scholarly journals Structure and correlates of interpersonal problems and sensitivities

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher James Hopwood ◽  
Evan Good
Keyword(s):  
Factor Model ◽  
Interpersonal Problems ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Problematic Behaviors ◽  
Interpersonal Dysfunction ◽  
Important Marker

ObjectiveInterpersonal dysfunction is an important marker of individual differences in personality and well‐being. Existing research on interpersonal dysfunction focuses primarily on the problematic behaviors of individuals without considering how sensitivity to others’ behavior impacts functioning. In this study, we test the structure and correlates of a model of relationship dysfunction that integrates the problems individuals bring to relationships with their sensitivities to others’ behavior. We specifically examine the conjoint structure of interpersonal problems and sensitivities using a circumplex framework and associations between dimensions derived from this structure and personality, well‐being, attachment, and response style variables.MethodWe evaluated competing measurement models and examined validity correlations of interpersonal problems and sensitivities in two samples (Study 1: N = 955; 79.2% women; Mage = 19.43; Study 2: N = 1,005; 72.1% women; Mage = 19.77).ResultsSix factors capturing general (nonspecific problems and sensitivities) and stylistic (warmth and dominance for both problems and sensitivities) variation in interpersonal dysfunction were empirically distinguishable and provided incremental information about external criteria.ConclusionsResults support problems and sensitivities as overlapping but distinct sources of information about interpersonal dysfunction, and they specifically suggest an integrative six‐factor model with considerable potential for future research.

Testing Rival Measurement Models of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension in Two Taiwanese Samples

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Yuan Hsiao
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Public Speaking ◽  
Communication Apprehension ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Environmental Causes

Some previous research has questioned the appropriateness of using McCroskey's Personal Report of Communication Apprehension with participants of non-Western countries. Rival measurement models of the scale were examined on two samples of 216 and 177 college students in Taiwan. Confirmatory factor analysis of the data showed that although a four-factor model was more representative of the data than the models with one, two, or three factors, this model did not generate an acceptable fit to the data. Further testing of discriminant validity suggested that Taiwanese college students do not differentiate a meeting setting from group, dyadic, and public speaking settings. Findings of this study suggest a re-examination of the conceptualization of communication apprehension before evaluating the relative importance of biological and environmental causes.

scholarly journals Validation of the Italian Versions of the Flourishing Scale and of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience

SAGE Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 215824401668229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Giuntoli ◽  
Francesco Ceccarini ◽  
Claudio Sica ◽  
Corrado Caudek
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Subjective Well Being ◽  
Negative Experience ◽  
Student Sample ◽  
Cognitive Component ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Healthy Control

Researchers are divided between those who consider well-being as a single global construct and those who maintain the need to keep the hedonic and eudaimonic components of well-being separate. Diener et al. proposed two separate scales for measuring well-being: the Flourishing Scale (FS) for eudaimonic well-being and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) for hedonic well-being. The aim of this article is to validate the Italian versions of the FS and SPANE, and to provide support for the usefulness of distinct measures of well-being components. In Study 1, we examined an Italian undergraduate student sample ( n = 684), whereas in Study 2 we considered two samples of unemployed ( n = 282) and healthy control individuals ( n = 426). Through multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, we demonstrated that the Italian FS and SPANE obtained strict measurement invariance across administration methods (paper-and-pencil and Internet) and strong measurement invariance across different groups (unemployed individuals seeking work and a healthy control group). In our data, we found a superior fit for a two-factor model over a one-factor model of well-being, which suggests the utility of separate measures of well-being components. Concurrent validity was verified with other well-being, depression, and anxiety measures. Furthermore, we showed that flourishing is more strongly related to the cognitive component of subjective well-being than hedonic affect. In summary, the Italian FS and SPANE are reliable and valid instruments, and may be beneficial in their applications in future Italian studies on well-being.

Meaning-in-Life in Nursing Home Patients: A Validation Study of the Purpose-in-Life Test

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gørill Haugan ◽  
Unni Karin Moksnes
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Meaning In Life ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Purpose In Life ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Life Test ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Nursing Home Patients ◽  
Purpose In Life Test

Background: The experience of meaning has been found to be a strong individual predictor of life satisfaction and an important psychological variable that promotes well-being. Therefore, a valid and reliable measurement of meaning-in-life among nursing home patients is highly warranted. Aims: This study intended to further investigate (a) the factor structure of the Purpose-in-Life test (PIL), (b) the reliability of PIL scores, and (c) the construct validity of the PIL test in a nursing home population. Methods: Participants were 202 cognitively intact nursing home patients representing 44 different Norwegian nursing homes. Concerning the dimensionality of the PIL, the following 3 measurement models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis; the original 1-factor, a 2-factor, and a 3-factor model. Results: With the exclusion of 10 items, a previously published and supported 2-factor construct for the PIL by Morgan and Farsides (2007) provided a good fit for older nursing home patients, demonstrating good measurement reliability and construct validity. Conclusion: The 2-factor model by Morgan and Farsides, comprising 10 items, is an improvement over the original 20-items PIL, based on these nursing home data. The measure yielded highly significantly factor loadings, good values for average variance extracted and composite reliability, as well as significant correlations in the expected direction for relevant selected measures; all supporting the construct validity.

scholarly journals Post more! The mediating role of social capital between Instagram use and satisfaction with life

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda-Elisabeth Reimann ◽  
Phillip Ozimek ◽  
Elke Rohmann ◽  
Hans-Werner Bierhoff
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Social Capital Theory ◽  
Path Model ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Bonding Social Capital ◽  
Bridging Social Capital ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

AbstractSince more and more people have begun to use social networking sites (SNSs), research on the use of SNSs is flourishing. This study examines Instagram use and the psychological well-being of the users. It was conducted based on two samples (n1 = 143 and n2 = 320) examining the relationship between Instagram use, social capital, and satisfaction with life using online questionnaires. Social capital was divided into bonding and bridging social capital and Instagram use was distinguished depending on an active and passive mode, respectively. Instagram use was measured by a behavioral report – the Instagram Activity Questionnaire (IAQ) – which was developed in accordance with the Facebook-Activity Questionnaire (FAQ; cf., Ozimek & Bierhoff, 2016). The results indicated consistently in both samples the occurrence of positive associations between mode of Instagram use and social capital variables. Furthermore, only bonding social capital – not bridging social capital – was positively correlated to satisfaction with life. A path model showed that the negative association of active Instagram use and satisfaction with life was positively mediated by bonding social capital. These results are discussed based on social capital theory. Limitations of this investigation are pointed out and suggestions for future research are outlined.

Preliminary Validation of the Teacher-Rated DESSA in a Low-Income, Kindergarten Sample

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin B. Doromal ◽  
Elizabeth A. Cottone ◽  
Helyn Kim
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Emotional Learning ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Social And Emotional ◽  
Measurement Models

This study investigated the measurement of social emotional competence in low-income youth by assessing the validity of responses derived from the widely used, teacher-rated Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA). Based on the five-component social emotional learning model proposed by the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, the teacher-rated DESSA shows promise as an easy-to-administer, strengths-based assessment tool for teachers from low-income communities. In a sample of 313 kindergarten students from a southeastern city, three competing measurement models were tested (one-factor, correlated five-factor, and higher order five-factor) using confirmatory factor analyses. Results revealed that, relative to the one-factor model, the higher order five-factor framework had the best model-data fit, although the first-order factors were highly correlated with the second-order factor. Furthermore, zero-order correlations showed that the DESSA was associated with both direct and teacher-reported measures of school-related outcomes. Implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed.

scholarly journals Economic Student Scientific Publication Model Exploration Factor Analysis (EFA) Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boy Piter Nizu Kekry ◽  
Saraswati Shinta Komang ◽  
Helius Yare ◽  
Daniel Duwiri
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Achievement Goals ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Scientific Publication ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Correlation Relationship ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Bartlett’S Test ◽  
Economics Students

Background: Our research reveals factor measures, which are generated to encourage economics students to engage in scientific publication and research processes. Research purposes: Availability of motivational models for scientific publications, as a form of developing economics students in the future. Research methods: Estimation using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) approach, with statistical tools Jeffreys's Amazing Statistics Program (JASP) version 0.16.0.0. Research results: This study shows the accuracy of the model, including the calculated value of McDonald's and Cronbach's > 0.700, for the MSA value of 0.762, and the value of Bartlett's test < .001. For the correlation relationship, it is strengthened by the RMSEA number which is between 0.05-0.08. This study forms a 3 factor model for scientific publications of economics students. Conclusion: This study estimates the factors that can encourage the scientific publication model of economics students. Several factors in this research model are in line with the findings of previous researchers. This study shows that the accuracy of the model includes the McDonald's and Cronbach's > 0.700, for the MSA value of 0.762, and the Bartlett's test value < .001. For the correlation relationship, it is strengthened by the RMSEA number which is between 0.05-0.08. Thus, there are 3 factors in this model, namely the role of lecturers and families, students' basic abilities, and academic achievement goals. We realize that there are several theoretical challenges and measurement models, therefore further research is carried out using statistical test instruments and tools such as AMOS, PLS, and LISREL.

Humility, Personality, and Psychological Functioning

2021 ◽  
pp. 003329412110628
Author(s):  
Lisa T. Ross ◽  
Jennifer C. Wright
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Positive Psychology ◽  
Psychological Functioning ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Social Self ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Potential Applications

As part of the shift to a more positive psychology, researchers have demonstrated a relatively new and intense fascination with humility. Following a discussion of this construct and its correlates, we investigate how humility relates to personality dimensions, anxiety and depression, love of life and happiness, and self-efficacy in two samples—college students and adult Mturk workers. In both studies, we used the Dual Dimension Humility Scale, a measure that does not conflate the construct with honesty. Among students ( N = 399), aspects humility correlated with dimensions of personality (more conscientiousness and openness, and less agreeableness and neuroticism), less depression, more love of life and happiness, and stronger social self-efficacy. Although fewer associations were found, overall, among adults ( N = 509), aspects of humility correlated with dimensions of personality, less anxiety, and some dimensions of psychological well-being. The most unique contributions of this study include linking humility with college students’ love of life and self-efficacy, and with adults’ well-being. We conclude with a discussion of ideas for future research and potential applications to boost humility.

scholarly journals Assessing Workplace Bullying: Spanish Validation of a Reduced Version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Moreno Jiménez ◽  
Alfredo Rodríguez Muñoz ◽  
Marino Martínez Gamarra ◽  
Macarena Gálvez Herrer
Keyword(s):  
Workplace Bullying ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Spanish Validation ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Study Support ◽  
Correlated Factors ◽  
Negative Acts

The aim of the present study was to validate a reduced Spanish version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ; Einarsen & Raknes, 1997). This instrument, which has been widely used in various studies, was developed to measure workplace bullying. Two samples, the first comprising 352 employees from 11 organizations, and the second comprising victims of bullying who were recruited from 15 Spanish associations against bullying, participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis conducted with the data from the first sample revealed a two-factor solution that accounted for 63.3% of the total variance. The data from the second sample were used for confirmatory factor analyses to compare three structure models of the NAQ (one factor, two independent factors, and two correlated factors). The results indicate that the correlated two-factor model provided the best fit to the data (χ2/df = 2.1, CFI = .93, GFI = .95, RMR = .04, RMSEA = .06, AIC = 215.4). Reliability analysis showed that this 14-item Spanish version had high internal consistency. Significant correlations between the NAQ and its dimensions and diverse health and perceived stress scales were found, which provided evidence of construct validity. Taken conjointly, the results of this study support the use of the Spanish version of the reduced NAQ in future research.

scholarly journals Identifying the strongest self-report predictors of sexual satisfaction using machine learning

2022 ◽  
pp. 026540752110470
Author(s):  
Laura M. Vowels ◽  
Matthew J. Vowels ◽  
Kristen P. Mark
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Relationship Satisfaction ◽  
Sexual Satisfaction ◽  
Predictor Variable ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Total N ◽  
Relationship Length ◽  
Two Samples

Sexual satisfaction has been robustly associated with relationship and individual well-being. Previous studies have found several individual (e.g., gender, self-esteem, and attachment) and relational (e.g., relationship satisfaction, relationship length, and sexual desire) factors that predict sexual satisfaction. The aim of the present study was to identify which variables are the strongest, and the least strong, predictors of sexual satisfaction using modern machine learning. Previous research has relied primarily on traditional statistical models which are limited in their ability to estimate a large number of predictors, non-linear associations, and complex interactions. Through a machine learning algorithm, random forest (a potentially more flexible extension of decision trees), we predicted sexual satisfaction across two samples (total N = 1846; includes 754 individuals forming 377 couples). We also used a game theoretic interpretation technique, Shapley values, which allowed us to estimate the size and direction of the effect of each predictor variable on the model outcome. Findings showed that sexual satisfaction is highly predictable (48–62% of variance explained) with relationship variables (relationship satisfaction, importance of sex in relationship, romantic love, and dyadic desire) explaining the most variance in sexual satisfaction. The study highlighted important factors to focus on in future research and interventions.

Preliminary Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being in Portuguese Adolescents

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1032-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helder Miguel Fernandes ◽  
José Vasconcelos-Raposo ◽  
Carla Maria Teixeira
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Factorial Validity ◽  
Fit Indices ◽  
Psychological Well Being ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Short Versions ◽  
Portuguese Adolescents

This article presents a set of research studies that aim to adapt Carol Ryff‘s scales of psychological well-being (SPWB) and to analyze its psychometric properties in adolescents. The first two studies focused on the reliability and factorial validity of different Portuguese short versions of SPWB, revealing measurement models inadequacies and low internal consistency. In the third study we developed a shortened version (30 items), taking into account the application of psychometric criteria suggested by van Dierendonck (2005). The scales of this version revealed better reliability and adequate goodness of fit indices for the six-factor model, as proposed by Carol Ryff’s PWB theory. Although further research focused on the psychometrical properties reanalysis of this shortened version of SPWB is needed, this article provides a contribution to the research and intervention on positive mental health during adolescence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document