scholarly journals THE POSITION OF STUDENTS' ERRORS IN ALGEBRAIC PROBLEM-SOLVING BASED ON FIELD DEPENDENT AND INDEPENDENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-70
Author(s):  
Aloisius Loka Son ◽  
Darhim ◽  
Siti Fatimah
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Algebraic Problem ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Figure Test ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Better Than

There is a strong relationship between field-dependent (FD), field-independent (FI) cognitive styles, and problem-solving performance. FD students are more oriented towards the outside world, while FI students rely more on their knowledge and experience. The present study aimed to reveal the position of the FI and FD student's errors in algebraic problem-solving. The subjects of this study were 27 students of class VII in one of the Junior High Schools in Kefamenanu, Indonesia, Academic Year 2018/2019. Data collection involved tests of algebraic problem-solving ability, interviews, and Group Embedded Figure Test. The case study results showed that the algebraic problem-solving abilities of FI students were better than FD students. The scores of algebraic problem-solving abilities of FI students were dominant in the medium and high categories. In contrast, the FD students were dominant in the medium and low categories. Also, FI students predominantly committed procedural errors. Whereas, most FD students made errors on all types of errors, specifically factual, conceptual, and procedural errors. Thus, it is recommended that FI and FD students' algebraic problem-solving ability become the focus of attention and importance to characterize them as a basis for further research.

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLUTION OF OPEN ENDED PROBLEMS REVIEWED FROM STUDENT COGNITIVE STYLES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Rizky Alimuddin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Data Validity ◽  
Figure Test ◽  
Draw Conclusion ◽  
Problem Solving Strategy ◽  
Solving Strategy

The study aims at examining the characteristics of open ended problem solving based on student cognitive styles, namely field independent and field dependent. The study was descriptive qualitative started by determining research subject using group embedded figure test (GEFT) to group students based on their cognitive and the result of GEFT, the reasearcher choose 6 subjects from 19 students of drade IX at SMPN 1 Ma�rang consisted of three subjects of field independent and three of field dependent. Afterwards, the researcher gave open ended problem solving test on algebra and geometry mate rials, and conducted interview. Data validity of the study employed triangulation technique. The results of the study reveal tha the steps and strategy of open ended problem solving of field independent subject and field dependent subject: (1) in the steps of open ended problem solving, field independent subjects overall were able to understand the problem, plan the solution, and conduct the plan up to recheck it. One of field independent subject even was able to draw conclusion form one of the problems given which was the algebra 2 problem. In contrast, the field dependent subjects overall had steps of open ended problem solving that only able to understand and recheck it, (2) in problem solving strategy, there was no difference between field independent subjects and field dependent subjects. The field independent subjects used open ended problem solving strategy by thinking backward, thinking inductively, and thinking forward. Similarly, the field dependent subjects also used open ended problem solving by thinking backward, thinking inductively, and thinking forward

scholarly journals GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD-DEPENDENT DAN FIELD-INDEPENDENT SEBAGAI JENDELA PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH POLYA DARI SISWA SMP

Factor M ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Resti Wulan
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Pythagoras Theorem ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Better Than

The aim of this research is to describe junior high school students’ problem solving profile in the Pythagoras Theorem problem based on the cognitive styles of FI and FD. The subjects of this research consisting of two subjects FI and two subjects FD in VIII H SMP Negeri 2 Lumajang. Instruments used: cognitive style tests (GEFT), Pythagoras Theorem problem solving tests, and interview guideline. Problem-solving indicators that be used is Polya's problem solving steps: understanding the problem, devise a plan, carry out the plan, and looking back. The results of this study is the FI subject is better than the FD subject. The FI subject understand the problem very well, arranging a solution plan well, implementing a plan properly, and looking back well. Different from previous research, subject FI make error even though not any Polya’s step. Nevertheless, The FD subjects are categorized as lacking in the step of understanding the problem, devising a plan with deficient category, implementing the plan without looking back on the solution, so it is categorized as lacking and errors emerged at almost every step. Some errors in problem solving showed by FI and FD subjects, so for further research need to analyses errors and the other cognitive style.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA

JURNAL IQRA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Tyas Kusumaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Thinking Aloud ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to determine: (1) Which has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct instruction, (2) Which has the achievement better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style field dependent (FD), (3) in each cognitive style, which one has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct learning, (4) on each of the learning model, which one has the achievement of better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style of field dependent (FD. This study is a quasi-experimental research. The populations in this study were all students of class VII SMP N 5 Metro 2015/2016 school year. The sampling technique was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling. The balance test performed using one way analysis of variance with different cells before carrying out a study of three groups of population. The data analysis technique used to test the hypothesis is two-way ANOVA with different cell with a 3x2 factorial design. Lilliefors prerequisite test method to test for normality and Bartlett methods for homogeneity. From the analysis concluded: (1) cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps ) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct, (2) students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) had mathematics learning achievement better than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD), (3) the individual cognitive style, cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS ), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct (4) on each model of learning, mathematics achievement of students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) have better mathematics learning achievement than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD). Keywords: Tapps, TSTS, Direct learning, Learning Achievement, Cognitive Style.

BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA BERDASARKAN GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD INDEPENDENT DAN FIELD DEPENDENT

EDUPEDIA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Sayyidah Umma Rahmawati ◽  
Senja Putri Merona
Keyword(s):  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Figure Test

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan berpikir reflektif siswa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field independent dan field dependent. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Adapun istrumen yang digunakan adalah Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), tes soal berpikir reflektif dan wawancara. Sedangkan analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis data Miles dan Huberman yang tediri dari reduksi data, penyajian data dan kesimpulan atau verifikasi.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pada indikator berpikir reflektif reacting terdapat kesamaan berpikir reflektif antara siswa field independent dan field dependent. Pada indikator berpikir reflektif comparing terdapat perbedaan dalam hal menghubungkan pengetahuan yang diberikan dengan pengetahuan yang dimiliki. Pada indikator berpikir reflektif contemplating terdapat perbedaan pada kemampuan mendeteksi kesalahan. Temuan lain dalam penelitian ini adalah bahwa siswa field independent menjelaskan jawabannya dengan detail dan rinci, cenderung menggunakan cara menghafal dan memiliki kepercayaan diri yang tinggi. Sedangkan siswa field dependent menjelaskan jawabannya secara umum, memiliki analisis yang baik dan menyukai cara yang telah ditetapkan

scholarly journals Using Design Thinking Principles to Improve Outpatients’ Experiences in Hospital Pharmacies: A Case Study of Two Hospitals in Asir Region, Saudi Arabia

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 854
Author(s):  
Dalia Almaghaslah ◽  
Abdulrhman Alsayari ◽  
Saleh Ali Alyahya ◽  
Rana Alshehri ◽  
Khawlah Alqadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Management System ◽  
Design Thinking ◽  
Queue Management ◽  
End User ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Hospital Pharmacies ◽  
Asir Region

Introduction: Design thinking, an innovative problem-solving approach, has gained wide popularity in healthcare disciplines. The aim of this work is to improve outpatients’ experiences in hospital pharmacies in two hospitals in Asir region, Saudi Arabia. Methods: The design thinking approach, adopted from Stanford University’s D-School, was used in this study. Results: Several problems were identified: lack of comfortable environment in the pharmacies’ waiting area, lack of a queue management system, and workflow inefficiencies related to ordering and supplies of medicines. A prototype was proposed to overcome these challenges. Discussion and Conclusion: The design thinking approach helped in identifying end-user (patients visiting outpatient pharmacies) values and desires and provided an understanding of their struggles. It also proposed tailored solutions that could improve patients’ experiences while using the services of the outpatient pharmacies.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model to Improve Creativity and Self-Efficacy of Field Dependent and Field Independent Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farrah Maulidia ◽  
Saminan Saminan ◽  
Zainal Abidin
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Paper Test ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Conventional Methods ◽  
Pbl Model ◽  
Better Than

Students’ creativity and self-efficacy in solving mathematical problems remain low. Students with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styleshave different creativity and self-efficacy. One learning model that is believed to increase students' creativity and self-efficacyis Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. This study aimed to increase the creativity and self-efficacyof FD and FI students through the application of PBLmodel. This research is an experimental study with pre-test and post-test control group design.The population of this research was grade VIII students in State Islamic School (MTsN) 1 Banda Aceh,while the sample consisted of two classes out of 11 classes. The sampling technique usedrandom samplingwith one experimental class and one control class. Data collection was carried out by using two instruments; a paper-test to measure students’ creativity and a questionnaire to measure students’self-efficacy. The grouping of FD and FI students was based on the results of the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). Furthermore, a paired t-test was conducted to obtain an increase in students' creativity and self-efficacy. At the same time, a correlation test was performed to see the relationship between creativity and the self-efficacy ofstudents. The results of the study revealed that the increase of FD and FI students’ creativity who were taught by the PBL model was better than students taught by conventional methods. The results also reported that the increase of FD and FI students’ self-efficacy who were taught with the PBL model was better than the students who were taught with conventional methods. In addition, there was a significant relationship between FI and FD students' creativity and self-efficacy.

Psychological Differentiation and Performance on Conditional Reasoning Tasks

1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 935-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin W. Boss ◽  
Martin E. Amin
Keyword(s):  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Psychological Differentiation ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Reasoning Tasks ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Grade 8

The relationship between psychological differentiation and performance on three content types (concrete-plausible, concrete-implausible, symbolic) of conditional reasoning tasks was investigated. Using intelligence as a covariate, field-independent subjects ( n = 94) in Grade 8 performed significantly better than field-dependent subjects ( n = 121) on each type of content. A significant interaction was found. Greater differences between field-independent and field-dependent subjects were observed for concrete-implausible and symbolic contents than for concrete-plausible content.

scholarly journals Metaphorical Thinking of Students in Solving Algebraic Problems based on Their Cognitive Styles

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-89
Author(s):  
Muthmainnah Muthmainnah ◽  
Marwan Ramli ◽  
M Ikhsan
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metaphorical Thinking ◽  
Algebraic Problem ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Banda Aceh

One of thinking concepts which connects real life to mathematics is called metaphorical thinking. Metaphor and modelling are two closely related concepts. Besides, each individual performs different cognitive styles, such as field independent (FI) and field dependent (FD) cognitive styles. This factor possibly leads to different metaphorical thinking in solving algebraic problems. The participants of this qualitative research consist of two students at grade 7 of one of junior high school in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, with FI and FD as their cognitive styles. Based on the findings, it is found that: 1) Metaphorical thinking of the student with FI cognitive style in solving the algebraic problem in the stage of understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back is considered to achieve the target for each criteria of CREATE; 2) Metaphorical thinking of the student with FD cognitive style in solving the problem in the all four stages but could not reveal all criteria mentioned in CREATE. This happens as the student is unable to find the appropriate metaphor to the algebraic problem. Therefore, the student does not need to explain the suitability of the metaphor to the algebraic problem.

scholarly journals Peer Correction On Writing Quality Of College Students Having Different Cognitive Styles

INFERENSI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-282
Author(s):  
Sri Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Writing Quality ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Figure Test ◽  
Writing Tests

Correction in writing process is beneficial to improve students’ writing quality. However, different kinds of correction may affect students’ writing quality differently. Furthermore, depending on their cognitive style, students may receive correction differently. This research aims at investigating the effect of peer correction on writing quality of college students’ having different cognitive styles. Two groups of students participated in this study. In the treatment, one group conducted peer correction, and the other group conducted self correction on their writings. To collect the data on students’ cognitive styles, Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) was used. To collect the data on students’ writing quality before and after the treatment, writing tests were used. To test the hypotheses, an analysis of covariate (ANCOVA) was used. The results shows that both types of corrections, peer and self corrections, and students’ cognitive styles, field dependent and field independent, significantly affects the students’ writing quality. However, it seems to be no significant interaction between types of corrections and students’ cognitive styles. The types of correction and cognitive styles do not affect students’ writing quality at the same time. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document