scholarly journals METODOLOGY OF REALIZATION OF THE INNOVATION VECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION AMONG TERRITORIAL AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS OF UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4(77)) ◽  
pp. 61-72
Author(s):  
О.А. IERMAKOVA

Topicality. Under the conditions of the decentralization reforms in Ukraine the communities’ cooperation becomes one of the key tools of their socio-economic development. At the same time, this tool was underused in Ukraine in the sphere of innovation activity. The experience of world in general and Europe in particular showed that the cooperation among territorial and economic systems is efficient in the sphere of innovations and is actively applied by the regions both in the national and cross-border cooperation. Aim and tasks. The elaboration of methodological and applied bases of the realization of innovation vector of economic development and cooperation among territorial and economic systems of Ukraine and elaboration of the classification models of such cooperation in innovation sphere. Research results. The article suggests the methodological, classification, institutional bases of cooperation among territorial and economic systems, implementation of which will facilitate the realization of their innovation potential. The application of the territorial and economic systems as an object of the research allows to approach the studied problem not from the standpoint of administrative- territorial division, that involves the study of inter-municipal cooperation, formation of subregions, agglomerations, conurbations, etc., but from the functional standpoint to explore the inter-territorial innovation process in the context of cooperation within the innovation systems, production clusters, etc. While the issue of the regional innovation systems and clusters formation is well-studied, their formation in the interregional aspect remains topical both in the theoretical and applied aspects for the Ukrainian economy. Conclusion. The methodology of the realization of innovation vector of economic development and cooperation among territorial and economic systems of Ukraine, that is suggested in the research, provides the system approach and determines key orientations of the politics of inter-territorial cooperation activation in the innovation sphere.

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 04026
Author(s):  
Andrey Kopein ◽  
Kseniya Demidenko ◽  
Olga Fattakhova ◽  
Tamara Frolova ◽  
Valeriy Lovchikov ◽  
...  

The article deals with the theoretical and practical issues of innovation activity as a factor of economic development and its sustainability. It reveals that economic instability can affect the investment climate, as well as cause significant slowdown of the innovation process. It points out the differences in adaptation processes in regions, which are reflected in the pace and direction of innovation implementation. An assessment of the innovation potential of a resource-type region was carried out based on indicative method and a set of criteria which were divided into five groups. The groups are formed according to scientific, technical, personnel, financial and resulting components. The analysis revealed that the resulting component is in a pre-crisis state, which is determined by the small number of active enterprises introducing innovation technologies and a small share of innovative products. It was noted that the technical and personnel components are in a normal state, and the financial component is in the state of crisis. It was concluded that there exists a sufficiently high innovation potential in the basic sectors of the industrial region. The debatable results of any assessments of the innovation potential and its impact on the sustainability of socio-economic development are underlined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Obidkul Sattorkulov ◽  
◽  
Dilorom Mamadiyorova ◽  
Madina Obidzhonova

This article presents the main ways in which innovation can have a positive impact on economic growth, welfare of the population, economic structure, social image of society and various sectors of the economy, innovation opportunities, their application and development prospects. Key words:innovation, novation, science, new development, innovation, innovation infrastructure, innovation activity, innovation process.


Author(s):  
Анна Сазонова ◽  
Anna Sazonova

The national innovation system is one of the main mechanisms for restructuring the Russian economy. The implementation of innovations, the active development of the science and technology industry creates the necessary conditions and prerequisites for the transition of the economy to its new technological structure, providing an innovative type of economic growth. In recent years, the literature has developed many approaches to the definition of the concept of “innovative potential”. Some authors consider this category as a set of resources and capabilities of the system to create and implement innovations. Others define innovative potential as a measure of the region’s readiness to create and promote innovations. The third group of authors treats innovation potential as a result of innovation activity, identifying in some way the concept of “innovation potential” and “innovation process”. This article discusses approaches to the definition of a comprehensive indicator of innovative potential. The assessment methods considered in this article allow to determine the level of innovative potential of an organizational system, to perform a comparative analysis of systems according to a generalized indicator of innovative potential and its components, and also to develop programs for the development of organizational systems taking into account the effective use of innovative system capabilities.


Author(s):  
G. A. AKZHANOVA ◽  
◽  
G. A. SHMARLOUSKAYA ◽  

The article considers the terms “innovation potential”, “regional innovation potential”, and the state of innovation potential. The purpose of this article is to determine the current state and prospects for the development of the innovative potential of the Akmola region. The research methodology consists in systematization of innovative indicators of the region by comparison and economic and statistical groupings. The analysis of the formation of the innovative potential of the region on the example of the Northern regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan is carried out. In particular, the dynamics of the gross regional product and innovation activity in the Akmola region is presented.


Author(s):  
Valerij N. Minat ◽  

Introduction. The subject of the research is public-private partnership (PPP), which contributes, through funding and incentives, to the spatial development of innovation in the United States. As an economic phenomenon, PPP is seen as an effective mechanism for integrating investors, business (primarily venture capital) and the state aimed at implementing the innovation process at the meso-spatial level – states and regions (subregions) of the United States – within the framework of regional innovation systems (RIS), contributing to territorial differentiation. Theoretical analysis reveals the factors and mechanisms of public-private interaction in the space of the corresponding RIS states and sub-regions of the country, characterized by the institutional and functional role of American forms of PPP in the implementation of innovative projects at the regional level. A hypothesis is formulated about the heterogeneity and unevenness of the united innovation space in the United States, one of the foundations of which is the differential nature of state financing of innovation activities at the regional level. Empirical analysis. A correlation is shown between indicative indicators reflecting the level of innovative potential and characterizing the innovative activity of the RIS of the states and subregions of the United States as a whole, on the one hand, and the degree of development of the innovative potential of PPP within the RIS of the corresponding territory, on the other hand. The carried out typological grouping of RIS states based on the lognormal distribution reflects the statistical commonality of the analyzed indicators. Results. Based on the available values of the indices characterizing the innovation activity of the RIS of specific states and subregions of the United States, as well as the calculation of integral indicators that make it possible to assess the interaction of PPP subjects, which are at the same time the institutional and functional elements of the corresponding RIS, a hypothetical statement about the unevenness of the US innovative development has been confirmed. In this case, the territorial differentiation of innovation in the United States and its impact on the spatial aspect of the development of an innovative economy, and, consequently, on economic growth, is determined by the intensity of the use of innovative potential by forms of PPP, which involves proactive financing and stimulation of innovative business projects at the expense of budgetary funds in the RIS of specific groups of states and sub-regions of the United States.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 987-1003
Author(s):  
Dorota Ciołek ◽  
Anna Golejewska ◽  
Adriana Zabłocka-Abi Yaghi

The literature emphasises the role of regional and local innovation environment. Regional Innovation Systems show differences in innovation outputs determined by different inputs. Understanding these relationships can have important implications for regional and innovation policy. The research aims to classify Regional Innovation Systems in Poland according to their innovation capacity and performance. The analysis covers 72 subregions (classified as NUTS 3 in the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) in 2004–2016. Classes of Regional Innovation Systems in Poland were identified based on a combination of linear and functional approaches and data from published and unpublished sources. It was assumed that innovation systems in Poland differ due to their location in metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions, thus, the Eurostat NUTS 3 metro/non-metro typology was applied for this purpose. Panel data regressions as models with individual random effects were estimated separately for metropolitan and non-metropolitan groups of subregions. The study identified common determinants of innovation outputs in both NUTS 3 types: share of innovative industrial enterprises, industry share, unemployment rate, and employment in research and development. Next, NUTS 3 were classified within each of two analysed types in line with output- and input-indices, the latter being calculated as non-weighted average of significant inputs. Last, the subregions were clustered based on individual inputs to enable a more detailed assessment of their innovation potential. The cluster analysis using k-means method with maximum cluster distance was applied. The results showed that the composition of the classes identified within metropolitan and non-metropolitan systems in 2004– 2016 remains unstable, similarly to the composition of clusters identified by inputs. The latter confirms the changes in components of the capacity within both Regional Innovation System types. The observed situation allows us to assume that Regional Innovation Systems in Poland are evolving. In further research, the efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems should be assessed, taking into account the differences between metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions as well as other environmental factors that may determine the efficiency of innovative processes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
R.S. Gabdualieva ◽  
N.M. Tyukavkin

The author of the article clarifies theoretical aspects of institutions and institutional support for innovative systems. The author proposed a definition of the Institute category. The classification of institutional support for innovative activities of enterprises was developed. The life cycle of the innovation process was supplemented with a subsystem for personnel preparation to absorb generated knowledge, which allows unlocking the internal innovation potential of the organization.


Author(s):  
Oleksandr Dziubliuk

The article gives a rationale for rebuilding the country’s innovation capacity as a key task of the current economic policy of the state, since it is the use of innovations that is extremely important for successful business activity and for obtaining competitive advantages in the world market. The subject matter of the study is the role of banking system, whose lending activity can serve as a powerful source for funding innovation, which, in turn, is seen as a key driver for investment and economic growth. The purpose of the research paper is to substantiate the appropriate theoretical and methodological approaches to understanding the role of the banking system within the framework of stimulating innovative development of the economy. The article critically analyzes the current state of innovation activity in Ukraine and systematizes the main factors restraining the innovative development of the economy. Particular attention is paid to the lack of funding for innovation, the ineffective structure of the national economy, and insufficient state financial support. The lack of an adequate level of funding for innovation activities of enterprises is identified as one of the main constraints on the introduction of innovations and enhancement of innovation potential. It is stressed that the limited amount of own funds and the objective difficulties in attracting foreign financial resources of investors are usually the main reasons for the low degree of innovation activity of enterprises in Ukraine. It is argued that it is the banking system that can act as the main institutional element of the innovation infrastructure, which has the proper organizational, technological and financial potential, sufficient for accumulation and redistribution of those investment resources that are necessary for activating the innovation process in the national economy. The advantages of banks in comparison with other participants of the financial market are determined, which determines the key role of the banking system in the innovative development of the economy. The author articulates a set of organizational, institutional and economic measures at the macro- and micro-levels which can contribute to incorporating the banking system into the framework of stimulating innovation processes.


Author(s):  
M. Yu. Afanasiev ◽  
M. A. Lysenkova

Currently, there is a tendency to evaluate the innovation system at the national level. Qualitative inter-country comparison requires quantitative and qualitative assessment of the factors influencing the innovation activity of the region. The purpose of this work was to justify quantitatively the impact of science and business on the innovation activity of the region. International patent applications are selected as an indicator reflecting the result of innovation activity in the region. Statistical hypothesis testing is carried out in this paper. The dependence between the results of innovation activity and innovation space of the region is confirmed by the methods of econometric modeling. The innovation space of the region is described in the work as a set of potential links between business and organizations that create new knowledge. The study used the official statistics of the regions of such countries as Russia, Switzerland, USA, China and Japan. Estimates of parameters of national and regional innovation systems of the Russian Federation, Switzerland, the USA, China and Japan are received by methods of econometric modeling. It is shown that the assessment of elasticity and technical efficiency of the innovation space of the region indicate the development of the innovation system. In the considered time range it is established that the Pareto-optimality property is possessed by the parameters of innovation systems of Japan, China and Switzerland. Estimates of the technical efficiency of the innovation space for a total of 190 regions according to 2012, a comparative analysis of the countries on the basis of the estimates. The paper provides a rationale for the use of parametric descriptions of national and regional innovation systems. This description can be used for cross-country comparison of the impact of science and business on the results of innovation activity, clustering of national innovation systems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (43) ◽  
pp. 36-54
Author(s):  
Nina Dorosh ◽  
Alina Snetkova

Nowadays, innovation activity is becoming the most important factor of economic development. The scale and effectiveness of innovation are the major contributing items, which determine the level of socio-economic development of the country and its national security. The large-scale and multi-vector changes of recent decades have transformed a significant part of the world's socio-economic processes. The speed of change has significantly accelerated, and competitiveness is increasingly determined by innovations. There is a need to study the innovative component of investment. Ukraine faces objectively necessary investment processes for transition to an innovative model of development. Taking into account these trends, the question about the theoretical coverage of the main approaches and the display of information on the costs of innovation of enterprises in Ukraine, adhering to national and international accounting standards, becomes of particular urgency. Thus, the author considers the accounting and analytical support issues of innovative activity of enterprises of the processing industry, in particular, the food industry of Ukraine. A thorough analysis of approaches to the interpretation of the definition of "innovation" has been conducted. Component analysis of national and international statistical indicators of Ukraine's innovation potential has been carried out. The dynamics of the introduction of innovations in industrial enterprises by types of activities and directions of innovations is presented. The features of cost accounting for innovations in processing enterprises (on the example of enterprises of the food industry) were investigated and accounting approaches were adopted for ensuring the costs of innovations and R & D taking into account the accounting standards and international financial reporting standards. Specific objects of accounting, accounts of synthetic and analytical accounting are outlined. The author has proved that the use of the proposed approaches to accounting for investment in innovations requires additional regulation both at the state level and at the enterprise level. The measures for improving the accounting of investments in innovations of the enterprises of the processing industry are proposed, and the creation of a unified method of accounting for the costs of innovations is proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document