scholarly journals The Election Violations Conducted by Election Organizers of Aceh Besar Regency

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-356
Author(s):  
Taqdirullah Taqdirullah ◽  
Syarifuddin Hasyim ◽  
M. Adli

This research aims to analyze election violations committed by election organizers in Aceh Besar Regency in 2019. The violation of this election occurred at several points in the sub-district of aceh regency, where the violation of the law is contained in the administration of the election file and also in the part of the organizer that is the election implementation team. This is one of the indicators in this study. Using empirical juridical research methods and qualitative data analysis, the study found that there were only 5 (five) unlawful actions in aceh besar district elections, among which there were un registerable reports, muted reports and follow-up reports to the Jantho District Court. It is recommended to the government, Bawaslu, Panwaslih to conduct more checking or control and also full supervision on a scale to minimize the on-the-process election violations in Aceh Besar Regency in particular as well as other districts.

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-55
Author(s):  
Zihan Fahiza ◽  
Siti Nur Zalikha

The Covid-19 pandemic is the largest disease outbreak that occurred from 2019 to 2020, therefore the government itself issued policies related to policies. one of which is related to congregational prayer activities during the pandemic. The emergence of policies related to congregational activities inevitably raises pros and cons among the community. When a region carries out large-scale social activities (PSBB), it disturbs every activity related to religion. The method used here is juridical normative and uses qualitative data analysis techniques. each policy formulation that is responsible for membership registered in a meeting arranged hierarchically.


Author(s):  
Steven Krauss

An introduction and explanation of the epistemological differences of quantitative and qualitative research paradigms is first provided, followed by an overview of the realist philosophical paradigm, which attempts to accommodate the two. From this foundational discussion, the paper then introduces the concept of meaning ma king in research methods and looks at how meaning is generated from qualitative data analysis specifically. Finally, some examples from the literature of how meaning can be constructed and organized using a qualitative data analysis approach are provided. The paper aims to provide an introduction to research methodologies, coupled with a discussion on how meaning making actually occurs through qualitative data analysis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reni ◽  
Ratna Widayati

The purpose of this study was to find out how the implementation of giving credit to the Bank Nagari west Sumatra. In analyzing the data, qualitative data analysis was used as a research methods that explained descriptively. The results of the study conclude that in the implementation of lending must go through several prosedures that must be met by customers, namely: credit application, credit analysis, credit approval, credit contract and credit search. arter the signing of the contract, the customer must carry out all agreement, which are binding and cannot be contested


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
Danial Syah

The research study about first to find out the reasons for the judge declaring a lawsuit unclear or obscure (obscuur libel) and second is to find out the consequences of an unclear or obscure lawsuit (obscuur libel). In this study using qualitative data analysis. The approach method in this research is to use a normative juridical approach, namely an approach that is carried out by collecting secondary data.The results of this study were (1) The reason the judge stated that a lawsuit was unclear or obscure (obscuur libel) were nine factors that caused the claim submitted by the plaintiff to be unacceptable. The nine factors are: (a) The identity of the parties (Plaintiff and Defendant). (b) The object of the lawsuit being litigated is unclear. (c) Petitum lawsuit exceeds the claim posita. (d) Power of attorney does not meet the requirements. (e) The lawsuit is filed by an underage / incapable person. (f) Claims are not filed on time. (g) Incomplete parties. (h) The court is not competent to hear the claim that is submitted. (i) The grounds of the plaintiff's rights are not clear. (2) As a result of a lawsuit is unclear or obscure (obscuur libel), then the person concerned does not accept such a decision, because the decision does not give satisfaction to what he wants from the claim as stated in the lawsuit. Because the verdict cannot be accepted in practice in the District Court based on the consideration that the plaintiff's claim is unacceptable, in fact it is a consideration regarding the subject matter of the case, namely whether the plaintiff is the owner or entitled to the suspect land, it is more appropriate to declare the claim rejected. Therefore, the plaintiff's unclear rights to the object of the lawsuit in dispute are not appropriate to be used as legal considerations to declare the claim unacceptable.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-113
Author(s):  
Ihwan Wahid Minu

One purpose of economic activity is to make a profit. Profit can be a pretty important reference in assessing the condition of the success of a business. Profit should be interpreted broadly and holistically not only from the material aspect but also from the mental and spiritual aspects. The purpose of this research is to explain how profit means in Islamic Economics and how the flexibility of the application of profit meanings in Islamic Economics. This research uses research methods with qualitative approaches and literature and qualitative data analysis as an analytical tool. The results of the study show that profits in Islamic Economics are divided into two, namely material profits and spiritual benefits. The application of the meaning of profit in Islamic Economics is flexible which depends on conditions and runs according to principles


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Raden Hamengku Aji Dewondaru ◽  
Umar Ma’ruf

View the establishment of notary formation and PPAT that have been set Based on their respective authorities, it appears that a notary can Concurrent PPAT as long as in one working area within the territory of office Notary Public. This is the author's interest to study about duplicate Position, because it does not close the possibility will happen Dual positions between Notary and PPAT which not one office but still One area of notary public. So this discourse needs to be studied in order to be able Known the possible impact that will appear.The formulation of the problem in this research are: 1.) Why are there any provisions that require notary work area / region and PPAT in one area / work area? 2.) What are the consequences or sanctions faced by a notary who holds PPAT if it is not domiciled in one territory / Working Area and 3.) What is the action done by the Honorary Assembly if the notary concurrent with PPAT is not domiciled in the same work area. The method used in this research is the normative juridical approach, the type of normative legal research. The source of the data is the secondary data. Technique of collecting data with bibliography, method of analysis by using method of qualitative data analysis. Problems are analyzed with the theory of benefit and the theory of justiceBased on the result of this research, it can be concluded 1.) Reason requiring Regional / Working Areas of Notary and PPAT in One Region / Working Area is in accordance with the Law on Notary Position and Government Regulation Number 37 Year 1998 About PPAT Regulation. 2.) Result or sanction faced by a Notary who concurrently PPAT if not domiciled in one region / work area. Legal effect to Notary Deed, the deed is null and void or can be canceled. Notary deed may be canceled because if there is a lawsuit from the parties mentioned in the deed to cancel notary deed and Legal Effect on Notary's Office. 3.) Acts Conducted by Honorary Council If Notary Accepting PPAT Not Domiciled In The Same Working Area gives warning and witness or revocation of permit. Keywords: Multiple Position, Region / Working Area, Notary and PPAT


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 102-106
Author(s):  
Hulman Panjaitan

The adoption of children is nothing new in Indonesian society, including the adoption of international children, more specifically the adoption of children carried out by foreign citizens of Indonesian citizens. In practice, international appointments cause many legal problems, especially those related to the legal consequences. In this study normative juridical legal research methods are used with qualitative data analysis, which analyzes the data of the brother through existing legal materials based on applicable laws and regulations. At least as a result of international child adoption law, relating to aspects of citizenship, marriage guardianship and inheritance.  


Corruptio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Laura Naomi Rotua Gultom

The Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator play a role in facilitating the disclosure of criminal acts of corruption, because none other than people involved in institutions suspected of corrupt practices and in other words the witness's information is key for disclosure of a case of corruption. The problem in this study is whether the similarities and differences between justice collaborator and whistleblowers in corruption, and how is the legal protection between justice collaborator and whistleblower in criminal acts of corruption. This research uses normative juridical and juridical empirical research methods with qualitative data analysis. The data sources used in this study are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that whistleblower equations and justice collaborator were in 3 (three) categories, namely vision and mission in uncovering criminal acts of corruption, guarantee of protection in the form of physical, psychological and legal protection, and awards where whistleblowers and justice collaborators cannot be prosecuted criminal and civil and given sentence relief. In addition to these equations, there are also differences between whistleblowers and justice collaborator divided into 4 (four) categories, namely subject, motivation, guarantee of protection, and procedural law. The protection between justice collaborator and whistleblower in corruption namely legal protection in the form of keeping the identity of the witness confidential and then provides security for witnesses in the trial process by providing physical, psychological, and legal protection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Nurwita Ismail

ABSTRACTDekonsentrasi Authority of the head of the region in implementing the financial management of this Research Area focuses on these problems. Using research methods normative legal science by using qualitative data analysis, comprehensive, and complete. Sebingga it was found that the results of research, organization of dekonsentrasi committed by the local government in line with the Undang-undnag Number 33 Year 2014 about equalization kuangan Central Government and local governments should It is a comprehensive system. Financial equalization is carried out in line with the governmental affairs division between the Government and the Government of the region, which is in the system settings not only covers aspects of revenue areas, but also aspects of the management and accountability. In line with that, then surrender the authority of the Government, pelimpahan the authority of Government, and the assignment from the Government in the framework of the Organization of the principle of decentralization, dekonsentrasi, and pembantuan should also be followed with the settings funding and utilization of the national resources efficiently and effectively.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document