Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning Ability (MRA) with the Discovery Learning Model in Gender issues

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Mohamad Salam ◽  
Salim Salim
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Gender Issues ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Male Students ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Mathematical Problems

This study examines students' mathematical reasoning based on Discovery learning models in terms of gender. This research was conducted at the SMPN 3 Kendari with quasi-experimental methods involving two classes with different treatments. The simple random technique is used to determine the class of research. Class VII. 6 (experimental class) consisted of 15 women and 11 men, while class VII.9 (control class) consisted of 15 men and 7 women. The instrument used was a student's mathematical reasoning ability test consisting of four items in the form of essays tested. Data processing using 2-way ANOVA with further tests using Scheffe. The conclusion obtained is that students are given a learning discovery model, the reasoning ability of male students excels in the ability to give mathematical problems verbally and in writing provided in the form of logical diagrams that contain existing data, perform mathematical manipulation related to the problem, and ensure validity as an argument, whereas women excel in the ability to draw conclusions based on relationships between mathematical concepts. The discovery learning model can increase students' mathematical penalties and overcome gender discussions.

scholarly journals The Differences of Realization Ability between Students’ Learning Model Problem Based Discovery Learning Model in Smk Private Laksamana Martadinata Medan

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 496
Author(s):  
Lilis ◽  
Togi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Early Mathematics ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Study Population

<pre><em>The purpose of this study was to examine differences in overall mathematical <br />reasoning abilities and based on indicators among students who received problem <br />based learning with students who obtained discovery learning based on early math <br />skills. This study was a quasi experimental research, with the study population was <br />all students of class XI SMK Laksamana Martadinata consisting of twenty classes. <br />By purposive sampling, two classes were chosen, with experimental class 1were <br />given problem-based learning treatment and experiment class 2 were given <br />discovery learning treatment. The instrument of mathematical reasoning ability, the <br />ability of early mathematics and observation sheet were stated to have fulfilled the <br />validity requirements of the contents, and the reliability coefficients of 0.740 and <br />0.830 respectively. Data analysis of mathematical reasoning ability was done by <br />analysis of covariance (ANAKOVA). The results showed that there were significant <br />differences in mathematical reasoning ability both overall and per indicator between <br />students who were given problem-based learning with students who were given <br />discovery learning, with problem-based learning showed better results. The results <br />suggest that problem-based learning is an alternative to improving the ability of <br />mathematical reasoning.</em><em></em></pre>

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS ANTARA PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN PENEMUAN TERBIMBING DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL MATEMATIS SISWA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Marfi Ario
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Fundamental Aspect ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Guided Discovery ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Mathematical reasoning ability is fundamental aspect in mathematic learning. Efforts to improve the ability of mathematical reasoning necessary. Based on that, this study was conducted to examine improvement of mathematical reasoning ability students who received problem based learning and guided discovery learning in terms of categories Early Mathematical Ability (EMA) students. This study was a quasi experimental research with the pretest-post-tes two treatment design. The population in this study were the students in class XI from one of SMK in Pekanbaru. Samples in this study were 76 students from two classes using purposive sampling technique. Instrument that used in this study was the questions of mathematical reasoning ability test. The findings of this study are: there is a difference in the improvement of mathematical reasoning ability among students who get problem based learning and students who gain guided discovery learning on medium KAM category students. In high and low KAM category students, there is no significant difference in the improvement of mathematical reasoning abilities between students who received problem based learning and students who received guided discovery learning.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING: STUDI PADA KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-110
Author(s):  
Fitry Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Reflective Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Mathematical Abilities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
The Right

In solving the problems they face, students must think so that they can apply the right concepts to the problems they face. This process can run effectively in learning if students have good reflective thinking skills. Mathematical reflective thinking is one of the thought processes needed in the process of solving mathematical problems. The purpose of this study was to determine the increase in reflective thinking skills between students who received learning with problem-based learning and conventional learning. The research method used is quantitative research with a quasi-experimental design. The population of this study was students of grade 7 MTs Islmaiyah Medan in the academic year 2019/2020. The sample in this study was students of class 7-A and 7-B MTs Islamiyah Medan. The data were collected by giving a reflective thinking ability test instrument. The data obtained were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA statistical test. Based on the research findings, it was found that there was an increase in students' reflective thinking skills taught by problem-based learning with students taught conventionally. Where the increase in reflective thinking skills between students whose learning process using problem-based learning is significantly higher than students whose learning is through conventional learning. Based on these results, it can be concluded that in an effort to foster students' mathematical abilities, the learning model used must match the characteristics of the learning model with mathematical abilities.

KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model

scholarly journals Implementasi Teams Games Tournaments dan Number Head Together ditinjau dari Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Achievement ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this research is to know the influence of Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT) model to the students 'mathematical learning achievement that reviewed students' mathematical reasoning ability. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 3 × 3 factorial design. The researcher uses 2 indicators of learning achievement that is (1) Mathematics achievement test and (2) Test of mathematical communication ability. Analysis of the data used is the analysis of two-way variants with different cells. The results of this research can be summarized as follows. (1) Learning using TGT learning model makes better student's mathematical learning achievement compared to student's mathematical learning achievement with NHT learning model and conventional learning, while NHT model gives a better result of student's mathematical learning achievement from student's learning achievement with conventional learning. (2) Learners with high mathematical reasoning ability have better learning achievement compared with learners with medium ability as well as medium ability better than low ability. (3) Students have high and moderate reasoning abilities with the three learning models giving the same mathematical achievement, whereas students with low mathematical reasoning ability using TGT and NHT models provide the same mathematical achievement, but better than conventional learning models, and conventional learning models and NHT produces the same mathematical achievement. (4) The learning model of TGT and NHT in students with high, medium and low mathematical reasoning ability produce the same mathematical achievement, whereas conventional learning model on students with high and medium mathematical reasoning has the same mathematical achievement but better than students with reasoning low math.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Giving Question Getting Answer dan Think Pair Share terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa Kelas VII

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-352
Author(s):  
Asurya Octaviyunas ◽  
Arta Ekayanti
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Experimental Study ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Mathematics Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental

AbstrakPenelitian ini didasari atas permasalahan pentingnya kemampuan penalaran matematis dan pencapaiannya yang masih rendah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Giving Question Getting Answer dan Think Pair Share terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa, dan efektifitasnya dalam meningkatkan kemampuan tersebut. Populasi Penelitian eksperimen semu ini mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VII SMPN 1 Balong. Kelas VIIA diberi pembelajaran dengan model TPS sedangkan kelas VIIB dengan model GQGA. Instrumen pengumpulan data berbentuk tes, meliputi soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran GQGA berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran siswa kelas VIIB dengan peningkatan yang terjadi dari nilai pretest ke posttest. Begitu juga dengan model pembelajaran TPS berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa kelas VIIA dengan peningkatan nilai pretest ke posttest. Model pembelajaran GQGA tidak lebih efektif daripada model pembelajaran TPS dalam meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa. The Effect of Learning Model Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share Toward Reasoning Mathematics Ability Student’s Grade VII AbstractThis research is based on the problem of the importance of mathematical reasoning abilities and their low achievement. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share learning models on students' mathematical reasoning abilities and their effectiveness in enhancing these abilities. Population This quasi-experimental study included all seventh-grade students of Balong 1 Junior High School. The VIIA class is given learning with the TPS model while the VIIB class is with the GQGA model. The instruments of data collection are in the form of tests, including the questions of the pretest and posttest. The results showed that the GQGA learning model had an effect on the reasoning ability of students in class VIIB with an increase that occurred from the pretest to the posttest. Likewise, the TPS learning model influences the mathematical reasoning abilities of VIIA students with an increase in the value of the pretest to posttest. The GQGA learning model is no more effective than the TPS learning model in improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING BERBANTUAN CABRI 3D DI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 27 MEDAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina . Richi ◽  
Mukhtar . .
Keyword(s):  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Essay Test ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Better Than

ABSTRAKPenelitian eksperimen semu ini bertujuan untuk melihat bahwa kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Cabri 3D lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran Discovery Learning Berbantuan Cabri 3D di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 27 Medan T.A 2016/2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan posttest control design dengan populasi seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 27 Medan tahun ajaran 2016/ 2017 dan sampel penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII-4 dan VIII-6 yang dipilih dengan teknik cluster sampling. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui tes uraian. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Cabri 3D lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran Discovery Learning Berbantuan Cabri 3D di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 27 Medan T.A 2016/2017.Kata Kunci : Pemahaman Konsep Matematika, Problem Based Learning, Discovery Learning, Cabri 3D   ABSTRACT This quasi experimental research aimed to know understanding of mathematical concepts using Problem Based Learning model assisted by Cabri 3D was better than understanding of mathematical concepts using Discovery Learning model assisted by Cabri 3D in grade eight of SMP Negeri 27 Medan in academic year of 2016/2017. This  research used  posttest  control design with  population was all students of grade eight of SMP Negeri 27 Medan in academic year of 2016/2017and samples were students of VIII-4 and VIII-6 class that were chosen by cluster sampling. The data of research were obtained by essay test. Based on the result of research, it could be concluded that the understanding of mathematical concepts using Problem Based Learning model assisted by Cabri 3D was better than  understanding of mathematical concepts using Discovery Learning model assisted by Cabri 3D in grade eight of SMP Negeri 27 Medan in academic year of 2016/2017.Keywords: Understanding of mathematical concepts, Problem Based Learning model, Discovery Learning model, Cabri 3D. 

scholarly journals Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Gender dengan Pendekatan STEM pada Modul Matematika

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-51
Author(s):  
Kartika Pratiwi ◽  
Saiful Bahri ◽  
Dona Dinda Pratiwi
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Experimental Design ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Male Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Pbl Model ◽  
Model Approach

This research aims to find out the implementation of STEM module based on ICARE learning model approach regarding to the differences gender in mathematics abilities. This research is a Quasi Experimental Design with a 2 × 2 factorial design. The sample of this research was 2 clasess those were VII C and VII F, each classes consisted of 30 students, which 35 male students and 25 female students. To conduct the data, the researcher used test to control class and experiment class, then analyzed the data using SPSS 25.0. Based on the results of the two-way analysis of variance with different cells, showed that the ICARE learning model assisted by the module with the STEM approach and the PBL model assisted by students' worksheet on mathematical reasoning abilities, (gender differences in mathematical reasoning abilities, there is no interaction with the ICARE assisted learning model module with the STEM approach and PBL model assisted by students' worksheet with gender differences on mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals CAPAIAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DENGAN MODEL AIR

Numeracy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Nuralam Nuralam ◽  
Maulidayani Maulidayani
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Test Statistic ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Cluster Technique ◽  
Reasoning Abilities

The mathematical concept learned in school require mathematical reasoning abilities. But the test results show the students’ mathematical reasoning ability is still relatively low. To overcome this problem, applied a learning model called Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR). AIR can develop mathematical reasoning abilities students through problem solving. The purpose of this study is to describe the mathematical reasoning abilty of students through the AIR learning model is higher than taught through conventional learning models.. The research design used was quasi experiment with pretest-posttest control group design. The populations in this study were all of the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Jantho and the samples taken were classes VIII-2 and VIII-1 by using the random cluster technique sampling. The data collected wasby using the mathematical reasoning ability test. The result of research through the right-hand t-test statistic test obtained 3.79 > 1.68 then accept Ha reject Ho. Therefore, it was concluded that the students’ mathematical reasoning ability learned through the AIR learning model were higher than those taught conventional learning models. Abstrak Konsep matematika dipelajari di sekolah memerlukan kemampuan penalaran matematis. Namun hasil tes menunjukkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa masih tergolong rendah. Salah satu alternatif membuat kemampuan penalaran matematis lebih baik melalui model pembelajaran Auditory Intelectually Repetition (AIR). Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang diajarkan dengan model AIR lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajarkan dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Rancangan penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-posttest control grup design. Populasi dalam penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 Kota Jantho dan sampelnya kelas VIII-2 dan VIII-1 dipilih dengan teknik cluster random sampling. Data yangdikumpulkan dengan menggunakan tes kemampuan penalaran matematis. Hasil penelitian melalui uji statistik uji-t pihak kanan diperoleh thitung > ttabel yaitu 3,79 > 1,68 maka Ha tolak Ho. Disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang diajarkan dengan model AIR lebih baik daripada yang diajarkan denganpembelajaran konvensional.   Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran,  Model Air, Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis  

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF THE ABILITY OF MATHEMATICAL REASONING OF SMK STUDENTS USING A METACOGNITIVE SKILL APPROACH THROUGH ADVANCE ORGANIZER LEARNING MODELS WITH A SAINTIFIC APPROACH THROUGH DISCOVERY LEARNING

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Rosalina Rolina ◽  
Sri Aryani ◽  
Erik Taufiqurrohman
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Advance Organizer ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Metacognitive Skills ◽  
Metacognitive Skill ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Scientific Approach

This research is motivated by the low level of mathematical reasoning ability students. This study aims to determine the comparison of mathematical reasoning abilities students between those who learn using the metacognitive skills approach through advance organizer and the scientific approach through discovery learning. The method is an experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design involving two groups and random sampling. At the beginning and end of learning, the two classes are given a test. The population in this study were State Vocational High School students in Cimahi, while the sample consisted of two randomly selected classes. Obtained class XI TEK A  which was given a metacognitive skill approach through advanced organizer and class XI TOI A  is given a scientific approach through discovery learning. The instrument used was a 5-item mathematical reasoning ability test description, then the data mathematical reasoning students were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics using the help of SPSS 21 software. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the improvement of students' mathematical reasoning using skills the metacognitive skills approach through advance organizer is better than students who use a scientific approach through discovery learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document