scholarly journals Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Perumahan Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah di Kabupaten Lahat Provinsi Sumatera Selatan

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-51
Author(s):  
Mendra Wijaya ◽  
Handrisal Handrisal
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Housing Development ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Government Program ◽  
The Government ◽  
Settlement Areas ◽  
Low Income Housing

In essence, the implementing regulations for the construction of housing and settlement areas are clear as the responsibility of the government, as has been described above that the government's role is to determine development in the field of housing and settlement areas. The central government program with 1 (one) million subsidized houses would also pay more attention to its implementation performance, so that the existing implementing regulations will not only become passive laws. In Indonesia today there are still many regulations which in the end become a symptom of problems in their own country. In the context of accelerating housing development for low-income people (MBR), the government makes simplification efforts in simplifying licensing for low-income housing development. By issuing Government Regulation Number 64 of 2016 concerning Low-Income Community Housing Development, then to accelerate its implementation in the regions, it is regulated in Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 55 of 2017 concerning the Implementation of Licensing and Non-Licensing of Housing Development for Low-Income Communities (MBR) in the Region. This study aims to determine government policies related to the implementation of MBR housing development and to determine the implementation of Housing Development Permits for Low-Income Communities (MBR) in the Regions, especially in Lahat Regency, South Sumatra Province.

scholarly journals Policy for Implementing Housing Development Licensing for Low-Income Communities in Palembang City

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-288
Author(s):  
Zanariah ◽  
Irfan Ridwan Maksum ◽  
Eko Prasodjo
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Housing Development ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
The Government ◽  
The City ◽  
Low Income Housing

In the context of accelerating housing development for low-income people (MBR), the government makes simplification efforts in simplifying licensing for low-income housing development. To expedite this, the government issued Government Regulation Number 64 of 2016 concerning Low-Income Community Housing Development, then to accelerate its implementation in the regions, it is regulated in Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 55 of 2017 concerning Implementation of Licensing and Non-Permitting Housing Development for Low-Income Communities (MBR) in the Region. This study aims to determine government policies related to the implementation of MBR housing development and to determine the performance of the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 55 of 2017 concerning the Implementation of Licensing and Non-Licensing of Housing Development for Low-Income Communities (MBR) in the Regions, especially in the city of Palembang.

Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Untuk Menentukan Kapabilitas Konsumen Dalam Mengambil Pinjaman KPR

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Adhi Kusnadi ◽  
Risyad Ananda Putra
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Classification Tree ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Housing Development ◽  
Good Precision ◽  
Index Terms ◽  
The Government ◽  
Fold Cross Validation

Indonesia is one country that has a relatively large population . The government in the period of 5 years, annually hold a procurement program 1 million FLPP house units. This program is held in an effort to provide a decent home for low income people. FLPP housing development requires good precision and speed of development on the part of the developer, this is often hampered by the bank process, because it is difficult to predict the results and speed of data processing in the bank. Knowing the ability of consumers to get subsidized credit, has many advantages, among others, developers can plan a better cash flow, and developers can replace consumers who will be rejected before entering the bank process. For that reason built a system that can help developers. There are many methods that can be used to create this application. One of them is data mining with Classification tree. The results of 10-fold-cross-validation applications have an accuracy of 92%. Index Terms-Data Mining, Classification Tree, Housing, FLPP, 10-fold-cross Validation, Consumer Capability

From Prime Ministerial Power to Core Executive

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. W. Rhodes
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Prime Minister ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Approaches To Studying ◽  
The Core ◽  
Executive Politics ◽  
Core Executive ◽  
The Government ◽  
Different Parts

The core executive is a new concept replacing the conventional debate about the power of the prime minister and the Cabinet. It refers to all those organizations and procedures that coordinate central government policies, and act as final arbiters of conflict between different parts of the government machine. In brief, the ‘core executive’ is the heart of the machine. The chapter reviews the several approaches to studying the British executive: prime ministerial government; prime ministerial cliques; Cabinet government; ministerial government; segmented decision-making; and bureaucratic coordination. It then discusses several ways forward by developing new theory and methods. The Afterword discusses the core executive as interlocking networks, and the fluctuating patterns of executive politics.

scholarly journals Citizen’s Charter a Mechanism for Accountability: An Analysis of India Conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Ramthanpuia Pachuau
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Administrative Reforms ◽  
The People ◽  
Official Statement ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Government ◽  
Democratic Country

The initiatives of Citizen’s Charter are an effort in solving citizen’s problems that they encounter regularly over a long time while dealing with the government or any other organizations. It is a document of an official statement that ensures the accountability of the organization and their commitment towards the citizen in providing the quality of service. The charter aimed to revolutionize public service by empowering the people who were so long regarded as a silent spectator and a mere receiver on the government policies and programmes. In a democratic country, citizens have become more vocals towards the government responsibilities and they expect the administration not only to respond to their demands but also to foresee their needs in the future. In India, the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances in Government (DARPG) is in charge of organizing, directing, formulating, and operationalizing Citizen's Charters at the Central Government as well as States Government. However, the fulfillment of Citizen’s Charter in India faced many difficulties due to its government bureaucratic structure and resistant to change in its working system.

Modi will look to philanthropists in COVID-19 fight

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Special Fund ◽  
Economic Support ◽  
The Government ◽  
Medical Relief ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Relief Efforts

Subject Role of philanthropy in India. Significance India has seen a surge in philanthropic activity in response to COVID-19. Late last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a special fund to support people requiring medical relief or experiencing hardship because of the nationwide lockdown imposed by the government to prevent the spread of the disease. Impacts Individuals making large donations to COVID-19 relief efforts will aim to ensure their generosity receives maximum publicity. Companies hit financially by the shuttering of the economy could struggle to discharge corporate social responsibility. The central government faces pressure to offer more economic support to low-income people who have struggled through the COVID-19 lockdown.

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arabiyani Arabiyani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Year 2013

Pasal 18B ayat (1) UUD Tahun 1945 memberikan legitimasi terhadap Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh yang merupakan hasil kesepakatan Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GAM. Hal ini kemudian dituangkan ke dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Permasalahannya adalah materi qanun tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 77 Tahun 2007. Pemerintah Pusat menghendaki perbaiki terhadap beberapa materi qanun, namun pihak Pemerintah Aceh dianggap menyalahi MoU Helsinki. Rumusan masalah kajian ini sebagai berikut: Pertama, apakah landasan pemikiran lahirnya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh? Kedua, apakah akibat hukum dari adanya Pasal 246 ayat (2), dan ayat (4) serta Pasal 247 Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh? Ketiga, apakah akibat hukum adanya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh? Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut: Pertama, menemukan landasan pemikiran lahirnya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh terdiri dari Pasal 18B UUD Tahun 1945 serta perumusan Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006. Kedua, bahwa akibat hukum dari adanya Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 berlaku dan sah untuk diterapkan melalui pembentukannya Qanun Aceh. Ketiga, konsekuensi yuridis adanya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 berlaku secara yuridis dan dapat ditindaklanjuti oleh Pemerintah Aceh karena sudah diundangkan dalam lembaran daerah. Tentu sudah berlaku secara otomatis karena pada saat disahkan oleh Gubernur Aceh selaku Kepala Pemerintah Aceh dan DPRA secara serta merta diundangkan dalam lembaran daerah Pemerintah Provinsi Aceh. Legal Certainty of Qanun Aceh Number 3 Year 2013 On Flag and Symbol of Aceh  The 1945 Constitution Article 18B paragraph (1) gives legitimacy to the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh which is the result of the Government of Indonesia's agreement with GAM. This is then poured into Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding Aceh Government. The problem is that the Qanun material is considered to be contradictory to Government Regulation Number 77 of 2007. The central government wants to improve on some of the Qanun material, but the Government of Aceh is considered to have violated the Helsinki MoU. The formulation of the problem as follows: First, what is the basis of thinking the formulation of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the flag and the symbol of Aceh? Second, what are the legal consequences of the existence of Article 246 paragraph (2), and paragraph (4) and Article 247, Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding Aceh Government? Thirdly, what are the legal consequences of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh? The results of the research are as follows: First, find the foundation of the thought of the birth of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh consists of Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution and the formulation of Article 246 and Article 247 of Law Number 11 Year 2006. Second, the existence of Article 246 and Article 247 is valid and valid to be implemented through the establishment of Aceh Qanun. Thirdly, the juridical consequences of the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 are valid in juridical manner and can be acted upon by the Government of Aceh as already enacted in the regional slabs. Of course already valid automatically because at the time passed by the Governor of Aceh as Head of the Government of Aceh and DPRA is immediately promulgated in the sheet area of Aceh Provincial Government.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI GUBERNUR SEBAGAI WAKIL PEMERINTAH PUSAT DI DAERAH

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahyunir Rauf
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Central Government ◽  
National Government ◽  
City Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
City Area ◽  
Delegation Of Authority ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Government

In the Indonesian national government system is recognized the existence of local government, the region consists of provincial, district and municipal areas. The Provincial Region is headed by a Governor, a Regency area headed by a Regent and a City area headed by a Mayor. Based on Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government placed the Governor in 2 (two) functions, namely; As Head of Region and As Deputy of Central Government in Region. The governor as the representative of the central government in the regions gained the delegation of authority from the government to carry out central government affairs in the regions. As a representative of the central government in the region the governor carries out the absolute affairs and implements the concurrent governmental affairs which are the authority of the central government and conducts the guidance and supervision of the districts / municipalities in carrying out the concurrent affairs which are the authority of the district / city government. In the implementation of central government affairs in the region it is necessary to have central government representatives in the regions and vertical institutions. Prior to the issuance of Law Number 23 Year 2014 in relation to the Governor as the representative of the central government in the regions is regulated in Law Number 32 Year 2004 regarding regional government and followed up by Government Regulation No. 7 of 2008 on Deconcentration and Co-Administration. In Act No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government it is stated that the representative of central government in the regions is only given to the Governor, while the Regent / Mayor does not get the authority as a representative of the central government in the region. In carrying out the guidance and supervision on the implementation of government affairs which is the authority of the district / city and the task of assistance by the district / city, the President is assisted by the Governor as the representative of the central government.  

scholarly journals Tantangan Pemerintah Pusat dalam Merubah Sistem Akuntansi dan Pelaporan Keuangan dari Half Accrual Accounting ke Full Accrual Accounting

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 044-048
Author(s):  
Tohirin Tohirin
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Management ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Accounting System ◽  
Accrual Accounting ◽  
State Finance ◽  
The Government ◽  
New System

Sesuai dengan Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 2004 tentang keuangan Negara dan Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara serta Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 10 tahun 2010 tentang Standar akuntansi Pemerintahan, Pemerintah Pusat diharuskan membuat laporan keuangan berdasarkan basis akuntansi akrual mulai tahun 2015.Tulisan ini bertujuan menguraikan tentang tantangan yang harus dihadapi oleh pemerintah pusat untuk berpindah dari sistem yang sekarang digunakan yaitu Half AccrualAccounting ke sistem yang baru yaitu Full Accrual Accounting. Metode analisa yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah analisis statistika deskriptif. Paper ini akan memberikan gambaran singkat tentang apa yang telah dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah Pusat di dalam menjalankan mandat dari Undang-Undang terkait Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara di era reformasi. Pemerintah pusat menghadapi tantangan saat harus meninggalkan sistem yang saat ini dipergunakan dengan pendekatan Half accounting Accrual dengan disupport oleh Aplikasi Saiba menuju sistem baru yang Full Accrual Accounting yang disupport oleh Aplikasi Sakti. Pertama, tantangan regulasi; Kedua, tantangan Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi; Ketiga, tantangan Sumber Daya Manusia; Keempat, tantangan resiko implementasi sistem baru dalam konteks pengelolaan keuangan negara; dan terakhir; Kelima, tantangan perubahan bisnis proses. Pemerintah pusat sesungguhnya belum sepenuhnya menjalankan mandat undangundang dalam menjalankan sistem akuntansi dan pelaporan keuangan karena belum menerapkan Full Accrual Accounting System. Kajian ini memberikan rekomendasi pemerintah untuk bisa bermigrasi dengan aman menuju sistem baru yang akuntabel dan reliabel   In accordance with Act No. 1 of 2004 concerning State Finance and Act No. 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury and Government Regulation No. 10 of 2010 concerning Government Accounting Standards, the Central Government is required to make financial reports based on accrual accounting starting in 2015. This writing aimed to describe the challenges that must be faced by the central government to move from the system currently in use, namely Half Accrual Accounting to the new system, namely Full Accrual Accounting. The analytical method used in this study was descriptive statistical analysis. This paper provided a brief overview of what has been done by the Central Government in carrying out the mandate of the Laws relating to Management of State Finance in the reform era. The central government faced challenges when it comes to leaving the system that is currently being used with the Accrual Half accounting approach, supported by the Saiba Application to the new system namely Full Accrual Accounting supported by the Sakti Application. First, regulatory challenges; Second, the challenges of Information Systems and Technology; Third, the challenges of Human Resources; Fourth, the risk challenges of implementing a new system in the context of state financial management; and last; Fifth, the challenge of changing business processes. The central government actually had not fully implemented the legal mandate in carrying out the accounting and financial reporting system because it had not implemented a Full Accrual Accounting System. This study suggested the government to be able to migrate safely towards a new accountable and reliable system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document