scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA SISWA

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Eni Tri Budianti ◽  
Helma Mustika
Keyword(s):  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Reciprocal Teaching ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Better Than

This research is motivated by the low understanding of the concept by students of science class XI SMA Negeri 1 Rengat Barat. The purpose of this study is to determine the ability to understand the mathematical concepts of students by class XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Rengat Barat.This type of research is quasi exsperiment with randomyzed subject posstest only control group design. The analysis technique in this test is t-test. Based on the hypothesis test calculation its shows the significant value of the sample class is smaller than α that is 0.006 <0.05. This means that it can be concluded that the ability to understand the concept of mathematics using the reciprocal teaching learning model is better than the ability to understand the concept of mathematics by using conventional learning model.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-195
Author(s):  
Fitri Ramadhani ◽  
Delima Septiani
Keyword(s):  
Middle School ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Better Than

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical communication skills of class VII students at Muhammadiyah Middle School in Pasir Penyu. This type of research is a Quasi Experiment with the design of Randomized Subject Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The data analysis technique in this test uses the t-test. Based on the calculation of the hypothesis test shows the significant value of the sample class is 0.003 <0.05. Based on these results, H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematical communication skills of students using the think talk write learning model is better than the mathematical communication skills of students using conventional learning models in class VII in the middle school Muhammadiyah Pasir Penyu.Keywords: Mathematical Communication, Think Talk Write

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Siti Sarniah ◽  
Chairul Anwar ◽  
Rizki Wahyu Yunian Putra
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Better Than

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa dengan model pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran yang biasa digunakan oleh guru. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif, dengan metode eksperimen semu. Desain yang digunakan adalah Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Populasinya adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII di salah satu SMP Lampung Selatan. Simple random sampling merupakan teknik dalam pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini. Kelas VIII A sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas VIII B sebagai kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan hasil uji hipotesis N-gain kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis pada materi relasi dan fungsi diperoleh bahwa kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa dengan model pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran biasa. Kata kunci: Auditory Intellectually Repetition, pemahaman konsep.   ABSTRACT This study aims to determine whether the increasing of students mathematical concepts understanding on the class with Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) model is better than on the class with usual learning models. This study is a quantitative research by using the quasi-experimental method. The design is Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The population is all of eighth grade students of a Junior High School in South Lampung. Simple random sampling technique is used to get the sample. The VIII A class is the experimental class and VIII B class is the control class. Based on the results of the N-gain hypothesis test of the ability to understand mathematical concepts in relation and function material, the understanding of students' mathematical concepts with the Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) learning model is better than students who use usual learning models. Keywords: Auditory Intellectually Repetition, concept understanding.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN STRATEGI THE FIRING LINE UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS SISWA SMP

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Selvia Lovita Sari ◽  
Rubhan Masykur ◽  
Rizki Wahyu Yunian Putra
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Flat Side ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Firing Line ◽  
Better Than

The objective in this research is to find out whether the ability to understand student’s mathematical concepts with the application of The Firing Line strategy is better than ordinary learning. This research used quantitative research. The method used quasi experiment using pretest- posttest Control Group Design. The population in this study is all students in class VIII SMPN 3 Jati Agung. Sampling used class random technique by lottery technique, obtained class VIII A as experiment class and class VIII B as control class. Based on the results of the N-gain hypothesis test the ability to understand mathematical concepts in the material builds up a flat side space (cubes and beams) at signification level  obtained value and . Because . Its means  is rejected. Thus, it can be concluded that the ability to understand student’s mathematical concepts with The Firing Line strategy is better than ordinary learning models.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82
Author(s):  
Eka Rosdianwinata ◽  
Muhammad Ridwan
Keyword(s):  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Better Than

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROBING PROMPTING LEARNING MODEL ON UNDERSTANDING SKILLS OF STUDENT MATHEMATICS CONCEPT. This study aims to determine the ability of understanding the Probing Prompting grade VIII MTs MA Cikaliung model. The research method used posttest-only nonequivalent control group design. Based on the results of hypothesis testing obtained t count = 0.883 and ttable = -1.672 with significance level α = 0.05. The words H0 and H1 are rejected, things that require an understanding of mathematical concepts capable of digging better than others.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elekrolit di Kelas X Madrasah Aliya DDI Lonja

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Muslimah Muslimah ◽  
Kasmudin Mustapa ◽  
Ratman Ratman
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Better Than

This research describes the differences of student’s learning with the application of cooperative learning type make a match in the electrolyte and non-electrolyte at the X grade student’s of the Madrasah Aliya DDI Lonja. This research used quasi experimental with non randomized pretest-posttest control group design. This research was conducted with two groups: XA as the experimental (n=21) XB as the control group (n=18). The data findings means score of experimental group (X1) is 70,5 with the standard deviation 9,6 and the control group (X2) is 62.0 with the standard deviation is 6. Based on the results, the researcher concludes cooperative learning type make a match has better than control class that used conventional learning model.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SAINS TEKNOLOGI MASYARAKAT (STM) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA PADA POKOK BAHASAN EKOSISTEM KELAS VII MTs Amilda 3 1 PARADIGMA PALEMBANG

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
Amilda Amilda ◽  
Sulton Nawawi ◽  
Uci Minasari
Keyword(s):  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Science ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Science Technology Society ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the application of learning model ofScience Technology Society (STS)  to the ability of understanding the concept of Biologystudents on the subject of VII grade ecosystem MTs Paradigma Palembang. The desain ofstudy used the design of the Nonequivalent Control Group Design with Quasi Experimentalmethod (quasi experiment). These sample included 35 students. Based on the results of theanalysis of students' concept of understanding shows that the implementation of learningusing the model of learning Science Technology Society (STS)  is better than theconventional learning model. It can can be seen from the calculation of the t-test showed ofstudents' concept of understanding sig t-value 0.000 < 0,05, then Ha accepted and H0 rejected.The result of analysis of the improvement of the average completeness of the conceptualunderstanding of the experimental class is 48.2% while the students 'understanding of thecontrol class is 29.2%, which means that the students' understanding of the concept of theexperimental class is higher than the understanding of the concept of the control class. This, itcan be concluded that the learning model of Science Technology Society (STS) around effecton understanding the concept of students of class VII MTs Paradigma Palembang

scholarly journals Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Means End Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Nur Asih ◽  
Sendi Ramdhani
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Better Than

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.

scholarly journals Pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Isna Rafianti ◽  
Khairida Iskandar ◽  
Lilis Haniyah
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Equivalent Control ◽  
Mathematical Dispositions

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya hasil belajar matematika siswa di Indonesia. Hal ini disebabkan  oleh  beberapa  faktor,  diantaranya  adalah  rendahnya  kemampuan  pemahaman  konsep matematis dan didukung oleh rendahnya disposisi matematis siswa yaitu apresiasi terhadap pembelajaran matematika. Salah satu upaya untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa adalah dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share  (SSCS)  yang  menjadikan  siswa  mandiri,  aktif  dan  fokus  dalam  pembelajaran  matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa dengan menggunakan model SSCS dalam pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain non-equivalent control group design. Subyek penelitian ini adalah kelas VIII C (eksperimen) dan VIII D (kontrol) semester 2 SMPN 2 Kota Serang. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah soal tes kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan skala disposisi matematis. Data hasil penelitian ini dianalisis menggunakan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji perbedaan rata-rata. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS lebih baik dari siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Disposisi matematis yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS memiliki peningkatan yang lebih rendah atau sama dengan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Dengan demikian model pembelajaran SSCS bisa diterapkan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis namun kurang efektif dalam peningkatan disposisi matematis siswa SMP. Kata kunci: Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis, Disposisi Matematis, Model Pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the low mathematics learning result of students in Indonesia. This is caused by several factors, such as the low ability of understanding mathematical concepts and supported by the low mathematical disposition of students is the appreciation of mathematics learning. One of the efforts to improve the students' understanding of mathematical concepts and mathematical dispositions is by using Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) learning model which makes students self-reliant, active and focused in learning mathematics. This study aims to determine the improvement of the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition of students by using SSCS model in mathematics learning. This research uses quasi experimental method with non-equivalent control group design. The subjects of this research are class VIII C (experiment) and VIII D (control) semester 2 SMPN 2 Serang City. The instrument used in this research is the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition scale. Data of this study were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity test, two-party test, and one-party test. The conclusion of this research is the ability of understanding mathematical concepts of students using SSCS learning model better than students using conventional learning model. While mathematical dispositions using SSCS learning models have a lower or equal increase with students using conventional learning models. Thus the SSCS learning model can be applied to improve the comprehension of mathematical concepts but less effective in improving mathematical disposition of Junior High School students.   Keywords: Ability  to  Understand  Mathematical  Concept,  Mathematical  Disposition,  Search,  Solve, Create and Share Learning Model (SSCS)

scholarly journals Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran CORE dengan Pendekatan Scientific

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ria Deswita ◽  
Yaya S Kusumah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Better Than

This research is motivated by the importance of mathematical communication ability. Mathematical communication ability of students is still low. In order that this problem can be solved, a learning model that can enhance mathematical communication ability of students is required. In this research, CORE model learning with scientific approach was selected. This study aims to analyze the enhancement of mathematical communication ability. This research was a quasi-experimental with nonequivalent control group design. The population was students in eighth grade in one of the junior high schools in Jambi.  The sample consisted of two classes which were selected by purposive sampling. The instrument of this research is a test of mathematical communication ability. The data were analyzed by using Independent t-test. Based on the data analyzed, it is found that: The enhancement of mathematical communication ability of students who received the CORE learning model with scientific approach is better than the enhancement of students who received conventional learning.

scholarly journals STUDI KOMPARATIF MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TALKING STICK DAN SNOWBALL THROWING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DAN KOMUNIKASI (TIK) SISWA KELAS XI SMA NEGERI 1 SERIRIT TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Made Dwi Antari ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana
Keyword(s):  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Multiple Choice Tests ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Equivalent Control ◽  
Questionnaire Method

AbstrakPembelajaran TIK hendaknya dapat menyiapkan kondisi yang mendukung agar aktivitas dan kreativitas siswa memperoleh pengetahuan sendiri melalui proses belajar. Pemilihan model pembelajaran yang tepat sesuai karakteristik siswa akan membantu keberhasilan suatu pembelajaran. Penelitian studi komparatif akan membandingkan dua model pembelajaran, untuk mengetahui model manakah yang lebih baik. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui(1) Pengaruh hasil belajar TIK siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 1 Seririt dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Talking Stick dan Snowball Throwing, (2) Hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi antara model pembelajaran Talking Stick atau Snowball Throwing, (3) respon siswa terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran Talking Stick  dan Snowball Throwing.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only With Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Pengumpulan data dilakukandenganmetodetespilihangandauntukmengukurranahkognitifdanujiketerampilanuntukranahPsikomotor. Data hasilbelajardianalisismelaluiujiprasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan homogenitas dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen, dilanjutkan dengan ujihipotesismenggunakan Anova Satu jalur lalu dilanjutkan dengan uji berpasangan t-Scheffe.Hasil uji anova satu jalur menyatakan terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dalam penggunaan model pembelajaran Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing, dan konvensional. Karena terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan maka dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara masing-masing pasangan. Kemudian dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran Talking Stick lebih baik dengan rata-rata hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi. Sedangkanuntukresponmenggunakanmetodeangket. Hasil analisis angket model Talking Stick diketahui 36% respon sangat positif, 61% respon positif dan 3% respon cukup positif. Sedangkan untuk model Snowball Throwing diketahui 25% respon sangat positif, 67% respon positif dan 8% respon cukup positif. Kata kunci:  Studi Komparatif, TIK, Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing,  hasil belajar, dan respon siswa AbstractTIK learning must have to prepared student’s activities and creativities to obtained the own knowledge by means of learning process. An appropriate learning model election agree with students characteristics would help an success learning. The comparative study research would have to compared both of learning model, to know which model was better. This research aimed to know (1) The influenced about the result of students’ TIK study used Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model (2) the highest result of study between Talking stick and Snowball Throwinglearning model (3) the students’ response toward Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model application.Kind of this research was quasi experiment by Post Test Only with Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The data accumulation done by multiple choice tests to measured cognitive domain and skill test to psychomotor domain. The students’ result study analyzed by prerequisite test was normality test and homogeneity by the result of the three group which normal distribution and homogeneous, continued by hypothesis test used a strip Anova then continued by t-SheffeThe result of one way onova exist a significance influenced on the used of Talking Stick leaarning model, Snowball Throwing and conventional. Because of thee was a significance difereences between each partner. Afterwards, seen from the result average of study  can be concluded the Talking Stick learning model better than the higest result average of study. Meanwhile, the respond of used questionnaire method, the result of Talking stick model questionnaire known 36% very positive responses, 61% positive responses and 3% positive sufficient responses. Then, Snowball Throwing model known 25% very positive responses, 67% positive responses, and 8% positive sufficient responses. Keywords : The Comparrative Study, TIK, Talking stick, Snowball Throwing, the                   study result,  students’ respond

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document