scholarly journals Law Enforcement in Indonesia in Perspective of Transcendental Legal Justice Paradigm

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-114
Author(s):  
Siti Kasiyati

Law enforcement in Indonesia still leaves various problems, especially regarding the sense of justice. Such as diffable cases dealing with the law, civil cases, especially in the land sector, which relies on property rights certificates, cases of domestic violence (nusyuz).In this case, this study discusses how law enforcement in Indonesia is, and how law enforcement is in the perspective of the transcendental justice paradigm. This research is a literary research using secondary data sources, namely primary and secondary legal materials. This study includes a normative study with a synthetic analytic approach.Based on the results of the analysis, law enforcement in Indonesia, both criminal and civil, is still fixated on legal certainty, thus ignoring substantive justice. This is where a shift is needed from the paradigm of law enforcement based on legal certainty to transcendent justice. This condition can be seen from several decisions that are very formalistic and based on laws, where legal certainty is the front line compared to substantive justice so that justice is not felt by the public. This condition is also strongly influenced by the legal paradigm adopted in Indonesia, namely positivist law or known as the systemic legal paradigm. Transcendental starts from irrational and metaphysical thinking such as emotions, feelings, instincts, moral spirituality and as part of building science. In this context, law enforcement. The perspective of the transcendental legal justice paradigm highlights how the purpose of Islamic law is useful for justice and human welfare. Where the law is based on ethics (morals) so that it can produce substantive justice, not mere formalistic justice, which summarizes the human attitude to be fair to God as the creator, fair to fellow humans and fair to the universe.

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Adib Khoirul Umam

<p>This study aims to determine how Islam views which in this case is limited only four schools of opinion about the position of an advocate as law enforcement. In Islam indeed advocates known as providers of legal bantuah namely Hakam, mufti and mashalih alaih that functions similar to advokat.Penelitian function is called normative research with descriptive methods comparative analysis between positive law and Islamic law, namely Law No. 18 2003 and scholarly opinion four schools as primary data. Secondary data were taken from books or books that explain the legal theory of primary data. Article 5 of Law No. 18 of 2003 on lawyers has been explained that the position of advocate parallel with other law enforcement such as judges, prosecutors and police. But in fact appear black advocates not to enforce the law but instead became mafias that sell traded equity law. For it will be studied how exactly Islam's view of the position of Advocates with the formulation of the problem sebegai follows, first how the views of Islamic law for the position of advocate in Article 5 of Law No. 18 of 2003 on advocates, who both like where the relevance of Islam's view of the position of advocate in enforcement law in Indonesia. From research conducted authors argue for their refisi against the law number 18 of 2003 on advocates. alignment between advocates and other law enforcement must be followed by the high quality of an advocate and supervision of the performance of lawyers in order to minimize the occurrence of fraud in practice in providing legal aid.</p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pandangan Islam yang dalam hal ini hanya dibatasi pendapat empat madzhab tentang kedudukan advokat sebagai penegak hukum. Dalam Islam memang advokat dikenal sebagai lembaga pemberi bantuah hukum yaitu hakam, mufti dan mashalih alaih yang secara fungsi hampir sama dengan fungsi advokat. Penelitian ini disebut penelitian normatif dengan metode deskriptif analisis perbandingan antara hukum positif dan hukum Islam, yaitu undang-undang nomor 18 tahun 2003 dan pendapat ulama empat madzhab sebagai data primer. Data sekunder diambil dari kitab-kitab atau buku-buku teori hukum yang menjelaskan tentang data primer. Dari penelitian yang dilakukan penulis berpendapat perlunya adanya refisi terhadap undang-undang nomor 18 tahun 2003 tentang advokat. kesejajaran antara advokat dan penegak hukum lainya harus diikuti dengan tingginya kualitas seorang advokat dan pengawasan terhadap kinerja advokat agar bisa meminimalisir terjadinya penyelewengan dalam praktiknya dalam memberi bantuan hukum.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e531101120059
Author(s):  
Liza Agnesta Krisna ◽  
I Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Prija Djatmika ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda

The implementation of Islamic law in Aceh is based on the special autonomy and privileges of Aceh. The implementation of Islamic law brings the spirit of formalizing Islamic teachings through formal state regulations, namely the Aceh Qanun. Qanun Jinayat is a regulation that regulates disgraceful acts that should be punished in the teachings of Islamic law or can be referred to as a compilation of criminal law in Aceh. There are ten types of jarimah (criminal acts) regulated in the Qanun Jinayat, two of which are jarimah of sexual harassment and jarimah of rape. During the implementation of the Qanun Jinayat related to the law enforcement of the crime of sexual violence against children, both crimes of sexual harassment and rape have attracted a lot of criticism from the public, this crime is seen as no longer regulated in the Qanun Jinayat because it has been regulated previously and is more complete in the Child Protection Law. The ratio legis for regulating sexual violence against children in the Qanun Jinayat is because this act is seen as a continuation of the act of khalwat. This study shows an inaccuracy in the formulation of the type of jarimah in the Qanun Jinayat and the neglect of horizontal harmonization of national law.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-16
Author(s):  
Hanif Shofarudin ◽  
Andry Indradi

The objective of the Socialization of the Prevention of Non-Procedural Indonesian Migrant Workers (PMI-NP) is a preventive effort in the law enforcement process carried out by the Immigration agency through the activities of the Immigration Polytechnic cadets to reduce the number of Indonesian Non-procedural Migrant Workers in Indonesia. Preventive efforts are carried out in coordination with the Manpower Office in Pati District.The socialization of the prevention of Non-Procedural Indonesian Migrant Workers is carried out at the Indonesian Educational and Professional Development Institutions. The results of the implementation of these activities are expected that the public will have legal awareness of the process of becoming PMI procedurally, know the impact of the dangers of becoming PMI - NP, and provide legal certainty for PMI candidates so that they can become procedural PMIs so that it is safe to do work outside the territory of the Republic of Indonesia.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (II) ◽  
pp. 181-204
Author(s):  
Amrunsyah

This paper is entitled "The Neglected Dream" (Implementation of the Purpose of Law and Criminal Law in Indonesia). Law and the purpose of law have interrelated and inseparable links. The law always plays an important role in a country even the law has a multifunction with the aim of the public good in order to achieve justice, legal certainty, order, expediency, and others. However, this is far from the fire. That is, the public is only given the wind of heaven and dreams that wash away while the state authorities use the law as a tool to suppress society, so that society can be positioned in accordance with the desires of the state authorities. The implementation of the law and the purpose of the law in force in Indonesia is clearly visible, so through a number of legal theories set forth in this paper will be a little stomping for anyone who understands it when compensating for the facts that occur in the midst of society. In fact, for people who want to get legal justice but in reality are entangled in the law. The government should be serious in responding to this because the people have given full mandate to manage this country, including in dealing with legal issues, both in terms of legal structure, legal substance and legal culture played by law enforcement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-62
Author(s):  
M. Alvi Syahrin ◽  
Rio Restu Prabekti

Arrest is an act of the investigator to temporarily restrict the freedom of the suspect or accused if there is sufficient evidence for proposes of investigation or prosecution and/or adjudication in matters and by means regulated in the law. One of the cases that has caught the public's attention is the prevention and arrest of Ratna Sarumpaet who is a suspect in the case of spreading hoaxes in the immigration area of Soekarno-Hatta International Airport. This research has the formulation of the problem whether the prevention of going abroad and the arrest of suspect Ratna Sarumpaet in the immigration area is in accordance with applicable regulations. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the forced efforts made in this case the arrest and prevention of Ratna Sarumpaet violates the rules or not. This research is a normative study using several problem approaches which include the Law approach and analysis approach. The data sources used are secondary data, namely library materials which include library books, legislation, and others. Data will be analyzed by normative analysis method. The theoretical basis used is the rule of law theory, the theory of state sovereignty, the theory of law enforcement and the theory of criminal law. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded that the prevention of leaving the Territory of Indonesia and the arrest of Ratna Sarumpaet which was a forced attempt by the police in coordination with the immigration party were in accordance with applicable regulations, namely as stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, Law Number 6 2011 concerning Immigration and Government Regulation Number 31 of 2013 concerning Regulations for the Implementation of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration.  


Author(s):  
Yessy Yulianti ◽  
Elwi Danil ◽  
Aria Zurnetti

In the present study, the research problems proposed are: 1) What is the basic consideration of the judges in imposing the criminal and rehabilitation sanction on the perpetrators of narcotics abuse? 2) How is the proof of a case whose verdict is a criminal sanction? and 3) How is the implementation of imprisonment and rehabilitation sanction verdicts? In answering the research problems, juridical empirical approach is chosen to obtain primary data directly from informants and secondary data from primary of law materials including secondary and tertiary law materials. As a result, it can be concluded that there is a chance for a judge to impose imprisonment sanction and sanction for actions in a form of rehabilitation to perpetrators of narcotics abuse, but, in fact, it is challenging because of some reasons; one of which is the existence of various perceptions of law enforcement officers on the implementation of the laws, specifically on the Law number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Moreover, there is no strict provision regulating the procedures of the implementation of the law. As a result, it encounters many challenges in its implementation for the related institution. However, it should be concerned for the regulation makers for the realization of law enforcement reflecting justice, legal certainty, and benefits in the society.           


Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Reski Anwar ◽  
Faisal Faisal ◽  
Rio Amanda Agustin

The perspective of justice from law enforcement is only on the law’s guidance, not based on God’s guidance that prioritizes substantive justice. The idea of religious justice contained in the renewal of criminal law there is Article 53 paragraph (2), with the provision reads in considering the establishment of law and justice as referred to in paragraph (1) there is a conflict that can not be met, the judge must prioritize justice. The recommendations are stated because the explanation of Article 53 paragraph (2) says that justice and legal certainty are two legal objectives that are often not in line with each other and difficult to avoid in legal practice. A rule of law that meets more legal certainty demands, the more likely aspects of justice are urged. Metode research used in this study is normative research, namely research on library materials that are essential data that is classified as secondary data that rests on data collection tools similar to literature studies or document studies. The results showed that if in the application of concrete events, justice and legal certainty are mutually urgent, then the judge, as far as possible, prioritizes justice over legal certainty. Religious Justice that exists in the value of Pancasila formulated into the renewal of criminal law justice contains a demand that people treat others following their rights and obligations. The treatment is not indiscriminate or compassionate; instead, everyone is treated equally under their rights and responsibilities.


2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (S4) ◽  
pp. 81-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Viverette ◽  
Jennifer Leaning ◽  
Susan K. Steeg ◽  
Kristine M. Gebbie ◽  
Maureen Litchveld

The Commission on the Accreditation of Law Enforcement (CALEA) employs rigorous evaluation techniques. Objective accreditation, such as made possible by CALEA, is important from the public’s perspective and in the national community of law enforcement.To counteract a general distrust of law enforcement agencies, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) developed a grant to develop standards by which the quality and performance of law enforcement could be measured. LEAA developed 107 standards and, though well received by the law enforcement community, no single group or agency took the initiative to begin a program to evaluate and implement the standards. In 1979, the Department of Justice established an additional grant that effectively organized the four major law enforcement groups: the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the National Sheriff’s Association, the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, and the Police Executive Research Forum.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Arif Budi Pamungkas ◽  
Djauhari Djauhari

An auction is an activity of selling of goods in public by means of a verbal-bid to get the higher price or to get lower prices and the price quote can be done in a closed and written. This is done by the way of collecting the prospective buyers of the auction led by officials of the auction. In this case, the intended auction was the sale of goods that are held publicly. The auction, according to the regulations of security right, is when the debtor made a breach, the holder of the security rights have the right to sell the security rights’ objects over its own power through a public auction as well as taking payment of account receivable from the sale proceeds. An auction is an alternative to the sale of an undertaken asset by way of inviting prospective buyers at a particular time and place in which the last highest bidder in writing or orally is determined as the winner. The author used socio-legal research as his research method. To meet the forth standards set by the law, the auction should be widely announced to the public, either through printed file, electronic or visual. A legal certainty as a basis which concerned with propriety and justice is very closely related to the principle of auction sales in another. As the formulation of the problem of the form of identification of the problem, namely how the legal protection of the auction buyers encountered the obstacles as well as the solution.Keywords: Auction; Legal Protection; Mortgage Right


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document