scholarly journals Intraarterial Injection of Drugs of Abuse into Femoral Artery: Case Report and Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Nina Kobilica ◽  
Nina Kobilica ◽  
Vojko Flis

Accidental intraarterial injection is a serious condition which can compromise the viability of the limb within hours. There are no evidence based guidelines suggesting the proper treatment protocol and there is no consensus about the ideal treatment for these events. We present a case where a mixture of benzodiazepine pills and street heroin was injected in right femoral artery. Patient arrived in hospital days after event. With intraarterial application of thrombolysis, vasodilators and heparin major amputation was avoided. It seems that in selected cases combined therapy with rtPA lysis and PGE1 intra-arterial infusion may prevent major limb amputation even in delayed presentation of acute leg ischaemia caused by inadvertent injection of drugs of abuse.

VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betz ◽  
Steinbauer ◽  
Uhl ◽  
Toepel

Inadvertent intraarterial injections in the context of drug abuse can cause damage to the vascular system. The clinical picture depends on the drug properties and ranges from partial ischemia to necrosis of the affected extremity. There are no current evidence-based guidelines regarding the management of intraarterial drug injections. In many cases the concept of solving vasospasm after injection is based on the use of intraarterial application of prostaglandins. We report a case in which a mixture of drugs was injected into the left femoral artery. The patient arrived 24 hours later with ischemia of the left leg at our emergency department. Angiography showed that there was no blood flowing in the leg. Despite intraarterial application of vasodilatators, regional neurolysis and thrombolyis with urokinase major amputation was unavoidable. The outcome after inadvertent injection depends on certain drug properties and the delay between injection and the beginning of therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1413
Author(s):  
Judith Catella ◽  
Anne Long ◽  
Lucia Mazzolai

Some patients still require major amputation for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease treatment. The purpose of pre-operative amputation level selection is to determine the most distal amputation site with the highest healing probability without re-amputation. Transcutaneous oximetry (TcPO2) can detect viable tissue with the highest probability of healing. Several factors affect the accuracy of TcPO2; nevertheless, surgeons rely on TcPO2 values to determine the optimal amputation level. Background about the development of TcPO2, methods of measurement, consequences of lower limb amputation level, and the place of TcPO2 in the choice of the amputation level are reviewed herein. Most of the retrospective studies indicated that calf TcPO2 values greater than 40 mmHg were associated with a high percentage of successful wound healing after below-knee-amputation, whereas values lower than 20 mmHg indicated an increased risk of unsuccessful healing. However, a consensus on the precise cut-off value of TcPO2 necessary to assure healing is missing. Ways of improvement for TcPO2 performance applied to the optimization of the amputation-level are reported herein. Further prospective data are needed to better approach a TcPO2 value that will promise an acceptable risk of re-amputation. Standardized TcPO2 measurement is crucial to ensure quality of data.


VASA ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Andreas S. Peters ◽  
Katrin Meisenbacher ◽  
Dorothea Weber ◽  
Theodosios Bisdas ◽  
Giovanni Torsello ◽  
...  

Summary: Background: Isolated femoral artery revascularisation (iFAR) represents a well-established surgical method in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving common femoral artery disease. Data for iFAR in multilevel PAD are inconsistent, particularly in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of iFAR in CLI regarding major amputation and reintervention and to identify associated risk factors for this outcome. Patients and methods: The data used have been derived from the German Registry of Firstline Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia (CRITISCH). A total of 1200 patients were enrolled in 27 vascular centres. This sub-analysis included patients, which were treated with iFAR with/without concomitant iliac intervention. For detection of risk factors for the combined endpoint of major amputation and/or reintervention, selection of variables for multiple regression was conducted using stepwise forward/backward selection by Akaike’s information criterion. Results: 95 patients were included (mean age: 72 years ± 10.82; 64.2% male). Of those, 32 (33.7%) participants reached the combined endpoint. Risk factor analysis revealed continued tobacco use (odds ratio [OR] 2.316, confidence interval [CI] 0.832–6.674), TASC D-lesion (OR: 2.293, CI: 0.869–6.261) and previous vascular intervention in the trial leg (OR: 2.720, CI: 1.037–7.381) to be associated with reaching the combined endpoint. Conclusions: iFAR provides a reasonable, surgical option to treat CLI. Lesion length (TASC D) seems to have a negative impact on outcome. Further research is required to better define the future role of iFAR for combined femoro-popliteal lesions in CLI – best in terms of a randomised controlled trial.


1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (9) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
WF Todd ◽  
DG Armstrong ◽  
PJ Liswood

More inpatient hospital days are used for the care of diabetic foot infection than for any other diabetic sequela. Both the number of lower extremity amputations and the overall treatment cost of treating diabetic infections may be reduced by using a team approach in the care of the infected diabetic pedal wound. The authors propose an evaluation and treatment protocol of infected pedal ulcerations in an urban, community teaching institution when admitted to an established, multidisciplinary diabetic foot care team. The hospital course of 111 patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of infected pedal ulceration are retrospectively reviewed. Results revealed an average-length hospital stay of 7.4 days with a 96% limb-salvage rate. The authors suggest that in the treatment of the infected pedal wound, a diabetic foot care team with a well developed treatment protocol may yield a consistently favorable outcome and a cost-effective hospital course.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 221049172110569
Author(s):  
Pui M Chung ◽  
Bolton KH Chau ◽  
Esther C-S Chow ◽  
Kwok H Lam ◽  
Nang MR Wong

Introduction Lower limb amputation has significant morbidity and mortality. This study reviews the potential factors affecting the one-year mortality rate after lower limb amputation in the Hong Kong Chinese population. Methods Cases with lower limb amputations (toe, ray, below-knee, and above-knee amputations) from a regional hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were recruited. Amputations due to trauma were excluded. The one-year mortality rate and the potential risk factors (age, sex, length-of-stay, multiple operations, extent of surgery (minor vs. major), medical comorbidities including (1) end-stage renal failure (ESRF), (2) cardiac diseases, (3) ischemic heart disease, (4) peripheral vascular disease and (5) diabetes mellitus) were analyzed by multiple logistic regression using Matlab 2018a. Results A total of 132 patients were recruited (173 operations). The one-year mortality rate was 36.3%. The mean age at death was 72.2 years. The results of the regression analysis showed patients having ESRF (β = 2.195, t 120 = 3.008, p = 0.003) or a major amputation (including above- or below-knee amputation) (β = 1.079, t 120 = 2.120, p = 0.034), had a significantly higher one-year mortality. The remaining factors showed no significant effect. The one-year mortality rate in ESRF patients was 77.8%; while the one-year mortality rate without ESRF was 29.8%. The mean age at death in the ESRF group was 62.9 years; while that without ESRF was 76.1 years. The one-year mortality for patients with major amputation was 45.8% while that for minor amputation was 20.4%. Conclusion ESRF and major amputation are factors that increase the one-year mortality rate after lower limb amputation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel M. P. J. Reijnen ◽  
Iris van Wijck ◽  
Thomas Zeller ◽  
Antonio Micari ◽  
Pierfrancesco Veroux ◽  
...  

Purpose: To report a post hoc analysis performed to evaluate 1-year safety and efficacy of the IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) enrolled in the IN.PACT Global study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01609296). Materials and Methods: Of 1535 subjects enrolled in the study, 156 participants (mean age 71.8±10.4; 87 men) with CLI (Rutherford categories 4,5) were treated with DCB angioplasty in 194 femoropopliteal lesions. This cohort was compared to the 1246 subjects (mean age 68.2±10.0 years; 864 men) with intermittent claudication (IC) treated for 1573 lesions. The CLI cohort had longer lesions (13.9±10.6 vs 11.9±9.4 cm, p=0.009) and a higher calcification rate (76.8% vs 67.7%, p=0.011). Major adverse events [MAE; composite of all-cause mortality, clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), major (above-ankle) target limb amputation, and thrombosis at the target lesion site], lesion and vessel revascularization rates, and EuroQol-5D were assessed through 1 year. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, CD-TLR, and amputation events; estimates are presented with the 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Estimates of 12-month freedom from major target limb amputation were 98.6% (95% CI 96.7% to 100.0%) in subjects with CLI and 99.9% (95% CI 99.8% to 100.0%) in subjects with IC (p=0.002). Freedom from CD-TLR through 12 months was 86.3% (95% CI 80.6% to 91.9%) in CLI subjects and 93.4% (95% CI 91.9% to 94.8%) in IC subjects (p<0.001). The MAE rate through 12 months was higher in CLI subjects (22.5% vs 10.7%, p<0.001), and CLI patients had poorer overall survival (93.0%, 95% CI 88.9% to 97.2%) than IC subjects (97.0%, 95% CI 96.0% to 97.9%, p=0.011). Health status significantly improved in all domains at 6 and 12 months in both groups. Conclusion: Treatment of femoropopliteal disease with DCB in CLI patients is safe through 12-month follow-up, with a low major amputation rate of 1.4%. The rates of MAE and CD-TLR were higher in CLI subjects and reinterventions were required sooner. Additional research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of DCB treatment for femoropopliteal lesions in CLI patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-529
Author(s):  
Pradeep Ramakrishnan ◽  
Prateek Vaswani ◽  
Milind Padmakar Hote ◽  
Shiv Kumar Choudhary

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949902095847
Author(s):  
Varun Vasudeva ◽  
Adam Parr ◽  
Alan Loch ◽  
Chris Wall

Background: Major lower limb amputation is occasionally required in the management of end-stage pathology where other treatment options have failed. The primary aim of this study was to determine the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates of patients undergoing nontraumatic major lower limb amputation. Secondary aims were to investigate risk factors for poor outcomes, incidence of previous minor amputation, and the rate of subsequent major amputation. Methods: All nontraumatic, major lower limb amputations performed at Toowoomba Hospital during an 18-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Mortality data were obtained from the Queensland Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to determine survival after amputation. Results: A total of 147 patients were included in the study, with 104 undergoing below knee and 43 undergoing above knee amputations. Ten patients identified as having an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander background. For all patients, the 30-day mortality was 4.1% and 1-year mortality was 21.1%. For Indigenous patients, 30-day mortality was 10%. Previous minor amputation had occurred in 40 patients. Twenty-nine patients underwent further minor surgery after their initial major amputation, with thirteen requiring subsequent major amputation. Factors that increased mortality risk were the presence of peripheral vascular disease, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of four and age greater than 65 years. Conclusion: The morbidity and mortality following major lower limb amputation is significant. The findings of this study highlight the importance of preventative measures to minimize the incidence of lower limb amputations in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 828-831
Author(s):  
S. Maruthu Thurai ◽  
◽  
P. Mohan Raja ◽  
M. Murali ◽  
◽  
...  

Introduction: Aim is to study the poor prognostic determinants for patients undergoing superficial femoral artery angioplasty . Material and Methods: It is a Prospective observational study done in fifty patients who has undergone superficial femoral artery angioplasty for lower limb ischemia. Results: 22% had reocclusion of lesion, 10% required reintervention and 8% underwent major limb amputation .These three were considered major negative impact conditions. These were found in majority of patients with renal insufficiency, critical limb ischemia, smoker and drug defaulters. Conclusion: Thus poor prognostic determinants in the study were renal insufficiency, critical limb ischemia , smoker and drug defaulters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document