scholarly journals Dinamika Konsepsi Penguasaan Negara Atas Sumber Daya Alam

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 401
Author(s):  
Ahmad Redi
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Control Rights ◽  
Control Concept ◽  
Control Right ◽  
The Government ◽  
Draft Bill ◽  
The Guardian

Discourse concerning state control concept on natural resources in Article 33 clause (3) of the 1945 Constitution is very dynamic. Such dynamic can be seen on      a variety of conceptions of state control rights on natural resources formulated in various acts in natural resources area. Lack of single concept on ‘state control right’ will impact to unfavorable situation where natural resources shall escape from conception of state control right and into control not by the state. The Constitutional Court as the Guardian and Interpreter of the Constitution has a significant role to ascertain that an act in natural resources area really adopt the principle of state control on natural resources in Indonesia. This article analyzes on dynamics of conception of state control on natural resources in various acts and the role of the Constitutional Court in guarding and interpreting acts in natural resources in order to be in accordance with Article 33 clause (3) of the 1945 Constitution. From the result of analysis a conclusion is achieved that there are many different concepts    of state control on natural resources in various acts in natural resources area. The Constitutional Court indeed has made interpretation on state control right. In order to make the conception stronger it is necessary to have an act in natural resources area as instruction of Article 33 clause (5) of the 1945 Constitution that further provisions of Article 33 shall be regulated by an act. Moreover, DPR (The House of Representatives) and the Government have to make certain or definite the concept of state control right in every draft bill of natural resources area so that liberalism and capitalism stream will not erode the principle of state control right.

scholarly journals HAK MENGUASAI NEGARA DALAM SISTEM TATA KELOLA MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI: ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 36/PUU-X/2012 / The State Control Rights In Oil And Gas Management System: The Analysis Of Constitutional Decision No 36/PUU-X/2012

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 407
Author(s):  
Nizammudin Nizammudin
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Management Policy ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Control Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
State's Rights

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-X/2012 tentang judicial review UU No. 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi telah menimbulkan perdebatan publik tentang sistem tata kelola minyak dan gas bumi di Indonesia. Adapun hasil yang ditemukan dalam penelitian ini yaitu, Pertama, konsep “hak menguasai negara” dalam Pasal 33 UUD 1945 secara filosofis berangkat dari konstruksi Pancasila yang memberikan kekuasaan kepada negara untuk campur tangan dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam demi mewujudkan sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat, namun pada saat yang sama tetap memberikan peluang bagi kepemilikan perdata sepanjang tidak mendegradasi peran negara dalam pengambilan keputusan dan penentuan kebijakan. Kedua, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-X/2012 tidak membatasi kewenangan Pemerintah dan DPR untuk membentuk badan pengelola migas tertentu sejauh tidak bertentangan dengan opsi yang terdapat dalam pertimbangan hukum MK, yakni BUMN atau Pemerintah. Terminologi “Pemerintah” dalam pertimbangan hukum MK memiliki makna yang jauh lebih luas dan tak harus dibatasi pada Kementerian ESDM, namun mencakup pula BUMN atau badan independen yang mungkin dibentuk oleh pemerintah berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan.The Constitutional Court Decision No. 36 / PUU-X / 2012 concerning the unconstitutionality of BP Migas in Law No. 22 of 2001 on Oil and Gas has provoked public debate about the management systems of Indonesian oil and gas. This study focuses on the following questions: First, what the meaning and the concept of the state control rights of oil and gas under the 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia?; Second, what what are the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-X/2012 on the national oil and gas management policy?. The results of the study shows the following conclusions. First, the concept of state’s rights in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia philosophically derived from the construction of Pancasila which empowers the state to involve in the management of natural resources in order to provide the prosperity of the people, but at the same time providing opportunities for private ownership as far as not to degrade the state's role in determining the decision-making and policy-making. Secondly, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-X/2012 does not limit the authority of the Government and the Parliament to form any oil and gas administrative body to the extent not contrary to the options proposed by the Constitutional Court, i.e. the state-owned enterprises or the government. The term ‘government’ in the legal consideration of the Constitutional Court has a much broader meaning and should not be limited to the Ministry of Energy, but also includes the SOE itself or an independent agency that may be established by the government based on the law.

DEKADENSI PEMILIHAN HAKIM AGUNG OLEH DPR RI

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-104
Author(s):  
Rustam Magun Pikahulan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Institutional Status ◽  
The Government

Abstract: The Plato's conception of the rule of law states that good governance is based on good law. The organization also spreads to the world of Supreme Court justices, the election caused a decadence to the institutional status of the House of Representatives as a people's representative in the government whose implementation was not in line with the decision of the Constitutional Court. Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court No.27/PUU-XI/2013 explains that the House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only approve or disapprove candidates for Supreme Court Justices that have been submitted by the Judicial Commission. In addition, the proportion of proposed Supreme Court Justices from the judicial commission to the House of Representatives (DPR) has changed, whereas previously the Judicial Commission had to propose 3 (three) of each vacancy for the Justices, now it is only one of each vacant for Supreme Court Judges. by the Supreme Court. The House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only "approve" or "disagree" the Supreme Judge candidates nominated by the Judicial Commission.

THE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS SECURITY – AN ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (30) ◽  
pp. 154-191
Author(s):  
Remigiusz Lewandowski ◽  
Tadeusz Wachowski
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Public Security ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
State Control ◽  
Corrective Actions ◽  
The Government ◽  
Draft Bill ◽  
The Eu

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify gaps and weaknesses in the proposed system of public documents security as well as to formulate corrective actions. Project and methods: The research is based on an analysis of a draft bill on public documents together with implementing acts, the literature review and publicly available data on public documents security. Results: The analysis shows that the draft has some essential weaknesses which may cause its inconsistence with the EU law and reduce the level of public documents security. These weaknesses have been identified and appropriate corrections have been proposed. Conclusions: The implementation of the analyzed legal regulations is necessary as regards public security. However, they need significant corrections. In particular, it is essential to reduce the catalogue of the 1st category of public documents, give authorization for changes in specimens of existing public documents to the Commission on public documents, fill gaps in rules of specimens designing; increase state control over the exclusive producer of blankets of public documents of the 1st category, resign from the option which enables the government to consign manufacturing of blankets of public documents of the 1st category to a producer different that the exclusive.

scholarly journals Disharmonized the Regulation of Biological Resources and its Ecosystem in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 332-340
Author(s):  
Sumurung P. Simaremare ◽  
◽  
Muhammad Dzikirullah H. Noho ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Convention On Biological Diversity ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Cartagena Protocol On Biosafety ◽  
Cartagena Protocol ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Definition Of

The goal of state control over natural resources is an anticipatory step to avoid the widest possible use by individuals or legal entities as a means of oppression and exploitation of others. However, in reality, many regulations overlap and are not in harmony with one another. The author of this study uses normative juridical research. The definition of normative juridical is a type of research that emphasizes more on library research, where the materials used will be obtained from laws, literature, mass media, which are related to writing materials. This study found that the arrangement of living natural resources in Indonesia that is less harmonious is: a. Law Number 21 of 2004 concerning Ratification of the Cartagena Protocol On Biosafety To The Convention On Biological Diversity and b. Constitutional Court Decision No.35/PUU-X/2012.

scholarly journals Menakar Konstitusionalitas Syari’at Islam dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 606
Author(s):  
Hani Adhani
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Historical Study ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Technical Management ◽  
Aceh Province ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Salah satu point penting yang diatur dalam perjanjian Helsinki terkait dengan penegakan hukum di Aceh adalah diberlakukannya Qanun dengan tujuan untuk menghormati tradisi sejarah Islam dan adat istiadat rakyat Aceh yang mayoritas muslim. Selain itu, untuk mensinergikan antara Qanun dengan pengadilan, maka di Provinsi Aceh dibentuk suatu sistem peradilan Syar’iyah yang tidak memihak dan independen, termasuk pengadilan tinggi yang tetap merupakan bagian dari sistem peradilan Republik Indonesia. Pembentukan Pengadilan Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh merupakan salah satu upaya untuk membuat kekhususan sebagaimana diatur dalam perjanjian Helsinki pada tahun 2005.  Namun, dalam dataran teknis pengaturan manajemen pengadilan Syar’iyah juga masih terkendala khususnya oleh karena adanya dua aturan hukum yang berlaku yaitu Qanun yang dibuat oleh Dewan Perwakilam Rakyat Daerah Provinsi Aceh dan undang-undang yang dibuat oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat beserta Presiden. Hal tersebut berakibat Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Aceh yang mengatur tentang teknis pengaturan pengadilan Syar’iyah dan pembuatan Qanun juga banyak di lakukan judicial review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisa tentang efektifitas pemberlakukan Qanun dan pengadilan Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh pasca di undangkannya Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Aceh. Adapun tulisan ini dibuat dengan menggunakan metode penulisan normatif dengan pendekatan studi historis dan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan Syar’iyah yang telah dibentuk di Provinsi Aceh meski pada awalnya mengalami kendala namun dapat berjalan baik. Adanya kekhususan yang diberikan kepada Provinsi Aceh merupakan bagian dari upaya untuk menjalankan amanat konstitusi khususnya Pasal 18B UUD 1945.Kata kunci: Qanun, Pemerintahan Aceh, Mahkamah Syar’iyah, Mahkamah Konstitusi. Abstract One crucial point stipulated in the Helsinki agreement related to law enforcement in Aceh is the enactment of the Qanun with the aim of respecting Islamic historical traditions and the customs of the Acehnese people who are predominantly Muslim. Besides, to synergise between the Qanun and the court, in the Province of Aceh a Syar'iyah justice system was formed which was impartial and independent, including a high court which remained part of the judicial system of the Republic of Indonesia. The establishment of the Shariah Law in Aceh Province was one of the efforts to make it specific as stipulated in the Helsinki agreement in 2005. However, in the field of technical management of the Syariah court management is also still constrained especially due to the existence of two applicable laws namely the Qanun made by the Aceh Province Regional People's Representative Council and laws made by the House of Representatives and the President. This resulted in the Law on the Government of Aceh governing the Syar'iyah court and the Qanun being judged by the Constitutional Court. This paper aims to analyse the effectiveness of the implementation of Qanun and the Syar'iyah court in Aceh Province after the enactment of the Law on the Governing of Aceh. The writing is made using normative writing methods with historical study approaches, and case study approaches. The results of the study showed that the Syar'iyah court which had been formed in the Aceh Province even though initially had problems but could work well. The specificity given to the Aceh Province is part of an effort to carry out the mandate of the constitution, especially Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution. 

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA NEGARA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945

Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Johansyah Johansyah
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Election Results ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The Constitutional Court is the executive branch of the judiciary that is independent and separate from other branches of power, namely the government (executive) and legislative institutions. The Constitutional Court as a first and last level judiciary does not have an organizational structure as large as the Supreme Court which is the peak of a judicial system whose structure is vertically and horizontally covers five judicial environments, namely the general court environment, the state administrative court environment, the religious court environment, and military court environment. As an organ of judicial power that operates the judicial function, the Constitutional Court is independent, both structurally and functionally. The functions and authorities of the Constitutional Court based on Law No. 24 of 2003, namely the Constitutional Court has the authority to hear: Test the laws against the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution; Decide on authority disputes between state institutions whose authority is granted by the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution; Decide the dissolution of political parties; Decide disputes about election results; Give a verdict on the opinion of the House of Representatives that the President and / or Vice-President are suspected of violating the law in the form of treason, corruption, bribery, other serious crimes, or despicable acts, or no longer fulfill the conditions as President and or Vice President, as intended in the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution.

scholarly journals KELEMBAGAAN PENGELOLA MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 36/PUU-X/2012)

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Ganesha Patria Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Similar Function ◽  
Exploration And Exploitation ◽  
Reform Agenda ◽  
Regulation Function ◽  
The Government

BP Migas the kind of reform agenda from institutional manager oil and gas which is the part of Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001. BP Migas is institusional manager of oil and gas that formed to become the government representation as mining rights to controlling and supervising exploration and exploitation oil and gas that formerly held by pertamina. Politiekrecht establishment BP Migas is to avoiding conflict of interest if the regulation function and business has been place in the same institutional like the old Pertamina, so doing the separation institutional which do the function of regulation and business. The existancy of BP Migas impact to the mining rights which is the part of the authority of state control become obscuur ,because the fifth function that constructed by Constitutional Court by doing interpretation to  section 33 act (2) dan (3) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 can’t through all and gradual. Through Constitutional Court decision No 36/PUU-X/2012 all the section which have related with BP Migas are unconstitutional. BP Migas should be dissolved and government from the regulation function should control the new institutionals function and authority. With the dissolution of BP Migas the government would establish similar function and authority institutional which named SKK Migas .With the present SKK Migas, so all the mining rights problems become interested to be re-examined.

scholarly journals Living Constitution in Indonesia: The Study of Constitutional Changes Without A Formal Amendment

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Addi Fauzani ◽  
Nur Aqmarina Deladetama ◽  
Muhammad Basrun ◽  
Muhammad Khoirul Anam
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Amendment ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Change ◽  
Political Will ◽  
Constitutional Convention ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Government ◽  
Constitutional Changes

The discussion regarding the living constitution in Indonesia has been increasingly important. The importance of this discussion deals with to the extent it has developed, particularly after Indonesia's constitutional amendment from 1999 to 2002. The current study of constitutional change in Indonesia, as a result of the constitutional amendment during Reformation, adds an emphasis on its change without a formal amendment. Thus, this paper will discuss the urgency of enforcing the amended 1945 Constitution in the lens of the living constitution and how to uphold it through the living constitution. This study uses doctrinal research and, in examining the case, it uses the statutory and conceptual approaches. The result of the study shows that the urgency of upholding the constitution through the living constitution relies on the concept of the living constitution that can dynamize the 1945 Constitution. In response to difficulties to formally amend the 1945 Constitution that depends on political will and rigid juridical condition, there should be a shift in the method of interpretation of the constitution by the Constitutional Court judges, from originalism to the living constitution. The enforcement of the 1945 Constitution through the living constitution can apply the constitutional convention and the interpretation by constitutional judges. This study suggests that the Government and the House of Representatives and other relevant state institutions can use the living constitution, by taking into account the constitutional convention is a source in the organization of the state to patch up the weaknesses of the constitution. Keywords: Living Constitution, Constitutional Changes, Formal Amendment.

scholarly journals Penegasan Peran Negara dalam Pemenuhan Hak Warga Negara Atas Air

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
Helmi Kasim
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Access To Water ◽  
The Government ◽  
Private Corporations ◽  
The Right

This writing analyses access to water not merely as a right but as human  rights. Since the right to water constitues human rights, then constitutionally, the state, mainly the government, is obliged to respect, fulfil and protect that right. In order that the government can perform its obligation to fulfil the right of citizens   to water, the sate should put control of water under the power of the state. Thus, there are two perspectives in fulfilling the rights of citizens to water, human rights perspective and the perspective of state control. From the perspective of human rights, the 1945 Constitution has stipulated the obligation of the state in fulfilling the human rights of citizens including the right to water as stated in Article 28I paragrahp (4). From the perspective of state control over water resources, the 1945 Constitution has also determined constitutional standard as stipulated in Article 33. This concept of state control based on Article 33 has been interpreted by the Constitutional Court in its decisions. Specifically, in the decision concerning the law on water resources, the Court returned control over water to the state. The Court  set some limitations on how to utilize water resources. Private corporations are still allowed to participate in water management with strict conditions. The enhancement of this control by the state over water is intended to guarantee the fulfilment of the right of citizens to water. As an idea, monopoly of the state over water resources might be also be considered just like monopoly of state over electricity.

scholarly journals KONSEP PENINGKATAN KUANTITAS DAN KUALITAS PROGRAM LEGISLASI NASIONAL: REKOMENDASI KONSEPTUAL DAN KEBIJAKAN PADA PROLEGNAS 2015-2019

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 399
Author(s):  
Muh Risnain
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Institutional Capacity ◽  
Political Commitment ◽  
Crucial Issue ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Draft Bill ◽  
The Impact

<p>Rendahnya capaian Prolegnas baik dari sisi kuantitas maupun kualitas pada dua periode Program Legislasi Nasional (Prolegnas): periode 2005-2009 dan periode 2010-2014, merupakan persoalan krusial pembangunan hukum yang harus dipecahkan. Dampaknya bukan saja minimnya capaian Prolegnas, tetapi pada eksistensi negara hukum Indonesia. Penelitian mengidentitifikasi dua permasalahan, Pertama , apa saja hal-hal yang menghambat tercapainya target Prolegnas pada periode 2005-2009 dan periode 2010-2014? Kedua , bagaimanakah konsep peningkatan kualitas dan kuantitas Prolegnas pada masa yang akan datang? Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan kualitas Prolegnas, maka ketika pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) oleh DPR, Pemerintah dan DPD hendaknya memperhatikan hal-hal: harmonisasi vertikal materi RUU dengan UUD NRI 1945 dan harmonisasi horizontal RUU dengan peraturan perundang-undangan, tingkat urgensitas dan kompatibilitas materi muatan undang-undang, dan peningkatan kapasitas legislative drafting anggota legislatif. Untuk menjamin peningkatan kuantitas Prolegnas, maka hendaknya ketika penyusunan RUU yang masuk menjadi bagian Prolegnas DPR, Pemerintah maupun DPD memperhatikan kapasitas kelembagaan DPR dengan target Prolegnas yang akan dicapai, mengkaji secara mendalam kerangka konseptual, landasan filosofis, landasan yuridis maupun landasan sosiologis keberadaan RUU, dan komitmen politik secara kelembagaan baik Pemerintah, DPR maupun DPD dalam menyelesaikan Prolegnas.</p><p>Low Prolegnas achievements both in terms of quantity and quality in the two periods of the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas): 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, is a crucial issue of law development that must be solved. The impact is not only the lack of achievement Prolegnas but the existence of the state of Indonesian law. This research identified two problems, first, what are the things that hinder the achievement of the Prolegnas target in the period 2005-2009 and the period 2010- 2014? Second, how is the concept of improving the quality and quantity of Legislation in the future? This type of research is a normative juridical research. The study concluded that in order to improve the quality of Prolegnas then the Government and Regional Representatives Council (DPD) in the discussion of each bill by the House of Representatives (DPR), should pay attention to things, such as: the vertical harmonization of each Draft Bill’s substance with the 1945 Constitution and the horizontal harmonization with legislation, the level of urgency and the compatibility of the laws’ substance, and the legislative drafting capacity of legislatures. To improve the quantity of Prolegnas, in the drafting of each Draft Bill that is in the Prolegnas, the Government and the DPD should pay attention to things, such as: the institutional capacity of the DPR with the Prolegnas target to be achieved, do an in depth conceptual framework studies, philosophical, juridical and sociological basis of the existence of the Draft Bill, and institutional political commitment of the Government, DPR and DPD in resolving Prolegnas.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document