scholarly journals Nutritional Assessment Tools for the Identification of Malnutrition and Nutritional Risk Associated with Cancer Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia Castillo-Martínez ◽  
Denisse Castro-Eguiluz ◽  
Erika Thalia Copca-Mendoza ◽  
Dana Aline Pérez-Camargo ◽  
Carlos Alberto Reyes-Torres ◽  
...  
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 4160
Author(s):  
Diogo Sousa-Catita ◽  
Maria Alexandra Bernardo ◽  
Carla Adriana Santos ◽  
Maria Leonor Silva ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
...  

Nutrition is an important health issue for seniors. In nursing homes, simple, inexpensive, fast, and validated tools to assess nutritional risk/status are indispensable. A multisurvey cross-sectional study with a convenient sample was created, comparing five nutritional screening/assessment tools and the time required for each, in order to identify the most useful instrument for a nursing home setting. Nutrition risk/status was evaluated using the following tools: Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), and calf girth (CG). The time spent completing each tool was recorded. Eighty-three subjects were included. MNA-SF and CG were the screening tools that ranked highest with regards to malnutrition identification. CG failed to identify nutritional risk/malnutrition in seniors with lower limb edema. CG was the fastest tool while SGA was the slowest. This was the first study comparing non-invasive nutritional tools with time expended as a consideration in the implementation. CG is responsive, fast, and reliable in elders without edema. MNA-SF was more efficient at detecting malnutrition cases in the elderly population. Both MNA-SF and CG are considered the most suitable for the nursing home setting.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Witzel Rollins ◽  
Maryanne Murphy

Practical relevance: Pet owners want dietary recommendations from their veterinarian. Providing a brief nutritional assessment for every cat at every visit will result in better medical care and build trust with clients. Clinical challenges: Examination time is limited, and it can be challenging to ensure appointments are efficient, yet thorough. A range of practical assessment tools is available that can assist with this process. Patient group: Every cat can benefit from a screening nutritional evaluation as the fifth vital assessment (after temperature, pulse, respiration and pain assessment). Identifying patients with nutritional risk factors or nutrition-responsive diseases should prompt a more in-depth review of dietary needs. Audience: This article is aimed at all veterinary health professionals and is accompanied by videos demonstrating the body condition scoring process for a series of cats ranging from ideal body weight through to obese. Evidence base: Information in the review is drawn from the current scientific literature, as well as the clinical experience of the authors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (35) ◽  
pp. 144-148
Author(s):  
Camila Weschenfelder ◽  
Luciane Vieira Figueira ◽  
Talita Sthephanie Scotta Cabral ◽  
Jacqueline Schaurich dos Santos

Introduction: Hospital malnutrition is associated with the worsening of the patient’s general condition and its early diagnosis allows the reduction of related complications. The aim of this study was to verify the agreement of the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) screening tool and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Methods: Cross-sectional study, carried out in a general hospital in the city of Porto Alegre (RS). The SNAQ was applied by previously trained nutritionists and nurses, and the patient was considered at nutritional risk when the score was ≥2. SGA was applied by nutritionists in all patients and considered the gold standard for comparison. The Kappa coefficient was used to assess the degree of agreement between the screening and nutritional assessment tools. Kappa values between 0.21-0.60 were considered as low agreement, 0.61-0.8 as moderate agreement and greater than 0.81, as strong agreement. Results: Between January and March 2017, 186 patients were evaluated, of them 115 (62%) were women. The mean age was 65.7 ± 16.6 years and the body mass index (BMI) mean was 26.5 ± 5.5 kg/ m². According to SGA classification, 73.7% of the sample was considered to be well nourished, 14% moderately malnourished and 12.4% severely malnourished. Low agreement was observed between the nutritional risk diagnosed by nursing vs. nutrition through SNAQ (Kappa=0.58) and good agreement of SNAQ applied by the nutrition team with the nutritional diagnosis of SGA (Kappa=0.73). The SNAQ presented sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI 73.3 - 92.9) and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI 84.4 - 94.4); positive predictive value of 76.4% (95% CI 65.7 - 84.5) and negative predictive value of 94.7% (95% CI 90 - 97.2). Conclusion: We conclude that the screening tool SNAQ when conducted by nutritionists can be used for early detection of hospital malnutrition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-317
Author(s):  
Federica Mascaretti ◽  
Jessica Evangelista

Nutritional risk screening and assessment of general nutritional status are of primary importance in the management of gastrointestinal cancers (GIC). Indeed, a major problem in these patients is the involuntary weight loss leading eventually to cachexia. With our review, we aimed at collecting the most recent advances in nutritional assessment of patients with GIC. All the abstracts presented both at the 2020 ASCO and ESMO World GI meetings were considered and a total number of 12 abstracts were selected, reporting colorectal, gastric, esophageal, and pancreatic cancer (PC) series. In some of the analyzed series, pathological conditions such as cachexia and sarcopenia had prognostic significance on clinical outcomes. One abstract reported the results of a phase I trial with the use of a novel interleukin-1-alpha antagonist, bermekimab. Its association with standard chemotherapy in advanced PC brought an improved patients’ performance during treatment. Insufficient attention is paid to the nutritional status of patients with GIC both at screening and during specific cancer treatment. The use of antropometric measurements, together with nutritional assessment tools, may facilitate the clinical evaluation of these patients. Large randomized trials are warranted in order to clarify the real impact of nutritional interventions on clinical outcomes.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1196
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Aprile ◽  
Debora Basile ◽  
Renato Giaretta ◽  
Gessica Schiavo ◽  
Nicla La Verde ◽  
...  

Malnutrition and muscle wasting are frequently reported in cancer patients, either linked to the tumor itself or caused by oncologic therapies. Understanding the value of nutritional care during cancer treatment remains crucial. In fact, cancer-associated sarcopenia plays a key role in determining higher rates of morbidity, mortality, treatment-induced toxicities, prolonged hospitalizations and reduced adherence to anticancer treatment, worsening quality of life and survival. Planning baseline screening to intercept nutritional troubles earlier, organizing timely reassessments, and providing adequate counselling and dietary support, healthcare professional may positively interfere with this process and improve patients’ overall outcomes during the whole disease course. Several screening tools have been proposed for this purpose. Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) are the most common studied. Interestingly, second-level tools including skeletal muscle index (SMI) and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) provide a more precise assessment of body composition, even if they are more complex. However, nutritional assessment is not currently used in clinical practice and procedures must be standardized in order to improve the efficacy of standard chemotherapy, targeted agents or even checkpoint inhibitors that is potentially linked with the patients’ nutritional status. In the present review, we will discuss about malnutrition and the importance of an early nutritional assessment during chemotherapy and treatment with novel checkpoint inhibitors, in order to prevent treatment-induced toxicities and to improve survival outcomes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
E.C. Bliemel ◽  
R. Aigner ◽  
C. Rolfes ◽  
S. Ruchholtz ◽  
B. Buecking ◽  
...  

ZusammenfassungDie Inzidenz von Mangelernährung geriatrischer Patienten wird im Allgemeinen mit über 50 % angegeben. Mangelernährung bei geriatrischen Traumapatienten rangiert im Kollektiv der proximalen Femurfrakturen zwischen 30 und 50 %. Insgesamt erscheinen sowohl die angegebenen Häufigkeiten als auch die angewandten Messinstrumente inhomogen. Malnutrition führt zu einer Verschlechterung der Wundheilung, einer längeren postoperativen Immobilität, einem verlängerten Krankenhausaufenthalt sowie zu einer Steigerung der Mortalität. Unter Hinzuziehung bestehender Leitlinien erreichen das Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) sowie das Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) eine ausreichende prädiktive Validität in diesem geriatrischen Patientengut, um ein Screening auf Mangelernährung durchzuführen. Bezüglich möglicher therapeutischer Interventionen ist die Studienlage limitiert: Vorhandene Studien zeigen oft eine geringe Patientenzahl und demente Patienten, die besonders häufig mangelernährt sind, wurden häufig ausgeschlossen. Eine Leitlinie explizit für dieses spezielle Patientengut existiert aktuell nicht. Ein suffizientes Screening des Ernährungszustandes sowie Daten zur Durchführbarkeit und Effizienz einer kurzfristigen perioperativen Nahrungsergänzung könnten einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Stabilisierung dieser oft multimorbiden und fragilen Patienten leisten.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shareef Syed ◽  
Adrienne E Lebsack ◽  
Jennifer C Lai

The World Health Organization defines malnutrition as a term referring to deficiencies, excesses, or imbalances in a person’s intake or energy and/or nutrients. Malnutrition is a nearly universal complication of end-stage liver disease, with a prevalence of up to 90%. Given their hepatic synthetic dysfunction, patients with cirrhosis are at a particularly high risk for protein-calorie depletion, which has been reported in over half of patients with cirrhosis and worsens with disease severity. Undernutrition is a potent predictor of adverse outcomes in cirrhotic patients, including lower survival rates, hepatic decompensation, longer length of days in the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), increased number of infection episodes, and higher resource utilization. On the other hand, excess energy intake, or overnutrition, is increasingly being recognized as an important determinant of long-term outcomes in this population, particularly those with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nearly one quarter of patients with cirrhosis are overnourished and up to 72% show excessive daily intake of energy and protein. In this review, we will consider the full spectrum of malnutrition in patients with end-stage liver disease and highlight key areas in need of further investigation. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 54 references. Key Words: frailty, inflammation, nocturnal feeding, nutritional assessment, nutritional risk, nutritional screening, protein-energy malnutrition, sarcopenia


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document