scholarly journals Relative Sensitivity of Common Target Genes For The Detection of SARS-Cov-2 In Real Time-PCR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Valadan ◽  
Soheila Golchin ◽  
Reza Alizadeh-Navaei ◽  
Mohammadreza Haghshenas ◽  
Mehryar Zargari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
N Gene ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Gene Expressions ◽  
Mazandaran Province

Abstract SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19) currently is the main cause of the severe acute respiratory disease and fatal outcomes in human beings worldwide. Several genes are used as targets for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, including the RDRP, N, and E genes. The present study aimed to determine the RDRP, N, and E genes expressions of SARS-CoV- 2 in clinical samples. For this purpose, 100 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were collected from diagnostic laboratories of Mazandaran province, Iran. After RNA extraction, the real time RT-PCR assay was performed for differential gene expressions’ analysis of N, E, and RDRP. The CT values for N, RDRP, and E targets of 100 clinical samples for identifying SARS-CoV-2 were then evaluated using qRT-PCR. This result suggests N gene as a potential target for the detection of the SARS‐CoV‐2, since it was observed to be highly expressed in the nasopharyngeal or oropharynges of COVID-19 patients (P < 0.0001). Herein, we showed that SARS-CoV- 2 genes were differentially expressed in the host cells. Therefore, to reduce obtaining false negative results and to increase the sensitivity of the available diagnostic tests, the target genes should be carefully selected based on the most expressed genes in the cells.

scholarly journals Pentaplexed Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for the Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of Botulinum Neurotoxin-Producing Clostridia in Food and Clinical Samples

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (13) ◽  
pp. 4387-4395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Kirchner ◽  
K. Melanie Krämer ◽  
Martin Schulze ◽  
Diana Pauly ◽  
Daniela Jacob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Simultaneous Detection ◽  
Locked Nucleic Acid ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Quantitative Real Time Pcr ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Pcr Assays

ABSTRACT Botulinum neurotoxins are produced by the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum and are divided into seven distinct serotypes (A to G) known to cause botulism in animals and humans. In this study, a multiplexed quantitative real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of the human pathogenic C. botulinum serotypes A, B, E, and F was developed. Based on the TaqMan chemistry, we used five individual primer-probe sets within one PCR, combining both minor groove binder- and locked nucleic acid-containing probes. Each hydrolysis probe was individually labeled with distinguishable fluorochromes, thus enabling discrimination between the serotypes A, B, E, and F. To avoid false-negative results, we designed an internal amplification control, which was simultaneously amplified with the four target genes, thus yielding a pentaplexed PCR approach with 95% detection probabilities between 7 and 287 genome equivalents per PCR. In addition, we developed six individual singleplex real-time PCR assays based on the TaqMan chemistry for the detection of the C. botulinum serotypes A, B, C, D, E, and F. Upon analysis of 42 C. botulinum and 57 non-C. botulinum strains, the singleplex and multiplex PCR assays showed an excellent specificity. Using spiked food samples we were able to detect between 103 and 105 CFU/ml, respectively. Furthermore, we were able to detect C. botulinum in samples from several cases of botulism in Germany. Overall, the pentaplexed assay showed high sensitivity and specificity and allowed for the simultaneous screening and differentiation of specimens for C. botulinum A, B, E, and F.

scholarly journals Development and Evaluation of AccuPower® COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower® SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Bum Suh ◽  
Jaegyun Lim ◽  
Hyo Seon Kim ◽  
Guil Rhim ◽  
Heebum Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
N Gene ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Pooled Samples

Rapid and accurate detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is essential for the successful control of the current global COVID-19 pandemic. The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Real-time RT-PCR) is the most widely used detection technique. This research describes the development of two novel multiplex real-time RT-PCR kits, AccuPower ® COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit (NCVM) specifically designed for use with the ExiStation ™48 system (comprised of ExiPrep ™48 Dx and Exicycler ™96 by BIONEER, Korea) for sample RNA extraction and PCR detection, and AccuPower ® SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit (SCVM) designed to be compatible with manufacturers` on-market PCR instruments. The limit of detection (LoD) of SCVM was 2 copies/µ L and the LoD of the NCVM was 120 copies/mL for both the gene and the SARS-CoV-2 gene (N gene and RdRp gene). The AccuPower ® kits demonstrated high precision with no cross reactivity to other respiratory-related microorganisms. The clinical performance of AccuPower ® kits was evaluated using the following clinical samples: sputum and nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab (NPS/OPS) samples. Overall agreement of the AccuPower ® kits with a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved emergency use authorized commercial kit (STANDARD ™ M nCoV Real-Time Detection kit, SD BIOSENSOR, Korea) was above 95% (Cohen`s kappa coefficient ≥ 0.95), with a sensitivity of over 95%. The NPS/OPS specimen pooling experiment was conducted to verify the usability of AccuPower ® kits on pooled samples and the results showed greater than 90% agreement with individual NPS/OPS samples. The clinical performance of AccuPower ® kits with saliva samples was also compared with NPS/OPS samples and demonstrated over 95% agreement (Cohen`s kappa coefficient > 0.95). This study shows the BIONEER NCVM and SCVM assays are comparable with the current standard confirmation assay and are suitable for effective clinical management and control of SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals One-step RNA extraction for RT-qPCR detection of 2019-nCoV

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Sentmanat ◽  
Evguenia Kouranova ◽  
Xiaoxia Cui
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Virus Transmission ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Taqman Probe ◽  
N Gene ◽  
Structural Protein ◽  
Diagnostic Panel ◽  
Primer Sets

ABSTRACTThe global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has placed an unprecedented burden on healthcare systems as the virus spread from the initial 27 reported cases in the city of Wuhan, China to a global pandemic in under three month[1]. Resources essential to monitoring virus transmission have been challenged with a demand for expanded surveillance. The CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time Diagnostic Panel uses a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) consisting of two TaqMan probe and primer sets specific for the 2019-nCoV N gene, which codes for the nucleocapsid structural protein that encapsulates viral RNA, for the qualitative detection of 2019-nCoV viral RNA in respiratory samples. To isolate RNA from respiratory samples, the CDC lists RNA extraction kits from four manufacturers. In anticipation of a limited supply chain of RNA extraction kits and the need for test scalability, we sought to identify alternative RNA extraction methods. Here we show that direct lysis of respiratory samples can be used in place of RNA extraction kits to run the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time Diagnostic assay with the additional benefits of higher throughput, lower cost, faster turnaround and possibly higher sensitivity and improved safety.

scholarly journals Direct Viral RNA Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and DENV in Inactivated Samples by Real-Time RT-qPCR: Implications for Diagnosis in Resource Limited Settings with Flavivirus Co-Circulation

Pathogens ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1558
Author(s):  
Zhan Qiu Mao ◽  
Mizuki Fukuta ◽  
Jean Claude Balingit ◽  
Thi Thanh Ngan Nguyen ◽  
Co Thach Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Heat Inactivation ◽  
Resource Limited Settings ◽  
Rna Detection ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Starting Point

The RT-qPCR method remains the gold standard and first-line diagnostic method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and flaviviruses, especially in the early stage of viral infection. Rapid and accurate viral detection is a starting point in the containment of the COVID-19 pandemic and flavivirus outbreaks. However, the shortage of diagnostic reagents and supplies, especially in resource-limited countries that experience co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2 and flaviviruses, are limitations that may result in lesser availability of RT-qPCR-based diagnostic tests. In this study, the utility of RNA-free extraction methods was assessed for the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 and DENV-2 in heat-inactivated or chemical-inactivated samples. The findings demonstrate that direct real-time RT-qPCR is a feasible option in comparison to conventional real-time RT-qPCR based on viral genome extraction-based methods. The utility of heat-inactivation and direct real-time RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2, DENV-2 viral RNA detection was demonstrated by using clinical samples of SARS-CoV-2 and DENV-2 and spiked cell culture samples of SARS-CoV-2 and DENV-2. This study provides a simple alternative workflow for flavivirus and SARS-CoV-2 detection that includes heat inactivation and viral RNA extraction-free protocols, with aims to reduce the risk of exposure during processing of SARS-CoV-2 biological specimens and to overcome the supply-chain bottleneck, particularly in resource limited settings with flavivirus co-circulation.

scholarly journals Effects of sample handling on the detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in oral fluids by reverse-transcription real-time PCR

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 807-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley C. Weiser ◽  
Korakrit Poonsuk ◽  
Sarah A. Bade ◽  
Phillip C. Gauger ◽  
Marisa Rotolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Free Water ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Sample Handling ◽  
Oral Fluids

We evaluated effects of handling procedures on detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in oral fluids (OFs) by reverse-transcription real-time PCR (RT-rtPCR). The experiments were conducted using a composite sample of PRRSV-positive OF collected from 5-wk-old pigs vaccinated 15 d earlier with a modified-live PRRSV vaccine. Five pre-extraction sample-handling steps and all combinations thereof were evaluated: 1) thaw temperature (4°C or 25°C); 2) sample diluent (1:1 dilution with nuclease-free water or guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol); 3a) sonication of the sample (yes or no); 3b) temperature (4°C or 25°C) at which step 3a was conducted; and 4) temperature at which the sample was maintained after step 3b and until RNA extraction was initiated (4°C or 25°C). All combinations of the 5 sample-handling steps (i.e., 32 unique treatments) were tested in a completely randomized factorial design with 4 replicates and 1 negative control for each treatment. The entire experiment was repeated on 5 separate days to produce a total of 800 PRRSV RT-rtPCR results. Binary (positive or negative) data were analyzed by logistic regression and results (Ct) were analyzed using a generalized linear model. Overall, 1 false-positive result was observed among 160 negative controls (99.4% specificity), and 85 false-negative results were observed among the 640 known-positive samples (86.7% sensitivity). The most significant factor affecting test outcome was thaw temperature (4°C or 25°C); samples thawed at 4°C had higher positivity rate (94% vs. 80%, p < 0.0001) and lower Ct (36.2 vs. 37.5, p < 0.0001).

scholarly journals Evaluation of Amplification Targets for the Specific Detection ofBordetella pertussisUsing Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Rubayet Hasan ◽  
Rusung Tan ◽  
Ghada N Al-Rawahi ◽  
Eva Thomas ◽  
Peter Tilley
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Reference Panel ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Polymerase Chain

BACKGROUND:Bordetella pertussisinfections continue to be a major public health challenge in Canada. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to detectB pertussisare typically based on the multicopy insertion sequence IS481, which offers high sensitivity but lacks species specificity.METHODS: A novelB pertussisreal-time PCR assay based on the porin gene was tested in parallel with several previously published assays that target genes such as IS481,ptx-promoter, pertactin and a putative thialase. The assays were evaluated using a reference panel of common respiratory bacteria including differentBordetellaspecies and 107 clinical nasopharyngeal specimens. Discrepant results were confirmed by sequencing the PCR products.RESULTS: Analytical sensitivity was highest for the assay targeting the IS481element; however, the assay lacked specificity forB pertussisin the reference panel and in the clinical samples. False-positive results were also observed with assays targeting theptx-promoter and pertactin genes. A PCR assay based on the thialase gene was highly specific but failed to detect all reference strains ofB pertussis. However, a novel assay targeting the porin gene demonstrated high specificity forB pertussisboth in the reference panel and in clinical samples and, based on sequence-confirmed results, correctly predicted allB pertussis-positive cases in clinical samples. According to Probit regression analysis, the 95% detection limit of the new assay was 4 colony forming units/reaction.CONCLUSION: A novel porin assay forB pertussisdemonstrated superior performance and may be useful for improved molecular detection ofB pertussisin clinical specimens.

scholarly journals A Novel Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renfei Lu ◽  
Xiuming Wu ◽  
Zhenzhou Wan ◽  
Yingxue Li ◽  
Xia Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Qpcr Assay ◽  
N Gene ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity

COVID-19 has become a major global public health burden, currently causing a rapidly growing number of infections and significant morbidity and mortality around the world. Early detection with fast and sensitive assays and timely intervention are crucial for interrupting the spread of the COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2). Using a mismatch-tolerant amplification technique, we developed a simple, rapid, sensitive and visual reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection based on its N gene. The assay has a high specificity and sensitivity, and robust reproducibility, and its results can be monitored using a real-time PCR machine or visualized via colorimetric change from red to yellow. The limit of detection (LOD) of the assay is 118.6 copies of SARS-CoV-2 RNA per 25 μL reaction. The reaction can be completed within 30 min for real-time fluorescence monitoring, or 40 min for visual detection when the template input is more than 200 copies per 25 μL reaction. To evaluate the viability of the assay, a comparison between the RT-LAMP and a commercial RT-qPCR assay was made using 56 clinical samples. The SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP assay showed perfect agreement in detection with the RT-qPCR assay. The newly-developed SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP assay is a simple and rapid method for COVID-19 surveillance.

scholarly journals Efficient SARS-CoV-2 detection in unextracted oro-nasopharyngeal specimens by rRT-PCR with the Seegene Allplex™ 2019-nCoV assay

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Freppel ◽  
Natacha Merindol ◽  
Fabien Rallu ◽  
Marco Bergevin
Keyword(s):  
Detection Rate ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Free Water ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Proteinase K ◽  
N Gene ◽  
Infected People

Abstract Background The fight against the COVID-19 pandemic has created an urgent need to rapidly detect infected people. The challenge for clinical laboratories has been finding a high throughput, cost-efficient, and accurate testing method in the context of extraction reagents shortage on a global scale. To answer this need, we studied SARS-CoV-2 detection in oro-nasopharyngeal (ONP) swabs stored in Universal Transport Media (UTM) or in RNase-free water by rRT-PCR with Seegene Allplex™ 2019-nCoV assay without RNA extraction. Results Optimal results were obtained when swabs stored in UTM were diluted 1/5 and 1/2 in RNase-free water. Thermal lysis before rRT-PCR testing slightly improved detection rate. In addition, proteinase K (PK) treatment allowed for a significant reduction of invalid results and increased sensitivity for detection of low viral load specimens. In a panel of positive samples with all 3 viral genes amplified and N gene Cycle threshold values (Ct values) from 15 to 40, our detection rate was 98.9% with PK and 94.4% without. In a challenging panel of low positive samples with only the N gene being detectable at Ct values > 30, detection rate was increased from 53.3 to 76.7% with the addition of PK, and invalid rate fell off from 18.3 to 0%. Furthermore, we demonstrated that our method reliably detects specimens with Ct values up to 35, whereas false negative samples become frequent above this range. Finally, we show that swabs should be stored at − 70 °C rather than 4 °C when testing cannot be performed within 72 h of collection. Conclusion We successfully optimized the unextracted rRT-PCR process using the Seegene Allplex™ 2019-nCoV assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNAs in nasopharyngeal swabs. This improved method offers cost savings and turnaround time advantages compared to automated extraction, with high efficiency of detection that could play an important role in the surveillance of Covid-19.

scholarly journals Evaluation of real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification for detection of Chikungunya virus in clinical samples

2009 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1168-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-N. Telles ◽  
K. Le Roux ◽  
P. Grivard ◽  
G. Vernet ◽  
A. Michault
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Chikungunya Virus ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Nucleic Acid Sequence ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Nucleic Acid Extraction

The Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a member of the genus Alphavirus that is transmitted to humans by Aedes mosquitoes. In 2005 and 2006, the Indian Ocean island of La Réunion was hit with an unprecedented CHIKV fever outbreak that infected 300 000 people. In the present study, we describe the evaluation of real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (RT-NASBA) for the detection of CHIKV in clinical samples. A co-extracted and co-amplified chimerical CHIKV RNA sequence was used as an internal control to eliminate false-negative results. The detection threshold of the assay was determined from quantified CHIKV-positive plasma, and estimated to be 200 copies per NASBA reaction. The specificity of the assay was determined using blast analyses and non-cross-reactivity using an O'nyong-nyong virus culture and 250 CHIKV RT-PCR-negative plasma samples. A 100 % specificity was found and no invalid result was obtained, showing the good quality of the nucleic acid extraction. The assay was then evaluated using 252 CHIKV-positive RT-PCR plasma samples. The samples were all tested positive, including those with low viral load. This evaluation showed that the RT-NASBA is a rapid (5 h from sample nucleic acid extraction to detection), sensitive, specific and reliable method for the routine diagnosis of CHIKV in clinical samples.

scholarly journals Influence of Different Inactivation Methods on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 RNA Copy Number

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailong Chen ◽  
Rui Wu ◽  
Yuan Xing ◽  
Quanli Du ◽  
Zerun Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Medical Laboratory ◽  
High Temperature Treatment ◽  
N Gene ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Heat Inactivation ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab

ABSTRACT The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread across the world and was characterized as a pandemic. To protect medical laboratory personnel from infection, most laboratories inactivate the virus causing COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in clinical samples before testing. However, the effect of inactivation on the detection results remains unknown. Here, we used a digital PCR assay to determine the absolute SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy number in 63 nasopharyngeal swab samples and assess the effect of inactivation methods on viral RNA copy number. Viral inactivation was performed by three different methods: (i) incubation with the TRIzol LS reagent for 10 min at room temperature, (ii) heating in a water bath at 56°C for 30 min, and (iii) high-temperature treatment, including autoclaving at 121°C for 20 min, boiling at 100°C for 20 min, and heating at 80°C for 20 min. Compared to the amount of RNA in the original sample, TRIzol treatment destroyed 47.54% of the nucleocapsid protein (N) gene and 39.85% of open reading frame (ORF) 1ab. For samples treated at 56°C for 30 min, the copy number of the N gene and ORF 1ab was reduced by 48.55% and 56.40%, respectively. The viral RNA copy number dropped by 50 to 66% after heating at 80°C for 20 min. Nearly no viral RNA was detected after autoclaving at 121°C or boiling at 100°C for 20 min. These results indicate that inactivation reduced the quantity of detectable viral RNA and may cause false-negative results, especially in weakly positive cases. Thus, use of the TRIzol reagent rather than heat inactivation is recommended for sample inactivation, as the TRIzol reagent had the least effect on the RNA copy number among the tested methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document