scholarly journals COVID cure or perpetual vaccination?: 30 cheap effective treatments of COVID-19 & variants, like ivermectin, or never-ending compulsory injection, with unsafe, genotoxic, infertilizing, injuring, crippling, handicapping, lethal, inefficient, ineffective, abortion-tainted, abortive, unethical, experimental genetic-hacks, deceivingly called vaccines instead of haccines? Scientific proof of the COVID PLANdemic with 1000 peer reviewed published references.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico A. Nazar
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Herd Immunity ◽  
Package Insert ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Reasonable Doubt ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Effective Treatments

What is 10x more lethal than COVID-19? Viral covidiocy. 9 out of 10 COVID deaths were vaccinated in Argentina, where case fatality rate was 1300% higher for the vaccinated than for the unvaccinated, plus a higher 40% contagion rate (5% if unvaccinated): the opposite of the narrative. Though not as drastic, Israel, UK, Chile, Uruguay and the USA, also showed worse outcomes for the vaccinated than the unvaxxed, because of different natural evolution of variant waves, periods, treatments and vaccine brands. COVID waves seem to have receded due to the increase of herd immunity of the recovered, both vaccinated and unvaccinated.In the USA and Europe, 5 million adverse reactions and 70 thousand deaths were reported linked to COVID vaccines. Informed consent forms can’t protect COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers against legal actions, even under immunity by law, not only because they are not really “vaccines” but gene hacks to produce the S1 spike protein (or parts), nor because some or all the elements are secret, un-disclosed or hidden, but especially, because the cure had been found, voiding Emergency Use Authorization (EUA): if you get COVID, especially if vaccinated, follow this successful evidence-based treatment: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/ ( translations: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/translations/ ). Yet, there are many other options in this document.This research is not “anti-vaccine”, but pro-sane-vaccines. Unlike insane vaccines, it stands for evidence based medicine, i.e. scientifically proven safe and effective treatments. 500 scientific citations prove a systemic bias against cheap effective cures and towards unethical, ineffective and/or unsafe vaccines.Among dozens of effective treatments here reviewed, ivermectin is the best mass cure for COVID-19 variants. It had been scientifically proven beyond any reasonable doubt by May 2020, yet, instead of informing the public about the amazing results and going back to normal, there was a global scheme to block lifesaving information and promote lock downs, masks, restrictions, experimental vaccines and passports.1 million dollars of ivermectin would end the pandemic compared to 160 thousand million dollars PER YEAR to keep a perpetual endemic disease, with vaccines always chasing new variants in a never ending lucrative arms race. It is not a matter of unsettled science: there are more RCT studies than for any other standard-of-care treatment. An insane “war on bugs” by legal drug cartels?With COVID vaccines, Governments have turned a medical act into an administrative mandate. Yet, not a single medical association protested against this violation of the right of the physician to practice medicine, i.e. a customized treatment according to the best knowledge/possibilities?Human rights continue to be systematically violated: to life, to informed consent, to fertility, to ethical treatments (where benefits are higher than harms), to healthcare (instead of sickening-care), to treatments for vaccine injuries, to compensation for injuries and death, to privacy (passes), to freedom (to work, move, assemble, worship), etc.This research presents scientific evidence for a planned global genocide: COVID lab creation, vital information cover-up, deadly recommendations, COVID cure censorship and lethal disinformation to promote dangerous vaccines, which are the worst medical and epidemiological solution to the plandemic:MAY A PERSON :WITHCOVIDVACCINATIONWITHEFFECTIVETREATMENTAVOID GETTING SICK FROM COVID?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID INFECTING OTHERS?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID HOSPITALIZATION?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID DYING FROM COVID?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID SIDE-EFFECTS LIKE INFERTILITY, MISCARRIAGE, DISABILITY OR DEATH?🗴 No✓ YesGET HEALTHCARE OR MANUFACTURER LIABILITY FOR INJURIES, DEATH OR NEGLIGENCE?🗴 No✓ YesHELP PROTECT OTHERS?🗴 No✓ YesHELP REDUCE THE SATURATION OF THE HEALTH SYSTEM?🗴 No✓ YesGENERATE HERD IMMUNITY?🗴 No✓ YesHELP TO END THE PANDEMIC?🗴 No✓ YesREDUCE THE GENERATION AND SPREAD OF VARIANTS?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID COOPERATION WITH VACCINES PRODUCED WITH ABORTION CELL LINES?🗴 No✓ YesGIVE INFORMED CONSENT WITH A PACKAGE INSERT LISTING ALL THE INGREDIENTS?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID UNDISCLOSED GENE-HACKING, NANO-TAMPERING AND BLUETOOTH CHIP?🗴 No✓ YesFrom the systematic genocide of abortion, they moved on to the COVID genocide of the elderly blocking effective treatment, and then, to the mass genocide with experimental vaccines, starting with the elderly and ending with the babies, even the unborn (vaccinating the pregnants). The genocidal trend didn’t change, only the target population. Same serial killers, different weapons.Hosea 4:6 “My people are dying for lack of knowledge...”

A Mini Review and Evidence Based Cutoff Values with the Validation of Criterion-Referenced Standards for Sarcopenic Elderly Fitness Improvement

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saejong Park ◽  
Soo Hyun Park ◽  
Hyunseok Jee
Keyword(s):  
Physical Fitness ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Transitional Period ◽  
Health Programs ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cutoff Values ◽  
Criterion Referenced

This study provides a newly updated perspective of information on severely screened 21 previous studies of the various measurement methods for improving physical fitness and providing determined cutoff values from our reserved elderly human database by based on the above 21 screened precious previous studies. We thus aimed to provide scientific evidence-based information regarding physical fitness standards for developing useful prognostics, promoting and maintaining health programs for sarcopenic elderly. 21 previous studies emphasizing criterion referenced standards and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for improving physical fitness were screened. For predicting the prevalence of sarcopenia, the t-test, logistic regression, linear regression, ROC curve analyses and voluntary categorizations such as twentieth or sixtieth percentile classification were used. Based on these scientific evidences, we determined cutoff values from our reserved DB, and realized that 75 years for men and 70 years for women is the transitional period during which there are large declines in muscle and fat mass (p<0.01), which reflects physical function tests (p<0.01) in both genders. Using the six factors with ideal cutoff thresholds, an individual exercise program can be designed for alleviating symptoms of frailty caused by sarcopenia for the elderly.

scholarly journals Benchmarking the CoVID-19 pandemic across countries and states in the U.S.A. under heterogeneous testing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenzo Asahi ◽  
Eduardo A. Undurraga ◽  
Rodrigo Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Us States ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Public Health Officials ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Support Evidence

AbstractPublic health officials need to make urgent decisions to reduce the potential impact of the CoVID-19 pandemic. Benchmarking based on the increase in total cases or case fatality rates is one way of comparing performance across countries or territories (such as states in the USA), and could inform policy decisions about COVID-19 mitigation strategies. But comparing cases and fatality across territories is challenging due to heterogeneity in testing and health systems. We show two complementary ways of benchmarking across countries or US states. First, we used multivariate regressions to estimate the test-elasticity-of-COVID-19-case-incidence. We found a 10% increase in testing yielded ~9% (95% CI:4.2–3.4%; p<0.001) increase in reported cases across countries, and ~2% (95%CI:0.1-3.4%; p=0.03) increase across US states during the week ending April 10th, 2020. We found comparable negative elasticities for fatality rates (across countries: β =-0.77, 95%CI:-1.40– -0.14; p=0.02; US states: β=-0.15, 95%CI:-0.30-0.01; p=0.06). Our results were robust to various model specifications. Second, we decomposed the growth in cases into test growth and positive test ratio (PTR) growth to intuitively visualize the components of case growth. We hope these results can help support evidence-based decisions by public health officials as more consistent data hopefully becomes available.

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Optimal Cutoff Values with the Validation of Criterion-Referenced Standards for Sarcopenic Elderly Fitness Improvement

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hyunseok Jee ◽  
Soo Hyun Park ◽  
Saejong Park
Keyword(s):  
Physical Fitness ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Transitional Period ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Optimal Cutoff ◽  
Cutoff Values ◽  
Criterion Referenced

This study provides a newly updated perspective of information on severely screened 21 previous studies of the various measurement methods for improving physical fitness and providing determined cutoff values from our reserved elderly human database. We aimed to provide scientific evidence-based information regarding physical fitness standards for developing useful prognostics, promoting and maintaining health programs for sarcopenic elderly. 21 previous studies emphasizing criterion referenced standards and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for improving physical fitness were screened. For predicting the prevalence of sarcopenia, the t-test, logistic regression, linear regression, ROC curve analyses, and voluntary categorizations such as the twentieth or sixtieth percentile classification were used. Based on these scientific evidences, we determined cutoff values from our reserved DB and realized that 75 years for men and 70 years for women are the transitional period during which there are large declines in muscle and fat mass (p<0.01), which reflects physical function tests (p<0.01) in both genders. Using the six factors with ideal cutoff thresholds, an individual exercise program can be designed for alleviating symptoms of frailty caused by sarcopenia for the elderly.

scholarly journals Nursing Home and Vaccination Consent: The Italian Perspective

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 429
Author(s):  
Nunzia Cannovo ◽  
Roberto Scendoni ◽  
Marzia Maria Fede ◽  
Federico Siotto ◽  
Piergiorgio Fedeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
General Principle ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Herd Immunity ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Vaccination Campaigns ◽  
To Receive

Since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, many countries have begun vaccination campaigns, with different methods and timelines, with the goal of vaccinating over 75% of the population and thus achieving herd immunity. Initially it was necessary to identity the categories of citizens who should be the first to receive the vaccines, on the basis of scientific evidence. On the basis of this information, elderly residents in nursing homes and the staff who care for them should be the highest priority subjects for vaccination. In this context, obtaining informed consent to Covid-19 vaccination presents a considerable challenge, as the advanced age and frequent comorbidities of a significant number of the residents may mean that they are incapable of expressing consent themselves. The legislation of various Western nations substantially agrees on the general principle that those capable of judgement must be asked for their consent for healthcare services, and that even those with psychological weaknesses that limit their full ability to decide must be involved in these decision-making processes. The article can help systematize the processes to be implemented to protect the health of individuals as members of a close and fragile community.

scholarly journals Benchmarking the Covid-19 pandemic across countries and states in the USA under heterogeneous testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenzo Asahi ◽  
Eduardo A. Undurraga ◽  
Rodrigo Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Health Systems ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Positive Test ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Policy Decisions ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Public Discussion ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Support Evidence

AbstractScientists and policymakers need to compare the incidence of Covid-19 across territories or periods with various levels of testing. Benchmarking based on the increase in total cases or case fatality rates is one way of comparing the evolution of the pandemic across countries or territories and could inform policy decisions about strategies to control coronavirus transmission. However, comparing cases and fatality rates across regions is challenging due to heterogeneity in testing and health systems. We show two complementary ways of benchmarking across territories and in time. First, we used multivariate regressions to estimate the test-elasticity of Covid-19 case incidence. Cases grow less than proportionally with testing when assessing weekly changes or looking across states in the USA. They tend to be proportional or even more than proportional when comparing the month-to-month evolution of an average country in the pandemic. Our results were robust to various model specifications. Second, we decomposed the growth in cases into test growth and positive test ratio growth to intuitively visualize the components of case growth. We hope these results can help support evidence-based decisions by public officials and help the public discussion when comparing across territories and in time.

scholarly journals Pneumonia and influenza hospitalization in HIV-positive seniors

2010 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
pp. 1317-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. MOR ◽  
J. A. AMINAWUNG ◽  
A. DEMARIA ◽  
E. N. NAUMOVA
Keyword(s):  
Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Hiv Status ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hiv Positive Adults ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Hiv Negative

SUMMARYHIV-positive persons and the elderly have increased risk for influenza-related complications, including pneumonia. Using claims data for pneumonia and influenza (P&I) hospitalization in the USA, we described the temporo-demographic trends and in-patient case-fatality in persons aged ⩾65 years by HIV status. Our results showed a near doubling in the fraction of P&I admissions representing HIV-positive persons between 1991 and 2004 [relative risk (RR) 1·95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·80–2·13]. HIV-positive adults were younger (70·3 vs. 79·9 years, P<0·001), and had higher case-fatality (18·0% vs. 12·6%, P<0·001). Adjusting for other variables, case-fatality decreased by 5·8% in HIV-positive persons with the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy (P=0·032). However, HIV-positive seniors were still 51% more likely to die during hospitalization than HIV-negative persons in 2004 (OR 1·51, 95% CI 1·23–1·85). HIV-infected persons represent a growing fraction of the elderly population hospitalized with P&I. Additional measures are needed to reduce case-fatality associated with P&I in this population.

scholarly journals A feasible and more efficient SARS-Cov-2 vaccine allocation to states and counties in the USA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony R. Ives ◽  
Claudio Bozzuto
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Current Distribution ◽  
Herd Immunity ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Health Care Personnel ◽  
Distribution Strategy ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Vaccine Distribution

While discussion of vaccine allocation has centered around who should be prioritized (e.g., health care personnel and the elderly), we argue that vaccines should also be allocated to jurisdictions (e.g., counties within the USA) with the greatest immunization thresholds needed for ending the epidemic. At the current rate of vaccine distribution (March 15, 2021), universal herd immunity in the USA could be reached in roughly 4.5 months. However, distributing vaccines according to where the virus spreads more easily (dense counties with high R0 values), herd immunity would be reached simultaneously in all counties almost two months earlier and would require roughly 40% fewer vaccine doses. Furthermore, under the current distribution strategy densely populated counties would reach herd immunity last, with negative epidemiological and socio-economic consequences. In sum, it would be more fair and efficient to distribute vaccines to jurisdictions that need them most to reach herd immunity.

Comparative Analysis: The State of Colorado Study, Part II

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Kathryn Mueller ◽  
Douglas Van Zet ◽  
Debra J. Northrup ◽  
Edward B. Whitney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Daily Living ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Assessments ◽  
Physician Judgment ◽  
History Of ◽  
Key Terms ◽  
Causation Analysis ◽  
Work Interference

Abstract [Continued from the January/February 2004 issue of The Guides Newsletter.] To understand discrepancies in reviewers’ ratings of impairments based on different editions of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), users can usefully study the history of the revisions as successive editions attempted to provide a comprehensive, valid, reliable, unbiased, and evidence-based system. Some shortcomings of earlier editions have been addressed in the AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, but problems remain with each edition, largely because of the limited scientific evidence available. In the context of the history of the different editions of the AMA Guides and their development, the authors discuss and contextualize a number of key terms and principles including the following: definitions of impairment and normal; activities of daily living; maximum medical improvement; impairment percentages; conversion of regional impairments; combining impairments; pain and other subjective complaints; physician judgment; and causation analysis; finally, the authors note that impairment is not synonymous with disability or work interference. The AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, contrasts impairment evaluations and independent medical evaluations (this was not done in previous editions) and discusses impairment evaluations, rules for evaluations, and report standards. Upper extremity and lower extremity impairment evaluations are discussed in terms of clinical assessments and rating processes, analyzing important changes between editions and problematic areas (eg, complex regional pain syndrome).

Infections caused by medical products at longterm nursing care

2020 ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Hardy Thorsten Panknin
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Care ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Medical Products ◽  
The Disabled ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Therapeutic Measures

Nosocomial infections in the elderly, often suffering from many ailments, patients in homes for the disabled and the old are among the problematic diseases that specialized nursing staff and doctors have to deal with more often in such institutions. Review work from the USA introduces relevant information about infectious risks, as well as possible preventive and therapeutic measures.

An Evidence-Based Review of Antitussive Herbs Containing Essential Oils in Traditional Persian Medicine

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayda Hosseinkhani ◽  
Bijan Ziaeian ◽  
Kamran Hessami ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Zarshenas ◽  
Ali Kashkooe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medicinal Plants ◽  
Essential Oils ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Herbal Remedies ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Persian Medicine ◽  
Troublesome Symptom ◽  
Traditional Persian Medicine

Background: Cough is one of the most common medical symptoms for which medical advice is sought. Although cough is a protective reflex responsible for clearing the airways from secretions and foreign bodies, it can be a troublesome symptom that causes discomfort to patients. Due to the increasing interest in herbal remedies in the both developed and developing countries, in the current study, we aimed to overview medicinal herbs containing essential oils used as antitussive agents according to the Traditional Persian Medicine [TPM] textbooks. We summarized the relevant scientific evidence on their possible pharmacological actions. Methods: To collect the evidence for treatment of cough or “seaal” [cough in ancient books] from TPM sources, five main medicinal Persian manuscripts were studied. The antitussive herbs were listed and their scientific names were identified and authenticated in accordance with botanical reference books. ScienceDirect and PubMed online databases were searched for related mechanisms of action of the reported medicinal plants. Results: The number of 49 herbs containing essential oils were recommended in TPM for the treatment of cough; 21 of them had at least one known mechanism of action for cough suppression in the scientific literature. According to this review, most of the cited medicinal plants were assessed for either nitric oxide inhibitory or antitussive/expectorant activities. Conclusion: In addition to advantageous effects of antitussive herbs noted by TPM, the present review highlighted some recent evidence-based data on these promising candidates that could be used as an outline for future research on their medicinal use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document