scholarly journals The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: A Bibliometric Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Gu ◽  
Waixing Li ◽  
Dabao Xu
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Great Degree ◽  
Hot Spot ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Reproductive Outcome ◽  
Intrauterine Adhesions ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Intrauterine Adhesion ◽  
Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis

Abstract Background: Bibliometric analysis is a statistical method which attempts to assess articles by their citations, analyzing their frequency and pattern of citing phenomenon. Through the analysis, some guidance can be extracted for future research directions. Over the past few years, there have been articles published in mounting numbers focused on intrauterine adhesions. Nevertheless, little is known about the properties and qualities of these researches. No existed analysis commits to reflecting the progress of researches in intrauterine adhesion.Methods: Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Citation Index and MEDLINE were searched for the identifying articles released from 1950 to October 2020. Articles concerning about Intrauterine adhesion were determined. Subsequently, the 100 most cited articles were chosen for analysis of citation count, citation density (citations/article age), authorship, theme, geographic distribution, time-related flux, level of evidence, and network analysis.Results: An overwhelming majority of the certain 100 articles were put out in the 2010s (35%). Citations per article ranged from 30 to 253. China possesses the most papers among the top 100 papers, followed by the USA, France, Israel and Italy. The study theme that most highlighted were operative hysteroscopy and adjunctive treatments for improving reproductive outcome. Level II is the most common level of evidence, and there is no statistical difference in the number of citations between the levels. The network analysis connoted that hysteroscopy, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, infertility, and reproductive outcome had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s and 2010s, while placental implantation had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s and stem cell and fibrosis had a great degree of centrality in the 2010s. Conclusions: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles in the literature on intrauterine adhesions. It is worth noting that hysteroscopy and hysteroscopic adhesiolysis were long-term concern in the field of intrauterine adhesion researches. As the elapse of time, postoperative adjuvant treatment has gradually become the hot spot of researches. However, there are only 9 experimental articles among these 100 articles, showing the lack of breakthrough progress in the field of intrauterine adhesions at the mechanism level.

scholarly journals The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intrauterine Adhesion: a Bibliometric Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Gu ◽  
Waixing Li ◽  
Xingping Zhao ◽  
Dabao Xu
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Great Degree ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Reproductive Outcome ◽  
Citation Pattern ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Intrauterine Adhesion ◽  
Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis

AbstractBibliometric analysis is a statistical method that attempts to assess articles by their citations, analyzing their frequency and citation pattern, which subsequently gleans direction and guidance for future research. Over the past few years, articles focused on intrauterine adhesions have been published with increasing frequency. Nevertheless, little is known about the properties and qualities of this research, and no current analysis exists that has examined the progress in intrauterine adhesion research. Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Citation Index, and MEDLINE database were searched to identify articles on intrauterine adhesion published from 1950 to October 2020. The 100 most cited articles were chosen to analyze citation count, citation density, authorship, theme, geographic distribution, time-related flux, level of evidence, and network analysis. An overwhelming majority of these 100 articles were published in the 2010s (35%). Citations per article ranged from 30 to 253. Chinese authors published the most papers in the top 100, followed by the USA, France, Israel, and Italy. The most salient study themes included operative hysteroscopy and adjunctive treatments for improving reproductive outcomes. The most common level of evidence was level II, and there was no statistical difference in the number of citations between the levels. The network analysis indicated that hysteroscopy, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, infertility, and the reproductive outcome had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s and 2010s. In comparison, placental implantation had a great degree of centrality in the 2000s, and stem cell and fibrosis had a great degree of centrality in the 2010s. The value of IUA investigation has been gradually appreciated recently. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was continuously explored to achieve better reproductive outcome. Over time, the main focus of research has gradually shifted from complications to postoperative adjuvant treatment. Moreover, breakthrough progress is needed in underlying mechanism and early prevention of IUA.

scholarly journals The top 100 most cited articles on total hip arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenchao Zhang ◽  
Ning Tang ◽  
Xiaopeng Li ◽  
Daniel M. George ◽  
Guangxu He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
The Usa ◽  
High Degree

Abstract Background Over the past few decades, more and more articles about total hip arthroplasty have been published. We noticed, however, little is known about the characteristics and qualities of these studies. Methods The databases of Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Citation Index, MEDLINE, etc. were utilized for the identification of articles published from 1990 to May 2019. Total hip arthroplasty–related articles were identified, and the 100 most cited articles were selected for subsequent analysis of citation count, citation density (citations/article age), authorship, theme, geographic distribution, time-related flux, level of evidence, and network analysis. Results The selected 100 articles were published mainly in the 1990s (46%) and 2000s (47%) with almost equal amount. Citations per article ranged from 994 to 191. Leading countries were the USA followed by Canada, England, and Sweden, all located in North America and Western Europe. The most highlighted study themes were postoperative thrombosis and surgical methods and materials. The most common level of evidence was level III (35%). The network analysis connoted that radiography, acetabulum, reoperation, and bone cement had a high degree of centrality in the 1990s, while cement had a high degree of centrality in the 2000s and 2010s. Conclusions The time, area, and theme distribution of the top 100 most cited articles in the total hip arthroplasty have been thoroughly analyzed. It is noticeable that postoperative thromboembolism currently plays a major role in the field of total hip arthroplasty researches. However, most of them focus on the effectiveness of different treatments and drugs; little is known about its underlying mechanisms and influencing factors.

scholarly journals Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Over the Past 40 Years: a Global Analysis and Review of the Most Highly Cited Articles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Buchan Jiang ◽  
Cong Wei ◽  
Wenchao Zhang ◽  
Daniel M George ◽  
Ning Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Global Analysis ◽  
Citation Rate ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
The United States ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Global Trends ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to use citation analysis to identify the top 100 papers in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and report the qualities and characteristics of the most influential articles in UKA research.Methods: UKA–related articles published from 1950 to June 2020 were identified using multiple databases. The 100 most cited articles were selected for further analysis of citation count, citation density, current citation rate, authorship, theme, geographic distribution, level of evidence, and network analysis.Results: The top 100 articles' publication dates ranged from 1980 to 2015, with the largest number in the 2000s. Total citations per article ranged from 65 to 473. The USA was the most productive country, but England led the race in terms of citations. The Bone & Joint Journal was the most prolific journal with 25 articles. Price AJ was the most productive first author and corresponding author. The most popular study theme was therapeutic research, followed by prognostic research. The most common level of evidence was level IV. The network analysis connoted that follow-up study had the highest degree of centrality.Conclusions: The study of UKA is steadily evolving. It could be predicted that there will be an increasing number of publications on UKA research in the following years according to the current global trends, the United States and England will likely maintain leadership in this area. Meanwhile, further prospective studies are required to better recognize the prognosis of UKA procedures.

Introduction

2020 ◽  
pp. xxii-13
Author(s):  
Ryan Light ◽  
James Moody
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Social Network ◽  
Social Network Analysis ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Social Life ◽  
New Directions ◽  
Central Paradigm

This chapter provides an introduction to this volume on social networks. It argues that social network analysis is greater than a method or data, but serves as a central paradigm for understanding social life. The chapter offers evidence of the influence of social network analysis with a bibliometric analysis of research on social networks. This analysis underscores how pervasive network analysis has become and highlights key theoretical and methodological concerns. It also introduces the sections of the volume broadly structured around theory, methods, broad conceptualizations like culture and temporality, and disciplinary contributions. The chapter concludes by discussing several promising new directions in the field of social network analysis.

scholarly journals A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top-Cited Articles on Diabetic Foot Ulcers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiasheng You ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
Yixin Chen ◽  
Weifen Zhu ◽  
Shunwu Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Scientific Discipline ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Bibliometric Method ◽  
Academic Publications ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Citation analysis is a bibliometric method for appraising the impact of academic publications in any given scientific discipline. There is a paucity of literature concerning influential works on diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Aims: To determine the top-cited articles in the field of DFU research.Methods: A bibliometric analysis of citations indexed in the Scopus and the Web of Science databases was conducted in January 2021 to determine all publications related to DFU. The 50 top-cited articles that met the inclusion criteria were ranked. Articles were evaluated for several characteristics including year of publication, country of origin, authorship, publishing journal, topic categories, publishing type and level of evidence.Results: The median number of citations per article in the list was 442 (interquartile range [IQR], 320-520), with a median of 21.8 citations (IQR, 16.5-34.5) per year since publication. The publication years ranged from 1986 to 2017, with 1998 accounting for the greatest number of studies (n = 7). The citation classics were published in 20 journals and originated from institutions in nine countries. The majority of the studies were clinical, of which expert-opinion/review with Level V evidence and clinical studies with Levels I and II evidence comprised the greater proportion in the list.Conclusions: This study identified the top-cited articles and provides useful insights into the history and development of DFU research. Our findings may serve as a quick reference for education curriculums and clinical practice, in addition to providing a foundation for further studies on this topic.

scholarly journals The Latest Developments in Immunomodulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions, Both Allogeneic and Autologous

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-ming Chen ◽  
Qiao-yi Huang ◽  
Yun-xia Zhao ◽  
Wei-hong Chen ◽  
Shu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
The Body ◽  
Immune Rejection ◽  
Intrauterine Adhesions ◽  
Allogeneic Mscs ◽  
Intrauterine Adhesion ◽  
Low Levels

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is an endometrial fibrosis disease caused by repeated operations of the uterus and is a common cause of female infertility. In recent years, treatment using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been proposed by many researchers and is now widely used in clinics because of the low immunogenicity of MSCs. It is believed that allogeneic MSCs can be used to treat IUA because MSCs express only low levels of MHC class I molecules and no MHC class II or co-stimulatory molecules. However, many scholars still believe that the use of allogeneic MSCs to treat IUA may lead to immune rejection. Compared with allogeneic MSCs, autologous MSCs are safer, more ethical, and can better adapt to the body. Here, we review recently published articles on the immunomodulation of allogeneic and autologous MSCs in IUA therapy, with the aim of proving that the use of autologous MSCs can reduce the possibility of immune rejection in the treatment of IUAs.

scholarly journals Economic journals of Russia, their characteristics and network analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-182
Author(s):  
F.T. Aleskerov ◽  
◽  
A.I. Kazachinskaya ◽  
D.S. Karabekyan ◽  
A.S. Semina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Impact Factor ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Science Citation ◽  
Hirsch Index ◽  
Total Citation ◽  
Science Index ◽  
Economic Journals ◽  
Number Of Publications

We study economic journals published in Russia and indexed in the Russian Index of Science Citation (RISC). We analyze citations of 466 journals for 2016–2020 and compare these journals using several metrics: total citation count, Hirsch index, Impact factor RISC, and Science Index RISC. We also use network analysis for citation graphs and compare journals by centrality indices: Copeland index and two new indices: Bundle and Pivotal. We found that “Voprosy Ekonomiki” is the only journal that is among the top-5 journals for all metrics. Other top journals differ for different metrics. We noticed that some top journals have a questionable reputation and the reason why they are among the top journals is a high number of publications, which makes classical journals less influential with respect to the metrics.

scholarly journals Orthopaedic research in low-income countries: A bibliometric analysis of the current literature

SICOT-J ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Simon Matthew Graham ◽  
Ciaran Brennan ◽  
Maritz Laubscher ◽  
Sithombo Maqungo ◽  
David G. Lalloo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Geographic Origin ◽  
High Income ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Orthopaedic Research ◽  
Level I

Background: To perform a bibliometric analysis and quantify the amount of orthopaedic and trauma literature published from low-income countries (LICs). Methods and methods: The Web of Science database was utilised to identify all indexed orthopaedic journals. All articles published in the 76 orthopaedics journals over the last 10 years were reviewed, to determine their geographic origin. Results: A total of 131 454 articles were published across 76 orthopaedic journals over the last 10 years. Of these, 132 (0.1%) were published from LICs and 3515 (2.7%) were published from lower middle-income countries (LMICs); 85.7% (n = 112 716) of published orthopaedic research was undertaken in a high-income setting. The majority of the studies (n = 90, 74.4%) presented level IV evidence. Only 7.4% (n = 9) were high-quality evidence (level I or II). Additionally, the majority of research (74 articles, 56%) was published in partnership with high-income countries (HICs). Conclusions: There is a stark mismatch between the publication of scientific reports on orthopaedic research and the geographical areas of greatest clinical need. We believe there is an urgent need for orthopaedic research to be carried out in low-income settings to guide treatment and improve outcomes, rather than assuming that evidence from high-income settings will translate into this environment. Level of evidence: IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document