scholarly journals Chinese researchers on philosophy and culture ground of Xi Jinping’s concept of a community with a shared future for mankind

Author(s):  
A. V. Boyarkina

The concept of Xi Jinping "a community with a shared future for mankind" put forward at the 18-th National Congress in 2012, is one of the main Chinese philosophical and diplomatic strategies in the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to analyze Chinese academics’ ideas on philosophical and cultural ground of "a community with a shared future for mankind". The historical and structural methods of analysis are used. The novelty of the study is that the concept, in the author’s opinion, creatively develops Marxism, which reflects a view on the world and humanity from the point of view of countries and peoples, their culture and religion. The concept is focused on improving the life of mankind and preserving global environment. The author shows that this concept is bound with the ancient strategies of political culture and Marxist philosophy.

Author(s):  
Koichi Tonuma

The author, Emeritus Professor at Waseda University, Tokyo, is currently Chairman of the Board of the Research Institute for Urban and Environmental Development, Japan (UED). Dr Tonuma is the author of a book entitled Japan in the 21st Century with emphasis on planning for residential surroundings, and of numerous articles, some of which have also been published in Ekistics. He is a former Vice-President of the World Society for Ekistics. The text that follows is a revised and edited version of a paper presented by the author at the WSE Symposion"Globalization and Local Identity, " Hikone, Japan, 19-24 September,2005. He has pursued the theme of this paper in research published in Japanese in the UED Report, January 2007, and is currently researching habitability zones and Ecumenopolis. 


Author(s):  
Gunta Plūksna

The introduction outlines the problem: the views about the world outlook of the humankind changed radically from the verge of 19/20th century to the verge of the 20/21st century; the old paradigms must be changed to the new ones, but the relevant concepts are just developing. It expresses itself also in so called anthropological turn, when a person changes uncontrollably, rapidly and dangerously taking over the most important place in the global world system. Symbol is as a link between a word and an action, and it is an instrument for understanding the world, and a person plays an important role in it. The first section discusses the world outlook of Russian religious philosopher P. Florensky from the point of view of symbolism. It is based on the fundamentals of his world outlook: antinomy, life, the Unified. The second section is devoted to creativity in his life, which in an organic way links P. Florensky’s understanding about the world-outlook and life. The conclusions stress the contemporary aspects in P. Florensky’s symbolism expressed as: 1) spirituality; 2) aesthetics; 3) consubstantiality; 4) the dialogue with the Unified; 5) creativity in life. The research methods: hermeneutic and semiotic analysis of P. Florensky’s texts, critical analysis of the scientific literature.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Deyse Luciano De Jesus Santos

Do ponto de vista da educação, pensar a sociedade do século XXI, nos remete a como a mesma se transformou ao longo dos séculos. Da antiguidade aos dias atuais, universalizações e descentracão dos sujeitos no mundo fruto das relações estabelecidas, sobretudo no campo teológico, nos leva a reflexões acerca de como estaremos num futuro próximo e incerto, reflexo das novas configurações pós-modernas. Assim, o presente trabalho propõe refletirmos o futuro da educação voltada ao reconhecimento da diversidade presente nas instituições de ensino, tomando como base a formação de professores evangélicos e o conflituoso diálogo dos mesmos, com as discussões propostas pelos componentes curriculares voltados ao diálogo no campo das humanidades. Considerando a quebra dos paradigmas modernos e o avanço do campo religioso no Brasil atual, como professores religiosos lidam com uma formação que vise atender as novas formatações da sociedade?Palavras-chave: Formação de Professores Evangélicos. Currículo. Diversidade. Teacher training, diversity and religion: curricular components and conflict zonesABSTRACTFrom the point of view of education, thinking about the society of the 21st century reminds us of how it has changed over the centuries. From the antiquity to the present day universalizations and decentralization of the subjects in the world, fruit of the relations established mainly in the theological field, leads us to reflections about how we will be in the near future and uncertain, reflecting the new postmodern configurations. Thus, the present work proposes to reflect the future of education aimed at recognizing the diversity present in educational institutions, based on the formation of evangelical religious teachers and the conflictive dialogue of them, with the discussions proposed by the curricular components aimed at dialogue in the field of humanities. Considering the breakdown of modern paradigms and the advancement of the religious field in present-day in Brazil, how do religious teachers deal with a formation aimed at attending to the new formations of society?Keywords: Formation of Evangelical Teachers. Curriculum. Diversity. Formación de profesores, diversidad y religión: componentes curriculares y zonas de conflictoRESUMENDesde el punto de vista de la educación, pensar la sociedad del siglo XXI, nos remite a cómo la misma se ha transformado a lo largo de los siglos. De la antigüedad a los días actuales universalizaciones y descentraciones de los sujetos en el mundo, fruto de las relaciones establecidas sobre todo en el campo teológico, nos lleva a reflexiones acerca de cómo estaremos en un futuro próximo e incierto, reflejo de las nuevas configuraciones postmodernas. Así, el presente trabajo propone reflejar el futuro de la educación orientada al reconocimiento de la diversidad presente en las instituciones de enseñanza, tomando como base la formación de profesores religiosos evangélicos y el conflictivo diálogo de los mismos con las discusiones propuestas por los componentes curriculares dirigidos al diálogo en el campo de las humanidades. Considerando la ruptura de los paradigmas modernos y el avance del campo religioso en el Brasil actual, ¿cómo los profesores religiosos se ocupan de una formación que apunta a atender a las nuevas formaciones de la sociedad?Palabras clave: Formación de Profesores Evangélicos. Plan de estudios. Diversidad.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Tendai Chingore

This article aims to analyze the issue of democracy the delegated cooperative democracy as an alternative to the crisis of contemporary democratic policies. At first, the theoretical premises that guide the theoretical framework that underlies the liquid-cooperative democratic model are exposed: starting from the philosophical reflections of John Dewey and Axel Honneth. In a second point of view, from procedural deliberative democracy to liquid-cooperative democracy: How can we redirect power to citizens in the context of today's democracies? In the third point we present the idea that lies behind the "spirit" of net-cooperative democracy as a credible alternative to democracies in the 21st Century. We consider this credible democratic model that can "rally" power to citizens. Methodologically, the work is based on deconstruction and reconstruction, accompanied by the reading, analysis and interpretation of texts that deal with the subject under study. It is concluded that the time has come to institute a democratic policy that can 'redouble' power in the hands of citizens in order to participate equally in public life, thereby minimizing the great social, political and economic inequalities prevailing in the various States considered democratic in the world and in Mozambique in particular.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 3696099
Author(s):  
Clóvis Trezzi

This article discusses the issue of intolerance and its consequences in the world. It starts from the idea that intolerance is a problem that coexists with humanity and is part of its history, and analyzes it from the point of view of human options, seeking reflexes in education. It aims to hold a discussion on intolerance in 21st century society that, with the strengthening of authoritarian governments, has been gaining strength, and seeking ways to overcome the problem. The bibliographic character of the article allows a greater hermeneutic analysis of intolerance as an ideological trait. We work here from authors, especially Ricoeur (1990) and Adorno (1995) who analyze the elements that lead from ideology to the polarization of opinion, which is an engine of intolerance. If the contemporary world is so polarized and depoliticized, politics and critical thinking seem to be the way. It is concluded that, beyond the acquisition of the critical spirit, the possibility of overcoming lies in the human capacity for discernment, since the critical spirit itself, when not well understood, can be at the service of an ideology and serve to reinforce intolerance. The school is largely responsible for developing the criticality needed to overcome intolerance. ResumoEste artigo debate a questão da intolerância e suas consequências no mundo. Parte da ideia de que a intolerância é um problema que coexiste com a humanidade e faz parte da sua história, e analisa-a do ponto de vista das opções humanas, buscando reflexos na educação. Tem como objetivo realizar uma discussão sobre a intolerância na sociedade do século XXI que, com o fortalecimento de governos autoritários, vem ganhando força, e buscar caminhos de superação do problema. O caráter bibliográfico do artigo permite uma análise hermenêutica maior da intolerância como traço ideológico. Trabalha-se aqui a partir de autores, especialmente Ricoeur (1990) e Adorno (1995) que analisam os elementos que conduzem da ideologia para a polarização de opinião, sendo esta um motor da intolerância. Se o mundo contemporâneo está tão polarizado e despolitizado, a política e o espírito crítico parecem ser o caminho. Conclui-se que, para além da aquisição do espírito crítico, a possibilidade de superação está na capacidade humana de discernimento, uma vez que o próprio espírito crítico, quando não bem compreendido, pode estar a serviço de uma ideologia e servir para reforçar a intolerância. Cabe à escola, em grande parte, a responsabilidade pelo desenvolvimento da criticidade necessária à superação da intolerância.ResumenEste artículo analiza el tema de la intolerancia y sus consecuencias en el mundo. Parte de la idea de que la intolerancia es un problema que coexiste con la humanidad y es parte de su historia, y lo analiza desde el punto de vista de las opciones humanas, buscando reflexiones sobre la educación. Su objetivo es mantener una discusión sobre la intolerancia en la sociedad del siglo XXI que, con el fortalecimiento de los gobiernos autoritarios, ha ido ganando fuerza y buscando formas de superar el problema. El carácter bibliográfico del artículo permite un mejor análisis hermenéutico de la intolerancia como rasgo ideológico. Trabajamos aquí de autores, especialmente Ricoeur (1990) y Adorno (1995) que analizan los elementos que conducen desde la ideología a la polarización de la opinión, que es un motor de intolerancia. Si el mundo contemporáneo está tan polarizado y despolitizado, la política y el pensamiento crítico parecen ser el camino. Se concluye que, más allá de la adquisición del espíritu crítico, la posibilidad de superación radica en la capacidad humana de discernimiento, ya que el espíritu crítico en sí mismo, cuando no se entiende bien, puede estar al servicio de una ideología y servir para reforzar la intolerancia. La escuela es en gran parte responsable de desarrollar la criticidad necesaria para superar la intolerancia.Palavras-chave: Intolerância, Política, Educação.Keywords: Intolerance, Policies, Education.Palabras claves: Intolerancia, Politica, Educación.ReferencesADORNO, Theodor. Educação e emancipação. São Paulo: Paz & Terra, 1995. BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Modernidade líquida. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2001.COMTE-SPONVILLE, André. Pequeno tratado das grandes virtudes. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1995.FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da indignação. Cartas pedagógicas e outros escritos. São Paulo: Unesp, 2000.FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da tolerância. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2014.MARTINS, Carlos H. dos Santos; CARRANO, Paulo C. R. A escola diante das culturas juvenis: reconhecer para dialogar. Educação, Santa Maria, v. 36, n. 1, p. 43-56, jan./abr. 2011. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reveducacao/article/ download/2910/1664Acesso em 11 jul. 2019.RICOEUR, Paul. Amor e justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012.RICOEUR, Paul. Interpretação e ideologias. 4ª ed., Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1990.ZIZEK, Slavoj. O absoluto frágil. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2015.ZUIN, Antonio A. S. A sociedade do espetáculo e a reconfiguração da autoridade pedagógica. Educar em Revista, Curitiba, Brasil, n. 50, p. 207-222, out./dez. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/er/ n50/n50a13.pdf. Acesso em 11 jul. 2019.e3696099


2021 ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
A. Y. Blazhkina

This article analyzes the concept of Great Unity (da tong), textually enshrined in the treatise “Kong-zi jiayu”, chapter “Li yun”. The concept of Great Unity is considered by Confucian thinkers as the ideal state in which the Tianxia was in the period of golden antiquity. This concept is directly related to the modern political culture of China. It was embodied in the idea of a "Community of Shared Future for Mankind," which was first introduced at the 18th National Congress of the CPC in November 2012 by the General Secretary of the CPC Central Committee Xi Jinping. Within the framework of this article, there isa preliminary comparison of the chapter “Li yun” from the “Kong-ji jiayu” and the chapter of the same name from the famous written monument, named “Li ji”; the article also discloses the main ideological content of this chapter.


Napredak ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-50
Author(s):  
Wang Cungang

Since 1949, diplomacy of the People's Republic of China has successively undergone transformation for three times, namely diplomacy of establishing the PRC, diplomacy of enriching the country and major-country diplomacy. Developing a new type of international relations is an effective way to achieve diplomatic transformation of New China, but its connotations vary with different periods of history. During the two turnarounds from 1949 to 2012, New China's diplomacy, which holds up the Principle of Independence and Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, took shape in the practice of developing a new type of international relations. The former principle have played an important role in safeguarding China's sovereignty and dignity, protecting national security and promoting the country's development. The latter became basic norm of international relations and basic principle of international law due to its openness and inclusiveness. Since the 18th CPC National Congress, in face of profound changes unseen in a century and a new posture for China to increasingly move toward the center of the world arena, President XI Jinping made great endeavors to promote major country diplomacy with Chinese characteristics, and actively touched upon building a new type of international relations featuring mutual respect, fairness, justice, and win-win cooperation, which innovates on and develops the Principle of Independence and Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, as well as pushes forward the world multi-polarization process and the building of a community with a shared future for mankind.


Subject Prospect for politics in China in 2018. Significance Last month’s 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party saw President Xi Jinping confirmed as the single most powerful person in China. He can now pursue his ambitions for the country with tighter coordination and greater intensity. These include transforming China into a dominant influence on the world stage.


Author(s):  
I. E. Denisov

The article is devoted to the modern approaches of the PRC to international problems and the main changes in Chinese diplomacy after Xi Jinping’s coming to power in 2012. The diplomacy of Xi Jinping is characterized by a gradual departure from Deng Xiaoping’s foreign policy concept. The article reviews innovation, strategic ideas and new diplomatic initiatives of the Chinese leadership, as well as the challenges faced by China as one of the leading global players. From the author’s point of view, foreign evaluations of China’s foreign policy remain in the line with official Chinese concepts that tend to exaggerate the swiftness and revolutionary nature of changes in the diplomatic course of Xi Jinping. In reality, these changes occur more smoothly. In Beijing’s foreign policy there is a complex picture of the intertwining of various trends. External observers often take Chinese rhetoric for evidence of the allegedly emerging new quality of diplomacy. According to the author, in the 1970s. the true motives of Deng Xiaoping in the course of adopting a reserved and cautious foreign policy doctrine for China were not limited to saving Beijing’s limited resources necessary for internal development. He was moved by the fear of losing on the world chessboard to more experienced powers, which would mean an internal political discredit of the Communist Party and could undermine its power. Even today, China’s deep insecurity in its own strength continues to constrain its transition to a more ambitious foreign policy. Although China’s dependence on external conditions is obvious, internal political instability can not be compensated by any diplomatic successes and the most favorable external environment. The position of China as the world’s second economy is not automatically transformed into a global influence. Most of the changes that today are associated with the so-called fifth generation of Chinese leaders, in reality were initiated by their predecessors. Imaginary novelty is the continuation of China’s gradual adaptation to socio-economic changes at the national and global levels. The article concludes with an analysis of the prospects for changing China’s role in the world. 


2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-223
Author(s):  
Alastair Iles

At the beginning of the 21st century, the United States is criticized widely for its attitudes to treaty-making. It has sought to oppose, or withdraw from, a number of treaties such as the Kyoto Protocol or the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. Such behavior is conventionally attributed, in neo-realistic international law and political science theories, to the interests and ideologies that the US Government articulates. This essay uses a constructivist approach, namely focusing on how treaty-making is shaped by the interpretive work of people regarding the world they live in, to expand the analysis to include structural and cultural factors. The United States' treaty-making is also affected by the decentralized and participatory system of government, and by broader societal commitments to political transparency and culturally contingent understandings of risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document