scholarly journals Keefektifan PBL seting kolaboratif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Tety Dwi Setyaningsih ◽  
Agus Maman Abadi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Anxiety ◽  
Math Anxiety ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Mathematics

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan mana yang lebih efektif antara PBL setting kolaboratif kelompok dan berpasangan ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-postest nonequivalent comparison-group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Kalasan yang terdiri dari empat kelas. Kelas VII C dan VII D ditentukan sebagai sampel secara acak. Dari kedua kelas tersebut diberi instrumen pretest dan postest tentang prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket kecemasan siswa. Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran digunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan digunakan uji MANOVA dan untuk mengetahui pembelajaran mana yang lebih efektif digunakan uji independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) PBL seting kolaboratif kelompok maupun berpasangan masing-masing efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan siswa, (2) PBL seting kolaboratif kelompok lebih efektif dibandingkan PBL seting kolaboratif berpasangan ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, namun tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kecemasan siswa. The effectiveness of PBL with collaborative setting in terms of algebraic achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety AbstractThis study aimed to describe which was more effective between PBL with grouped collaborative setting or paired collaborative setting in terms of the algebraic achievement, critical thinking ability, and mathematics anxiety. This research was quasi-experimental with the pretest-posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. The research population included all 7th grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Kalasan which consisted of four classes. Two classes were randomly established as the sample. Before and after the treatment, these two classes were given a pretest and posttest of algebraic achievements, critical thinking ability, and and questionnaire of math anxiety. To test the effectiveness of this study, the researcher used one sample t-test; to examine differences in the effectiveness, the researcher used MANOVA; to determine which learning model was more effective, the researcher used the independent sample t-test. The results of this study show that: (1) the PBL with grouped and paired collaborative setting were effective in terms of the algebraic achievements, critical thinking ability, and mathematics anxiety, (2) the PBL with grouped collaborative setting was more effective than that using the PBL with paired collaborative setting in terms of algebraic achievement, but no difference in the effectiveness in terms of critical thinking ability and math anxiety

KECEMASAN MATEMATIKA DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS SISWA DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiq Zulfikar Hadi ◽  
Maman Fathurrohman ◽  
Cecep Anwar Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematics Anxiety ◽  
Math Anxiety ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
High Anxiety ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
And Mathematics

This research is conducted by the low mathematics critical thinking ability of students in junior high schools, especially in  VII grade .Students of VII grade commonly are transitioning from elementary school to junior high school could be a reason how low students of VII grade on mathematic critical thingking ability. The low ability mathematics critical thingking one of caused by mathematics anxiety. This study aims to find a relationship between math anxiety and mathematics critical thinking ability of VII grade at SMPN 5 Serang City. The method of this research is quantitative descriptive by making 110 students from VII grade as a sample. The data were collected using questionnaire and test. The result of this study indicate that 1) the ammount of correlation between math anxiety with critical thingking ability is -0,5991> rs table 0,1695, which means there is a significant and negative relationship between anxiety and critical thingking ability 2) the average of students’s mathematics critical thingking ability is different where score between students with low anxiety have a better score than student with mid anxiety and low anxiety,and students with mid anxiety have a better score than students with high anxiety, and students with mid anxiety have a better score than students with high anxiety.

scholarly journals Efektivitas PBL setting TTW dan TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Hardiyanto ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) dan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think pair share (TPS) serta mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan antara PBL setting TTW dan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket self-efficacy siswa. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan one sample t-test, dan analisis multivariat (MANOVA). One sample t-test dilakukan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TPS, sedangkan analisis multivariat (MANOVA) dilakukan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua treatment tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan pendekatan PBL setting TPS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Selain itu hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan yang signifikan antara pendekatan PBL setting TTW dengan pendekatan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. The Effectiveness of PBL Setting TTW and TPS Seen from Students Learning Achievement, Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy  AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) and PBL setting think pair share (TPS) and describe the difference of the effectiveness between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and self-efficacy of grade students. This research is quasi-experimental research. The research instruments to collect the data are a learning achievement test, a test to examine the ability to think critically and a self-efficacy questionnaire. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. Meanwhile, multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out to determine the difference between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. The results show that both PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS are effective in terms of students learning achievements, critical thinking ability, and self-efficacy and there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of PBL setting TTW and the effectiveness of PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and student self-efficacy.

scholarly journals Improvement of Critical Thinking Ability and Preparedness Assisted by Android-Based Media to Understand Landslide through Physics Learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Ulfaturrona Nur Labibah ◽  
Mundilarto Mundilarto ◽  
Syazana Bt Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Disaster Preparedness ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This research aimed to understand the critical thinking ability improvement and preparedness assisted by Android-based media to understand landslides through physics learning and understand the effectiveness of the media. This research provides knowledge about disaster preparedness through physics learning in landslide-prone schools using Android media. This research used quasi-experimental with Control Group Design. The research subjects included tenth-grade students in class X (30 people) at SMA N 1 Kokap. The samples were selected using the lottery method and saturated sampling technique to determine the control and experiment groups (quasi-experimental with Control Group Design). The pretest and posttest were in the form of essay questions. The analysis data used independent sample T-test and effect size. The results show that the average critical thinking ability of the experimental class increased from 18.13 to 65.00, and the average preparedness increased from 68.75 to 81.88. The results of the independent sample t-test show the value of Sig. (2-tailed) on critical thinking ability was 0.000 and preparedness was 0.027 (Sig. (2-tailed) 0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that there are significant differences in critical thinking ability and disaster preparedness in the experimental class and the control class. The effect size of using an Android-based understanding of landslide natural disasters on students' critical thinking ability and preparedness is 2.0 with high effectiveness. Media landslides and landslides through Android-based physics learning can improve students’ critical thinking ability and disaster preparedness.

scholarly journals Keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan discovery ditinjau dari prestasi, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kecemasan matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-180
Author(s):  
Enggar Prasetyawan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Math Anxiety ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Nonequivalent Groups ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Contextual Teaching

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan dan perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dan Discovery ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain nonequivalent groups prestest-posttest. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Ngaglik. Sampel penelitian ini adalah kelas X MIA 2 dan X MIA 4 yang diperoleh melalui pemilihan secara acak dari empat kelas yang masing-masing siswanya berjumlah 31 orang. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar berupa soal pilihan ganda yang terdiri dari 20 butir soal, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis berupa soal uraian yang terdiri dari 4 butir soal, dan angket kecemasan matematika yang terdiri dari 32 butir pernyataan. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan discovery dilakukan dengan uji one sample t-test. Pengujian perbedaan keefektifan antara pendekatan CTL dan Discovery dilakukan dengan uji MANOVA (Hotteling’s Trace). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan CTL dan discovery efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika, (2) tidak ada perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan Discovery ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika. Effectiveness of CTL and discovery approach viewed from students’ achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness and difference of effectiveness between of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and discovery approach viewed from students’ learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety. This research was quasi experiment with nonequivalent groups prestest-posttest design. The population in this study was all students of class X of SMAN 2 Ngaglik. The sample of the study was the students of X MIA 2 and X MIA 4 which is determined randomly from four classes which each of that classes consist of 31 students. The instruments used to collect data were a learning achievement test consisting of 20 multiple choice questions, a critical thinking ability test consisting of 5 essays, and math anxiety questionnaires that consisted of 32 statements. To determine the effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Discovery approach, one sample t-test was used. To discover the difference of effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach and Discovery approach MANOVA (Hotteling’s Trace) was used. The results show that (1) Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Discovery approach are effective viewed from student’s learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety,(2) there is no difference in effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach and Discovery approach viewed from student’s learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety.

scholarly journals Efektivitas guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi, dan self-efficacy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-132
Author(s):  
Imaludin Agus
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
T Test ◽  
Contextual Approach ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Guided Discovery ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Thinking Ability

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan guided discovery meggunakan pendekatan kontekstual dan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy matematika siswa SMP. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi-experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kontukowun, kabupaten Muna dan kelas VIII-1 dan Kelas VIII-2 dipilih secara acak sebagai sampel. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual dan konvensional menggunakan uji one sample t-test, sedangkan untuk perbedaan keefektifan metode pembelajaran menggunakan uji two group manova. Jika terdapat perbedaan maka dilanjutkan dengan uji perbandingan menggunakan independent sample t-test. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy; metode konvensional tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy; dan guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual lebih efektif dibandingkan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy. The effectiveness of guided discovery using the contextual approach in terms of critical thinking ability, achievement, and self-efficacyAbstractThe aim of the study aims to describe the effectiveness of guided discovery using the contextual approach in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement and self-efficacy in the mathematics of junior high school students. The study was quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design method. The population in this research was all 8th-grade students from one public junior high school in Kontukowuna, Muna Regency, Indonesia and class VIII-1 and VIII-2 were randomly selected as a sample. One sample t-test was used to determine the effectiveness of the guided discovery using the contextual approach and the conventional method. Whereas, two groups of Manova was used to know the difference between the learning methods. Then, if the result showed there is a significant difference between the two classes, the independent sample t-test was administered. Result of the study indicates that the guided discovery using the contextual approach is effective in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy; the conventional method is not effective in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy; and the guided discovery using contextual approach is more effective than conventional in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy.

scholarly journals KEEFEKTIFAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEM SOLVING DAN PROBLEM POSING DENGAN SETTING KOOPERATIF DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Widha Nur Shanti ◽  
Agus Maman Abadi
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Cooperative Problem Solving ◽  
Thinking Ability

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan pembelajaran (problem solving dengan setting kooperatif dan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif) dan membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif dan pendekatan problem solving dengan setting kooperatif pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari ketercapaian standar kompeten-si, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecerdasan emosional siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. Populasi sampelnya adalah siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Pengasih dan siswa Kelas X2 dan X3.Untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan pembelajaran (problem solving dengan setting kooperatif dan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif), data dianalisis menggunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk menguji bahwa pendekatan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif lebih efektif daripada pendekatan problem solving dengan setting kooperatif, data dianalisis menggunakan MANOVA yang dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Bonferroni. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan pembelajaran (problem solving dengan setting kooperatif dan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif) efektif dan pendekatan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif lebih efektif daripada pendekatan problem solving dengan setting kooperatif pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari ketercapaian standar kompetensi, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecerdasan emosional siswa. Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem solving dengan setting kooperatif, pendekatan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif, ketercapaian standar kompetensi, kemampuan berpikir kritis, kecerdasan emosional.   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COOPERATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING AND COOPERATIVE PROBLEM POSING APPROACHES IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING Abstract This study aims to describe the effectiveness of the cooperative problem solving and cooperative problem posing approaches and the more effectiveness of the cooperative problem posing approach than cooperative problem solving approach in in mathematics learning viewed from the achievement of competency, critical thinking ability, and student’s emotional intelligence. This study was a quasi experimental study using the pretest-posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. The research population comprised all Year X students, consisting of 6 classes of SMA Negeri 1 Pengasih. From the population, two classes, Class X2 and Class X3, were selected randomly as the research sample. To test the effectiveness of the cooperative problem solving and cooperative problem posing approach, the one sample t-test was carried out. Then, to compare the effectiveness of the cooperative problem posing approach with the cooperative problem solving approach, the MANOVA was carried out and then continued by the t-Bonferroni test. The results of the study show that the cooperative problem solving and cooperative problem posing approaches are effective and the cooperative problem posing approach is more effective than the cooperative problem solving approach in mathematics learning viewed from the achievement of competency, critical thinking ability, and student’s emotional intelligence. Keywords: the cooperative problem solving approach, the cooperative problem posing approach, achievement of competency, critical thinking ability, emotional intelligence.

scholarly journals Development of Maquette to Promote Primary School Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Social Sciences

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rindang Hayom Sasami ◽  
Sujarwo Sujarwo
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
T Test ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Main Field ◽  
School Students ◽  
Gain Score ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability

This research aimed to analyse the feasibility of the use of maquette and the effectiveness of maquette in improving students’ critical thinking ability. The research model employed was the development research model developed by Borg & Gall. The research subjects were third graders. The testing was divided into preliminary field testing, main field testing, and operational field testing. The analysis of the medium feasibility was based on the assessment by media experts, the assessment by subject matter experts, students’ response, and teacher’s response. The analysis of maquette effectiveness was carried out using a t-test (two independent samples) to figure out the difference and gain score of the experimental class for the purpose of identifying the improvement after the use of maquette. In the feasibility analysis, a score of 88 in the category “feasible” was gained from the assessment by a media expert and a score of 85 in the category “highly feasible” was gained from the assessment by a subject matter expert. From the preliminary field testing, scores of 60.5 and 65 in the category “highly feasible” were gained for the students’ response and teacher’s response, respectively. Meanwhile, from the main field testing, scores of 56.1 and 66.5 in the category “highly feasible” were gained for the students’ response and teacher’s response to the maquette use, respectively. The t-test results show a significant value in the critical thinking, namely.000 <.05, indicating a significant difference between the control class and the experimental class. The gain score was 0.5 and fell into the “moderate” category. Thus, it can be concluded that maquette is effective in improving critical thinking ability.

scholarly journals The Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability of Students on Additives and Addictive Substances Class VIII SMPN 12 Padang

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-132
Author(s):  
Mesia Dewi Hasanah ◽  
Heffi Alberida ◽  
Yosi Laila Rahmi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability

Implementation of Curriculum 2013 requires students to learn actively, independently, and critical thinking. Critical thinking is an activity through thinking about ideas related to concepts or problems. The efforts to improve critical thinking skills of learners can be done by using the appropriate learning model. One of the learning models that can be used to improve the ability of critical thinking is a problem-based learning model. This type of research is quasi experiment with randomized control-group pretest posttest design. The sample of this research choosed by used purposive sampling method. Class VIII6 as experimental class and class VIII4 as control class. Data of this research result are quantitative data of critical thinking ability. Data were analyzed by using t test. The results showed that the mean difference of posttest value with pretest value of critical thinking ability of experimental class learners is higher than control class. Hypothesis testing with t-test obtained tcalculate=2,94>ttable= 1,67, then H1 accepted. Based on these results the authors conclude that the implementation of problem-based learning model has a positive effect on the ability to think critically learners on the material additives and addictive substances.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document