scholarly journals Surgery for primary supratentorial brain tumors in the United States, 2000–2009: effect of provider and hospital caseload on complication rates

2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria T. Trinh ◽  
Jason M. Davies ◽  
Mitchel S. Berger
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Primary Brain Tumors ◽  
Supratentorial Brain Tumors

OBJECT The object of this study was to examine how procedural volume and patient demographics impact complication rates and value of care in those who underwent biopsy or craniotomy for supratentorial primary brain tumors. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) on 62,514 admissions for biopsy or resection of supratentorial primary brain tumors for the period from 2000 to 2009. The main outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, routine discharge proportion, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications. Associations between these outcomes and hospital or surgeon case volumes were examined in logistic regression models stratified across patient characteristics to control for presentation of disease and comorbid risk factors. The authors further computed value of care, defined as the ratio of functional outcome to hospital charges. RESULTS High-case-volume surgeons and hospitals had superior outcomes. After adjusting for patient characteristics, high-volume surgeon correlated with reduced complication rates (OR 0.91, p = 0.04) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.43, p < 0.0001). High-volume hospitals were associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (OR 0.76, p = 0.003), higher routine discharge proportion (OR 1.29, p < 0.0001), and lower complication rates (OR 0.93, p = 0.04). Patients treated by high-volume surgeons were less likely to experience postoperative hematoma, hydrocephalus, or wound complications. Patients treated at high-volume hospitals were less likely to experience mechanical ventilation, pulmonary complications, or infectious complications. Worse outcomes tended to occur in African American and Hispanic patients and in those without private insurance, and these demographic groups tended to underutilize high-volume providers. CONCLUSIONS A high-volume status for hospitals and surgeons correlates with superior value of care, as well as reduced in-hospital mortality and complications. These findings suggest that regionalization of care may enhance patient outcomes and improve value of care for patients with primary supratentorial brain tumors.

High-Volume Hospitals with High-Volume and Low-Volume Surgeons: Is There a “Field Effect” for Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Wood ◽  
Sharona B. Ross ◽  
Ty A. Bowman ◽  
Amanda Smart ◽  
Carrie E. Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Field Effect ◽  
Hospital Volume ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Surgeon Volume ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Leapfrog Group ◽  
Discharge Status ◽  
Low Volume

Since the Leapfrog Group established hospital volume criteria for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the importance of surgeon volume versus hospital volume in obtaining superior outcomes has been debated. This study was undertaken to determine whether low-volume surgeons attain the same outcomes after PD as high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals. PDs undertaken from 2010 to 2012 were obtained from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. High-volume hospitals were identified. Surgeon volumes within were determined; postoperative length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, discharge status, and hospital charges were examined relative to surgeon volume. Six high-volume hospitals were identified. Each hospital had at least one surgeon undertaking ≥ 12 PDs per year and at least one surgeon undertaking < 12 PDs per year. Within these six hospitals, there were 10 “high-volume” surgeons undertaking 714 PDs over the three-year period (average of 24 PDs per surgeon per year), and 33 “low-volume” surgeons undertaking 225 PDs over the three-year period (average of two PDs per surgeon per year). For all surgeons, the frequency with which surgeons undertook PD did not predict LOS, in-hospital mortality, discharge status, or hospital charges. At the six high-volume hospitals examined from 2010 to 2012, low-volume surgeons undertaking PD did not have different patient outcomes from their high-volume counterparts with respect to patient LOS, in-hospital mortality, patient discharge status, or hospital charges. Although the discussion of volume for complex operations has shifted toward surgeon volume, hospital volume must remain part of the discussion as there seems to be a hospital “field effect.”

Abstract 19212: Racial Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization Associated With Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis From 2011-2012

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilay Kumar ◽  
Rohan Khera ◽  
Neetika Garg
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Native Americans ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
The United States ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Background and objectives: Heart failure (HF) incidence is higher among Blacks compared to Whites. There is a paucity of recent data on racial differences in in-hospital mortality and resource utilization in a nationally representative, multiracial cohort of HF hospitalizations. Hypothesis: There are significant racial-ethnic differences in HF hospitalization outcomes. Methods: We used the 2011-2012 Nationwide/National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of HF using relevant ICD-9 codes. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS) and mean inflation adjusted charges. The effect of race on outcomes was ascertained using logistic or linear regression. Results: 375,740 primary HF hospitalizations representing 1.8 million hospitalizations nationwide were included. Mean age was 72.6 (SD 14.6) years and 50.1% were females. After adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, APR-DRG mortality risk and socioeconomic status, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower for Blacks (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64 - 0.74; p<0.001), Hispanics (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.91; p<0.001) and Asians or Pacific Islanders (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 - 0.99; p=0.04) compared to Whites. Average inflation adjusted charges were significantly higher for all minorities compared to Whites except for Native Americans for whom charges were significantly lower than Whites (p<0.05 for Black, Hispanic, Asian, NA or Others vs. Whites). LOS was modestly higher for Blacks or Other races vs. Whites (p=0.01 B vs. W and Others vs. W) and lower for Native Americans vs. Whites (p<0.001). Conclusions: Blacks, Hispanics and Asians hospitalized for HF are significantly less likely to die in the hospital compared to Whites. Hospital charges for racial-ethnic minorities are significantly higher compared to Whites. The reasons for racial differences in HF hospitalization outcomes require further investigation.

Abstract 45: Thrombolytic Treatment for In-Hospital Ischemic Strokes in United States

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tenbit Emiru ◽  
Malik M Adil ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent emphasis on protocols for emergent triage and treatment of in-hospital acute ischemic stroke, there is little data on rates and outcomes of patients receiving thrombolytics for in-hospital ischemic strokes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of in-hospital ischemic stroke treated with thrombolytics and to compare outcomes with patients treated with thrombolytics on admission. DESIGN/METHODS: We analyzed a seven-year data (2002-2009) from the National Inpatient Survey (NIS), a nationally representative inpatient database in the United States. We identified patients who had in-hospital ischemic strokes (defined by thrombolytic treatment after one day of hospitalization) and those who received thrombolytics on the admission day. We compared demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, in hospital complications, length of stay, hospitalization charges, and discharge disposition, between the two patient groups. RESULT: A total of 18036 (21.5%) and 65912 (78.5%) patients received thrombolytics for in-hospital and on admission acute ischemic stroke, respectively. In hospital complications such as pneumonia (5.0% vs. 3.4%, p=0.0006), deep venous thrombosis (1.9% vs. 0.6%, p<0.0001) and pulmonary embolism (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p=0.01) were significantly higher in the in-hospital group compared to on admission thrombolytic treated group. Hospital length of stay and mean hospital charges were not different between the two groups. Patients who had in-hospital strokes had had higher rates of in hospital mortality (12.1% vs. 10.6%, p=0.02). In a multivariate analysis, in-hospital thrombolytic treated group had higher in-hospital mortality after adjustment for age, gender and baseline clinical characteristics (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.95, p=0.008). CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE: In current practice, one out of every five acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytics is receiving treatment for in-hospital strokes. The higher mortality and complicated hospitalization in such patients needs to be recognized.

Abstract TP306: Characteristics and Outcomes Among Patients Transferred to Regional Stroke Centers Across the United States for Specialized Stroke Care

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed F Ali ◽  
Gregg Fonarow ◽  
Eric Smith ◽  
Li Liang ◽  
Robert Sutter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Front Door

Intro: Many patients are transferred to stroke centers for advanced stroke care, especially after IV tPA. We sought to determine differences in the baseline characteristics and outcomes between AIS cases presenting directly to stroke centers’ front doors vs. transfers-in from another regional acute care hospital. Methods: Using data from the national GWTG-Stroke registry, we analyzed 970,390 AIS cases (01/2010 - 03/14). Patients at hospitals with high transfer-in rates (>15%) were selected (284 hospitals, 303,739 patients). Due to large sample size, instead of p-values, standardized differences were reported. Multivariable model (MV) examined the association of transfer-in vs. front door with the primary and secondary outcomes, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics including NIHSS. Results: High volume transfer-in hospitals admitted 31% of their patients via transfer. Transfer-in patients were younger, more often white and non-Hispanic. They had similar stroke risk factors except for hypertension and previous stroke/TIA which were less common. Transfer-in had worse initial NIHSS, more often had altered consciousness and language disturbance. Transfer-in patients had longer length of hospital stay, higher mRS at discharge, and were less often discharged home. In-hospital mortality was ∼ 3% higher in transfer-in as compared with front-door. Among tPA treated patients, sICH < 36hr was more common in transfer-in patients. On MV, transfer-in patients had overall worse outcomes as shown by the higher odds of in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay, and not able to ambulate independently at discharge (Table). Conclusion: Many hospitals receive high volumes of stroke patients via transfer. Because transfer-in patients have worse outcomes, these patients have the potential to negatively influence institutional outcomes rates. Transfer-in patients should be carefully accounted for in risk adjusted models of hospital outcomes.

scholarly journals Risk factors for childhood and adult primary brain tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1357-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinn T Ostrom ◽  
Maral Adel Fahmideh ◽  
David J Cote ◽  
Ivo S Muskens ◽  
Jeremy M Schraw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Primary Brain Tumors ◽  
Clinical Databases ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Race Ethnicity

Abstract Primary brain tumors account for ~1% of new cancer cases and ~2% of cancer deaths in the United States; however, they are the most commonly occurring solid tumors in children. These tumors are very heterogeneous and can be broadly classified into malignant and benign (or non-malignant), and specific histologies vary in frequency by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Epidemiological studies have explored numerous potential risk factors, and thus far the only validated associations for brain tumors are ionizing radiation (which increases risk in both adults and children) and history of allergies (which decreases risk in adults). Studies of genetic risk factors have identified 32 germline variants associated with increased risk for these tumors in adults (25 in glioma, 2 in meningioma, 3 in pituitary adenoma, and 2 in primary CNS lymphoma), and further studies are currently under way for other histologic subtypes, as well as for various childhood brain tumors. While identifying risk factors for these tumors is difficult due to their rarity, many existing datasets can be leveraged for future discoveries in multi-institutional collaborations. Many institutions are continuing to develop large clinical databases including pre-diagnostic risk factor data, and developments in molecular characterization of tumor subtypes continue to allow for investigation of more refined phenotypes. Key Point 1. Brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of tumors that vary significantly in incidence by age, sex, and race/ethnicity.2. The only well-validated risk factors for brain tumors are ionizing radiation (which increases risk in adults and children) and history of allergies (which decreases risk).3. Genome-wide association studies have identified 32 histology-specific inherited genetic variants associated with increased risk of these tumors.

scholarly journals Adults with myelomeningocele and other forms of spinal dysraphism: hospital care in the United States since the turn of the millennium

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph H. Piatt
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Care ◽  
Spinal Dysraphism ◽  
Consumer Price Index ◽  
High Volume ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Degenerative Spine ◽  
Degenerative Spine Disease ◽  
Spine Disease

OBJECTIVE The natural history and management of myelomeningocele (MM) in children is fairly well understood. There is a deficiency of knowledge regarding the care of adults, however, even though there are now more adults than children living with MM. The purpose of this study was to characterize the hospital care of adults with MM and hydrocephalus on a nationwide population base. Adults with other forms of spina bifida (SB) were studied for contrast. METHODS The Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the years 2001, 2004, 2007, and 2010 was queried for admissions with diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes for MM with hydrocephalus and for other forms of SB. RESULTS There were 4657 admissions of patients with MM and 12,369 admissions of patients with SB in the sample. Nationwide rates of admission increased steadily for both MM and SB patients throughout the study period. Hospital charges increased faster than the health care component of the Consumer Price Index. Patients with MM were younger than patients with SB, but annual admissions of MM patients older than 40 years increased significantly during the study period. With respect to hospital death and discharge home, outcomes of surgery for hydrocephalus were superior at high-volume hospitals. Patients with MM and SB were admitted to the hospital more frequently than the general population for surgery to treat degenerative spine disease. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MM and SB continue to require neurosurgical attention in adulthood, and the demand for services for older patients with MM is increasing. Management of hydrocephalus at high-volume centers is advantageous for this population. Patients with MM or SB may experience high rates of degenerative spine disease.

scholarly journals Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany—A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1016
Author(s):  
Paul I. Heidekrueger ◽  
Nicholas Moellhoff ◽  
Raymund E. Horch ◽  
Jörn A. Lohmeyer ◽  
Mario Marx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
National Level ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Standard ◽  
High Volume ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Complication Rates

While autologous breast reconstruction has gained momentum over recent years, there is limited data on the structure and quality of care of microsurgical breast reconstruction in Germany. Using the breast reconstruction database established by the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC), the presented study investigated the overall outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions in Germany. Data of 3926 patients and 4577 DIEP flaps performed by 22 centers were included in this study. Demographics, patient characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were accounted for. Centers performing < Ø 40 (low-volume (LV)) vs. ≥ Ø 40 (high-volume (HV)) annual DIEP flaps were analyzed separately. Overall, total and partial flap loss rates were as low as 2.0% and 1.1% respectively, and emergent vascular revision surgery was performed in 4.3% of cases. Revision surgery due to wound complications was conducted in 8.3% of all cases. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HV group (LV: 385.82 min vs. HV: 287.14 min; LV: 9.04 (18.87) days vs. HV: 8.21 (5.04) days; both p < 0.05). The outcome and complication rates deduced from the national registry underline the high standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction on a national level in Germany.

Heart Failure Related Hospitalizations Are Associated with Increased Morbidity and Mortality in Pediatric Oncology Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4482-4482
Author(s):  
Britton Keeshan ◽  
Kimberly Y Lin ◽  
Matthew J O'Connor ◽  
Jill P Ginsberg ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Inpatient Database

Abstract Introduction: Cardiomyopathy is a well-described complication of cancer therapy in pediatric patients. However, the prevalence and outcomes of heart failure related hospitalizations in these patients are unknown. We hypothesize that while heart failure related hospitalizations are uncommon in pediatric oncology patients, they are likely associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database, a nationwide database of pediatric hospitalizations in the United States, for oncology patients with and without heart failure for years 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009. Results: Heart failure was identified in 914 of 259,432 (0.4%) pediatric oncology admissions. Patients with heart failure were more likely to be non-white (52.2 vs 43%, p<0.001), less likely to be in the highest income bracket (23.9 vs 27.5%, p=0.014), more likely to have leukemia (40.7 vs 31.3%, p<0.001), and more likely to undergo bone marrow transplantation on admission (5.0 vs 1.6%, p<0.001). Several morbidities were significantly more common in patients with heart failure including respiratory failure [16.4% vs 1.3%, odds ratio (OR) 14.6, 95% CI 12.2-17.4), sepsis (21.9% vs 7.2%, OR 3.6, 95% CI 3.1-4.3), stroke (1.5% vs 0.6%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.3), and renal failure (11.7% vs 1.2%, OR 10.9, 95% CI 8.9-13.3). Length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges were also significantly greater in oncology patients with heart failure patients compared to those without; median LOS 9 (IQR 4-25) vs 4 days (IQR 2-6); median hospital charges $58,023 (IQR 18,835-169,826) vs $18,161 (IQR 8,860-39,640); p<0.001 for both. Hospital mortality was significantly greater in oncology patients with heart failure compared to those without (13.3% vs 1.3%; OR 11.5, 95% CI 9.5-14.0). On multivariable analysis, heart failure was independently associated with hospital mortality in pediatric oncology patients (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.63-3.00). Conclusion: Heart failure is an uncommon but serious complication in hospitalized pediatric oncology patients. The presence of heart failure was associated with increased morbidities, resource utilization, and mortality. Further study is needed for the prevention and treatment of heart failure in this population. Disclosures Aplenc: Sigma Tau: Honoraria.

In-hospital Mortality and Morbidity after Surgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the United States, 1996–2000: The Effect of Hospital and Surgeon Volume

Neurosurgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 995-1009
Author(s):  
Fred G. Barker ◽  
Sepideh Amin-Hanjani ◽  
William E. Butler ◽  
Christopher S. Ogilvy ◽  
Bob S. Carter
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
High Volume ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surgeon Volume ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Abstract OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the risk of adverse outcome after contemporary surgical treatment of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. Patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics were tested as potential outcome predictors, with particular attention to the surgeon's and hospital's volume of care. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study with the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1996 to 2000. Multivariate logistic and ordinal regression analyses were performed with endpoints of mortality, discharge other than to home, length of stay, and total hospital charges. RESULTS We identified 3498 patients who were treated at 463 hospitals, and we identified 585 surgeons in the database. Of all patients, 2.1% died, 3.3% were discharged to skilled-nursing facilities, and 12.8% were discharged to other facilities. The analysis adjusted for age, sex, race, primary payer, four variables measuring acuity of treatment and medical comorbidity, and five variables indicating symptoms and signs. The statistics for median annual number of unruptured aneurysms treated were eight per hospital and three per surgeon. High-volume hospitals had fewer adverse outcomes than hospitals that handled comparatively fewer unruptured aneurysms: discharge other than to home occurred after 15.6% of operations at high-volume hospitals (20 or more cases/yr) compared with 23.8% at low-volume hospitals (fewer than 4 cases/yr) (P = 0.002). High surgeon volume had a similar effect (15.3 versus 20.6%, P = 0.004). Mortality was lower at high-volume hospitals (1.6 versus 2.2%) than at hospitals that handled comparatively fewer unruptured aneurysms, but not significantly so. Patients treated by high-volume surgeons had fewer postoperative neurological complications (P = 0.04). Length of stay was not related to hospital volume. Charges were slightly higher at high-volume hospitals, partly because arteriography was performed more frequently than at hospitals that handled comparatively fewer unruptured aneurysms. CONCLUSION For patients with unruptured aneurysms who were treated in the United States between 1996 and 2000, surgery performed at high-volume institutions or by high-volume surgeons was associated with significantly lower morbidity and modestly lower mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document