permeability is much lower than horizontal permeability, production of vertical wells will improve while productivity of horizontal wells will decrease. Finally, pressure distribution of the reservoir under each scenario is strongly dependent upon the reservoir characteristics, including the hydraulic diffusivity of methane, and the porosity and permeability distributions in the reservoir.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-53
Author(s):  
Hussein Saeed Almalikee ◽  
Fahad M. Al-Najm

Directional and horizontal wellbore profiles and optimization of trajectory to minimizeborehole problems are considered the most important part in well planning and design. Thisstudy introduces four types of directional and horizontal wells trajectory plans for Rumailaoilfield by selecting the suitable kick off point (KOP), build section, drop section andhorizontal profile. In addition to the optimized inclination and orientation which wasselected based on Rumaila oilfield geomechanics and wellbore stability analysis so that theoptimum trajectory could be drilled with minimum wellbore instability problems. The fourrecommended types of deviated wellbore trajectories include: Type I (also called Build andHold Trajectory or L shape) which target shallow to medium reservoirs with lowinclination (20o) and less than 500m step out, Type II (S shape) that can be used topenetrate far off reservoir vertically, Type III (also called Deep Kick off wells or J shape)these wells are similar to the L shape profile except the kickoff point is at a deeper depth,and design to reach far-off targets (>500m step out) with more than 30o inclination, andfinally Type IV (horizontal) that penetrates the reservoir horizontally at 90o. The study alsorecommended the suitable drilling mud density that can control wellbore failure for the fourtypes of wellbore trajectory.


Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Tianyi Tan ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Xusheng Ma ◽  
Yufei Chen

Wellbore instability is a frequent problem of shale drilling. Accurate calculation of surge-swab pressures in tripping processes is essential for wellbore pressure management to maintain wellbore stability. However, cutting plugs formed in shale horizontal wells have not been considered in previous surge-swab pressure models. In this paper, a surge-swab pressure model considering the effect of cutting plugs is established for both open pipe string and closed pipe string conditions; In this model, the osmotic pressure of a cutting plug is analyzed. The reduction of cutting plug porosity due to shale hydration expansion and dispersion is considered, ultimately resulting in an impermeable cutting plug. A case study is conducted to analyze swab pressures in a tripping out process. The results show that, in a closed pipe condition, the cutting plug significantly increases the swab pressures below it, which increase with the decrease of cutting plug porosity and the increase of cutting plug length. Under the give condition, the swab pressure at the bottom of the well increases from 3.60 MPa to 8.82 MPa due to the cutting plug, increasing by 244.9%. In an open pipe string condition, the cutting plug affects the flow rate in the pipes and the annulus, resulting in a higher swab pressure above the cutting plug compared to a no-cutting plug annulus. The difference increases with the decrease of the porosity and the increase of the length and the measured depth of the cutting plug. Consequently, the extra surge-swab pressures caused by cutting plugs could result in wellbore pressures out of safety mud density window, whereas are ignored by previous models. The model proposes a more accurate wellbore pressure prediction and guarantees the wellbore stability in shale drilling.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmood R. Al-Khayari ◽  
Adel M. Al-Ajmi ◽  
Yahya Al-Wahaibi

In oil industry, wellbore instability is the most costly problem that a well drilling operation may encounter. One reason for wellbore failure can be related to ignoring rock mechanics effects. A solution to overcome this problem is to adopt in situ stresses in conjunction with a failure criterion to end up with a deterministic model that calculates collapse pressure. However, the uncertainty in input parameters can make this model misleading and useless. In this paper, a new probabilistic wellbore stability model is presented to predict the critical drilling fluid pressure before the onset of a wellbore collapse. The model runs Monte Carlo simulation to capture the effects of uncertainty in in situ stresses, drilling trajectories, and rock properties. The developed model was applied to different in situ stress regimes: normal faulting, strike slip, and reverse faulting. Sensitivity analysis was applied to all carried out simulations and found that well trajectories have the biggest impact factor in wellbore instability followed by rock properties. The developed model improves risk management of wellbore stability. It helps petroleum engineers and field planners to make right decisions during drilling and fields’ development.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaqan Khan ◽  
Mohammad Altwaijri ◽  
Ahmed Taher ◽  
Mohamed Fouda ◽  
Mohamed Hussein

Abstract Horizontal and high-inclination deep wells are routinely drilled to enhance hydrocarbon recovery. To sustain production rates, these wells are generally designed to be drilled in the direction of minimum horizontal stress in strike slip stress regime to facilitate transverse fracture growth during fracturing operations. These wells can also cause wellbore instability challenges due to high stress concentration due to compressional or strike-slip stress regimes. Hence, apart from pre-drill wellbore stability analysis for an optimum mud weight design, it is important to continuously monitor wellbore instability indicators during drilling. With the advancements of logging-while-drilling (LWD) techniques, it is now possible to better assess wellbore stability during drilling and, if required, to take timely decisions and adjust mud weight to help mitigate drilling problems. The workflow for safely drilling deep horizontal wells starts with analyzing the subsurface stress regime using data from offset wells. Through a series of steps, data is integrated to develop a geomechanics model to select an optimum drilling-fluid density to maintain wellbore stability while minimizing the risks of differential sticking and mud losses. Due to potential lateral subsurface heterogeneity, continuous monitoring of drilling events and LWD measurements is required, to update and calibrate the pre-well model. LWD measurements have long been used primarily for petrophysical analysis and well placement in real time. The use of azimuthal measurements for real-time wellbore stability evaluation applications is a more recent innovation. Shallow formation density readings using azimuthal LWD measurements provide a 360° coverage of wellbore geometry, which can be effectively used to identify magnitude and orientation of borehole breakout at the wellbore wall. Conventional LWD tools also provide auxiliary azimuthal measurements, such as photoelectric (Pe) measurement, derived from the near detector of typical LWD density sensors. The Pe measurement, with a very shallow depth of investigation (DOI), is more sensitive to small changes in borehole shape compared with other measurements from the same sensor, particularly where a high contrast exists between drilling mud and formation Pe values. Having azimuthal measurements of both Pe and formation density while drilling facilitates better control on assess wellbore stability assessment in real time and make decisions on changes in mud density or drilling parameters to keep wellbore stable and avoid drilling problems. Time dependency of borehole breakout can also be evaluated using time-lapse data to enhance analysis and reduce uncertainty. Analyzing LWD density and Pe azimuthal data in real time has guided real-time decisions to optimize drilling fluid density while drilling. The fluid density indicated by the initial geo-mechanical analysis has been significantly adjusted, enabling safe drilling of deep horizontal wells by minimizing wellbore breakouts. Breakouts identified by LWD density and photoelectric measurements has been further verified using wireline six-arm caliper logs after drilling. Contrary to routinely used density image, this paper presents use of Pe image for evaluating wellbore stability and quality in real time, thereby improving drilling safety and completion of deep horizontal wells drilled in the minimum horizontal stress direction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Jiaxin Zeng ◽  
Jiajun Xie ◽  
Liang Tang ◽  
Wenzhe Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Horizontal well drilling contribute to a dramatic increase of shale gas production in unconventional reservoirs. However, the drilling is also risky and challenging with different types of drilling problems often encountered including stuck pipes, inflows, losses and pack-offs, etc. To reduce shale-gas development costs, shale gas operators are faced with finding effective solutions to minimize drilling risks and improve drilling efficiency. A holistic workflow, which can be divided into three steps: pre-drilled modelling and assessment, real-time monitoring, and post-drilled validation, is proposed. Based on the pre-drilled geomechanical modeling, mud weights, mud formulations and casing setting depths are optimized to ensure wellbore stability during the drilling process. Real-time operations involve monitoring drilling parameters and cavings characteristics (shape and volume), and providing updated recommendations for field drilling engineers to mitigate and reduce borehole instability related problems. During the post-drilled stage, the updated geomechanical model will be used for optimizing the drilling designs of upcoming wells. With geomechanics as foundation, a systematic workflow was developed to provide integrated solutions by using multiple technologies and services to reduce serious wellbore instability caused by abnormal formation pressures, wellbore collapse and other complex drilling problems. The implementation of the systematic and holistic workflow has proven to be extremely successful in supporting the drilling of shale gas wells in China. The integrated approach, which was applied in a Changning shale gas block in Sichuan Basin for the first time in March 2019, recorded an improvement in ROP by 111.2% and a reduction in mud losses by 89.9% compared with an offset well without the risk mitigation strategy applied in the same pad. The geomechanics-based approach provides a convenient and effective means to assist field engineers in mud weight optimization, drilling risk assessments, and horizontal well drilling performance evaluation. The approach can also be extended to reduce potential drilling risks and improve wellbore stability, all of which contributes to reducing drilling costs and optimizing subsequent massive hydraulic fracturing jobs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (2E) ◽  
pp. 38-58
Author(s):  
Abbas Dakhiel

Wellbore instability in the Zubair oil field is the main problem in drilling operations. This instability of the wellbore causes several problems including poor hole cleaning, tight hole, stuck pipe, lost circulation, bad cementing, and well kick or blowout that lead to an increase in the nonproductive time. This article aims to set up an appropriate drilling plan that mitigates these instability issues for further well drilling. Field data from six wells (logs, drilling and geological reports as well as offset well tests) were used to build a one-dimensional mechanical earth modeling for each well. The constructed model of selected wells was combined to construct the three-dimensional mechanical earth modeling, which can enable the distribution of all estimated geomechanical parameters along the field of interest. The results revealed that the strip slip and normal faults are the common fault regimes in Zubair oil field located in carbonate rocks and clastic rocks, respectively. The Mogi-Coulomb failure criterion is conservative in determining the minimum and maximum mud weight, and it agrees with the determination of real failure from the image/and caliper logs. The best direction to drill the deviated and horizontal wells was towards the minimum horizontal stress with 140o azimuth from the north. The recommended ranges of mud weight along the sections of 12.25" and 8.5" of the highly deviated and horizontal wells were (between 1.46 and 1.58 gm/cm3) without any expected wellbore instability problems. Based on the outcomes of 3D model, it is expected that the wellbore instability issues are most likely to occur in the domes of; Shauiba and Hamma and in formations; Tanuma, Khasib and Nahr-Umr. In contrast the less wellbore instability problems are expected to expose in Rafidya dome. The study presents an appropriate mud window that can be used to design to minimize the wellbore stability problems when new wells will be drilled in Zubair oil field.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.. Aschehoug ◽  
C.S.. S. Kabir

Summary The production of a substantial fraction of carbon dioxide (CO2) in any hydrocarbon-gas stream poses a significant challenge in terms of separation and sequestration. Both environmental concerns and economic incentives encourage the operators to search for safe, cost-effective ways of disposing of CO2. This paper presents a case study in which a pragmatic solution of CO2 separation at surface and its disposal in a saline aquifer occur in close proximity to its source. A suite of both modern and classical analytical tools is used to understand the production behavior of individual wells. This understanding is imperative because production volume is dictated by the ability to dispose of the associated CO2 volumes to honor the fault-activation pressure limit. The analytical tool kit—transient-productivity index (PI), combined static and dynamic material-balance (MB) methods, and rate-transient analysis (RTA), among others—allowed for the rapid assessment of both the producing gas reservoir and the saline aquifer receiving the CO2 stream. The use of real-time data allowed a comprehensive assessment of in-place volumes for the source gas and the capacity of the aquifer. The injection of supercritical CO2 suggests that the terminal aquifer pressure has been reached by encountering less-than-expected storage volume and by the lowering of fracture-pressure gradient. On-time learning has allowed the asset team to search for alternative CO2-disposal solutions to ensure continuous gas production from this field.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif M. Hanafy ◽  
Hussein Hoteit ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Gerard T. Schuster

AbstractResults are presented for real-time seismic imaging of subsurface fluid flow by parsimonious refraction and surface-wave interferometry. Each subsurface velocity image inverted from time-lapse seismic data only requires several minutes of recording time, which is less than the time-scale of the fluid-induced changes in the rock properties. In this sense this is real-time imaging. The images are P-velocity tomograms inverted from the first-arrival times and the S-velocity tomograms inverted from dispersion curves. Compared to conventional seismic imaging, parsimonious interferometry reduces the recording time and increases the temporal resolution of time-lapse seismic images by more than an order-of-magnitude. In our seismic experiment, we recorded 90 sparse data sets over 4.5 h while injecting 12-tons of water into a sand dune. Results show that the percolation of water is mostly along layered boundaries down to a depth of a few meters, which is consistent with our 3D computational fluid flow simulations and laboratory experiments. The significance of parsimonious interferometry is that it provides more than an order-of-magnitude increase of temporal resolution in time-lapse seismic imaging. We believe that real-time seismic imaging will have important applications for non-destructive characterization in environmental, biomedical, and subsurface imaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document