scholarly journals Women’s Participation in Village Developent Planning: Case of Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 006 (02) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Dian Andryanto

The introduction of participatory processes concerning village development planning by Law 6/2014 on Village open up the opportunity for village communities to shape village development priorities. It is expected that village community involvement over village planning will make village government more accoutable downwardly and village development be responsive to villagers problems and needs. Using literature review, the present paper inspects closely a body of literature to ensure that women and other historically marginalized groups have chance to participate meaningfully in these processes. The reviewed literature suggest a divergence between what scholars believe about advantages of participatory processes and limited impact of such. Similarly, within this nascent stage of village law implementation participatory spaces in determining village development priorities are still dominated by village elites and men, and village development is heavily focus on infrastructure development. However, the presence and empowered women’s organizations or groups which exists in villages might influential to drivw village development priorities that are responsive for women. What we learned from these body of literature is that meaningful participation by women and other historically disadvantaged groups can only be achieved through continious intervention and facilitation either by dedicated and reform-minded public officials and other critical actors. Furthermore women should involve in participatory village development planning as a collective, rather than as individuals.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-38
Author(s):  
Hikmah Adila ◽  
Andy Alfatih ◽  
Alfitri

This study aimed to find out how community participation in the Village Fund program in Kemang Manis Village in the Four Lawang District in 2016 and the factors that supported and blocked community participation in the village fund program in Kemang Manis Village. The method used was qualitative so that the data obtained through interviews, observation and study of documentation and qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. The results showed that at the decision making stage, the participation of the Kemang Manis village community in the Village Fund Program in 2016 was still low because the data synchronization activities were not carried out, only the village elite community and workers as well as grant providers, were invited, attended, gave opinions, and approve the results of the meeting's decision. At the implementation stage (community participation) was quite good, it appeared in the crowded community who registered themselves as candidates for village infrastructure activities, following the work briefing and direction from the village government. At the time of implementation the community brought their own carpentry equipment, donated food and drinks, and received wages or daily work incentives, and participants of community empowerment activities received transport money. The stages of the utilization of benefits (benefits) the community felt the benefits of the results of village development. Roads could be passed by 4-wheeled vehicles, making it easier to transport agricultural produce, residents began to build houses because roads were available and land values ​​had also increased. The community had not yet been involved in the monitoring, supervision and evaluation stages, because in the planning stages of the Village RPJM and Village RKP documents the community involvement is still low. At the stage of implementation of village development the community was involved as an implementer, but the procurement and financial management and administration activities were carried out by the village government. There were no complaints from the public and information disclosure regarding the new Village Fund in the form of a Village Infrastructure development project board.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Anita Marianata

Reform in decentralization and village democratization can be seen in the involvement of villagers in the policy-making process, both in the economic, political and rural development fields. In the community planning process there is widespread (participatory) community involvement. The involvement of citizens in village development is one part of the development goals. Equality, justice, non-violence, tolerance, inclusiveness, transparency, accountability and responsiveness are principles that must be put forward in the village development planning process. The involvement of citizens in village development planning and budgeting aims to ensure and identify what should be the development priorities, policies, programs and activities that require budget or resources. By using a descriptive qualitative approach, this research is expected to be able to understand more deeply about inclusive and responsive democracy carried out by village government institutions and the involvement of villagers' participation. This is one of the first steps that should be taken by the village government in building democracy at the village level.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
Fajar Ifan Dolly

The GDM program is a concrete step by the Bungo Regency government in order to improve welfare, provide opportunities for the development of the local economy of the village. As well as increasing the capacity of the community through a variety of village-level organizational affiliations and providing an opportunity for the village government to explore the potential that exists in the village so that it can further be developed into a village economic strength. This study aims to determine how the implementation and effectiveness of the GDM program in the context of community empowerment in Bungo District. This research uses a qualitative method approach with descriptive analysis. Data analysis techniques using the model of Miles and Huberman. Furthermore, this study uses data validity testing using the Triangulation Method, namely by comparing information or data in different ways so as to obtain the correctness of information. The results showed that the implementation of village community empowerment in Bungo District did not go well so it did not create opportunities for the community to be more empowered and protect the weak groups. The implementation of empowerment was also not carried out as stated in the regent's regulations regarding the GDM program. This is because the village government tends to focus more on rural infrastructure development and not focus on empowerment activities. The flow of submission and implementation of village community empowerment activities through groups also did not include and involve the youth organization as a forum for discussion of various group needs that existed in village communities.


Author(s):  
Suyono Suyono ◽  
Kris Nugroho ◽  
Dwi Windyastuti

This study aimed to explore political communication in the building of political power networks in Jenggrik Village, Kedunggalar District, Ngawi Regency during the village head elections (village head election) from 1998 to 2019 from patron-client relations perspective. Political communication occurs through village elites and village community leaders. Political communication happens between the village head and his community members. This study was a descriptive study using a qualitative research method. This study sought to understand the processes and facts about political communication that shapes community loyalty and the leaders in Jenggrik Village, Kedunggalar District who have economic and non-economic power. The findings and conclusions of this study supported Max Weber's notion on Charismatic Leadership as well as Sartono Kartodirjo’s research which stated that the loyalty of village communities (clients) is formed because of village heads (patrons) for material (economic) and non-material (non-economic) reasons, such as authority and charisma of the leader; distribution of benefits from individuals or groups in exchange for political support; the loyalty of village communities, according to Jonathan Hopkins; also material factors such as financial aid, village physical infrastructure development assistance, or other economic assistance, according to James C. Scott and Ahimsa.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indrasto Wahyudi Dahlan ◽  
Anwar Parawangi ◽  
Amir Muhiddin

The study aims to determine the role of village government in Implementing the Rural Infrastructure Development Program (PPIP) In the village Sendana, Mambi district Mamasa Regency . Type research is descriptive qualitative approach is an approach that focuses on the process of data collection in order to describe the state of the object. Data collection technique used by observation, interview and documentation. The result of this study shows that the role of the village government can already be said to play an active role with the following indicator, which is to facilitate the village government to provide facilities at village meetings, implementation of transparency, and support facilities for CSOs. Community engagement where the village government to try and work together with management to prioritize community involvement; supervise and control the implementation of the PPIP. The village government to approach the manager for observing the principles of the PPIP program and use of the budget in accordance with the allocation; fostering CSO where the village government to provide guidance through the values of local wisdom and social capital so that the attitudes and behavior of society for the better organization. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui Peranan Pemerintah Desa Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pedesaan (PPIP) Di Desa Sendana Kecamatan Mambi Kabupaten Mamasa. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif adalah pendekatan yang menitik beratkan pada proses pengumpulan data. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi,wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa peranan Pemerintah Desa sudah dapat dikatakan berperan aktif dengan indikator yaitu: adalah menfasilitasi yang dimana Pemerintah Desa memberikan fasilitas pada musyawarah desa, transpransi pelaksanaan, dan fasilitas penunjang untuk OMS. Keterlibatan masyarakat yang dimana Pemerintah Desa berusaha dan bekerja sama dengan pihak pengelola untuk mengutamakan keterlibatan masyarakat; mengawasi dan pelaksanaan PPIP. Pemerintah Desa melakukan pendekatan kepada pengelola untuk memperhatikan prinsip-prinsip Program PPIP dan penggunaan anggaran sesuai dengan peruntukkannya; membina OMS yang dimana Pemerintah Desa melakukan pembinaan melalui nilainilai kearifan lokal dan modal sosial agar sikap dan perilaku organisasi masyarakat menjadi lebih baik.


Author(s):  
Zulmasyhur Zulmasyhur ◽  
Bhakti Nur Avianto

Musrenbangdes consist of formation activities, methods, programs and social movements with the aim of accommodating and identifying problems and needs that exist in each hamlet, Musrenbangdes conducted to filter aspirations and formulate policy directions. So there is a contribution to the role of village deliberation decision making that can increase community participation in rural infrastructure development. However, good planning is not optimal because it can be seen from the weakness of the ability of government officials, the community in implementing Musrenbangdes still has shortcomings, both seen technically and its performance is also not optimal, does not follow the procedures set by the Musrenbangdes stages so that the results obtained are not effective, efficient , not optimal and not in accordance with community needs. Factors hampering the Musrenbangdes, namely: weak capacity of village government in making development planning, cronyism of government and capacity building are weak and institutions that handle Musrenbangdes, weaknesses in identifying problems, and weak government data and information support. Influential actors in the process of preparing village development plans, among others, lack of planning workforce resources, limited time, development planning that is not integrated and the allocation of projects is ineffective and not based on priority scale.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Ahmad Sururi ◽  
Rahmi Mulyasih

The purpose of this community service activity is to co-ordinate with the community in developing innovative and participatory development planning policy formulation in a sustainable manner to produce the document as reference and recommendation of RPJMD and RKPD. The expected impact factor is to encourage the strengthening of the capacity of villagers both individually and in groups through the active participation of the community by utilizing local potentials and resources so as to generate village development planning cadres and transforming them into development policy actors as the subject of policy formulation. Strengthening Community Capacity-based innovation policy formulation is implemented through the following principles: (i) the community is the main actor of the development planner and is positioned as the decision maker / policy maker; (ii) prioritizing the values of local wisdom included in social capital in accordance with social, cultural and geographic characteristics; (iii) village governments are facilitators who facilitate village communities in developing innovative development planning policy formulations. The method used is Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA) or participatory village appraisal. The results of community service activities run in accordance with the predetermined plans. The stages of advisory activities are running well from socialization, observation and survey, identification, problem solving analysis and preparation of development planning documents to be handed over to village government as recommendation / reference materials for the preparation of RPJMD and RKPD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suharto Suharto

This article describes the Capacity of the Village Government in the framework of implementing the 2014 Law Number 6 concerning Villages which is very important in determining its success. In this study aims to determine the extent of the capacity of the Village Government in implementing the Village Law. Looking at the current condition of the Village which is very heterogeneous, both quantity, quality or capacity and even the potential of natural resources and human resources are very varied, so in the context of implementing the Village Law it needs to be addressed or concern us, especially academics. The problems in this study are: "What is the capacity of the village government in the framework of implementing the Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages?. Looking at the present condition of the village nationally, special steps are needed in the framework of implementing the Village Law. The parallel steps that must be considered and carried out in order to succeed the implementation of the Village Law include: First, the capacity level of the Village Government, namely the readiness of the Village Tools and Village Institutions (quantity and quality). Quantitatively, most villages currently do not have complete equipment as stipulated in PP 43/2014 article 61-article 64. Meanwhile, the available equipment capacity still needs to be improved. Second, the quality of the compilation of Village Development Planning documents (Village RPJM, Village RKP and Village APB). Based on PP 43/2014, paragraphs 114-115 and PP 60/2014 ps. 20, it is stated that the use of the Village Fund refers to the Village Medium Term Plan (RKPDes) and Village Government Work Plan (RKPDes). The implementation of the Village Law requires the capacity of the village government to master the technical and mechanism of managing trained and professional finance. With a number of issues, the current unprepared capacity makes feedback in efforts to improve the capacity of village financial management, together with all stakeholders (stakeholders), actors in the field, groups of care / volunteers and all village communities, because village funds must be able to promote the village and prosper villagers. Keywords: Village Government Capacity, Implementation of Village Law 


Publika ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 109-120
Author(s):  
Novi Ekri Nurwahyuni ◽  
Muhammad Farid Ma'ruf

Desa Wisata Jambu berdiri sejak tahun 2018  berlokasi di Kecamatan Kayen Kidul Kabupaten Kediri yang meraih penghargaan  nominasi kategori desa wisata terbaik 2018 dan 2019 pada Penghargaan Anugerah Desa. Pada fase awal pembangunan desa wisata menggunakan modal anggaran yang berasal dari Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan pemberdayaan masyarakat desa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, serta metode pengumpulan data dilakukan secara langsung turun ke lapangan dengan wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Focus penelitian ini adalah meneliti mengenai permasalahan yang diangkat yaitu sumber daya manusia yang kurang responsive terhadap pengelolaan desa wisata. Desa wisata jambu memiliki 17 spot wisata diantaranya yaitu  Kebun Bibit Kediri, Wisata Edukasi Wiwit Padi, Permainan Outbond, Wisata Tubing Niagara, Wisata Edukasi Menangkap Lele, Agrowisata Petik Kelengkeng, Agrowisata Petik Alpukat, Agrowisata Buah Lokal, Wisata Edukasi Menanam Padi, Agrowisata Okulasi dan Tabulampat, Wisata Edukasi Angon Kerbau, Edukasi Pengolakah Yogurt, Edukasi Perah Kambing Ettawa, Edukasi Pengolahan Limbah Kayu “Ask Craft”, Wisata Sungai Sejuta Ikan, Edukasi Karawitan, Pasar Papringan. Pemerintah Desa Jambu gencar mengupayakan tumbuhnya pemberdayaan masyarakat dengan mengelola desa wisata. Tujuan pemberdayaan masyarakat melalui pengelolaan desa wisata Jambu yaitu untuk meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat desa serta mewujudkan masyarakat desa yang mampu berdaya saing dan mandiri. Dalam proses pengelolaan desa wisata terdapat kendala atau hambatan yang terjadi yaitu tanggapan masyarakat yang tidak responsive terhadap konsep spot wisata yang sudah disepakati. Selain itu kurangnya akses sarana dan prasarana spot wisata juga menjadikan kondisi desa wisata yang tidak kondusif sehingga akan menurunkan daya tarik wisatawan. Kata kunci : Desa Wisata, Alokasi Dana Desa,  Pemberdayaan Masyarakat   Jambu Tourism Village was founded in 2018, located in Kayen Kidul District, Kediri Regency, which won the nomination award for the best tourism village category 2018 and 2019 at the Village Award. In the early phase of tourism village development using budget capital from the Village Fund Allocation (ADD) with the aim of increasing the empowerment of village communities. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach, and data collection methods are carried out directly in the field with interviews, observation, and documentation. The focus of this research is to examine the problems raised, namely human resources who are not responsive to the management of tourist villages. Guava tourism village has 18 tourist spots including Kediri Seed Garden, Wiwit Paddy Educational Tour, Outbound Games, Niagara Tubing Tour, Catfish Catching Educational Tour, Longan Picking Agro, Avocado Picking Agro, Local Fruit Agro Tourism, Paddy Planting Educational Tour, Grafting Agro tourism and Tabulampat, Education Tour for Buffalo Angon, Education for Yogurt Processing, Education for Ettawa Goat Milk, Education for Making Rengginang, Education for Wood Waste Processing “Ask Craft”, One Million Fish River Tour, Education for Karawitan, Papringan Market. The Jambu Village Government is aggressively seeking the growth of community empowerment by managing a tourist village. The purpose of community empowerment through the management of the Jambu tourism village is to improve the economy of the village community and create a village community that is able to be competitive and independent. In the process of managing a tourism village, there are obstacles or obstacles that occur, namely the response of the community that is not responsive to the agreed tourist spot concept. In addition, the lack of access to tourist spot facilities and infrastructure also makes the condition of the tourist village not conducive so that it will reduce the attractiveness of tourists. Keywords: Tourism Village, Village Fund Allocation, Community Empowerment


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 411
Author(s):  
Siti Rodhiyah Dwi Istinah ◽  
Uyunun Nafisa

Reform and regional autonomy is actually a new hope for the goverment and village communities to build their villages according to the needs and aspirations of the community. The implementation of development in the village is intended to improve the standard of living and welfare of the village community itself through the establishment of policies, program activities that are in accordance with the essence of the problem and priority needs of the village community. The Village Consultative Division (BPD in Indonesian) is an institution of the realization pf democracy from the village community or an institution that represents the voice of the community and is a working partner of the village Government in administering The Goverment in the village head along with his device was overseen by the Village Consultative Division (BPD in Indonesian). The method of the approach used in this study is the Juridical Sociological approach, it uses the Juridical Sociological. The selection results obtained include : 1) Inbiting factors influenced by human resource factors both from the village Government itself as the highest office holder in the village, as well as from PD members who are tasked with assisting in the implementation of the legislative functions of approval and discussion of illage regulations. 2) Solutions and efforts, the village Goernment is expected to conduct training in human resource development such as improving the quality of education and developing capabilities in shapping regulations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document