scholarly journals Alisha Alawiyah_130218229_B

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisha Alawiyah

Indonesia has ample marine resources but domestic fishermen are still faced with several restrictions. Therefore, the government has revised 18 regulations in the field of fisheries and prepared 89 specifications for fishing gear that are more environmentally friendly. Several regulations have created conflicts, such as Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Number 12 of 2020 concerning Management of Lobster and Crab in the Territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia and ratification of fishing gear.

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Rizal ◽  
Yanyan Yani

The purpose of state defense is to protect and to save the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, the sovereignty of the state, as well as its security from all kinds of threats, whether they are military or non-military ones. One of the non-military threats that potentially threatens the sovereignty and security of the nation-state is the misuse of technology and information in cyberspace. The threat of irresponsible cyber attacks can be initiated by both state and non-state actors. The actors may be an individual, a group of people, a faction, an organization, or even a country. Therefore, the government needs to anticipate cyber threats by formulating cyber security strategies and determining comprehensive steps to defend against cyber attacks; its types and the scale of counter-measures, as well as devising the rules of law. 


Author(s):  
Gatot Yoda Kusumah ◽  
Liong Ju Tjung ◽  
Priyendiswara A.B. Priyendiswara

Indonesian tourism is an important sector in increasing state revenues. The tourism sector ranks third in terms of foreign exchange earnings. in 2014 The government established tourism as the leading sector in improving the economy to encourage regional development and employment. With the law of the Republic of Indonesia number 39 of 2009 concerning Special Economic Zones, hereinafter referred to as K.E.K is a region with a certain boundary with the jurisdiction of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which is determined to carry out economic functions and obtain certain facilities. Kab. Central Lombok is one of the places where there is a K.E, namely K.E.K Mandalika. In order to increase the income of the Lombok region where the development of K.E.K Mandalika is 1,175 ha and the author takes 21 ha of land at K.E.K Mandalika to develop a Resort with a waterfront concept in order to increase Lombok tourism. Based on background problems, the main underlyinh problem is the lack of supporting facilities to support activities in the Mandalika Special Economic Zone, therefore the need for accommodation in the Mandalika Special Economic Zone.Abstrak Pariwisata Indonesia menjadi sektor yang penting dalam peningkatan pendapatan Negara. Sektor pariwisata menempati urutan ketiga dalam hal penerimaan devisa. Pemerintah pada tahun 2014 menetapkan pariwisata sebagai leading sektor dalam peningkatan perekonomian untuk mendorong pembangunan daerah dan lapangan pekerjaan. Dengan adanya undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 39 tahun 2009 tentang Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus, yang selanjutnya disebut K.E.K (kawasan ekonomi khusus), adalah Kawasan dengan batas tertentu dengan wilayah hukum Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia yang ditetapkan untuk menyelenggarakan fungsi perekonomian dan memperoleh fasilitas tertentu. Kab. Lombok Tengah merupakan salah satu tempat dimana terdapat K.E.K yakni adalah K.E.K Mandalika. Guna dapat meningkatkan pendapatan daerah lombok dimana Pengembangan K.E.K Mandalika seluas 1.175 ha dan Penulis mengambil 21 ha lahan di K.E.K Mandalika untuk dikembangkan Resort dengan konsep waterfront guna dapat meningkatkan pariwisata lombok. Berdasarkan permasalahan latar belakang, permasalahan utama yang mendasar adalah belum adanya fasilitas pendukung untuk menunjang aktivitas di Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Mandalika.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 463
Author(s):  
Ahmad Redi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto ◽  
Tundjung Herning Sitabuana ◽  
Ade Adhari

Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 mengatur mengenai penghormatan dan pengakuan atas satuan-satuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya sepanjang keberadaannya masih ada. Salah satu hak masyarakat adat di masyarakat pesisir di Provinsi Lampung ialah hak rumpon sebagai hak ulayat laut. Rumpon laut secara bahasa merupakan jenis alat bantu penangkapan ikan yang dipasang di laut, baik laut dangkal maupun laut dalam. Saat ini eksistensi rumpon laut terancam keberadaannya karena untuk menjaga dan melestarikan sistem pengelolaan perikanan ini tidak didukung oleh tindakan nyata oleh Pemerintah dan masyarakat sekitar pesisir. Tulisan ini melakukan pengkajian atas hak masyarakat hukum atas hak ulayat rumpon di Provinsi Lampung dengan fokus penelitian pada eksistensi hak ulayat laut rumpon pada masyarakat Lampung dan perlindungan konstitusional atas hak ulayat rumpon laut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode socio-legal yang melakukan kajian terhadap aspek hukum dalam ranah das sollen dan das sein.Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the respect and recognition on customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they still exist. One of the rights of indigenous peoples in coastal communities in Lampung Province is rumpon’s right as the ulayat right of the sea. Literaly, Rumpon laut is a type of fishing gear installed in the sea, both the shallow and the deep one. Currently the existence of rumpon laut is threatened because the maintenance is not supported by concrete actions by the Government and coastal communities. This paper conducts an assessment of the community’s right on customary rights of rumpon laut in Lampung Province. This paper focuses on the existence of the ulayat right of rumpon laut in Lampung and the constitutional protection of the ulayat right of rumpon laut. The research method used is a sociolegal method that studies the legal aspects in the realm of das sollen and das sein.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-212
Author(s):  
Ridwan Ridwan ◽  
Mulia Jaya ◽  
Rusdi Rusdi

Encoding is one of the mandatory matters that is not related to basic services. To elaborate regional authority related to coding matters, mapping of coding affairs is carried out in the context of structuring the Provincial / Regency / City Regional Institutional Apparatus in the Field of Encoding according to the direction of Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government. With the enactment of Law Number 23 Year 2014 in the Jambi Provincial Government, especially in the Bungo District, realizing harmonization of policies between the center and the regions that synergize with each other and will achieve the goals of Regional Autonomy in the welfare of people's lives. In the Bungo Regency in the coding activity supported by 17 sub-districts within the Regency area, the implementation was not yet optimal. This research uses qualitative research methods, qualitative research has a flexible nature. This research found that the implementation of the duties and functions of the Bungo Regency coding team in maintaining confidential government information in the context of efforts to realize the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) had not gone well. This is evidenced by the lack of awareness and responsibility of the coding team on the duties and functions of the coding field. Obstacles or obstacles facedby the coding team in carrying out their functions in safeguarding confidential government information in an effort to realize the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, including lack of awareness and full support from superiors or officials authorized to carry out coding functions and functions, there is no means from the government in the implementation of duties and functions in the coding field.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safitri Sugiarto

In 2020 the minister of maritime affairs and fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia issued regulation number 12 of 2020 concerning the management of lobsters, crabs and crabs in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. There are several troubling issues, namely as follows: 1. approval of fishing gear previously prohibited from use, including among others shrimp, payang, cantrang and the like that are classified as trawlers; 2. policies that allow the export of lobster seeds. It is feared that this will trigger horizontal conflicts between fishermen, which are increasingly rampant, because so far conflicts have often occurred with fishermen regarding the use of fishing gear that is not environmentally friendly.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-72
Author(s):  
I Wayan Bandem ◽  
I Nyoman Suandika

As Article 1 paragraph (3) of the State Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the stateof Indonesia is a state of law. Understanding the rule of law is simply a country whose administrationof power is based on law. and Article 1 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution that the Indonesian stateis a Republican unitary state with a government structure that is the Government, Provincial RegionalGovernment, Regency / City Regional Government and the lowest government is the VillageGovernment which has their respective leaders based on legislation applicable legislation. Inconnection with the establishment of the LPD in article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and in Article 18Bparagraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which reads "that the staterecognizes and respects customary law units and their traditional rights insofar as it is still alive andin accordance with the development of society and the principle of the unitary State of the Republic ofIndonesia, which is regulated in law. So the provincial government of Bali based on the Rural CreditSeminar dated February 21, 1984 in Semarang The Governor of Bali initiated the establishment ofVillage Heritage Institutions (LPD) in the province of Bali in the role of national development with theaim of: 1) Encouraging economic development in rural communities through targeted savings andeffective capital distribution; 2) Eradicating the practice of bondage, illegal pawns, and others in thecountryside; 3) Creating business opportunities for villagers and rural workers, and; 4) Increasingpurchasing power and facilitating traffic payments and circulation So that the authors are interested inexamining the Tax Exemption Benchmark for LPDs in Bali Province with the research method used isjuridical-normative research. Taking into account that the starting point of research on legislation andthe fact that it began from the founding of the LPD in 1984 until now has not been taxed. In the courseof its operation the LPD in Bali by the three Ministers in 2009 issued a Joint Decree of the Minister ofFinance, Minister of Home Affairs, Minister of State for Koprasi and Small and Medium Enterprisesand Governor of Bank Indonesia Number.351.1 / KMK.010 / 2009, Number 900-639A in 2009, Number01 / SKB / M.KUKM / IX / 2009, Number 11 / 43A / KRP.GBI / 2009 concerning the DevelopmentStrategy of Microfinance Institutions. Affirmed through a letter from the Minister of Home AffairsNumber 412.2 / 3883 / SJ dated November 4, 2009 to the managers of institutions microfinance thatdoes not yet have a clear institutional status based on the prevailing laws and regulations. So that theGovernor of Bali Made Mangku Pastika on behalf of the provincial government of Bali submits a Letterof Governor of Bali Number 900/8999 / PLP. Ekbang dated 15 December 2009 to Minister of InternalAffairs The Republic of Indonesia prihal; The Strategy for the Development of MicrofinanceInstitutions. Thus, with the issuance of Law Number 1 of 2013 concerning Microfinance Institutions(MFIs), it was stated that the Village Credit Institutions and Pitih Negari Granaries and institutionsthat existed before the Laws were in effect were declared to be based on adat and not subject to thisLaw. The real benefits of the existence of LPD can be proven by the distribution of net profits each yearas profit retribution by dividing the following: 60% for fertilizing LPD business capital, 10%production services for labor, contributions to Indigenous Villages 20% for development funds inPakraman Village, as well as 5% for social funds, and 5% for empowerment funds deposited by theLPD at the agency / agency that is given the authority to regulate and manage them based on the Perdaand Decree of the Governor of Bali.


Author(s):  
Tulus Santoso

The issue of decentralization has become significant in the handling of COVID-19, especially for countries with large island territories and heterogeneous communities such as Indonesia. This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between the center and the local in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia by conducting literature studies through books, journals, mass media articles, and sources from the internet. Initially, relations between the center and the regions in tackling COVID-19 showed a strong centralization of authority by the central government. In the end, local governments get a proportional role but still make the government conductor in policy orchestration. Synergies between the central and local governments will be the key to success in dealing with COVID-19 in Indonesia. However, cooperation must build within the framework of the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 415
Author(s):  
Budiana Setiawan

Kabupaten Natuna merupakan salah satu wilayah terluar dari Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia (NKRI), sehingga dianggap mempunyai potensi disintegrasi. Terlebih, Malaysia pernah mengklaim bahwa Natuna seharusnya masuk kedalam wilayahnya. Permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah: (1) Bagaimana rasa nasionalisme masyarakat Natuna? (2) Adakah potensi disintegrasi masyarakat Natuna, untuk memilih menjadi bagian dari Malaysia? (3) Bagaimana upaya pemerintah untuk menjaga Natuna agar tidak terlepas dari NKRI? Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menentukan rasa nasionalisme dan potensi disintegrasi masyarakat Natuna serta upaya pemerintah untuk menjaga Kabupaten Natuna sebagai wilayah kedaulatan NKRI. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedekatan geografis, ekonomi, dan sosial budaya dengan Malaysia, tidak menyebabkan rasa nasionalis me masyarakat Natuna rendah dan berkeinginan untuk disintegrasi. Meskipun demikian, apabila pemerintah kurang memperhatikan kesejahteraan masyarakat, potensi  disintegrasi tersebut dapat meningkat. Natuna Regency is one of outermost areas of the Republic of Indonesia that is considered to have disintegration potential. Moreover, Malaysia once claimed that Natuna should have entered to its territory. The problems in this paper are: (1) What about spirit of nationalism of people in Natuna is that geographically, economically and socio-cultural are closer to Malaysia than Indonesia? (2) Is there a potential for Natuna people to disintegrate themselves and choose to become a part of Malaysia? (3) What is government's effort to protect Natuna from being separated from the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia? The aims of this paper are to gauge the factors that determine the sense of nationalism and potential disintegration of Natuna community and to estimate the government's efforts to safeguard it as a part of its territory. This paper is qualitative research with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews, observations, and literature studies. The results show that the geographical, economic and socio-cultural proximity to Malaysia do not cause the Natuna people’s nationalism to be waning or want to disintegrate. However, if the government does not pay attention to people's welfare, potential for disintegration can increased dramatically.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Lily Bauw

The authority of governance in Papua Province through Act No. 21 of 2001 is very large, as stipulated in Article 4 paragraph (1), which covering all fields of government, except with regard to foreign affairs, defense and security, monetary and fiscal, religion, and justice, and except with regard to a particular field. In addition to the authority, the authority of Papua Province added with partial authority of the Government called a special authority as provided in paragraph (2) is the authority in the field of foreign policy, defense and security, monetary and fiscal, justice and religion. This authority, causing some people argues that leads to form a federal state and also may lead to the disintegration of nation. The assessment object with regard to the substance of Act No. 21 of 2001 that opposed to the concept of a unitary state, and designing a special autonomy of Papua in accordance with the principles of the Republic of Indonesia, by using juridical-normative. The result indicates that the special autonomy through Act No. 21 of 2001 does not conflict with the concept of a unitary state; it strengthens Papuan into the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Design of special autonomy in accordance with the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia that gives special powers to the province of Papua in the form of delegation of authority is clear and explicit to the Province of Papua through the implementation of devolution theory and delegation of authority from the provincial to the district/cities through the implementation of real household teachings.


Author(s):  
S. Amirulkamar ◽  
Ismail

The Government system of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia recognizes and respects special or special regional government units (Special in the Religious Field, Special in the Field of Education and Special in the Customary Field) regulated by Constitution. In this case the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD), which is abbreviated as DPRD, but names Aceh as a Provincial Region in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia system based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the title of elected government official will be determined by the DPRA after the 2009 general election. This is only a change in the legal nomenclature with the status remains in the position of Aceh Privileges. This long journey is the existence of the Council community in the formation of the Regional Qanun in the Aceh Parliament in the form of a legislative body as one of the tools of the DPRA that manages the formation of the Regional Qanun which is carried out jointly with the Regional Head. This is done with the delegation of government authority to the Regional Regions as a political tool in the struggle for human rights and the rights of social aspirations, as well as the Aceh People's Representative Council or the Aceh DPR as a nomenclature of legislative institutions in regions that have legitimated importance in governance. The regulation of laws and regulations in Indonesia as a constitutional basis for the 1945 Constitution of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia article 18B paragraph (1) states that "the State recognizes and respects special or special regional government units that are regulated by laws invite.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document