scholarly journals Survival and Analysis for Mixed Medullary-Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma: based on SEER database

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Wan ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Xin Miao ◽  
Zhida Chen ◽  
Sisi Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Extrathyroidal Extension ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Ajcc Staging

Abstract PurposeDue to lack of proper diagnostic tools, we aimed to establish a nomogram for Mixed Medullary-Follicular Thyroid (MMFTC) and comparison with AJCC staging in prognosis. MethodsData regarding 203 patients with MMFTC (ICD-O-3 codes 8346, 8347) between 2000 and 2016 from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. X-tile program was used to evaluate the optimal cut-off values for continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards regression model to analyze the independent factors related to prognosis. Construct cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The resulting values were compared with the nomogram and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging using C-index, verification curve, internal validation and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe CSS nomogram presented the prognostic factors including year of diagnosis (p = 0.045), tumor size (p = 0.003), extrathyroidal extension (p = 0.009) and pN stage (p = 0.008), while the OS nomogram showed the prognosis factors including year of diagnosis (p = 0.011), age at diagnosis (p = 0.010), tumor size (p = 0.013), extrathyroidal extension (p = 0.008), pT2 stage (p = 0.021) and Radioactive implants or Radioisotopes (p = 0.031).The C-index, verification curve, internal validation and DCA for these nomograms showed better performance in comparisons with the AJCC staging.ConclusionThe more appropriate and efficient therapeutic strategies were showed by the two nomograms for clinical prediction of OS and CSS in MMFTC.

Multi-Institutional Validation of a New Renal Cancer–Specific Survival Nomogram

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1316-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre I. Karakiewicz ◽  
Alberto Briganti ◽  
Felix K.-H. Chun ◽  
Quoc-Dien Trinh ◽  
Paul Perrotte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Fuhrman Grade ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Purpose We tested the hypothesis that the prediction of renal cancer–specific survival can be improved if traditional predictor variables are used within a prognostic nomogram. Patients and Methods Two cohorts of patients treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors were used: one (n = 2,530) for nomogram development and for internal validation (200 bootstrap resamples), and a second (n = 1,422) for external validation. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses modeled the 2002 TNM stages, tumor size, Fuhrman grade, histologic subtype, local symptoms, age, and sex. The accuracy of the nomogram was compared with an established staging scheme. Results Cancer-specific mortality was observed in 598 (23.6%) patients, whereas 200 (7.9%) died as a result of other causes. Follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 286 months (median, 38.8 months). External validation of the nomogram at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after nephrectomy revealed predictive accuracy of 87.8%, 89.2%, 86.7%, and 88.8%, respectively. Conversely, the alternative staging scheme predicting at 2 and 5 years was less accurate, as evidenced by 86.1% (P = .006) and 83.9% (P = .02) estimates. Conclusion The new nomogram is more contemporary, provides predictions that reach further in time and, compared with its alternative, which predicts at 2 and 5 years, generates 3.1% and 2.8% more accurate predictions, respectively.

scholarly journals Endoscopic and Surgical Treatment of T1N0M0 Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Population-Based Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanlong Zhu ◽  
Si Zhao ◽  
Kun Ji ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Population Based Study

Abstract Background: With the rapid advances in endoscopic technology, endoscopic therapy (ET) is increasingly applied to the treatment of small (≤20 mm) colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, long-term data comparing ET and surgery for management of T1N0M0 colorectal NETs are lacking. The purpose of this work was to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of such patients with ET or surgery.Methods: Patients with T1N0M0 colorectal NETs were identified within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2016). Demographics, tumor characteristics, therapeutic methods, and survival were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used 1:3 and among this cohort, Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to evaluate correlation between treatment and outcomes.Results: Of 4487 patients with T1N0M0 colorectal NETs, 1125 were identified in the matched cohort, among whom 819 (72.8%) underwent ET and 306 (27.2%) underwent surgery. There was no difference in the 5-year and 10-year OS and CSS rates between the 2 treatment modalities. Likewise, analyses stratified by tumor size and site showed that patients did not benefit more from surgery compared with ET. Moreover, multivariate analyses found no significant differences in OS [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.857, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.513–1.431, P = 0.555] and CSS (HR = 0.925, 95% CI: 0.282–3.040, P = 0.898) between the 2 groups. Similar results were observed when comparisons were limited to patients with different tumor size and site.Conclusions: In this population-based study, patients treated endoscopically had comparable long-term survival compared with those treated surgically, which demonstrates ET as an alternative to surgery in T1N0M0 colorectal NETs.

scholarly journals 2542

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 83-83
Author(s):  
Arnav Srivastava ◽  
Hiten Patel ◽  
Max Kates ◽  
Zeyad Schwen ◽  
Gregory Joice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Preoperative Staging ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Similar Survival

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Due to increased experience and favorable outcomes, the use of partial nephrectomy (PN) to treat renal cell carcinoma has grown in the past decade, with expansion to larger tumors. Performing PN for larger tumors could potentially increase the number of patients up-staged to pT3a after surgery, who may have instead been treated with radical nephrectomy (RN), if known preoperatively. We aimed to estimate the proportion of patients up-staged to T3a disease after PN stratified by size. We also compared size-stratified survival outcomes of up-staged patients to those with T1a, T1b, or T2 kidney cancer. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From 1998 to 2013, patients undergoing PN or RN were identified from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registries. The proportion of patients receiving PN found to have pT3a disease was quantified by size. Cox proportional hazards models compared cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) for PN patients with pT1a, pT1b, and pT2 disease with appropriately size-stratified pT3a patients. Also, PN patients with pT3a disease were compared to size-stratified RN patients with pT3a disease. Comparisons by size were performed within pT3a patients receiving PN. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: From a total of 28,854 patients undergoing PN, the estimated proportion up-staged to pT3a increased along with increasing tumor size: 4.2% for T1a, 9.5% for T1b, and 19.5% for T2. Among patients receiving PN, adjusted survival analysis demonstrated worse CSS for up-staged pT3a patients Versus appropriately stratified pT1a (CSS: HR=1.87, p=0.02), pT1b (CSS: HR=1.91, p=0.01), and pT2 (CSS: HR=2.33, p=0.01) patients. However, when assessing OS, only the size-stratified comparison of up-staged pT3a Versus pT1a disease demonstrated worse OS for the up-staged cohort (OS: HR=1.25, p=0.04). Comparing PN and RN for pT3a disease, size-adjusted analysis revealed no statistical difference in CSS or OS. Lastly, among patients undergoing PN with pT3a disease, patients with larger tumors, measuring 4–7 cm (CSS: HR=2.83, p<0.01; OS: HR=1.44, p=0.04) or 7–16 cm (CSS: HR=8.22, p<0.01; OS: HR=2.64, p<0.01), experienced worse survival than those with smaller pT3a tumors, <4 cm. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: A greater proportion of patients appear to experience T3a up-staging after PN with increasing initial T stage. Up-staged pT3a patients have worse cancer specific survival after PN compared to those with similarly sized localized tumors. Furthermore, the up-staged pT3a patients after PN appear to experience similar survival to pT3a patients undergoing RN. However, pT3a patients undergoing PN had worse survival with increasing tumor size, reinforcing the need for improvements in preoperative staging and identifying patients at risk of up-staging.

scholarly journals Radiotherapy Plus Chemotherapy Is Associated With Improved Survival Compared to Radiotherapy Alone in Patients With Primary Vaginal Carcinoma: A Retrospective SEER Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-li Zhou ◽  
Yang-yang Yue
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Vaginal Carcinoma ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone

BackgroundThe efficacy of radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (RTCT) versus radiotherapy alone (RT) in the treatment of primary vaginal carcinoma has been controversial. We aimed to evaluate the up-to-date efficacy of RTCT on primary vaginal carcinoma in a real-world cohort.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis in patients with primary vaginal carcinoma retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database from 2004 to 2016. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted and compared by the log-rank test. Inverse probability weighting (IPW)-adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing-risk model was applied.ResultsOf the 1,813 qualified patients with primary vaginal carcinoma from 2004 to 2016, 1,137 underwent RTCT and 676 underwent RT. The median survival time was 34 months for the RT group and 63 months for the RTCT group. RTCT was significantly associated with improved overall survival (unadjusted HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.62–0.82, p &lt; 0.001; adjusted HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.84, p &lt; 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (unadjusted sHR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.95, p = 0.012; adjusted sHR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.96, p = 0.016). Age, histological type, tumor size, surgery, and FIGO stage were all independent prognostic factors for survival (p &lt; 0.05 for all). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that RTCT was significantly associated with better survival in most subgroups, except for those with adenocarcinoma, tumor size &lt;2 cm, or FIGO stage I. Moreover, sensitivity analysis did not alter the beneficial effects of RTCT.ConclusionRTCT is significantly correlated with prolonged survival in patients with primary vaginal carcinoma. RTCT should be applied to most patients with primary vaginal carcinoma instead of RT alone, except for those with adenocarcinoma, tumor size &lt;2 cm, or FIGO stage I.

scholarly journals Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qichen Chen ◽  
Mingxia Li ◽  
Pan Wang ◽  
Jinghua Chen ◽  
Hong Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Ratio ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Positive Lymph Node ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Node Ratio ◽  
Cox Analysis

BackgroundAlthough lymph node dissection (LND) has been commonly used for patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoids (PCs), the prognostic values of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) and the number of removed nodes (NRN) remain unclear.MethodsPatients with resected PCs were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010–2015). The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN were determined by X-tile. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients in different PLNR and NRN groups.ResultsThe study included 1622 patients. The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN for survival were 13% and 13, respectively. In both Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis before IPTW, a PLNR ≥13% was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 3.364, P&lt;0.001) and worse CSS (HR = 7.874, P&lt;0.001). These findings were corroborated by the IPTW-adjusted Cox analysis OS (HR = 2.358, P = 0.0275) and CSS (HR = 8.190, P&lt;0.001) results. An NRN ≥13 was not significantly associated with worse OS in either the Kaplan-Meier or Cox analysis before or after IPTW adjustment. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis before and after IPTW adjustment, an NRN ≥13 was significantly associated with worse CSS (non-IPTW: HR = 2.216, P=0.013; IPTW-adjusted: HR = 2.162, P=0.024).ConclusionA PLNR ≥13% could predict worse OS and CSS in patients with PCs and might be an important complement to the present PC staging system. Extensive LND with an NRN ≥13 might have no therapeutic value for OS and may even have an adverse influence on CSS. Its application should be considered on an individual basis.

scholarly journals Molecular Subtype May Be More Associated With Prognosis and Chemotherapy Benefit Than Tumor Size in T1N0 Breast Cancer Patients: An Analysis of 2,168 Patients for Possible De-Escalation Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siji Zhu ◽  
Yafen Li ◽  
Weiguo Chen ◽  
Xiaochun Fei ◽  
Kunwei Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival

PurposeBreast cancer (BC) patients with T1N0 tumors have relatively favorable clinical outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether molecular subtypes can aide in prognostic prediction for such small, nodal-negative BC cases and guide decision-making about escalating or de-escalating treatments.Patients and MethodsT1N0 BC patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2017 were included and classified into three subgroups according to receptor status: 1) hormonal receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)−; 2) HER2+; and 3) triple negative (TN) (HR−/HER2−). Patients’ characteristics and relapse events were reviewed. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the iDFS and BCSS. The effects of risk factors and adjuvant treatment benefits were evaluated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) with Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsIn total, 2,168 patients (1,435 HR+/HER2−, 427 HER2+, 306 TN) were enrolled. The 5-year iDFS rates were 93.6, 92.7, and 90.6% for HR+/HER2−, HER2+, and TN patients, respectively (P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that molecular subtype (P = 0.043), but not tumor size (P = 0.805), was independently associated with iDFS in T1N0 BC. TN patients [HRs = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11–2.84, P = 0.018] had a higher recurrence risk than HR+/HER2− patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit was not demonstrated in all T1N0 patients but interacted with molecular subtype status. TN (adjusted HRs = 2.31, 95% CI = 0.68–7.54) and HER2+ (adjusted HRs = 2.26, 95% CI = 0.95–5.63) patients receiving chemotherapy had superior iDFS rates. Regarding BCSS, molecular subtype tended to be related to outcome (P = 0.053) and associated with chemotherapy benefit (P = 0.005).ConclusionMolecular subtype was more associated with disease outcome and chemotherapy benefit than tumor size in T1N0 BC patients, indicating that it may guide possible clinical de-escalating therapy in T1N0 BC.

scholarly journals Epilepsy as a Comorbidity in Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis—A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 3983
Author(s):  
Ella Nissan ◽  
Abdulla Watad ◽  
Arnon D. Cohen ◽  
Kassem Sharif ◽  
Johnatan Nissan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Cross Sectional

Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are autoimmune-mediated multisystemic myopathies, characterized mainly by proximal muscle weakness. A connection between epilepsy and PM/DM has not been reported previously. Our study aim is to evaluate this association. A case–control study was conducted, enrolling a total of 12,278 patients with 2085 cases (17.0%) and 10,193 subjects in the control group (83.0%). Student’s t-test was used to evaluate continuous variables, while the chi-square test was applied for the distribution of categorical variables. Log-rank test, Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards method were performed for the analysis regarding survival. Of the studied 2085 cases, 1475 subjects (70.7%) were diagnosed with DM, and 610 patients (29.3%) with PM. Participants enrolled as cases had a significantly higher rate of epilepsy (n = 48 [2.3%]) as compared to controls (n = 141 [1.4%], p < 0.0005). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, PM was found only to be significantly associated with epilepsy (OR 2.2 [95%CI 1.36 to 3.55], p = 0.0014), whereas a non-significant positive trend was noted in DM (OR 1.51 [95%CI 0.99 to 2.30], p = 0.0547). Our data suggest that PM is associated with a higher rate of epilepsy compared to controls. Physicians should be aware of this comorbidity in patients with immune-mediated myopathies.

Clinicopathological Features, Prognostic Factors, Survival Trends, and Treatment of Malignant Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors: A SEER Database Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 145-152
Author(s):  
Hualei Guo ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Wenhui Wang ◽  
Lingna Chen
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological prognostic factors of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT) and evaluate the survival trends of MOGCT by histotype. Methods: We extracted data on 1,963 MOGCT cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the histological classification of MOGCT, including 5 categories: dysgerminoma, embryonal carcinoma (EC), yolk sac tumor, malignant teratoma, and mixed germ cell tumor. We examined overall and disease-specific survival of the 5 histological types. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate survival curves and prognostic factors. We also estimated survival curves of MOGCT according to different treatments. Results: There was a significant difference in prognosis among different histological classifications. Age, histotype, grade, SEER stage, and surgery were independent prognostic factors for survival of patients with MOGCT. For all histotypes, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate estimates were >85%, except for EC, which had the worst outcomes at 1 year (55.6%), 3 years (44.4%), and 5 years (33.3%). In the distant SEER stage, both chemotherapy and surgery were associated with improved survival outcomes compared with surgery- and chemotherapy-only groups. Conclusions: Dysgerminoma patients had the most favorable outcomes, whereas EC patients had the worst survival. A young age, low grade, and surgery were all significant predictors for improved survival. In contrast, a distant SEER stage was a risk factor for poor survival. Chemotherapy combined with surgery contributed to longer survival times of patients with MOGCT in the distant SEER stage.

scholarly journals Individualized Prediction of Survival Benefits of Pancreatectomy Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Simultaneous Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duorui Nie ◽  
Guihua Lai ◽  
Guilin An ◽  
Zhuojun Wu ◽  
Shujun Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Calibration Plot ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Good Ability

BackgroundMetastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) is a highly lethal malignancy with poorer survival. However, chemotherapy alone was unable to maintain long‐term survival. This study aimed to evaluate the individualized survival benefits of pancreatectomy plus chemotherapy (PCT) for mPC.MethodsA total of 4546 patients with mPC from 2004 to 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The survival curve was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in survival curves were tested using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value of involved variables. A new nomogram was constructed to predict overall survival based on independent prognosis factors. The performance of the nomogram was measured by concordance index, calibration plot, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsCompared to pancreatectomy or chemotherapy alone, PCT can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with mPC. In addition, patients with well/moderately differentiated tumors, age ≤66 years, tumor size ≤42 mm, or female patients were more likely to benefit from PCT. Multivariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis, sex, marital status, grade, tumor size, and treatment were independent prognostic factors. The established nomogram has a good ability to distinguish and calibrating.ConclusionPCT can prolong survival in some patients with mPC. Our nomogram can individualize predict OS of pancreatectomy combined with chemotherapy in patients with concurrent mPC.

scholarly journals Lobectomy Versus Segmentectomy in Patients with Stage T (>2 cm and ≤3 cm) N0M0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linlin Wang ◽  
Lihui Ge ◽  
Guofeng Zhang ◽  
Yi Ren ◽  
Yongyu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Abstract Background: Whether lung segmentectomy is a safe and effective surgical treatment in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We have therefore reviewed the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes of patients receiving a lobectomy vs. segmentectomy to treat early T (>2 cm and ≤3 cm) N0M0 NSCLC.Methods: We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy between 2004 and 2015. To reduce bias and imbalance between the treatment groups, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to identify independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, and applied the Cox proportional hazards model to create forest plots. Results: A total of 5783 patients from the SEER database were included. Of these, 5531 patients underwent lobectomy, and 252 patients underwent segmentectomy. Before matching, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that patients who underwent lobectomy had better OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.561; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.292-1.885; P <0.001) and LCSS (HR: 1.551; 95% CI 1.198-2.009; P=0.001) than patients who underwent segmentectomy. However, survival differences between the groups were not significant; OS (P=0.160) and LCSS (P=0.097) after matching. Regression analyses revealed that age, sex, lymph node dissection, and grade were independent predictors of OS and LCSS (P <0.05).Conclusions: For patients with stage T (>2 cm and ≤3 cm) N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer, segmentectomy can achieve the same OS and LCSS compared with lobectomy. A large number of patients require further long-term follow-up analyses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document