scholarly journals Investigating Research Hotspots and Publication Trends of Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis during 2000-2018

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keda Yang ◽  
Lei Pei ◽  
Kaicheng Wen ◽  
Siming Zhou ◽  
Lin Tao
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
The United States ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Occurrence Matrix ◽  
Research Hotspots

Abstract Background: Spinal stenosis is a common elderly disease, present in a variety of forms. High incidence forces researchers to pay more attention and give countermeasures. Our study aimed to conclude the knowledge hierarchy and research anticipation of spinal stenosis according to bibliometric analysis.Methods: Admitted published papers were obtained from Web of Science Core collection and PubMed database. Bibliometric analysis was conducted by using online analysis software CiteSpace and Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB). Exported major MeSH terms were further biclustered with gCLUTO according to co-word analysis. Then the research hotspots and publication trends were identified based on the high-frequency MeSH terms.Results: 5606 scientific literatures were retrieved about spinal stenosis and the number maintained a roughly increasing trend from 108 in 2000 to 512 in 2018, only declining in 2011. The United States is the country keeping an academic leadership in this field. And the journal SPINE was the most authoritative with total 695 articles and average 12.73 citations. There were 17 major and 18 expanded MeSH terms extracted after bibliometric analysis. Co-word and biclustering analysis revealed seven research hotspots involved in etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, conservative treatment, operative indication, internal implantation and postoperative complications. Conclusions: In this study, we revealed the research hotspots in spinal stenosis focusing on the pathogenesis and surgical treatment. Narrowing caused by the pathological change of flavum ligamentum hypertrophy and posterior longitudinal ligament ossification attracts more attention in recent years. Besides, minimally invasive surgery and internal implantation fixation are more valid in clinical. Refining pathological classification, optimizing surgical method and instrument property will be an expectable direction of spinal stenosis.

scholarly journals Investigating Research Hotspots and Publication Trends of Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis During 2000–2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keda Yang ◽  
Lei Pei ◽  
Kaicheng Wen ◽  
Siming Zhou ◽  
Lin Tao
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
The United States ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Research Hotspots

Spinal stenosis is a common disease affecting the elderly that is present in a various forms. Its high incidence forces researchers to pay more attention and offer countermeasures. We used the Web of Science Core collection and PubMed database to obtain 5,606 scientific studies concerning spinal stenosis, and the number of publications maintained a roughly increasing trend from 108 in 2000 to 512 in 2018, only declining in 2011. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using the online analysis software CiteSpace and Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB). The United States maintains academic leadership in this field. The journal SPINE was the most authoritative, with 695 articles and an average of 12.73 citations. The exported major MeSH terms were further biclustered with gCLUTO according to co-word analysis to reveal research hotspots, including etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, conservative treatment, operative indication, internal implantation, and postoperative complications. After combination, the main topics focused on pathogenesis and surgical treatment. Narrowing causes flavum ligamentum hypertrophy, and posterior longitudinal ligament ossification is widely accepted. Additionally, minimally invasive surgery and internal implantation fixation are more valid in the clinic. Refining pathological classification and optimizing surgical methods and instrument properties will be important future research directions for spinal stenosis.

scholarly journals Mapping theme trends and recognizing hot spots in postmenopausal osteoporosis research: a bibliometric analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e8145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siming Zhou ◽  
Zhengbo Tao ◽  
Yue Zhu ◽  
Lin Tao
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Hot Spots ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Osteoporosis Research

Background This study aimed to draw a series of scientific maps to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate hot spots and trends in postmenopausal osteoporosis research using bibliometric analysis. Methods Scientific papers published on postmenopausal osteoporosis were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed database. Extracted information was analyzed quantitatively with bibliometric analysis by CiteSpace, the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology and Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB). To explore the hot spots in this field, co-word biclustering analysis was conducted by gCLUTO based on the major MeSH terms/MeSH subheading terms-source literatures matrix. Results We identified that a total of 5,247 publications related to postmenopausal osteoporosis were published between 2013 and 2017. The overall trend decreased from 1,071 literatures in 2013 to 1,048 literatures in 2017. Osteoporosis International is the leading journal in the field of postmenopausal osteoporosis research, both in terms of impact factor score (3.819) and H-index value (157). The United States has retained a top position and has exerted a pivotal influence in this field. The University of California, San Francisco was identified as a leading institution for research collaboration, and Professors Reginster and Kanis have made great achievements in this area. Eight research hot spots were identified. Conclusions Our study found that in the past few years, the etiology and drug treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis have been research hot spots. They provide a basis for the study of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and guidelines for the drug treatment of osteoporosis.

scholarly journals Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chantal Morin ◽  
Isabelle Gaboury
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Body Part ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Research Designs ◽  
System Body

Abstract Background Despite the increasing use of osteopathy, a manipulative complementary and alternative medicine therapy, in the general population, its efficacy continues to be debated. In this era of evidence-based practice, no studies have previously reviewed the scientific literature in the field to identify published knowledge, trends and gaps in empirical research. The aims of this bibliometric analysis are to describe characteristics of articles published on the efficacy of osteopathic interventions and to provide an overall portrait of their impacts in the scientific literature. Methods A bibliometric analysis approach was used. Articles were identified with searches using a combination of relevant MeSH terms and indexing keywords about osteopathy and research designs in MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. The following indicators were extracted: country of primary author, year of publication, journals, impact factor of the journal, number of citations, research design, participants’ age group, system/body part addressed, primary outcome, indexing keywords and types of techniques. Results A total of 389 articles met the inclusion criteria. The number of empirical studies doubled every 5 years, with the United States, Italy, Spain, and United Kingdom being the most productive countries. Twenty-three articles were cited over 100 times. Articles were published in 103 different indexed journals, but more than half (53.7%) of articles were published in one of three osteopathy-focused readership journals. Randomized control trials (n = 145; 37.3%) and case reports (n = 142; 36.5%) were the most common research designs. A total of 187 (48.1%) studies examined the effects of osteopathic interventions using a combination of techniques that belonged to two or all of the classic fields of osteopathic interventions (musculoskeletal, cranial, and visceral). Conclusion The number of osteopathy empirical studies increased significantly from 1980 to 2014. The productivity appears to be very much in sync with practice development and innovations; however, the articles were mainly published in osteopathic journals targeting a limited, disciplinary-focused readership.

A Paradigm Shift in Healthcare Innovation as Revealed by Research Trends in Mobile Health: A Bibliometric Analysis. (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfei Cao ◽  
Yeongjoo Lim ◽  
Shintaro Sengoku ◽  
Xitong Guo ◽  
Kota Kodama
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Trends ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Growth Trend ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Research Hotspots

BACKGROUND Smartphones have become an integral part of our lives with their unprecedented popularity and diversification of applications. The continuous upgrading of information technology has also enabled smartphones to display great potential in the field of healthcare. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to clarify the future research direction of mHealth by analyzing its research trends and latest research hotspots. METHODS This study collected mHealth-related literature published between 2000 and 2020 from the Web of Science database. Descriptive statistics of the literature were computed using Excel software. The publication trends of mHealth research were determined by analyzing the annual number of publications in the literature and annual number of publications categorized based on different countries. Finally, this study used the VOSviewer tool to construct visualization network maps of country/region collaborations and author keyword co-occurrences, and overlay visualization maps of the average publication year of author keywords to analyze the hotspots and research trends in mHealth research. RESULTS In this study, 12,593 mHealth-related research articles published between 2000 and 2020 were collected. The results showed an exponential growth trend in the number of annual publications in mHealth literature. The United States remained the leading contributor to the literature in this area (5,294/12,593, 42%), well ahead of other countries/regions. Other countries/regions also showed a clear trend of annual increases in the number of publications in mHealth literature. Regarding cooperation between countries, the four countries with the largest number of publications, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, were found to cooperate more closely. The rest of the countries/regions showed a clear geographical pattern of cooperation. The keyword co-occurrence analysis of the top 100 authors formed five clusters, namely: development of mHealth medical technology and its application in various diseases, use of mHealth technology to improve basic public health and health policy, mHealth self-health testing and management in daily life, adolescent use of mHealth, and mHealth in mental health. The research trends revealed a gradual shift in mHealth research from health policy and improving public healthcare to the development and social application of mHealth technologies. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, the most current bibliometric analysis dates back to 2016. However, the number of mHealth researches published between 2017 and 2020 exceeds the previous total. Therefore, the results of this study shed light on the latest research hotspots and research trends in mHealth research. These findings provide a useful overview of the development of the field; they may also serve as a valuable reference and provide guidance for other researchers in the field.

scholarly journals Publication Trends on Mitophagy in the World and China: A 16-Year Bibliometric Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingli Chen ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Yifan Jia ◽  
Zhongyuan Xia ◽  
Jishi Ye
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Progress ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Quality Of Results ◽  
The Past ◽  
The World

In the past 16 years, research on mitophagy has increasingly expanded to a wider range of subjects. Therefore, comprehensively analyzing the relevant progress and development trends on mitophagy research requires specific methods. To assess the hotspots, directions, and quality of results in this field worldwide, we used multiple tools to examine research progress and growing trends in research on the matter during the last 16 years (from 2005 to 2020). We also compared the quantity and quality of the literature records on mitophagy published by research institutions in China and other developed countries, reviewed China’s contribution, and examined the gap between China and these developed countries. According to the results of our bibliometric analysis, the United States and its research institutes published the most papers. We identified cell biology as the most commonly researched subject on mitophagy and AUTOPHAGY as the most popular journal for research on mitophagy. We also listed the most cited documents from around the world and China. With gradually increased funding, China is progressively becoming prominent in the field of mitophagy; nevertheless, the gap between her and major countries in the world must be closed.

Trends in Research Related to Premenstrual Syndrome and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: a Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingzhou Gao ◽  
Hui SUN ◽  
Changlong ZHANG ◽  
Dongmei GAO ◽  
Mingqi QIAO
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Premenstrual Syndrome ◽  
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder ◽  
The United States ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Publication Number ◽  
Research Hotspots

Abstract Background The global incidence of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is increasing, with increasing suicide reports. However, the bibliometric analysis of global research on PMS and PMDD is rare. We aimed to evaluate the global scientific output of research on PMS and PMDD and to explore their research hotspots and frontiers from 1945 to 2018 using a bibliometric analysis methodology.Methods Articles with research on PMS and PMDD between 1945 and 2018 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). We used the bibliometric method, CiteSpace V and VOSviewer to analyze publication years, journals, countries, institutions, authors, research hotspots, and trends. We plotted the reference co-citation network, and we used keywords to analyze the research hot spots and trends.Results We identified 2,833 publications on PMS and PMDD research from 1945 to 2018, and the annual publication number increased with time, with fluctuations. Psychoneuroendocrinology published the highest number of articles. The United States ranked the highest among the countries with the most publications, and the leading institute was UNIV PENN. Keyword and reference analysis indicated that the menstrual cycle, depression and ovarian hormones were the research hotspots, whereas prevalence, systematic review, anxiety and depression and young women were the research frontiers.Conclusions We depicted overall research on PMS and PMDD by a bibliometric analysis methodology. Prevalence and impact in young women , systematic review evaluations of risk factors, and the association of anxiety and depression with menstrual cycle phases are the latest research frontiers that will pioneer the direction of research in the next few years.

scholarly journals Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on astrocytoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Turki Elarjani ◽  
Othman T. Almutairi ◽  
Modhi Alhussinan ◽  
Gmaan Alzhrani ◽  
Fahad E. Alotaibi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Research Journal ◽  
The University

Background: Citation analysis reflects the scientific recognition and influential performance of a published article within its field. We aim to identify the top 100 most-cited articles on astrocytoma using this bibliometric analysis method. Methods: In May 2020, we performed a thorough search in the Scopus database using the word “Astrocytoma.” The top 100 most-cited articles were arranged based on citation count in descending order. The resultant articles were then analyzed with an assessment of pertinent factors. Results: The most-cited articles on astrocytoma had been cited 23,720 times. The top-cited article received a total of 682 citations, with an average of 34.1 citations annually. The list comprised eight clinical trials, in which the highest cited article received 625 citations. Articles were published from 1975 to 2015 with the 1995–2005 era as the most prolific period. Neuropathology studies were the most studied category, followed by clinical studies. The United States of America was the most significant contributor, with 49 published articles. The University of California San Francisco was the most contributing institution by producing 11 articles. Articles were published in 32 different journals led by the Cancer Research Journal, with a total of 12 publications. Approximately 160 authors contributed to the list in which Scheithauer, B.W. contributed the most with a total of eight articles. Conclusion: This report clustered the most impactful articles on astrocytoma. It serves as an adequate tool to identify publication trends and helps in achieving evidence-based clinical practice.

scholarly journals Bibliometric Analysis of Behavior-based Safety (BBS): Three Decades Publication Trends

Webology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (Special Issue 02) ◽  
pp. 278-293
Author(s):  
Fadzli Shah Abd Aziz ◽  
Khairul Hafezad Abdullah ◽  
Sharina Samsudin
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Behavior Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Organizational Behavior Management ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Reference Analysis ◽  
Publish Or Perish ◽  
Behavior Based

Behavior-based safety (BBS) has flourished worldwide, with previous researchers extensively verified and provided scientific evidence that BBS was effective for managing risks and preventing injuries. This study aims to examine the bibliometric analysis of BBS publication patterns, research growth, and related publication information. A total of 333 BBS publications from the Scopus database were analyzed from 1989 to 2020. Data were exported to Microsoft Excel, Publish or Perish (PoP), and VOSviewer. This study evaluated data on the global trend of publication, contributions of countries, the encouragement of sources, leading authors, leading institutions, reference analysis, and keywords related to BBS research. Based on bibliometric parameters, this study found inconsistent publication trends in the last three decades. The results showed that BBS publications mainly fixated on engineering and medicine. The influential publication countries were the United States, China, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Safety Science was the most potent and compelling source. Academicians and professional authors actively engaged in writing BBS articles over three decades. Authors’ keywords of “behavior-based safety”, “safety culture”, “accident prevention”, “safety”, and “organizational behavior management” has substantially impacted the online search for information. This research creates a new paradigm for comprehensive BBS study and intervention to improve future safety performance.

scholarly journals The 100 Most Cited Articles on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822095207
Author(s):  
Mengchen Yin ◽  
Chongqing Xu ◽  
Wen Mo
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bibliometric Method ◽  
Evaluation Standard ◽  
Short Period ◽  
High Level ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Study Design: Bibliometric analysis. Objective: With the increasing literature of spine surgery, some pioneering research studies have had a significant impact on the field of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The objective of the authors was to identify and analyze the most frequently cited 100 articles in this field. Methods: Web of Science was searched to identify 100 top-cited articles related to LSS from 2000 to 2019. Articles on the final list were filtered based on their titles and abstracts. The following information were recorded and analyzed with bibliometric method: article title, first author, year of publication, journal of publication, total number of citations, country, institution, and study topic. Results: The citation count for final articles on the list ranged from 71 to 2162, with a mean number of 207.7. The journal Spine contributed the maximum number of articles (37), followed by European Spine Journal (9) and Pain Physician (8). There were collectively 80 first authors contributing to articles on the final list. Twelve authors were represented multiple times in the top 100 articles. The most prolific years were 2008 and 2009, each had 11 articles published. With regard to country and region of origin, most articles were from the United States (58). The most cited article was published in Spine in 2000 by Fairbank and Pynsent, who discussed the role of the Oswestry Disability Index as an evaluation standard in spinal disorders, including LSS. Conclusion: The current study analyzed the 100 most cited articles on LSS. It no doubt developed a useful resource with detailed information for many, particularly orthopedic and neurosurgery physicians who want to assimilate research focus and advance of LSS within a relatively short period. Researchers may benefit from emphasis on citation count while citing and evaluating articles and realize the deficiencies when high-level articles appear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document