Neuro-Orthopedic Criteria of Dorsopathy in Pregnant Women
Study Objective: To improve the diagnostic and therapeutic efficiency of dorsopathy in pregnant women by introducing a neuro-orthopedic examination algorithm. Study Design: prospective cohort study. Materials and Methods. The study enrolled 171 pregnant women: 87 dorsopathy patients (study group) and 84 healty women (controls). Inclusion criteria in both groups were progressive single uterine pregnancy, while the inclusion criterion for the study group was lower back pain (LBP) or pelvic ring pain (PRP). Neuro-orthopedic examination complied with the Russian clinical recommendations. Study Results. Neuro-orthopedic criteria to differentiate between pregnant women with or without dorsopathy were lower craniosacral rhythm (7.37 ± 1.53 vs. 8.14 ± 1.46 cycle/min, р = 0.002); sacral counternutation (odds ratio (OR) = 2.66); somatic dysfunctions (SD) in the lower and/or middle third of the right shank, right knee, Th11 NSRL, right clavicle, atlantooccipital joint, cuniform bone (left torsion), dura mater. SD in the right hip and pubic symphysis was included into gestation-associated changes which were unrelated to dorsopathy (LBP and PRP). A probability of LBP and PRP during pregnancy is higher in right sacroiliac joint SD (OR = 13.28; 95% CI: 1.69-104.59). Conclusion. It is reasonable to use osteopathic methods in dorsopathy (LBP and PRP) during pregnancy. Neuro-orthopedic differential diagnosis of lower back and pelvic ring pain reduces the risk of unjustified therapy to prolong pregnancy. Keywords: dorsalgia, somatic dysfunction, pregnancy, neuro-orthopedic examination.