scholarly journals Pengaturan Bukti Petunjuk pada Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha dalam Kerangka Hukum Pembuktian di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 575
Author(s):  
Sterry Fendy Andih
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
District Court ◽  
Economic Evidence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Research Show

Regulations related to evidence in the procedural law of business competition still cause debate because regulations related to evidence of instructions that apply in the business competition procedural law are different from the regulation of evidence in the procedural law that generally applies in Indonesia, especially if there are objections to the KPPU's decision submitted to the district court. The formulation of the problem examined is related to the procedures for resolving business competition cases by the business competition supervisory commission and the use of evidence evidence in business competition law within the criminal procedural framework in Indonesia. This type of research method used is a normative legal research method with a proof of law approach. The results of the research show that the procedure for handling cases by KPPU based on Perkom 1/2019 is sourced from KPPU's reports and initiatives. The stages or process of procedure for handling cases by KPPU consists of the initial stages (receipt of reports or KPPU initiatives), investigations, commission assembly sessions (preliminary hearing and follow-up hearings), and decisions (deliberations of commission assemblies and reading of decisions and implementing decisions) . The use of evidence of guidance in business competition law contracted in Perkom 1/2019 can still lead to this debate because the procedural law used in general courts (if there is an objection to the KPPU's decision) is criminal or civil procedural law, which if understood there are still differences fundamental evidence related to these instructions. The evidence evidence can be obtained through economic evidence and communication evidence whereas in criminal procedural law the limit is limited to evidence evidence evidence obtained from evidence witnesses, letters and statements of the defendant. Pengaturan terkait alat bukti petunjuk dalam hukum acara persaingan usaha masih menimbulkan perdebatan dikarenakan pengaturan terkait alat bukti petunjuk yang berlaku dalam hukum acara persaingan usaha berbeda halnya dengan pengaturan alat bukti petunjuk dalam hukum acara yang secara umum berlaku di Indonesia, khususnya apabila terjadi keberatan atas putusan KPPU yang diajukan kepada pengadilan negeri. Adapun rumusan permasalahan yang dikaji adalah terkait tata cara penyelesain perkara persaingan usaha oleh komisi pengawas persaingan usaha dan penggunaan bukti petunjuk pada hukum persaingan usaha dalam kerangka hukum acara pidana di indonesia. Jenis metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan hukum pembuktian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tata cara penanganan perkara oleh KPPU berdasarkan Perkom 1/2019 adalah bersumber dari laporan dan insiatif KPPU.  Adapun tahapan atau proses tata cara penanganan perkara oleh KPPU terdiri dari tahapan awal (penerimaan laporan atau insiatif KPPU), penyelidikan, sidang majelis komisi (sidang pemeriksaan pendahuluan dan sidang pemeriksaan lanjutan), dan putusan (musyawarah majelis komisi dan pembacaan putusan serta pelaksanaan putusan). Penggunaan bukti petunjuk pada hukum persaingan usaha yang dikontruksikan dalam Perkom 1/2019 masih dapat menimbulkan perdebatan hal ini dikarenakan hukum acara yang dipergunakan pada peradilan umum (apabila terjadi keberatan atas putusan KPPU) adalah hukum acara pidana atau perdata, yang mana apabila dipahami masih terdapat perbedaan mendasar terkait alat bukti petunjuk tersebut. Alat bukti petunjuk dapat diperoleh melalui bukti ekonomi dan bukti komunikasi sedangkan dalam hukum acara pidana dibatasi secara limitatif alat bukti petunjuk diperoleh dari alat bukti keterangan saksi, surat dan keterangan terdakwa.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 559/PID.B/2017/PN.BYW. PENGADILAN NEGERI BANYUWANGI TENTANG PENYEBARAN AJARAN KOMUNISME/MARXISME-LENINISME SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PASAL 107A KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1108
Author(s):  
Andreas Purba ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Basic Element ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Security ◽  
Individual Accountability

Budi Pego was charged with violating Article 107a of Law Number 27 of 1999 concerning Amendment to the Criminal Law Code relating to crimes against State security, because of. Because of these accusations, Budi Pego was charged with a 10-month prison sentence in the Banyuwangi District Court. The problem faced is how criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code (case study of decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw)? The research method used is normative legal research. The results showed that criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code in Decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw. it is inappropriate if this criminal liability model is applied to criminal liability to individuals. Considering that individual accountability still requires actions and mistakes as a basic element of accountability. That is, without any deeds and mistakes, there is no criminal liability. Regarding the Budi Pego case, the policy of criminalizing the ideology of Communism/Marxism-Leninism was decriminalized. If this cannot be done, then the legislators need to revise Law No. 27 of 1999 with the concept of eliminating articles containing formal offenses and replacing them with the formulation of material offenses and in the formulation of the weight of sanctions.

scholarly journals Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu dalam rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Iwan Rois ◽  
Ratna Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
District Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Provincial Level ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
General Elections

This study aims to analyze the need to establish a special election court which has the authority to solve various election law cases in order to realize elections with integrity; and analyzing the formulation of election special justice in order to realize the integrity of the election. The research method used is the method of normative legal research and the implementation of this research collects data from various sources in order to get an answer to the issues that have been formulated. The results of the study shows that  the purpose of the need for the formation of special judicial elections; First, to meet the growing demands of increasingly complex justice in society and more election law enforcement so as to realize the integrity of the elections; Second, To handle the election law cases quickly and simply so as to obey the integrity of the election. Formulation; First, the election special justice to be able to work quickly and simply in handling election law cases, domiciled at the central and provincial level, then entering the District Court or the High Court; Secondly, the Guidelines for the election special judicial law shall be based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2017 on Procedures for the Settlement of Administrative Offenses of the General Elections in the Supreme Court. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlunya membentuk peradilan khusus pemilu yang mempunyai kewenangan menyelesaikan berbagai perkara hukum pemilu agar terwujud pemilu yang berintegritas; dan menganalisis formulasi pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu dalam rangka mewujudkan integritas pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pelaksanaan dari penelitian ini mengumpulkan bahan hukum dari berbagai sumber guna mendapatkan suatu jawaban atas pokok-pokok permasalahan yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan perlunya pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu; Pertama, Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perkembangan akan keadilan yang semakin kompleks dalam masyarakat dan lebih penegakan hukum pemilu sehingga mewujudkan integritas pemilu; Kedua, Untuk menangani perkara hukum pemilu dengan cepat dan sederhana sehingga mewudkan integritas pemilu. Formulasi; Pertama, Peradilan khusus pemilu agar bisa bekerja cepat dan sederhana dalam menangani perkara hukum pemilu, berkedudukan di tingkat pusat dan provinsi, selanjutnya masuk pada Pengadilan Negeri atau Pengadilan Tinggi; Kedua, Pedoman beracara pada peradilan khusus pemilu berdasarkan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum Di Mahkamah Agung.

scholarly journals A NEW CASES EXISTENCE OF LEGAL FICTION PRINCIPLES INDONESIA LAW

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solly Aryza
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Remote Areas ◽  
Legal Fiction ◽  
The Law ◽  
Research Show

The principle of Fixie Rechts or Legal Fiction still embraced in Indonesian legislation. It does notmatter that the policy is inconsistent with reality on the ground, which in fact creates more and more newproblems. For example the application of laws in very remote areas. How can a rural person who has no accessto information, if he does not comply with a rule that has been passed by the state through the state gazette, thenwithout considering the absorption aspect of his information, he remains entangled in the law. Because he afterthe law was enacted, he was supposed to know the law. This study uses normative legal research method byreviewing the literature related to legal fiction. Surely the principle that is deemed irrelevant to its real conditionlike this deserves no longer applied. For that required seriousness of government and society in participatingeliminate this law fiction principle. The results of this research show that Indonesia still enacts law governmentand culture as well, law maker or legislator and organization publish that.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-28
Author(s):  
Fahmi ◽  
Rai Iqsandri ◽  
Rizana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

The problems examined in this study are how to apply the sanctions against the perpetrators of hate speech in the Pekanbaru District Court and what are the obstacles faced in applying the sanctions against the perpetrators of hate speech in the Pekanbaru District Court. This research method is carried out directly in the field according to the type of sociological legal research. The results of the study show that the application of sanctions against hate speech offenders in the Pekanbaru District Court is not optimal. Factors that hinder the application of sanctions against hate speech offenders do not realize that what they are doing is a criminal act that has a fairly severe sanction in accordance with the law.

scholarly journals Legal Flaws in the Election of Wali Nanggroe 2018-2023 Period in Aceh

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ihsan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Electoral System ◽  
Candidate Selection ◽  
Selection System ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Election Commission ◽  
Research Show

The problem of elections in public office is often interesting to study, especially with the development of the electoral system which is continually being renewed to prevent corruption, collusion and nepotism, as well as to get candidates who are capable in their fields. One of these public offices which is Aceh-specific is Wali Nanggroe. This institution is a mandate of Aceh Government Law Number 11 of 2006. The determination of the Wali Nanggroe for the 2018-2023 period raises legal problems. Therefore this study will examine the wali nanggroe candidate selection system, the mechanism for selecting wali nanggroe based on Qanun number 8 of 2012, and whether there is a legal flaw in the election of wali nanggroe for the 2018-2023 period. This study uses a normative legal research method with a Law and Conceptual approach. The results of the research show that the wali nanggroe candidate selection system has not been carried out openly and transparently, even though Qanun allows for other candidates, in terms of election mechanisms, according to Qanun, an Election Commission must be formed in which there are 4 elements, but in practice the Commission Elections were not formed, this would be legally problematic, even legally flawed because one of the elements of the Election Commission was not involved as a member of the Election Commission as regulated by the Qanun. The elements that were not involved were representatives of ulama in each district/city.

scholarly journals REKOMENDASI BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN UNTUK PENGUATAN TATA KELOLA KEUANGAN NEGARA YANG BAIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Djatu Apriellia
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Financial Governance ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Research Show

The audit board of the republic of Indonesia (BPK) examination results in recommendations that must be followed by the public officials. Recommendations are needed for improvements in the management of financial governance. This research is normative as for the issues discussed in this research are first the follow-up monitoring arrangements on BPK recommendations and the sanctions if the recommendation is not followed by the audited entity. This legal research was conducted by examining the primary legal materials and secondary law. The results of this research show that normatively monitoring arrangements follow up on BPK recommendations currently using Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 which will use the information system so that the implementation of the follow-up monitoring of the audit board recommendations will be faster, more accurate, and efficient. Furthermore, if the public officials did not discharge the audit board recommendation then will be subject to administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions, but BPK has not had mechanisms and procedures for reporting to the police departement if the recommendation that has not been or is not acted upon by the audited entity. Hasil pemeriksaan BPK menghasilkan rekomendasi yang wajib ditindaklanjuti oleh pejabat. Rekomendasi diperlukan untuk perbaikan-perbaikan manajemen dalam menciptakan tata kelola keuangan negara yang lebih baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif adapun permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah pertama pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini dan kedua sanksi apabila rekomendasi BPK tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini menggunakan Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 yang akan menggunakan sistem informasi pemantauan tindak lanjut sehingga pelaksanaan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi BPK akan lebih cepat, akurat, dan efisien. Selanjutnya apabila pejabat tidak melaksanakan rekomendasi BPK maka akan dikenai sanksi administratif maupun sanksi pidana, namun BPK belum memiliki mekanisme dan prosedur pelaporan kepada pihak kepolisian apabila rekomendasi BPK yang belum atau tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa.

scholarly journals Dampak Rill Implementasi Status Otonomi Khusus Di Provinsi Papua, Indonesia: Kajian Hukum Perspektif Good Governance

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Rahmi Ayunda
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Cultural Representation ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Special Rights ◽  
Research Show

The reforms that have occurred in Indonesia have changed the joints of the life of the nation and state. One of them is changing the centralistic system of government. The demand for reforms related to the broadest possible implementation of regional autonomy is the beginning of the implementation of the decentralization principle in Indonesia. This principle can be reflected in the presence of the Special Autonomy policy, one of which is in Papua Province. This research uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of this research show that the stipulation of special autonomy status for Papua Province is legally based on Law Number 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for Papua Province. This law is an attempt by the central government to develop Papua to be the same as other regions. There are many specializations and special rights that the Papuan people have obtained through the determination of this status, but they are still not being implemented in real terms in the field. This is due to government inconsistencies, especially when viewed from a good governance perspective. Good governance in the principle of participation in Papua has not been implemented properly because of the existence of considerable power as a cultural representation which has not fully represented the Papuan people so that many rights and opinions and voices of the Papuan people have not been implemented.

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imran Imran
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research

ABSTRAKDalam sistem peradilan pidana penanganan suatu kasus dimulai sejak kasus itu muncul, kemudian ditangani oleh polisi, hingga proses akhir dari penegakan hukum terletak pada putusan hakim. Putusan hakim dapat berupa menjatuhkan hukuman ataupun membebaskan seorang terdakwa. Dalam putusan hakim akan terlihat kemampuan hakim dalam mengonstruksi kasus sejak dakwaan dibacakan hingga pledoi diucapkan. Semua konstruksi hakim tersebut akan tergambar dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangan. Dalam pertimbangan tersebut akan terlihat apakah suatu putusan tersebut melanggar kode etik atau tidak. Apa yang terlihat dalam dua putusan hakim yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo, mencerminkan adanya persoalan ketika seorang terdakwa dua kali dihukum oleh majelis hakim yang sama untuk perbuatan yang sama pula. Hal inilah yang kemudian menjadi rumusan masalah, apakah putusan tersebut melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim atau tidak? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang memfokuskan kajian pada data sekunder, maka akan terlihat bagaimana sesungguhnya dua putusan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim yang dilakukan oleh majelis hakim.Kata kunci: kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim; sistem peradilan pidana; profesionalisme.  ABSTRACT In the criminal justice system, the handling of a case starts since the claim arises, then is handled by the police, until the final process of law enforcement, which lies in the judge's decision. Judges' decisions can be in the form of sentencing or acquitting a defendant. The ability of a judge to construct a case will appear in the decision from the time the indictment is read until the plea is pronounced. In these considerations, it will be seen whether the judge's decision violates the code of ethics or not. Two judges' decisions issued by the Tobelo District Court reflect the problem in which a defendant was twice sentenced by the same panel of judges for violating the same law. This is what then becomes the formula of the problem, whether the decision violates the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges or not. By using normative legal research method focusing on secondary data construing, it will expose the fact of these two decisions. The results of this analysis indicate that there are violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges been committed by the panel of judges examining the case. Keywords: code of ethics and code of conduct of judges; criminal justice system; professionalism. 

scholarly journals PERJANJIAN DALAM PERKAWINAN MENURUT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI RI NO. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 DAN PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI TANGERANG NO.269/PEN.PDT.P/2015/PN.TNG

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1239
Author(s):  
Veren Abigail ◽  
Abdul Gan Abdulilah
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Third Party ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Third ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
The Law

According to the Marriage Law Article 29 the marriage agreement is made before or at the time of marriage. But in October 2016 the Constitutional Court passed verdict No.69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 as a material test of Article 29 of the Marriage Law which with the ruling of the constitutional court the marriage agreement can be made before, at the time of marriage, even throughout the marriage. However, before the constitutional court issued the verdict, the Tangerang District Court issued a ruling stipulating the marriage agreement throughout the marriage, namely the decision No. 269 / PEN.PDT.P / 2015 / PN.TNG which the parties were mixed marriages couple. The problem discussed is what the judge considers in deciding the marriage agreement when there is no provision that the marriage agreement can be made throughout the marriage. The legal research method used is a normative research method. Based on the research’s result, the judge granted and stipulated the marriage agreement based on the Marriage Law Article 4 which states that the marriage agreement is possible to be changed as long as there is agreement between the two parties and does not harm the third party In conclusion, the judge did not decide in accordance with the law regulating at the time. The suggestion is that it is expected that the judge as a law enforcer can make a decision in accordance with the law regulating at that time. Because ideally the judge's decision must contain justice, legal certainty, and expediency.

scholarly journals Analisis Tentang Wewenang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Sebagai Penegak Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-212
Author(s):  
Yunan Andika Putra ◽  
Lauddin Marsuni ◽  
Abd Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Research Initiatives

Penelitian betujuan mengetahui penegakan hukum persaingan usaha yang dilakukan oleh KPPU di Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa : (1) Kewenangan Penyelidikan yang dimiliki oleh KPPU adalah atribusi melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dan telah dikuatkan melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/PUU-XIV/2016, yang dalam pelaksanaanya, Komisi memberikan mandat Penyelidikan kepada Investigator Pemeriksaan untuk mendapatkan alat bukti yang cukup, tetapi hambatannya KPPU tidak mempunyai upaya paksa seperti penggeledahan dan penyitaan untuk mendapatkan dokumen/surat yang dapat menjadi alat bukti; (2) Hukum persaingan usaha dapat berjalan dikarenakan telah memuat norma primer yang bersifat larangan dan norma sekunder tentang tata cara penanganan perkara yang dilakukan melalui empat tahapan, yaitu pertama, klarifikasi terhadap laporan atau penelitian inisiatif, kedua, penyelidikan untuk mendapatkan alat bukti yang cukup, ketiga, pemeriksaan Majelis Komisi untuk membuktikan dugaan pelanggaran, dan keempat, penjatuhan Putusan Komisi. The research aims to find out the enforcement of business competition law conducted by KPPU in Indonesia. The research method uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that: (1) The Investigative Authority possessed by KPPU is attribution through Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and has been strengthened through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85 / PUU-XIV / 2016, which in its implementation, the Commission mandates Investigation to Investigate Investigators to obtain sufficient evidence, but the obstacle is that KPPU does not have compelled efforts such as searches and confiscation to obtain documents / letters that can serve as evidence; (2) The law of business competition can run because it contains primary norms that are prohibited and secondary norms concerning the procedures for handling cases which are carried out in four stages, namely first, clarification of reports or research initiatives, second, investigations to obtain sufficient evidence, third, examination of the Commission Council to prove the alleged violation, and fourth, the imposition of the Commission's Decision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document