scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF BLACK RICE FARMING COMPETITIVENESS (A CASE STUDY IN MERKARWANGI VILLAGE, CISAYONG DISTRICT, TASIKMALAYA REGENCY, WEST JAVA PROVINCE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-90
Author(s):  
Kuswarini Kusno ◽  
Galih Wilarko ◽  
Muhammad Arief Budiman ◽  
Lies Sulystiowati

Black rice is a functional food so that it is not only to meet food needs, but also to maintain the health of consumers. For farmers, producing black rice will be more profitable because the selling value is higher than other types of rice. However, not many consumers and farmers are aware of this, resulting in unstable black rice production. In this free trade era, the opportunity to export a commodity or penetrate the international market is getting bigger. Therefore, it is necessary to study the competitiveness of black rice to determine its potential.The purpose of this research was to identify competitiveness through competitive advantage and comparative advantage as well as the impact of government policies. The research design used was quantitative with survey techniques. Data were analyzed using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The results showed that black rice was competitive both competitively and comparatively, indicated by the value of PCR < 1 = 0.568 and DCR < 1 = 0.521. Therefore, 1) black rice farming was efficient financially and economically, and 2) black rice has the potential to be exported. The impact of government policies on black rice farming has overall reduced farmers' income. In addition, government policies also inhibited black rice exports as indicated by the value of NPCO < 1 = 0.793 and prevented farmers from exporting inputs as indicated by the value of NPCI < 1 = 0.565.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Yoanes Krisostomos Nargy Justra Septaris ◽  
Tinjung Mary Prihtanti

Competitiveness requires a country to excel in competitive and comparative advantage. The commodities that need to be developed are rice. This commodity was chosen because it is a commodity that the government prioritizes and is full of agricultural policies. The purpose of this study is to determine profits, competitive and comparative advantages and the impact of government policies. This research was conducted in March 2018 in Susukan District, Semarang Regency. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique with a total of 30 respondents. Data analysis using Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The results showed that farming has a competitive and comparative advantage seen from the value of PCR and DRCR less than 1 but the DRCR value of 0.935 means that farming is feared no longer has comparative advantage if there is no interference from government policy. For the government, the policy of subsidizing fertilizers and pesticides is continued so that the farming business remains competitive but the use of fertilizer by farmers should be reduced so that it is in accordance with recommendations from the Agriculture Service or researchers. Marketers should target the domestic market because the price of rice in the international market is lower than in the country.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Mira Mira ◽  
Riesti Triyanti ◽  
Yayan Hikmayani

<p>Program revitalisasi pada sektor perikanan telah berjalan sejak 8 tahun yang lalu dan telah berdampak pada usaha budidaya dan daya saing rumput laut di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dinamika daya saing rumput laut yang banyak dibudidayakan di daerah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survey dan wawancara dengan pembudidaya rumput laut di Nusa Penida dan Lombok Timur. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dengan membandingkan daya saing rumput laut tahun 2005 dan 2013. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan bahwa di dua lokasi penelitian dengan adanya intervensi pemerintah dari tahun ke tahun menyebabkan keuntungan yang diterima pembudidaya pada tahun 2013 rumput laut lebih besar (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) &gt; 1)) jika dibandingkan tanpa kebijakan (PC &lt; 1) (tahun 2005). Keefektifan perhatian pemerintah tersebut bisa dilihat dari nilai SRP <em>(Subsidy Ratio to Producers)</em> dan EPC <em>(Effective Protection Coofficient)</em> yang berubah dari tahun 2005 dan 2013, bila pada tahun 2005 nilai SRP bertanda negatif dan EPC &lt; 1, yang artinya subsidi dan kebijakan pemerintah belum efektif melindungi usaha rumput laut. Tahun 2013, nilai SRP bertanda positif dan EPC ) &gt; 1 di masing-masing lokasi penelitian, yang artinya kebijakan pemerintah dan subsidi efektif mengembangkan usaha rumput laut. Dalam kurun waktu 8 tahun usaha rumput laut memiliki keunggulan kompetitif dan keunggulan komparatif yang bisa dilihat dari nilai DRC dan PCR (Private Cost Ratio), meskipun ada tren penurun keungulan kompetitif, karena pada tahun 2013 di Nusa Penida menggunakan BBM yang memiliki komponen impor yang lebih besar. Implikasi kebijakan pemerintah (kebijakan input) di dua lokasi penelitian yang diindikasikan dengan nilai NPCI <em>(Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input)</em> yang semakin meningkat maka keberpihakan pemerintah Nusa Penida lebih tinggi dibandingkan keberpihakan pemerintah Lombok Timur terhadap input usaha rumput laut baik itu tahun 2005 maupun pada tahun 2013.</p><p> </p><p><em>(Competitive and Comparative Dinamics of the Seaweed Busineses)</em></p><p>Revitalization policy programs in the fisheries sector which has been creating since 8 years ago have the impact on the competitiveness seaweed at Small Islands. The purpose of this study examines competitive and comparative of seaweed. Survey and interview with seaweed cultivators were conducted at The Eastern Nusa Penida and The Eastern Lombok. Data analysis method uses a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results of the analysis indicate that in the two study sites government intervention have a positive impact. Benefits received by farmers in 2013 (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) &gt; 1) greater than without a policy of revitalization in 2005 ( PC &lt;1). The effectiveness of government policies showed by SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) and EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) values were changed from 2005 and 2013. The value of the SRP in 2005 is negative and EPC &lt;1, it means subsidies and government policies have not been effective in protecting the seaweed business. SRP value is positive and EPC)&gt; 1 in each of the research sites after 8 years of revitalization was launched (2013), it means government policies and subsidies effectively develop seaweed business. Seaweed business has also a competitive advantage and comparative advantages, it shown the DRC (Dosmetic Cost Ratio) and PCR (Private Cost Ratio) value. There is trend-lowering competitive advantage in Nusa Penida, because farmers in 2013 using a fuel that has a greater import components. Intervention of government (in terms of policy input) at two study sites increases the value of NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input). The concern of Nusa Penida government on input seaweed business is higher than in the Eastern Lombok government.</p><p><em><br /></em></p>


HABITAT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-176
Author(s):  
Yeni Wulandari ◽  
Suhartini Suhartini ◽  
Hery Toiba

Tuna commodity turns out to be one of fishery commodities contributing to an export increase by value above the average of 18.57%. This is an opportunity for Indonesia to improve the country's economy by utilizing existing fishery resources. Thus, government policies are needed in order to support the export performance of fishery products. This research was conducted to determine the impact of government policies toward tuna fish commodities in Malang. The method used was the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) that aimed at knowing the impact of government policies on tuna commodities. In this study, the respondents were 30 tuna fishermen at TPI Pondokdadap. The results of analysis showed that there were subsidies, taxes, and trade restrictions in input factor. Nonetheless, in output factor, fishermen did not receive subsidies. The existence of a policy on input is very helpful for fishermen so as to reduce production costs, while in the output policy the community receives more benefits at low output prices. However, it can be seen from the DRC and PCR values that they are less than one. This means that the tuna fish commodity in Malang still has comparative and competitive advantages in competitiveness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
Mahmud Mahmud ◽  
Mardianto Mardianto

      The research on "Analysis of Comparative and Competitive Advantages of Solok Rice (Case Study in Solok City)" is aimed to analyze the competitiveness of Solok rice based on comparative and competitive advantages and looking at the impact of rice policy in Solok City.  The method used in this research is the case study method. The analytical tool used is the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The results showed that rice farming in Solok City had comparative and competitive advantages, because a private profit of Rp. 6,454,307.44 and social benefits of Rp. 2,698,042,60. The results of the analysis obtained the value of PCR <1 (0.45) and DRCR <1 (0.66), which means that financially Solok rice farming is efficient and has the potential to trade in the free market. Solok rice farming is also effective to carry out even though there are output and input policies, because the EPC value> 1. The implementation of the protection policy applied by the government still provides incentives to farmers producing rice Solok because the value of NT> 0 and PC> 1. Farmer income will increase 31% if there is no market distortion carried out by the government because the SRP value obtained is 0.31.


Media Ekonomi ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Harmini Adibowo ◽  
Feryanto Willcharo

<em>Up to present, the dairy farmers only able to meet 25-30 percent of all milk demand in Indonesia, although milk and its derivatives continues to increase steadily. This condition occurs due to low milk productivity, small-scale dairy farm unit, inadequate government policies as well as economic globalization. The objectives of this study are, first, to measure the competitiveness of the small-scale dairy farm. Second, to evaluate the impact of government policies. Third, lastly, to analyse the implication of price changes on input-output. A Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) for data is applied. The results show that, first, the small-scale dairy farms operate in competitiveness. Second, so far government policies did not provide adequate incentives and directly promote the dairy farms’ competitiveness. Third, high import tariff (15 percent) could significantly protect the competitiveness of the small-scale dairy farms.</em>


Agro Ekonomi ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Putra Pratama ◽  
Dwidjono Hadi Darwanto ◽  
Masyhuri Masyhuri

This study aims to determine the competitiveness of clove commodities in Tolitoli Regency in terms of competitive and comparative advantages and to determine the impact of government policies on the sustainability of clove farming in Tolitoli Regency. The method of determining respondents using a simple random sampling method and obtained as many as 87 samples of clove farmers. The data analysis method used is the Multi-Period PAM (Policy Analysis Matrix). The results of this study indicate that the clove commodity in Tolitoli Regency has competitiveness in terms of competitive and comparative advantages with a PCR value of 0.415 and DRCR 0.412. The impact of government policies on the output of clove farming in Tolitoli is protective against farming systems with an NPCO value of 1.088, but tends to be weak. While on the other hand, the impact of government policies on clove farming inputs is unprotective with an NPCI value of 1.061,  meaning that farmers have not received positive incentives from the current input subsidy policy. The impact of government policies on input-output as a whole is protective and provides positive incentives to farmers, but the value of the coefficient shows the level of protection that is still relatively weak and very vulnerable if there is a change in policy. The regional government is expected to provide protection to clove farmers in the form of setting the cost of clove purchases and also to exercise strict supervision of cartel practices in the clove trade system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-28
Author(s):  
Gilang Wirakusuma

Government policies in the form of input subsidies have become an essential instrument for improving the performance of the agricultural sector and overcoming the limitations of resources owned by farmers. However, there are still questions about how effective this policy can be in boosting agricultural performance. This study aims to examine the impact of channeling input subsidies on agricultural productivity. Using the 2014 Agricultural Census microdata, 26,079 rice farm households were included in the analysis. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) is used to examine the impact of input subsidies on agricultural productivity represented by the productivity of rice farming. PSM was chosen because it can overcome the selection bias that could potentially arise in the analysis process. The analysis showed that the PSM model succeeded in reducing bias and confirmed that input subsidies had a significant effect on the productivity of rice farming. Thus, the input subsidy policy is an important and relevant instructor to improve the performance of the agricultural sector.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-118
Author(s):  
Heriyanto

ABSTRACT Indonesia is a country that has a level high enough fish production annually, submitted by the Minister of Fisheries and Maritime Affairs that Indonesia provides enough supply of fish to foreign countries. Indonesia was ranked second in the fish exporting country in the world after China. Based on the description in general, this study aims to: Analyze the competitiveness of enlargement catfish. As for the specifics, this study aims to 1) analyze know the characteristics of the farmers, 2) analyze the competitiveness of the business of enlarging catfish, 3) to analyze the impact of government policies on output and input in the business of enlarging catfish. This study is a survey in RumbaiPesisir sub-district Pekanbaru City with a sample size of 15 respondents. To answer the research objectives are analyzed descriptive statistics and analysis Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Based on the results of the research shows that the First: characteristics of the average farmer 41 years of age, low education, a farming experience of 8 years, an average of 0.19 hectares of land ownership. and the average number of family members of three people. Second: Enterprise's enlargement catfish in RumbaiPesisir sub-district Pekanbaru City on small investors have a competitive advantage which is characterized by catfish PCR <1 of 0.55 and a high comparative advantages characterized by DRCR <1 0.37. Third: government policy towards input subsidy in the form of tradable production facilities give benefits to business of enlarging catfish farmers RumbaiPesisir sub-district Pekanbaru City on the small investor farmers. Keywords: Competitiveness, Catfish, Input-Output, PAM Analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darmin Tuwu ◽  
◽  
Bambang Shergi Laksmono ◽  
Abu Huraerah ◽  
Laode Harjudin ◽  
...  

The Corona virus outbreak changes life habits, interaction patterns and people's behavior. The impact is very large and massive, not only targeting the health aspects but also the economic, psychological, social, political, educational, cultural, religious, etc, so that it needs to deal with proper government policies. The article uses a qualitative method with a case study approach that concentrates on the dynamics that occur in society after the implementation of policies related to COVID-19. Methods of data collection through observation, interviews, and content analysis of online media publications. The focus of the study is government policy, community response, and the events that follow after the policy was implemented in the period March to August 2020 in Kendari City. The results show that after the implementation of the policy to prevent the spread of COVID-19, there will be dynamics and noise in the community. The noise, panic, and stress were triggered by 3 things, first, the Mayor of Kendari's instruction that prohibited Kendari City residents from doing activities outside their home for 3 consecutive days without clear social security; second, the issue of the arrival of foreign workers from China, and third, the patient suspected of being infected with Corona escaped from the hospital isolation room. Public response to controversial government policies has ranged from non-compliance, violating health protocol rules, to anxiety and uproar in the community. In order not to cause uproar and controversy, government policies should be made to answer needs, solve problems, and improve the welfare of society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document