scholarly journals STATUS HUKUM ANAK LUAR KAWIN PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Martinelli
Keyword(s):  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Civil Status ◽  
The Law

Decision of Constitutional Court gives the child outside the civil status married to the biological father, the purpose of which provide legal protection to children outside of mating, so that the child’s rights as a whole can be obtained. The legal relationship between the child outside of mating with her biological father must be proven with science and technology and/or other evidence according to the law have blood relations.

scholarly journals KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK ASTRA DALAM HUKUM ADAT BALI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

This research aims to analyze about the significance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010 the position of anak astra in Bali customary law. The research method used is a normative study by selecting the type of statue approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials that were examined in this study consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and techniques were analyzed with the description, systematic, evaluation and argumentation. Based on the perspective ( review ) Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak astra have a civil relationship with her biological father and his family along can be proved by science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law. The juridical consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 to the norms of Bali customary law about anak astra Bali is must conform to the directions of law in the Decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals UPAYA PENGADILAN DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ANAK LUAR NIKAH BERDASARKAN SILA KE-5 PANCASILA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Dzanurusyamsyi Dzanurusyamsyi
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Illegitimate Child ◽  
The Law

In accordance with the Marriage Law Article 43 paragraph (1) and Article 100 Compilation of Islamic Law, that child out of wedlock obtain a civil relationship with her mother and her mother’s family. The provisions of article 43 paragraph (1) that the Court’s decision the Constitution of No. 046/PUU-VIII/2010 amended with the new norm, that “children born out of wedlock have links civil with her mother and her mother’s family as well as with men as a father to proven by science and technology and/ or other evidence under the law have blood relations, including civil relations with his father’s family’’ provisions of the new norm is still debatable and the pros and cons in the community that have not been finalized. Therefore, it is necessary to do research on: How Construction illegitimate child protection today; factors that affect the construction of the legal protection of a child out of wedlock is not justice at this time. This study used a qualitative approach with sosiolegal research. Factors that affect the protection of children out of wedlock is not justice due to several factors: -First; Factors Differing perceptions Ulama’ and Judges of children out of wedlock and protection against him; Factors Court decision is very diverse/ varied against illegitimate child protection issues; Factors diversity of perceptions on Registration of Population Administration in Indonesia. Then the provisions of the Marriage Law Article 43 paragraph (1)which has judicial review by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 046/PUU-VIII/2010 and Article 100 of the Compilation of Islamic Law must be reconstructed with the editor of a new article as follows: “a child born out of wedlock has relations civil with her mother and her mother’s family as well as with men as a father who can be proved by science and technology and/ or other evidence under the law have blood relation to the determination/ instruction judge and the Court’s decision, the Muslim Religious Court andbesides Islam in the District Court, including a civil relationship with his family “and there should be an affirmation form of additional chapters in the Marriage Law Article 43 with the editorial article as follows; “If it turns out according to a court ruling that the children who sought their origin was proven seedlings men and women and was born in/ from the marriage valid, then the child becomes legitimate child and have a relationship of civil full and relationships biological children with both parents and get inheritance rights.

scholarly journals Outer Children Marriages Status After Constitutional Court Decision No: 46/PUU-VII/2010

Rechtsidee ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Budi Purwaningsih
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Illegitimate Children ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No.46/PUU-VIII / 2010 dated 17 February 2012, granted the judicial review of Article 43 (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage by deciding that the article should read "Children who are born outside of marriage just had a civil relationship with her mother and her mother's family as well as with men as a father who can be proved based on science and technology and / or evidence, has blood ties according to law, including a civil relationship with his father's family". This Indonesian Constitutional Court's decision bring Juridical consequence that illegitimate children not only have a legal relationship with her mother, but also has a legal relationship with the father (biological) and his father's family, as long as it is proven with science and technology. The Constitutional Court's decision is a starting point in the legal protection of illegitimate children, namely the "right alignment" between the illegitimate child with the legitimate son. Illegitimate children have the rights to demand their civil rights toward their father (biological) as the same rights obtained by the legitimate son. How To Cite: Purwaningsih, S. (2016). Outer Children Marriages Status After Constitutional Court Decision No: 46/PUU-VII/2010. Rechtsidee, 1(1), 119-130. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v1i1.99

scholarly journals Paradigma Hakim Atas Perlindungan Hukum Anak Luar Kawin Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VII/2010

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Erikson Sihotang
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Biological Mother ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Article 28b paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution provides that "every child has theright to live, grow and develop and has the right to protection from violence anddiscrimination.” Child is the mandate at the same gift of Almighty God, which always shouldwe watch for in her inherent dignity, dignity, and rights as a human being which must beupheld. This paper analyzes the Constitution Court Decision No.46/PUU-VII/2010. Thedecision to make a breakthrough law for children born non-marital child. According toIndonesian civil law that non-marital child only have a legal relationship with his/herbiological mother, and according to the law number 1 of 1974 on Marriage that childrenborn non-marital child have a legal relationship with his/her biological mother dan his/her mother family. problem of this research, how are judge’s law paradigm in Decision No.46/PUU/VII/201. This research is the normative research, using the statutory approach, caseapproach and conceptual approaches. The main data is secondary data. Based on the resultsof the research thatThe judge’s paradigm in the constitutional court ruling is in contrast tothe Indonesian Civil Law and the law number 1 of 1974 on marriage. And according to theverdict non-marital child also has legal relationship with his/her biological father.

scholarly journals Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Rita Permanasari ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law Regulation

ABSTRAKKetentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mewajibkan notaris untuk menjaga kerahasiaan segala sesuatu mengenai akta yang dibuatnya dan segala keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta sesuai dengan sumpah janji jabatan kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain. Kemungkinan terhadap pelanggaran kewajiban tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (11) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, seorang notaris dapat dikenai sanksi berupa teguran lisan sampai dengan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Terlebih lagi dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dengan Nomor: 49/PUU–X/2012 memutuskan telah meniadakan atau mengakhiri kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN membuat notaris seakan-akan tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) harus berusaha menjalankan peranan pembinaan dan perlindungan meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan keterampilan para notaris. Demikian juga menjalin hubungan dengan para penegak hukum lainnya, agar penegak hukum lainnya yang ada hubungan dengan notaris dapat memahami kedudukan notaris sesuai UUJN.Berangkat dari pemikiran inilah kewajiban ingkar notaris masih tetap dipertahankan oleh pembuat undang-undang dalam revisi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tahun 2014 yang merupakan konfigurasi kekuatan perlindungan terhadap profesi dan jabatan notaris dari sisi politik.Kata Kunci : Jabatan Notaris, Hak Ingkar, Perlindungan Hukum.ABSTRACTThe provisions of Article 4 and Article 16 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph f of the Notary's Office Law require a notary to maintain the confidentiality of all matters concerning the deeds it has made and all the information obtained for the deed in accordance with the oath of pledge of office except the law otherwise. The possibility of breach of such obligation under Article 16 paragraph (11) of Notary Law Regulation, a notary public may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral reprimands until dismissal with disrespect. Moreover, with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the number : 49 /PUU-X/2012 deciding to have canceled or terminated the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) listed in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN made a notary as if there was no legal protection for a notary in performing duties. The Indonesian Notary Bond (INI) should endeavor to undertake the role of guidance and protection to increase the knowledge, abilities and skills of the notaries. Likewise establish relationships with other law enforcers, so that other law enforcement who has relationship with the notary can understand the position of notary under the UUJN.Departing from this thought the obligation of notarization is still maintained by the lawmakers in the revision of the Law Regulation of Position Notary on Year 2014 which is the configuration of the strength of the protection of the profession and the notary's position from the political side.Keyword : Position of Notary, Right of Remedy, Legal Protection.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK YANG TERLIBAT DALAM PERJANJIAN PADA PLATFORM LOAN-BASED CROWDFUNDING

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
Chartilia Gendis Napinillit M. ◽  
Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Important Thing ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<p>This article aims to analyze and know the law protection provided to parties involved in the agreement through the loan-based crowdfunding platform. The legal protection granted to the parties is contained within the agreement itself, namely within the clause of the clause agreed upon by the parties, and there is also an out of the agreement, that is, in the provisions of current laws and regulations. Law protection is an important thing to guarantee the fulfillment of the legal rights of a person. In addition to these objectives, law protection is provided to bring about legal certainty, legal benefit, and justice for the parties. Law protection can be preventive (prevent) or repressive (fix). The agreed agreement on the loan-based crowdfunding platform creates a legal relationship between the two parties of the manufacturer.  Legal Relationship is a relationship that gives rise to the consequences of a law guaranteed by law or law. Any legal action that raises legal consequences on a loan-based crowdfunding platform should have legal protection, especially when there is a dispute between the<br />parties. Peaceful forums or through deliberations can not be guaranteed to resolve existing disputes, therefore legal protection is required to provide a solution and clarity of existing dispute settlement or potentially occurring after the agreement is agreed.</p><p>Keywords: Law Protection, Agreement, Loan-based crowdfunding, .</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak yang terlibat didalam perjanjian melaui platform loan-based crowdfunding. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak terdapat didalam perjanjian itu sendiri, yaitu didalam klausula klausula yang telah disepakati para pihak, dan terdapat juga diluar perjanjian, yaitu didalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku saat ini. Perlindungan hukum merupakan suatu hal yang penting untuk menjamin terpenuhinya hak hak hukum dari seseorang. Selain tujuan tersebut, perlindungan hukum yang diberikan guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan hukum, dan keadilan bagi para pihak. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan dapat bersifat preventif (mencegah) atau represif (memperbaiki).  Perjanjian yang disepakati pada platform loan-based crowdfunding menimbulkan suatu hubungan Hukum antara dua pihak pembuatnya. Hubungan Hukum yaitu hubungan yang menimbulkan akibat Hukum yang dijamin oleh Hukum atau Undang-Undang. Setiap perbuatan hukum yang memunculkan akibat hukum pada platform loan-based crowdfunding harus memiliki perlindungan hukum, terlebih disaat terjadi suatu sengketa antar pihak. Forum damai atau melalui cara musyawarah belum dapat menjadi jaminan akan terselesaikannya sengketa yang ada, maka dari itu perlindungan hukum diperlukan untuk  memberi solusi dan kejelasan akan penyelesaian sengketa yang ada atau yang berpotensi terjadi pasca perjanjian disepakati.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Perjanjian, Loan based crowdfunding.</p>

scholarly journals El Tribunal Constitucional, un balance de cuarenta años // The Constitutional Court, a balance of forty years

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (101) ◽  
pp. 631
Author(s):  
Marc Carrillo
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Political Influence ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Interpretation ◽  
Institutional Prestige ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Law ◽  
Objective Meaning

Resumen:La previsión de la jurisdicción constitucional en la Constitución de 1978 ha sido un instrumento que ha reforzado su condición de norma jurídica. El indudable prestigio institucional del Tribunal Constitucional adquirido en los primeros años se ha visto reducido posteriormente por la influencia política en su composición y funcionamiento. La interpretación constitucional forma parte de la Teoría de la Constitución y los criterios hermenéuticos del empleados por el Tribunal han tenido una notable influencia en la jurisdicción ordinaria. Por otra parte, el sentido objetivo y las nuevas reglas sobre admisión del recurso individual (amparo), han permitido que el Tribunal pueda ejercer con mayor eficacia el juicio sobre la ley del Parlamento. Por otra parte, su función de garantía de losderechos fundamentales no puede ser concebida al margen del sistemaeuropeo de jurisdicción multinivel. Abstract:The provision of constitutional jurisdiction in the 1978 Constitution has been an instrument that has reinforced its status as a legal norm. The undoubted institutional prestige of the Constitutional Court acquired in the first years has been subsequently reduced by political influence on its composition and functioning. The constitutional interpretation forms part of the Theory of the Constitution and the hermeneutical criteria of the employees by the Court have had a notable influence in the ordinary jurisdiction. On the other hand, the objective meaning and the new rules on admission of the appeal for Constitutional rigth’s legal protection (amparo), has allowed the Court to exercise more effectively the judgment on the law of Parliament. On the other hand, its function of guaranteeing fundamental rights can not be conceived outside the European system of multilevel jurisdiction. Summary:1. The constitutional justice and the Constitutional Court. 2. The constitutional interpretation. 3. The control of constitutionality of the law. 4.-The objective meaning of the appeal for Constitutional rigth’s legal protection (amparo). 5. The conflicts of competences: the constitutional jurisdiction and the ordinary jurisdiction. 6. The sentence of the Constitutional Court and the Dissenting vote’s function. 

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF STATE PROPERTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
O.A. Belianevych ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Social Orientation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Social Functions ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Public Property ◽  
National Importance ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Law ◽  
Political Economic

The article considers topical issues of constitutional and legal protection of state property as public property. The objective necessity of functioning of the public sector of the economy follows from the constitutional provisions on the obligation of the state to ensure the social orientation of the economy (part 2 of Article 13 of the Constitution) and political, economic and ideological diversity of public life in Ukraine (part 1 of Article 15 of the Constitution). It is substantiated that the provisions of Section I of the Law of Ukraine "On repealing the Law of Ukraine "On the list of state property objects not subject to privatization" do not comply with the provisions of Articles 1, parts one and two of Article 8 part 2 of Article 19, part four of Article 13, Article 16, part 1 of Article 17 of the Constitution of Ukraine (in their sys temlogical connection). It is determined that a mandatory element of the system of constitutional and legal protection of state property is the norm of paragraph 36 of part 1 of Article 85 of the Constitution of Ukraine, according to which the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine approves the list of state property not subject to privatization. Defining the range of objects that are not subject to privatization, the legislator uses such a technical and legal technique as the simultaneous enshrinement in the text of the Law "On privatization of state property" types of state property that are not subject to privatization (currently these are objects of national importance, and state-owned enterprises) and enshrining in a separate law a list of objects of state property rights, the privatization of which is not allowed. The norms of such laws form an integral element of the special legal regime of state property. Taking into account the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, it is determined that the list of objects of state property that are not subject to privatization may be subject to change taking into account the needs of socio-economic development of the country. It is substantiated that the repeal of the Law of Ukraine "On the list of objects of state property that is not subject to privatization" means the emergence of a gap in the system of legal protection of state property relations, which can not be filled in any other way than the adoption of the relevant law, and which will negatively affect the state’s performance of its social functions.

scholarly journals Consumer Legal Protection Reviewed from Consumer Protection Law in Consumer Dispute Settlement through Litigation

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jarnawansyah ◽  
Reza Muhammad Rizqi
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Other ◽  
Business People ◽  
Business Goals ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law

There is a law called Law Number 8 of 1999 that deals with consumer protection. It says that disputes between consumers and business people can be settled through both litigation and non-litigation channels and that both types of channels can be used to do this. Using the courts to settle consumer disputes is a way to do this. This type of dispute resolution refers to the rules for general courts. So that consumers need to get help from the law to get their rights as consumers. Consumer protection is becoming more and more important as science and technology move faster and faster. This is because the speed of science and technology is what drives the productivity and efficiency of producers for the goods or services they make in order to reach their business goals. As a result of this, either directly or indirectly, the Consumers are the ones who feel the effects of these two things the most. In this case, the consumer protection law says that businesses must give legal protection to their customers, so this shows that businesses must do this. And legal remedies for resolving disputes between customers and business people in the event of a dispute can be used both in court and out of court. In order for a dispute to be resolved through litigation, one party has filed a lawsuit against the other party. However, non-litigation dispute resolution can be done in a number of ways, such as through negotiation, consolidation, mediation, arbitration, and so on. Keywords: Legal Protection, Consumers, Consumer Disputes, Litigation, Laws.

scholarly journals LEGISLASI ANAK BIOLOGIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-295
Author(s):  
Laili ‘Izza Syahriyati
Keyword(s):  
Research Result ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Religious Leader ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Biological Child ◽  
Natural Child

Natural child only have a nasab from his mother. Constitutional Court No.46/PUU- VIII/2010 add a child outside of marriage also connected to the biological father in civil. This provision aims to provide fair legal protection and certainty about child born. But, Indonesian Religious Leader (MUI) provide fatwa No 11/2012 about the position of the natural child and the treatment of it. This research will discuss about Hadith study is related to biological child legislation and legal content in it. The type of research is yuridis-normative. This research analizes law phenomena with nash, hadits and opinion of fiqh scholars about that. The Research result is HR.Abu Daud- 2266, HR.Bukhari ke-6319, HR.Bukhari- 4903 talk about natural child has nasab to the mother only. Next, HR.Bukhari ke-1271 about a child is always born with fitrah and can’t accept guilt of his parents. Jumhur scholars besides Hanafiyyah agreed about natural child has nasab with mother’s. But, Hanafiyyah is explain natural child have conecting nasab with biological father because his father and profeble.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document