scholarly journals Tort Bonding Sale Agreement (SPA) Made by Notary (Study Decision Number: 17 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN.Smg)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 717
Author(s):  
Fertin Fertin ◽  
Lathifah Hanim

SPA is a preliminary agreement on the purchase agreement of land rights which the agreement will be drawn up and signed in the presence of PPAT, a description of relevant scientific writing case of default in Decision 17 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN.Smg. Issues examined in this study is enforceable agreement of sale and purchase agreement (SPA) Notary as evidence of authentic, legal consequences if one of the parties in the agreement binding sale and purchase (SPA) has been in default as well as legal protection of the fulfillment of the rights of parties where one party is in default in a binding sale and purchase agreement. The method used in this research is the socio-legal approach that comes from the collection of the data obtained from the primary data and secondary data, and then analyzed by qualitative analysis method. The study provides an answer that the legal force PPJB made before a notary public as authentic evidence in the transfer of rights agreement is very strong. Regarding the legal consequences if one party has been in default then the agreement was null and void, in addition to the legal protection of the fulfillment of the rights of the parties where one party is in default is a return to power of the SPA were made, namely if made before a Notary Public, perlindunganya force in accordance with the protection of an authentic agreement.Keyword: Bonding Sale Agreement (SPA); Notary; Legal Consequences.

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 259
Author(s):  
Faizal Indra Nor Cahyo ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto

In the sale and purchase of land rights of course there are various parties, including Sellers and Buyers. In this case, Seller (RJ) and Purchaser (IS) 1 purchased land on September 26, 2007 with 10 certificates and total purchase value of land object amounting to Rp 2.232.650.000, - (two billion two hundred thirty two million Six hundred fifty thousand rupiah), due on July 31, 2008, which is until the due date the Purchaser (IS) has not been able to repay it. On the other hand, the Notary of MJ who made the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement committed a Law Against Act (PMH) by issuing a Sale and Purchase Deed which should not be issued in case of non-payment. With the formulation of the problem studied are: 1. What are the legal consequences that occur on a Notary who commits an unlawful act against the Deed of Sale and Purchase Land made? 2. How to solve a case against a Notary who committed a Legal Actions (PMH) on the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land?Approach method used in this research is normative juridical research supported by empirical juridical, research specification is analytical descriptive, writer use primary data and secondary data to get data related to this research.Based on the results of this study, based on the Case Court's Decision Number 05 / Pdt.G / 2009 / PN.Rbg, the case investigation between the Seller (RJ) and the Buyer (IS) on the first issue of the formulation of Notary MJ because it was proven to Act Against Law Falsify the information contained in the Deed of Sale and Purchase which is different from the Deed of Sale and Purchase Bond that has been agreed by both parties, then he must finish the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement between the RJ and the IS, and automatically does not Occur And in the formulation of the problem Second, the Buyer (IS) who has made a default booking by not automatically paying the purchase price with the binding agreement between himself and the Seller (RJ), he is charged with a 13th Stipikat to Seller (RJ) discount, With the payment already given To Seller (RJ) by Buyer (IS) is irrevocable and automatically becomes the property of Seller (RJ). As well as Buyer (IS) are charged the court fees that have arisen in advance of the trial.The author's suggestion in this research is for the seller, should be more careful in choosing and revoking the prospective buyer, thus minimizing the undesirable things that will be done by the Buyers so as to disadvantage the Seller, for the buyer, he must have good faith It should always be upheld that there will be no future Seller, for Notary Public, Notary as a public official should have a Neutral attitude toward both parties in the agreement, can be mediator, law-abiding and not doing the Fight Against Act (PMH), by reason No party harmed. Keywords: Sale and Purchase Agreement, Unlawful Actions, Wanprestatie.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurmawati Nurmawati ◽  
Dewi Nurul Musjtari

Roya is charged to the debtor without notifying that there is an additional obligation after paying off the mortgage. The aim of this research what are the legal consequences for the debtor if did not Roya in the implementation of the credit contract in PD BPR Bank Bantul. The metode of this research by using the empirical juridical method and qualitative analysis, the author examines primary data from interview with debtor, creditor and National Land Agency which combined with secondary data. The research shows that the legal protection for the debtor in the implementation of Roya are provided in Article 18 of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, a protection for customer from exemption clause in a standard contract. The contract that violate this law shall be considered as null and void. Article 22 of Law Number 4 of 1996 on Mortgage stated that the plea for Roya is submitted by the interested party which translated as the creditor. The legal consequences if the debtor did not do the Roya is that the Land Certificate still administratively considered as a mortgage and the owner of the certificate of land cannot take any legal action on it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Ananda Dwinanti Kinasih , ◽  
M. Hudi Asrori S ,

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims for reviewing how the settlement of compensation as the consequences of the tenure <br />of land rights unlawfully in civil law Surakarta state court verdict number 106/pdt.g/2017/PN.SKT and <br />number 103/pdt.G/2006/PN.SKT where the court’s decision has a permanent legal force. This research is <br />a juridical normative legal research. The location of this research at Notary Office and PPAT Adib Sujarwadi <br />and the State Court Surakarta Class 1A Specific. Kinds and the sources of data in this research are <br />consist of primary data and secondary data. The technique of data collection through interview and library <br />study. The analytical technique used by the author is by the method of syllogism that uses the deduction <br />mindset. Regarding the settlement of compensation due to unlawful tenure of land rights is a compensatory <br />damages, in the form of payment to the victim amounting to a loss that is actually experienced. Based on <br />the decision of the Panel of Judges. Regarding the non-granting of immaterial compensation because <br />the Plaintiff does not attach the appropriate evidence. After the verdict is declared incracht, outside the <br />court, the Defendant and the Plaintiff may hold deliberations to determine the amount of the indemnity or <br />the Plaintiff waived the indemnity obligation, but the Defendant must leave the land of the object of the <br />dispute voluntarily. In the case of still occupy it will be executed by the bailiff from the Court.<br />Keywords: Compensation; Tort; Tenure Of Land Rights.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana penyelesaian ganti rugi akibat penguasaan hak atas <br />tanah secara melawan hukum pada perkara perdata Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Nomor 106/<br />Pdt.G/2017/PN SKT dan Nomor 103/Pdt.G/2006/PN SKT, dimana putusan pengadilan tersebut telah <br />berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yuridis. Lokasi penelitian <br />yaitu di Kantor Notaris dan PPAT Adib Sujarwadi dan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Kelas IA Khusus. Jenis <br />dan sumber data penelitian ini meliputi data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui <br />wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah dengan metode <br />silogisme yang menggunakan pola pikir deduksi. Penyelesaian ganti rugi akibat penguasaan hak atas <br />tanah secara melawan hukum yaitu dengan ganti rugi kompensasi, berupa pembayaran kepada korban <br />sebesar kerugian yang benar-benar dialami. Berdasarkan keputusan Majelis Hakim. Mengenai tidak <br />dikabulkannya ganti rugi immateriil dikarenakan Penggugat tidak melampirkan bukti-bukti yang sesuai. <br />Setelah putusan dinyatakan incraht, di luar pengadilan, Tergugat dan Penggugat dapat mengadakan <br />musyawarah untuk menentukan jumlah ganti rugi atau Penggugat membebaskan kewajiban pembayaran <br />ganti rugi, namun Tergugat harus meninggalkan tanah obyek sengketa secara sukarela. Dalam hal masih <br />tetap menempati maka akan dilakukan eksekusi oleh juru sita dari Pengadilan.<br />Kata Kunci : Ganti Kerugian; Perbuatan Melawan Hukum; Penguasaan Hak Atas Tanah.</p>


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Mochamad Elmo Sidiq ◽  
Amin Purnawan

ABSTRAKProblematik penelitian ini adalah : Apa dasar hukum  Peran Notaris dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau? apa peran Notaris  Dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau? dan apa akibat hambatan hukum atas Peran Notaris dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau?Penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis-empiris yang bersumber dari pengumpulan data yang diperoleh dari data primer dan data sekunder, kemudian dianalisis dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah teknik wawancara. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis data kualitatif.Hasil temuan peneliti menunjukkan bahwa Dasar hukum Notaris dan/atau PPAT dalam pertanahan, didasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris dan Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor : 1 Tahun 2006 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor : 37 Tahun 1998 tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuatan Akta Tanah. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 55 Tahun 1993 maupun Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006, peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut dapat dilakukan melalui/dihadapan Notaris dan/atau PPAT. Peran nyata keterlibatan notaris dalam pembangunan komplek kantor Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau adalah pembuatan Akta Notaris Nomor 9 tanggal 06 Juli 2005 tentang Surat Perjanjian Pelepasan Hak atas Tanah di antara PT Sinar Bintang Sakti dan Pemda Kabupaten Sekadau dan Pembuatan Akta Notaris No. 10 tanggal 06 Juli 2005 tentang surat Pengakuan hutang yang pada pokoknya Pemkab Sekadau mengakui mempunyai hutang kepada CHAN INDRA, dengan jaminan tanah yang telah diterima pelepasan hak atas tanah dari CHAN INDRA selaku Direktur PT. Sinar Bintang Sakti. Perdebatan Notaris berwenang untuk membuat akta yang berkaitan dengan akta-akta pertanahan mengakibatkan keraguan mengenai keabsahan terhadap akta notaris yang terdapat dalam proyek pembangunan perkantoran di Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau.Kata Kunci : Notaris, Pengadaan Tanah, Kabupaten Sekadau. ABSTRACTIn relation to the authority of Notary, as mentioned in UUJN Number 30 Year2004 jo Law Number 2 Year 2014, Article 15 paragraph (2) letter (f), that Notary has authority to make deed related to land.The problematic of this research is: What is the legal basis of Notary's Role in Transaction of Land Procurement For Development Site of Sekadau Regency Government Complex  what is the role of Notary In Transaction of Land Procurement For Development Site of Sekadau Regency Government Complex ?; and what are the consequences of the legal barrier to the Notary's Role in the Land Acquisition Transaction for the Location of the Sekadau Regency Government Complex ?This research is with juridical-empirical approach that comes from collecting data obtained from primary data and secondary data, then analyzed by qualitative analysis method. Data collection techniques used are interview techniques. Data analysis techniques used qualitative data analysis.The findings of the researcher indicate that the legal basis of Notary and / or PPAT in the land is based on Law Number 30 Year 2004 regarding Notary Position and Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 1 Year 2006 regarding Provisions on Implementation of Government Regulation Number 37 Year 1998 on the Regulation of Officials of the Establishment of Deed of Land. Presidential Decree No. 55/1993 and Presidential Regulation No. 65/2006, the transfer of land rights can be done through / in the presence of a Notary and / or PPAT. The real role of notary involvement in the construction of the Sekadau District Government office complex is the making of Notarial Deed No. 9 dated July 6, 2005 concerning Letter of Agreement on the Release of Land Rights between PT Sinar Bintang Sakti and the Regional Government of Sekadau Regency and the Notarial Deed. 10 dated July 6, 2005, concerning letters of recognition of debt principally Pemkab Sekadau acknowledged to have a debt to CHAN INDRA, with guaranteed land that has been received the release of land rights from CHAN INDRA as Director of PT. Sinar Bintang Sakti. The debate of a Notary is authorized to make deeds relating to land deeds lead to doubts about the validity of the notarial deed contained in office building projects in the Sekadau District Government.Suggestions to lawmakers to anticipate differences in legal interpretation in the future, it is recommended that both Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law Number 2 Year 2014 on UUJN and the Notary Profession Code of Ethics, to strengthen the explanation of legislation has been compiled.Keywords : Notary Public, Land Procurement, Sekadau District.


Authentica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-74
Author(s):  
Yulia Yulia Widiastuti

The sale and sale of land rights must be done in the presence of PPAT as proof that there has been a sale and purchase of a land right and then PPAT makes a Deed of Sale and Then followed by registration at the local Land Office following the location of the land. But the fact that until now there is still a sale of land rights done in the presence of the Village Head, as happened in Plana Village Somagede District Banyumas Regency. The point raised in this study is why are the people of Plana Village Somagede sub-district still there who trade land rights, not before the authorized officials, namely PPAT? and what is the legal protection for buyers of land rights that are not done in the presence of authorized officials, namely PPAT? This research uses sociological juridical approach methods, primary data, and secondary data obtained and then analyzed based on legal norms and theories namely legal protection and legal effectiveness. From the results of the research and concluded, then the Village Head must dare to refuse to buy and sell land rights in front of him and the local government policy must impose strict sanctions on the Village Head who violated it, the socialization of the Banyumas district land office must be carried out regularly so that the people trade rights on the land following the prevailing regulations and for the villagers of Plana who have been able to trade rights on the land in front of the Village Head to immediately transition the rights to the land following Article 37 paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 24/1997 on Land Registration.Keywords: Buy and Sell, Village Head, PPAT


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Donald Andrean

In civil law, land is included in registered objects. Therefore ownership of land rights must be registered, for legal certainty. Land registration is regulated in PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. However, there are still many lands that have not been registered, to overcome this the government has issued a comprehensive systematic land registration program (PTSL) based on Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 6 of 2018. The aim of this program is to provide legal certainty and legal protection for land rights owned by the community. The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) provides an opportunity for people who have not registered their land that is located throughout Indonesia in one village or village area. As in the Lima Puluh Kota Regency, there are still many lands that have not been registered, the people obtained them from buying and selling under their hands.The formulation of the problem in this thesis is firstly how is the land registration procedure with the basis of under-selling rights of purchase under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office ?; second, what are the obstacles in the implementation of land registration on the basis of the right to buy and sell under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office? The specification of this research is analytical descriptive, with a normative juridical approach, which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as primary data and primary data as support, which are collected through literature studies and field studies with interview techniques. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. The results of the research and discussion of this thesis can be concluded that the procedure of land registration with the basis of the rights under the hand in the PTSL program in fifty cities is carried out with the stages of planning, location determination, preparation, formation and establishment of the PTSL adjudication committee and task force, counseling, physical data collection and collecting juridical data, researching juridical data for proving rights, announcing physical and juridical data and ratifying it, affirming conversion, recognizing rights and granting rights, accounting for rights, issuing certificates of land rights, documenting and submitting the results of activities and reporting.


Author(s):  
M. F. A. Pratama ◽  
A. Nurhayati ◽  
A. Rizal ◽  
A. A. H. Suryana

Seaweed is one of the leading commodities in the marine sector which has a high selling value. However, this potential is currently not optimally utilized in Karawang Regency. Karawang Regency has a large enough potential for aquaculture ponds, has a pond area of 18,273.30 hectares, and only 1% is cultivated for seaweed. This research aims to formulate a seaweed cultivation business development strategy that has not developed optimally. The respondents in this research were all 60 seaweed cultivators in Karawang Regency. The data used were primary and secondary data. Primary data were obtained through an interview with seaweed cultivators and using the questionnaire. Secondary data were obtained from institutions/agencies related to research, such as the Karawang Regency Fisheries Service The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used to determine a seaweed cultivation development strategy using a SWOT analysis. The results showed that the relative position of seaweed cultivation development based on the SWOT analysis is in the first quadrant which means the strategy used is a progressive or aggressive. The progressive strategy of developing seaweed cultivation can be carried out with strategies such as increasing production to meet the demand for seaweed, expanding the area for seaweed cultivation, empowering local communities about seaweed cultivation and diversifying processed seaweed products.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 425
Author(s):  
Rifan Agrisal Ruslan ◽  
Umar Ma’ruf

The purpose of writing in this study is the first, to know and analyze factors Some people in Tinanggea Sub-District South Konawe Regency of Southeast Sulawesi that has not yet had legal awareness in the act of buying and selling land ownership in the presence of PPAT. Second, To know and Analyze Efforts - Local Government efforts in awakening the community in District Tinanggea South Konawe Southeast Sulawesi against the sale and purchase of land ownership in the presence of PPAT. Third To know to be done in order to Maasyarakat in Tinanggea Sub-District of Konawe Selatan Regency in Sulawesi Teggara performs the sale and purchase of land ownership in the presence of PPAT.The approach method used in this research is empirical juridical. Juridically, this research is based on the rule of law of Basic Agrarian Law and Government Regulation Number 37 Year 1998 juncto Government Regulation Number 24 Year 2016. Empirically, this study aims to know about the rules related to the transfer of land rights with the fact that occurred that deviate from the rules that prevail in the District Tinanggea South Konawe Southeast Sulawesi. Specification of Research that is the object of research is the plot of land is the transfer of Rights to Land with the act of buying and selling of land ownership in the presence of PPAT conducted. Sources and Techniques Data collection is primary data obtained from interviews conducted by 30 respondents and secondary data obtained from the opinions of scholars and literature review. Then Theory in use is Position Theory, Authority Theory and Theory of Legal Certainty.From the results of research can be concluded that the legal consciousness of the people of Tinanggea Sub-District of South Konawe Regency of Southeast Sulawesi is related to the transfer of land rights due to the sale and purchase of land ownership in the presence of the First PPAT: Caused by lack of PPAT and PPATS in the community, which is set by the competent authorities, Caused by a very high kinship and Due to a very low legal community awareness. The second is the government's efforts in the form of socialization held by the local revenue agency related Value Object Tax (NJOP), Tinanggea sub-district office along with jejerannya Kelurahan and village appealed and made a place for reporting / consultation related to the transfer of rights of Sale and Purchase of Land, Cooperation undertaken by Tinanggea Subdistrict Sub-District and Village that make the Letter of Statement of Physical Land Mastery (SPPFT) that the letter is known by Kecamatan Kelurahan and Desa. The third is: The ideal concept of the author's research is the legal counseling to the public to grow knowledge to the public about the importance of legal awareness of the act of buying and selling land ownership in the presence of PPAT, Socialization of the sale and purchase of land ownership in the presence of PPAT. As a form of government service to the public in awakening the rights and obligations of the people in the eyes of the law and Data Collection and the making of Land Book is aimed to record and provide a legal protection for the community so that no land grab or land disputes.Keywords: Legal Awareness, Sale and Purchase, Tinanggea Sub-district.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-174
Author(s):  
Wahyudi Setiyawan ◽  
Absori Absori ◽  
Kelik Wardiono

The research aimed to describe the public legal awareness about meat distribution and legal protection for the beef consumers through law enforcement efforts at Boyolali District based on a qualitative non-doctrinal approach. Therefore, this focused more on primary data collected by interviews and observations and supported by secondary data collected by library research. The data then were processed for further qualitative analysis. Based on the results of the study it was found that legal protection related to the distribution of healthy and safe meat did not run well as this was influenced by the community legal, namely the knowledge and understanding of law, although it had been supported by good legal attitudes and behavioral factors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-464
Author(s):  
I Made Dwi Wahyu Kartika ◽  
Ni Made Jaya Senastri ◽  
Ni Gusti ketut Sri Astiti

Franchising is a marketing concept in order to expand the business to support the economy, in this case there are often problems related to the agreement that has been set. Therefore, a legal protection is needed for the recipient of the right. The purpose of this study is to reveal the choice of agreement in the implementation of franchise agreements in Indonesia and the form of legal protection for franchisees in Indonesia. The research method in this study is normative research focusing on the behavior of the legal community and through legal science book references. Sources of data used are primary data by examining regulations related to franchises and secondary data by examining literature, books, papers and journals. Data collection techniques by classifying primary legal materials with secondary legal materials as a support. Analysis of Legal Materials obtained by qualitative analysis. The results of the study reveal that the franchise business in Indonesia has been regulated in the provisions of PP No. 42 of 2007 concerning franchising, for the legal requirements for the establishment of a franchise business, it must meet the provisions in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, and the form of legal protection for franchisees is contained in Article 7 of the Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 12/ MDAG/Per/3/2006 so the franchisor cannot terminate the agreement at any time or at any time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document