scholarly journals Trends and methods of fighting cybercrime in the Russian Federation in terms of the transition to a digital economy

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-200
Author(s):  
Roman I. Dremliuga ◽  
Alexandr I. Korobeev ◽  
Alexey Y. Mamychev ◽  
Olga I. Miroshnichenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
High Increase ◽  
State Security ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Stability

The article deals with the problem of combating cybercrime in the Russian Federation in the context of its transition to the digital economy. Society and the state in the 90s and early 2000s did not recognize the danger behind cybercrimes. The concept of absolute freedom of dissemination of information, which existed at the time, and other factors have led to a high increase in cybercrime today. The authors concluded that the situation changed only in the last decade, when they began to fight against cybercrime in a comprehensive manner. The article also discusses the issue of delimiting cybercrimes from related criminal acts. The Russian Federation has recognized cybercrime as the main threat to state security and the stability of society. This is reflected both in the development of criminal-legal measures to combat cybercrimes and in preventive measures of an administrative nature. Objects of the so-called critical information infrastructure received special legal protection. The article also reviewed the social danger of some cybercrimes having been already liable to criminal responsibility.

scholarly journals Correlation analysis of voting results in the Russian federal and regional elections of 2011–2018

2021 ◽  
pp. 205-225
Author(s):  
Arkady Lyubarev
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Social Closeness ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Stability ◽  
High Level ◽  
Regional Elections

Correlation coefficients between the results of political parties in the 2016 State Duma elections in the Russian Federation as a whole and in 26 regions, as well as in the elections of regional parliaments of 35 subjects of the Russian Federation in 2012–2015 were calculated. For the 2016 State Duma elections, data was used at all levels – regions, single-member electoral districts, TEC and PEC. It is noted that the “United Russia” correlations with all major parties are generally negative. A fairly high level of correlation is observed between the liberal parties. The main focus is on correlations between parliamentary opposition parties and parties with similar names. The correlation coefficients between the results of parties and candidates in the State Duma elections of 2011 and 2016 and the Presidential elections of 2012 and 2018 were also calculated, showing the stability of the geographical distribution of the electorate of the main parties. Regional differences in the nature of correlations between the main political parties are noted. It is assumed that correlations between parties reflect not so much their ideological closeness as the social closeness of their electorate. In this regard, it is noted that a positive correlation between the results of ideologically distant parties (“Yabloko” and the Communist party or “Yabloko” and “Rodina”) is associated with their reliance on the urban electorate and, perhaps, its most educated part. The reasons for voting for spoiler parties and the role of these parties in reducing the results of the main participants in the elections are discussed.

Assessment of the formation of the social and labor situation in the Russian Federation: new challenges and threats to the stability of labor relations (based on the analytical Bulletin Of the center for monitoring and analysis of social and labor conflicts of the Saint Petersburg humanitarian University of trade unions)

2020 ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Dovganenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Trade Unions ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Saint Petersburg ◽  
Term Forecast ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Labor Conflicts

The article presents the state of Aff airs in the social and labor sphere, namely in the fi eld of social and labor confl icts, based on statistical data. The author presents trends and analyzes the causes of social and labor confl icts in industry and regional sections. The article contains a medium-term forecast of the formation and development of the social and labor situation in the Russian Federation for the fi rst half of 2020.

scholarly journals THE OPERATION OF COMPANIES IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Галина Крохичева ◽  
Galina Krohicheva ◽  
Елена Сидоренко ◽  
Elena Sidorenko ◽  
Татьяна Побиванец ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Commerce ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Great Emphasis ◽  
State Control ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation

The digital economy in the Russian Federation as an independent structure began to form and develop not so long ago, but it is aimed at all spheres of society. The state places great emphasis on the development of this form of economic relations. The Industry 4.0 project shows us the scale of the digital economy in Russia. We can say that this is a full-fledged transition of the functioning of society’s life to the technological sphere. The purpose of digitalization is to automate all spheres of society, improve the social life of the population, simplify state control over the circulation of funds in the country, and more. Therefore, with the development of digitalization, it is important to identify the characteristics of enterprises in the aspects of electronic commerce.

scholarly journals Date

2020 ◽  
pp. 124-136
Author(s):  
M.O. Kolbanev ◽  
I.I. Palkin ◽  
T.M. Tatarnikova
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Social Environment ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Functional Approach ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Human Interaction ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Structural Description ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation

The problem of interpreting the emerging terms of the digital economy is discussed. Examples demonstrating different understanding of the term “digital economy” by economists and information technology experts are given. We consider the basis of the digital economy - the cyberspace, as an environment of people’s activity in which any interactions are carried out due to digital data. The complexity of organizing cyberspace requires approaching the definition of the concept of the digital economy in terms of functional and structural descriptions. The functional approach has made it possible to identify three key attributes that reveal the essence of the digital economy: digital data, digital infrastructure, models of people’s activities. The activity is carried out through human interaction with natural objects through the "intermediary" - digital data. Changes in activities caused by the work with digital data, have come to be called transformation, its modern examples being medicine and transport. The examples show that the models of the digital economy involve a partial or complete rejection of human labor. The official government documents of the Russian Federation follow the functional approach to describing the concept of the digital economy: the program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”, decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030”. The structural description has made it possible to single out three echelons of managing the digital economy: the technological environment, the social environment, markets and industries. Each echelon has the right to make decisions within its competencies. The purpose of the technological echelon is the technical support of the digital economy, including information systems and information technology. At the level of the social environment of the digital economy, the following ones are formed: the legal regime for the development and use of digital technologies, the education and training system of the digital economy, the infrastructure of the digital economy, information security technologies for digital processes, and many others. At the level of markets and industries, spheres of activity of the digital economy are implemented. The structural approach has allowed us to propose an architectural model of the digital economy. The model is a stratified description, characterized by vertical decomposition, the sequence of digital data processing operations on each stratum, and the interconnection of performance indicators of all strata for a comprehensive assessment of the activity process as a whole.

scholarly journals Teaching the Public Administration in Health Care in the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Timur Giorgievich Okriashvili ◽  
Bert Valentinovich Pavlyuk ◽  
Alexey Viktorovich Smyshlyaev ◽  
Albert Gumarovich Yakupov
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Health Care Financing ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Scientific Cooperation ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Stability

Medicine is an important component of the stability of any state, so the study of teaching the legal problems   and state regulation of this sphere is useful from both theoretical and practical points of view. Currently, the health protection of the country is one of the priorities of the state policy in the social sphere, which is vividly demonstrated in the “May” decrees of the President of the Russian Federation from 2012 and 2018. Thus teaching the health care financing is the most important instrument of state regulation of this sphere of public life. The article analyzes the main tasks and directions of development of state support for the health care system in recent years. That also allowed to identify the most acute problems. This work may be useful for developing proposals for improving the relevant legislation in this area. In addition, this article will be useful for representatives of both medical and legal science. In the future, it is necessary to improve scientific cooperation between representatives of legal and medical Sciences.

scholarly journals Organizational and Methodological Aspects of Remote Research of Problems of Digitalization of Regions with Different Level of Sociocultural Modernization. Part II

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-149
Author(s):  
Vladimir S. Bogdanov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Management Training ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
The People ◽  
The Social ◽  
Smart Regulation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Methodological Aspects ◽  
Strategic Project

This is the second part of the article, devoted to the study of the issues relating to the control of digitalization processes in Russian regions with different levels of sociocultural modernization. In the first part of the article, the theoretical and methodological and organizational aspects of remote study of these issues were presented. In particular, in the context of socioeconomic transformations outlined and approved by state authorities in strategic “breakthrough” plans, the necessity of conceptualizing digitalization as a process was explicated. Digitalization and the digital economy have become new markers in the power and political discourse quite recently, but the national “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” project has already been launched, which, according to its developers, should ensure the high-quality achievement of the goals of digitalization with regard to the primary elements of management (training of personnel and development of organizational and technological infrastructures). However, the role of digitalization in the modernization of regions is not fully understood. The social effects that the population may experience from the introduction of “breakthrough” design choices are not clear. Today, the population is compulsorily involved in rigorous algorithms and procedures of information technology interactions, in which the rules are initially established by technocratic subsystems, and not by the people, who would at least have the right to a wider degree of feedback from government agencies and its contractors, with well-defined guarantees for resolving their problems. In this regard, we actualize the problem of the transition from technocratic smart “regulation” involving technical methods of one-way communication to the search for ways to organize feedback based on socially-oriented management. In the framework of the industrial scientific and educational discipline of management sociology, we continue to study these issues and suggest getting acquainted with the results of an empirical study of the readiness of residents of 17 regions of the Russian Federation for digital transformations in their life and work. For clarification of the associated issues, we conducted a survey of experts. We used the data collected to determine the general preparedness of regional organizations and enterprises for digital transformation and to evaluate their inclusion in the digitalization management process. In particular, an assessment of the available resources for the implementation of “breakthrough” projects was made, and the attitude of residents of the regions toward the implementation of the national “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” project was determined. The article also touches on the prospects for the implementation of the “Smart City” project as an essential aspect of the “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” strategic project.

scholarly journals Innovative Digital Rights in Corporate Relations

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 5176-5179
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Economic Life ◽  
Financial Assets ◽  
Digital Rights ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

This article aims to consider a promising trend for developing the digital economy, i.e. innovative digital rights in corporate relations. The authors of the article have determined that innovative technologies are being introduced into the economic life of Russia and foreign countries but legal protection issues remain insufficiently settled. Since October 1, 2019, new provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation will have come into force. According to these provisions, digital rights will become a new object of civil rights; citizens and corporate legal entities will receive additional guarantees that will allow them to more actively participate in the development of the future economy. The authors have concluded that the adoption of these innovations will contribute to the improvement of the Russian legislation on digital financial assets. They suggest that transaction methods via electronic and other technical means should be further elaborated. The authors emphasize the fact that the Government of the Russian Federation approved the program "Digital Economy of the Russian Federation" aimed at developing the digital economy. This program dwells on provisions of the Strategy of information society development in Russia for the years 2017-2030.

«Digital» property crimes: issues of criminalization and legislative regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-90
Author(s):  
Garik R. Grigoryan
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Telecommunications Networks ◽  
Radical Reform ◽  
Property Crimes ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article shows that an important role in the legal protection of the digital economy is played by modern criminal law, which is designed to form a system of legal mechanisms to ensure the protection of society from digital property crimes. The new mechanism of criminal legal protection should ensure effective counteraction to both real and potential criminal threats in the emerging digital reality. It is proved that in the context of digitalization, there is a need for a radical reform of Chapter 21 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Alternative directions for improving the criminal law provisions on liability for crimes against property are proposed. One of the author's options is to build new separate structures of property crimes property abuses and other violations in the field of information and telecommunications networks, including the Internet. Another is the allocation of an independent group of property crimes in the field of the digital economy within the framework of Chapter 21 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and accordingly the division of the chapter into two groups: property crimes against property (theft of other people's property, illegal possession of a vehicle, destruction and damage to other people's property) and crimes against property in the field of information and telecommunications networks.

scholarly journals TRENDS AND PROSPECTS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CROWDFUNDING AS A WAY OF FINANCING INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN RUSSIA

2020 ◽  
pp. 129-136
Author(s):  
K. L. Neopulo ◽  
I. S. Popov ◽  
A. S. Kuksov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Business Transformation ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
The Social ◽  
Financing Mechanism ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Financial Technology

With the rapid development of the digital economy and business transformation, modern financial technology tools are becoming more and more in demand. This article explores and reflects the main aspects of crowdfunding financing in the Russian Federation. The significance of crowdfunding in the implementation of projects, in particular in the social sphere, has been determined. The analysis has been presented and statistics of the most popular crowdfunding services has been displayed. The structure of crowdfunding financing by areas, country of ownership of users of the investment platform Planeta.ru has been considered. The factors have been reflected and the main vectors of the development of crowdfunding as a full-fledged financing mechanism in modern conditions have been formulated.

Regulatory Guillotine in the Field of Industrial Safety

2020 ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
E.V. Klovach ◽  
◽  
A.S. Pecherkin ◽  
V.K. Shalaev ◽  
V.I. Sidorov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Industrial Safety ◽  
State Control ◽  
Regulatory Impact ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Executive Body

In Russia, the reform of the regulatory guillotine is being implemented in the field of control and supervisory activity. It should result in a new regulatory system formed according to the principles specified in the key federal laws: «On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation» (Law on Control) and «On mandatory requirements in the Russian Federation» (Law on Mandatory Requirements) adopted in August 2020. In the field of industrial safety, this process was launched by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation № 1192, which will come into force on January 1, 2021. The main provisions are discussed in the article, which are related to the Law on Control and the Law on Mandatory Requirements. The Law on Control establishes the priority of preventive measures aimed at reducing the risk of causing harm in relation to the control activities, the grounds for carrying out control (supervisory) activities, the types of these activities in the forms of interaction with the controlled person and without such, the procedure for presentation of the results of control (supervisory) activity. The Law on Mandatory Requirements establishes that the provisions of regulatory legal acts should enter into force either from March 1 or September 1, but not earlier than 90 days after their official publication, and their validity period should not exceed 6 years. The drafts of regulatory legal acts developed by the federal executive bodies are subject to regulatory impact assessment. With a view to ensuring systematization of mandatory require ments, their register is kept. The federal executive body prepares a report on the achievement of the goals of mandatory requirements introduction. By January 1, 2021, 10 resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation, 48 federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety and 9 other regulatory legal acts of Rostechnadzor should be adopted. The drafts of all the documents are already prepared, some of the acts are completing the process of discussion and approval.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document