scholarly journals PENINGKATAN KEAKTIFAN DAN HASIL BELAJAR SEGITIGA DAN SEGIEMPAT MELALUI PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF MAKE A MATCH

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Tri Unggul Suwarsi ◽  
Pujianto Pujianto

<span lang="EN-US">This classroom action research</span><span lang="IN"> (CAR) </span><span lang="EN-US">aimed to: improve student’s</span><span lang="EN-US">activities and mathematics learning outcomes subject triangle and square for student at class VII B of SMP</span><span lang="EN-US">N</span><span lang="IN">egeri</span><span lang="EN-US"> 5<span>  </span>Surakarta through the implementation of </span><span lang="IN">the M</span><span lang="EN-US">ake a </span><span lang="IN">M</span><span lang="EN-US">atch cooperative learning model.</span><span lang="IN">This study used the method of CAR which was carried out during March until July 2018, it was in the 2017/2018 academic year.The receptive subject of the study was the 29 students of VII B while the agent subject was the mathematics teacher. The data were collected by observation, test, and documentation. The collected data were then analyzed using the technique of comparative descriptive sta­tistic and critical analysis. </span><span lang="EN-US">The result of </span><span lang="IN">CAR s</span><span lang="EN-US">hows that the imple</span><span lang="IN">­</span><span lang="EN-US">men</span><span lang="IN">­</span><span lang="EN-US">tation of cooperative learning model type make a match can improve the stu</span><span lang="IN">­</span><span lang="EN-US">dent’s activities and student’s mathematic learning outcome.</span>

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 555
Author(s):  
Arlinda Arlinda

The background of this study is the low learning outcomes of students' IPS, from 22 students only 10 (45.45%) reaching the determined KKM, in addition the average student learning outcome is 62.50. The study aims to improve the learning outcomes of IPS Through the application of TSTS learning model. This research is a classroom action research, this research is conducted in SDN 21 Sitorajo Kecamatan Kuantan Tengah. Subjects in this study were students of class IV B with a total of 22 students. This research is conducted two cycles with four stages, namely: planning, implementation, observation and reflection. The result of research stated that after applied cooperative learning model type TSTS can improve learning result of IPS. This is evidenced by: (a) teacher activity in cycle I is 62,50, in cycle II equal to 82,81. Student activity in cycle I earn 65,62, in cycle II equal to 85,93; (b) result of student learning on prasiklus equal to 62,50, at cycle I equal to 72,50 and at second cycle equal to 82,18.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-60
Author(s):  
Yustina Upik ◽  
Avelius Dominggus Sore

Abstract: The problem in this study is the lack of student activeness in learning causes low learning outcome percentage 52,94%. The form of research I use is classroom action research (PTK). Data were collected through observation, questionnaires, interviews, and test sheets, and the research phase was conducted in 2 cycles. The result of the research shows that the study of cooperative type listening team in the implementation of cycle 1 turns out that the students have not maximized their opinions so that the achievement of the value has not been maximized. It is seen from the students' learning result in cycle 1, the highest score is 80, the lowest score is 50, average 66 and the percentage of mastery of 58.82%. However, in cycle 2 students have been able to express the answers in groups well, and in cycle 2 ended the teacher's efforts to improve the learning outcomes with the highest score of students obtained by 90, with an average of 76, and the percentage of mastery of 94.11%. To improve student learning outcomes, teachers use the appropriate learning model and in accordance with the material that is taught, and critical thinking patterns and responsiveness of students can be honed by expressing opinions in front of the class.Keyword: Cooperative Learning Model Type Listening Team Improves Learning OutcomesAbstrak: Masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah kurangnya keaktifan siswa dalam belajar menyebabkan hasil belajar yang rendah persentasenya 52,94%. Bentuk penelitian yang saya gunakan adalah penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK). Data dikumpulkan melalui  observasi, angket, wawancara, dan lembar tes, serta tahap penelitian ini dilakukan dalam 2 siklus. Hasil penelitian menunjukan pengkajian terhadap hasil belajar menggunakan cooperative tipe listening team dalam pelaksanaan siklus 1 ternyata siswa belum maksimal  mengemukakan pendapat sehinga menyebabkan pencapaian nilai belum maksimal hal tersebut dilihat dari hasil belajar siswa pada siklus 1, nilai tertinggi 80, nilai terendah 50, nilai rata-rata 66 serta persentase ketuntasan sebesar 58,82%. Namun pada siklus 2 siswa telah mampu mengungkapkan jawaban dalam kelompok dengan baik, dan pada siklus 2 berakhirlah upaya guru untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dengan nilai tertinggi siswa di peroleh sebesar 90, dengan rata-rata 76, serta persentase ketuntasan sebesar 94,11%. Untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa, guru menggunakan model pembelajaran yang tepat dan sesuai dengan materi yang di ajarkan, dan pola berpikir kritis dan tanggap dari siswa dapat diasah dengan mengemukakan pendapat didepan kelas.Kata kunci: Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Listening Team meningkatkan Hasil Belajar


Author(s):  
Eline Yanty Putri Nasution ◽  
Farida Hanum Lubis

  Abstrak. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan kelas dengan 3 siklus sebagai kolaborasi penelitian antara dosen pendidikan matematika dengan guru matematika. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menelaah model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw berbasis Algebrator untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Pelenitian ini dilaksanakan pada salah satu sekolah menengah pertama dimana 215 orang siswa kelas delapan sebagai populasi, dan 21 orang siswa sebagai sampel penelitian. Penelitian ini menggunakan 8 buah instrumen baik tes maupun non-tes yang terlebih dahulu diuji coba validitasnya, yaitu: tes hasil belajar siswa I dengan nilai reliabilitas 0,80 (tinggi), tes hasil belajar siswa II dengan nilai reliabilitas 0,76 (tinggi), tes hasil belajar siswa III dengan nilai reliabilitas 0,81 (tinggi), skala aktivitas belajar siswa I dengan nilai reliabilitas 0,844 (sangat tinggi), skala aktivitas belajar siswa II dengan nilai reliabilitas 0,784 (tinggi), skala aktivitas belajar siswa III dengan nilai reliabilitas 0,878 (sangat tinggi), lembar observasi dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah: (1) rata-rata hasil belajar siswa pada siklus pertama adalah 65,62 (2) rata-rata hasil belajar siswa pada siklus kedua adalah 71,53 (3) rata-rata hasil belajar siswa pada siklus ketiga adalah 76 (4) rata-rata aktivitas belajar siswa pada siklus pertama adalah 41,29% (5) rata-rata aktivitas belajar siswa pada siklus kedua adalah 50,71% (6) rata-rata aktivitas belajar siswa pada siklus ketiga adalah 65,24% (7) lembar observasi dan wawancara menunjukkan bahwa siswa merasa senang dan tertarik terhadap pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw berbasis Algebrator. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw berbasis Algebrator dapat meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Kata kunci: Jigsaw, Algebrator, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Aktivitas Belajar dan Hasil BelajarAbstract. This study was classroom action research with 3 cycles as the research collaboration between mathematics education lecturer and mathematics teacher. The purpose of this study was investigated cooperative learning model type jigsaw based on Algebrator to improve students activity and learning outcomes in mathematics learning. This study was implemented in one of the junior high school which 215 students of eighth grade as the population and 21 students as research sample. This study used 8 instruments not only test but also non-test that checked the validity first, that are: students learning outcomes test I with reability score at 0.80 (high), students learning outcomes test II with reability score at 0.76 (high), students learning outcomes test III with reability score at 0.81 (high), students learning activity scale I with reability score at 0.844 (very high), students learning activity scale II with reability score at 0.784 (high), students learning activity scale III with reability score at 0.878 (very high), observation sheet and interview. Based on the analysis of the data result, the finding of this study are: (1) the average of students’ learning outcomes at the first cycle is 65.62, (2) the average of students’ learning outcomes at the second cycle is 71.53, (3) the average of students’ learning outcomes at the third cycle is 76 (4) the average of students’ learning activity at the first cycle is 41.29%, (5) the average of students’ learning activity at the second cycle is 50.71%, (6) the average of students’ learning activity at the third cycle is 65.24% (7) observation and interview result indicate that students enjoyed and interested in mathematics learning using cooperative learning model type jigsaw based on Algebrator. The conclution is cooperative learning model type jigsaw based on Algebrator can improve students’ activity and learning outcomes in mathematics learning. Keywords: Jigsaw, Algebrator, Classroom Action Research, Learning Activity and Learning Outcomes


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Zainur Zainur

This research was motivated by the low learning outcomes of grade IX SMP Muhammadiyah Padang LuasKecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. This study aims to improve learning outcomes in mathematicslearning through STAD type cooperative learning with the RME approach in class IX SMP MuhammadiyahPadang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. The subjects of this study were all classes IX in SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar totaling 26 people. The form ofresearch is classroom action research. This research instrument consists of performance instruments and datacollection instruments in the form of teacher activity observation sheets and activities. The results of the studystated that there were significant differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes before applyingthe STAD type cooperative learning model with the RME approach with after applying the STAD typecooperative learning model with the RME approach. The difference shows student learning outcomes after theaction is better than before the action with completeness reaching 80.77% or 21 completed. Based on the resultsof the study and discussion it can be concluded that the application of STAD type learning model with RealisticMathematic Education (RME) approach can improve the learning outcomes of grade IX students of SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar on statistical material.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 711
Author(s):  
Sarwati Sarwati

The purpose of this research is to improve learning outcomes of natural sciences subjects through theapplication of cooperative learning model type example non example in class V SDN 003 Beringin Teluk. Theform of this research is classroom action research, with 22 subjects consisting of 10 men and 12 women. Basedon the results of the research cycle I the percentage of teacher activity amounted to 54.1% with sufficientcategories and increased in the second meeting to 62.5% with good categories. In the second cycle of the firstmeeting the percentage of teacher activity was 70.8% in the good category and at the second meeting increasedto 83.3% in the very good category. student activity by 50% with less categories and at the second meetingincreased to 58.3% with enough categories. In the second cycle the first meeting the percentage of studentactivity was 75% in the good category and increased in the second meeting to 87.5% in the very good category.student learning outcomes in the basic score of the presentation was 40.9%, after repeated daily cycle Iincreased to 63.6% and again increased in cycle II to 86.3%. Departing from the results of this action it can beconcluded that the application of cooperative learning model type example non examples can improve thelearning outcomes of Natural Sciences class V SDN 003 Beringin Teluk.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Kasman Bamba

he background of this study is the low learning outcomes of English students. Of the 22 students only 9 studentsreached KKM. On this basis researchers do research by applying cooperative learning model type NHT toimprove English learning outcomes. This research is a classroom action research conducted in SMPN 1 Inuman,the subject of this study is the students of class VII with the number of 22 students. The results suggest that thelearning outcomes of English have increased in each cycle. This is evidenced by: In the basic score of thenumber of students who reached KKM or complete is 9 students (40.90%), the UH I has increased with thenumber of 17 students (77.27%) and in UH II increased with the number of 20 students (90.90%). In the basicscore of the learning result of the students get the value of 51,25 with the low category, at UH I experiencing theincrease of learning result with the acquisition value of 65,76 with the medium category, and at UH II studentlearning result again increase with the acquisition value equal to 79,25 with high category.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikmatul Fadhilah Sianipar ◽  
Asmin . .

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 5 Binjai yang diajar  menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran aktif tipe Index Card Match. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 5 Binjai yang terdiri dari 7 kelas dan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII-2 dan kelas VII-4 sebanyak 52 siswa. Kelas VII-2 diajar menggunakan model kooperatif tipe Make a Match dan kelas VII-4 diajar menggunakan model aktif tipe Index Card Match. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Data yang digunakan adalah tes PAM yang diambil dari 15 butir soal UN Sekolah Dasar dan postest berbentuk uraian sebanyak 5 soal untuk melihat hasil belajar matematika siswa. Sebelum pengujian hipotesis terlebih dahulu diuji normalitas tes dengan menggunakan uji Chi Square dan homogenitas tes menggunakan uji F. Dari pengujian yang dilakukan diperoleh bahwa hasil tes PAM kedua sampel berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal dan homogen, dengan demikian penulis bisa memberikan perlakuan kepada kedua sampel. Dari hasil analisis data diperoleh nilai rata-rata hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diberi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match adalah 75,68 dengan simpangan baku 4,90 dan rata-rata hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diberi model pembelajaran aktif tipe Index Card Match adalah 70,53 dengan simpangan baku 5,85. Untuk uji hipotesis digunakan uji t, dari hasil perhitungan diperoleh thitung = 3,43875 dan ttabel = 2,01. Ternyata thitung > ttabel, sehingga Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima sehingga diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa terdapat perbedaan antara hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dan model pembelajaran aktif tipe Index Card Match berbantuan Software Geogebra. Kata kunci: hasil belajar, make a match, index card match, geogebra ABSTRACT This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes between students of class VII SMP Negeri 5 Binjai who was taught using cooperative learning model type Make a Match by using the model of active learning type Index Card Match. The population in this research is all students of class VII of SMP Negeri 5 Binjai which consists of 7 classes and the sample in this research are students of class VII-2 and class VII-4 as many as 52 students. Class VII-2 was taught using a Make a Match type of cooperative model and VII-4 classes were taught using an active model of Index Card Match type. This type of research is a pseudo experiment. The data used is the PAM test taken from 15 items of UN Primary School and postest in the form of a description of 5 questions to see the students' mathematics learning outcomes. Before testing the hypothesis first tested the normality of the test by using Chi Square test and the homogeneity of the test using the F test. From the test it was obtained that the results of the PAM test of both samples came from a population of normal and homogeneous distribution, thus the authors can give treatment to both samples. From the results of data analysis obtained the average value of mathematics learning outcomes of students who are given a model of cooperative learning type Make a Match is 75.68 with standard deviation 4.90 and the average of mathematics learning outcomes of students who are given an active model of learning type Index Card Match is 70.53 with standard deviation 5.85. To test the hypothesis used t test, from the calculation results obtained tcount = 3.43875 and ttabel = 2.01. Apparently thitung> ttabel, so Ho is rejected and Ha accepted so that obtained the conclusion that there is a difference between mathematics learning outcomes of students who are taught with cooperative learning model type Make a Match and active learning model type Index Card Match Software Geogebra.Keywords: study results, make a match, index card match, geogebra


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Fauzi Martha Lisdyadana ◽  
Fury Styo Siskawati ◽  
Tri Novita Irawati

This study aims to improve student activity and learning outcomes through a problem possing learning model. This type of research is classroom action research (CAR). The subjects of this study were students of class VIII SMP An Nisa 'Gumukmas. The data collection method used is the method of testing, observation, interviews and documentation. This research was conducted in two cycles. Based on the results of the research conducted, the percentage of activity in the first cycle was 62.9% and in the second cycle it reached 81.5%, it appears that there is an increase. Then for the percentage of completeness of learning outcomes in cycle I reached 55.6% and in cycle II reached 92%, it appears that there is an increase. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the application of the problem possing learning model can improve student activity and learning outcomes.   Keywords: problem possing, learning activity, learning outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-131
Author(s):  
Yulia Anita Siregar

Abstract. This study aims to improve the learning outcomes of Mathematics students in grade IV SD N 101212 Padang Bujur. This study uses Classroom Action Research (CAR) type of collaboration with steps of planning, action, observation, and reflection consisting of two cycles. Data collection techniques used are test, non-test, and documentation. Adapaun indicator of success of this study is 85% of all students got a value of ≥ 75. The results of the study were analyzed by completeness analysis. In the teaching and learning process using the cooperative type NHT learning model, in cycles 1 and 2 Mathematics learning outcomes increased. Of the students with 15 children, when the pre-cycle students were completed there were 5 (33.33%). Whereas 10 students (66.66%) did not complete. After conducting classroom action research using the NHT cooperative learning model in the first cycle the students who completed the study numbered 8 students (53.33%) while the incomplete ones in the study were 7 students with an average score of 73.66. In the second cycle, students who completed learning were 13 students (86.66%), while those who did not complete the study were 2 students (13.33%) with an average score of 81.33. The results of this study indicate that through the NHT cooperative learning model can improve Mathematics learning outcomes for students in Class IV SD N 101212 Padang Bujur.Keywords: Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) type, Mathematics Learning Outcomes


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Idham Kamil ◽  
Kashardi Kashardi

This study aims to find out the significant differences between students' mathematical understanding abilities that are taught using the Cooperative Learning Model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and conventional learning models, and which learning model gives better results to improve students' mathematical understanding abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study was class VIII 27 of Seluma State Junior High School consisting of 4 classes. The sample of this study was chosen 3 classes randomly, namely class VIII A as the experimental class I using the Cooperative learning model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), class VIII B as the experimental class II using the cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Class VIII C as a control class using conventional learning models. Data collection on student mathematics learning outcomes in the form of tests consisting of pre-test and post-test. Data were analyzed using ANAVA and BNT. Based on ANAVA results, there are differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes in experimental class I, experimental class II, and control class. Based on the LSD test it was found that the treatment between the experimental class I with the experimental class II, the experimental class I with the control class, and the experimental class II with the control class there were differences. Auditory IntellectualyReceptition (AIR) cooperative learning model provides better results than the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and Conventional learning model.Keywords: mathematical understanding ability,  AIR,  NHT, learning model


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document