Ulrich Dopatka: Phänomenologie der absoluten Subjektivität. Eine Untersuchung zur präreflexiven Bewusstseinsstruktur im Ausgang von Edmund Husserl, Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Henry und Jean-Luc Marion

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-235
Author(s):  
Hans-Dieter Gondek
Author(s):  
Anda Kuduma

The article is dedicated to the evaluation of creative work by poet and translator Jānis Hvoinskis, and it characterises the content and artistic qualities of Hvoinskis’s poetry process. The main focus is on the representation of the phenomenon of the city as an essential and characteristic poetic chronotope segment in Hvoinskis’s poetry. The study aims to identify and assess the characteristic kinds of city concept formation and their importance in building Hvoinskis’s artistic style. The article highlights and evaluates the techniques for designing the artistic structure of the indivisible chronotope in Hvoinskis’s poetry. This view is based on the fundamental principles of phenomenology, i.e., an individual phenomenon (phainómeno) is crucial in the reflection of consciousness, inner temporality, intentionality, intersubjectivity, and lifeworld. In turn, the highlight of poetry subject’s primary condition and existential motifs is logically linked to the main ideas of existentialism in their attitude towards the reason of an individual’s existence, relationships to life and death, freedom of will and choice, determinism. The study’s theoretical and methodological basis includes the ideas of phenomenology theoreticians (Edmund Husserl, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and others) and the theories of existentialism philosophers (Søren Kierkegaard, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre). Hvoinskis’s poetry allows us to speak about a city as a concept, i.e., as a universal and capacious generalising notion (which includes images, notions, symbols) from which its associative components – poetry themes, motifs, images – derive. Thus, it is possible to speak about the depth dimension of the city phenomenon. The city phenomenon in Hvoinskis’s poetry is the landscape that has been adopted as the centre of the world of the lyric subject in both poetry collections that have come out to date: “Lietus pār kanālu e” (Rain over the Channel e, 2009) and “Mūza no pilsētas N” (Muse from City N, 2019). The depth dimension in Hvoinskis’s poetry appears in the natural synthesis of mythical and real chronotope, associatively impressive and plastic imagery, expressive style kindred to surrealism poetics. The city appears as a modernism project created by the logic of industrialisation, simultaneously revealing a metaphysical dimension where symbolic images as constituents of a myth preserve the memory of wholeness of the world. The emotional atmosphere of Hvoinskis’s poetry is defined by the highly existential atmosphere – despite the harsh indifference created by the city, the sadness of existential loneliness, social distance, and aversion towards life, the poet makes the tragic and ugly strangely appealing without losing the feeling of lightness and hope. The poet’s intense intuition and imagination exhibit the congeniality with the 20th-century French modernists. Hvoinskis’s poetry muse is death, which implies life.


Sapere Aude ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (13) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Paul Gilbert

<p>La cultura filosofica e scientifica accede ai media solo nelle ore più buie della notte. Sarà quindi da abbandonare ai nottambuli? Husserl si chiedeva se la filosofia potesse essere una “scienza rigorosa”. Questa domanda avrà ancora un interesse? Non dovremmo però contestare l’unilateralità della deriva culturale dei nostri tempi e rivendicare per la riflessione fondamentale nuovi spazi d’interrogazione? Le scienze sono credibili soltanto perché offrono la possibilità di alimentare la potenza della tecnica? Non dobbiamo porre invece la domanda sul loro fondamento razionale; criticare la mentalità che si accontenta del loro successo tecnico? Tenteremo di rispondere a queste domande leggendo alcuni testi di Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger e Michel Henry. Il nostro intento è di capire il significato del termine “riduzione” in fenomenologia. Questo termine ha conosciuto alcune avventure. Indica, infatti, per un fenomenologo il metodo più radicale per fondare il senso delle attività umane, comprese quelle scientifiche.</p><div><br clear="all" /><div> </div></div>


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-425
Author(s):  
Joanna Hodge ◽  

Adorno develops critiques in parallel of the phenomenologies of G. W. F. Hegel and of Edmund Husserl. While respecting their differences, he rehearses conjoined objections to their accounts of philosophy, and of progress, of history, and of nature. Critical of Hegel’s idealist dialectics, and of Husserl’s transcendental idealism, Adorno also in his readings of their texts reveals a textual materiality of their philosophical enquiries, which provides material evidence in support of his critique. This essay seeks to reveal the dynamic of this process, and show certain parallels with results supplied in the phenomenological enquiries of Michel Henry, and in the deconstructions of Jacques Derrida. If an epoch may still be captured in the concept, then the negative dialectical conceptuality developed by Adorno must capture a condition common to that epoch, and, in part, shared by other such thinkers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (31) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
Olga Senkāne

The present article falls within a number of papers about research on specification of philosophical novels. The aim of this article is to analyze author’s function as a narrative category in classical philosophical novels (Franz Kafka "The Trial" (1925) ”The Castle”(1926), Jean-Paul Sartre "Nausea" (1938), Hermann Hesse "The Glass Bead Game" (1943), Albert Camus ”The Plague” (1947)) and a novel of Latvian prose writer Ilze Šķipsna „Neapsolītās zemes” [Un-Promised Lands](1970)). The analysis is based on theoretical ideas of structural narratologists Gerard Genette, William Labov, Seymuor Chatman, Wolf Schmid, as well as philosophers Edmund Husserl, Jean-Paul Sartre, Paul Ricouer and semioticians Yuri Lotman (Юрий Лотман) and Umberto Eco.The real author can ”enter” the text only indirectly—as an image, with the help of the storyteller, and the way how this ”entry” happens is determined by the narration of the real author or narrative (communication) skills of the author. Thus, the author and implied author are functionally different concepts: author as a real person develops the concept idea, his intention is to define the concept under his original vision; narrator, in its turn, communicates with the reader, representing the concept, and his aim is to select appropriate means of communication with regard to reader’s perceptual abilities.


Dialogue ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Holmes

In the Introduction to Being and Nothingness, entitled “The Pursuit of Being”, Jean-Paul Sartre states that Edmund Husserl has misunderstood his own essential discovery of the intentionality of consciousness and that “from the moment that he makes of the noema an unreal, a correlate of the noesis, a noema whose esse is percipi, he is totally unfaithful to his principle”. In what follows I assess this claim as I explicate Sartre's development of the concept of intentionality and the basis for his claim. In addition, I show how an understanding of the views of both Husserl and Sartre reveals a basic convergence. My primary purpose in this is to further develop the correct description of the objects of the world through an analysis and elucidation of the accounts of Sartre and Husserl.


Author(s):  
Sergio González Araneda
Keyword(s):  

El presente trabajo tiene por objetivo describir una síntesis de los fundamentos, conceptos y principios que articulan y otorgan sentido a la fenomenología existencial de Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980), estableciendo como eje central de investigación su trabajo y producción fenomenológica. Para cumplir este objetivo general, en primer lugar, se revisará el concepto de intencionalidad, a la luz del distanciamiento que toma nuestro autor respecto del padre de la fenomenología Edmund Husserl (1859-1938). Esto servirá como suelo de sentido para nuestro segunda labor, a saber: revisar y analizar la íntima relación entre la reformulación de la intencionalidad, la preeminencia ontológica del cogito pre-reflexivo y la constitución de lo imaginario. Es importante realizar este paso, pues, como se verá, resulta fundamental para el devenir de la filosofía sartriana. De este modo, podremos acercarnos a nuestro tercer objetivo, sostener y profundizar nuestro análisis hacia la tesis más radical en el pensamiento de Jean-Paul Sartre, a saber: la absoluta libertad de una conciencia existente. Finalmente, proponemos una sintética revisión a los preceptos principales de la fenomenología existencial sartriana, destacando sus nexos con los conceptos abordados a lo largo de la investigación. Es decir, revisaremos la relación entre lo que Jean-Paul Sartre denomina pour-soi, en-soi y néantisation.


Author(s):  
Hanne Jacobs

Phenomenology is an approach to consciousness that originates at the beginning of the twentieth century in the work of Edmund Husserl. A phenomenological account of consciousness begins from a first-person reflection on consciousness that puts out of play our everyday or natural-scientific preconceptions about consciousness and the world and describes the structural features of our consciousness of the world. This project is carried on in the phenomenological works of authors such as Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, albeit with sometimes quite different emphases and aims. Insofar as phenomenology describes the structures of consciousness by virtue of which there is a world for us, phenomenology is a form of transcendental philosophy. Specifically, phenomenologists describe how the structures of intentionality, self-awareness, temporality, attention, embodiment, and intersubjectivity make possible our consciousness of worldly things, situations, and events. According to them, the world is not just an objective nature comprised of spatiotemporally extended and causally connected things; it is also always an intersubjectively accessible world that is shot through with values and organized in light of practical projects, due to which the world appears with a significance that is variable across time and space. Husserl maintains that phenomenological descriptions of the essential structures of consciousness that make possible the experience and knowledge of the world—that is, of transcendental consciousness—can also be taken as psychological descriptions of consciousness conceived as a natural event in the world. In this way, a number of contemporary philosophers draw on specific descriptive insights from the phenomenological tradition to address issues in contemporary philosophy of mind and drive the empirical investigation of consciousness forward (such as Gallagher and Schmicking 2010; Dahlstrom et al. 2015; Petitot et al. 1999; Thompson 2007; Zahavi and Gallagher 2012; Zahavi 2012). Alternatively, both Sartre and Merleau-Ponty explicitly draw on insights from psychology and psychopathology to inform their phenomenology of consciousness, which is a strategy that has also been employed by some contemporary phenomenologists (see Zahavi 2000).


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-206
Author(s):  
Joseph Rivera

Abstract The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) To show the basic contours of transcendental subjectivity in the later work of Edmund Husserl, especially the Cartesian Meditations and the Crisis, and in the strictly phenomenological work of Michel Henry, especially Material Phenomenology; (2) to highlight Henry’s radical critique of Husserlian intersubjectivity and show that such critique, while valuable in its intention, is ultimately misguided because it neglects the important contribution Husserl’s complicated vocabulary of lifeworld makes to the study of intersubjectivity; and (3) to point toward a phenomenological conception of intersubjective practice we may call the realm of we-synthesis that prioritizes the first-person perspective rooted in empathy, which enables meaningful engagement with the second-person perspective. Working in conjunction with Husserl and Henry on the phenomenological conception of shared life enables the recuperation of the fragile line between subjectivity and intersubjectivity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riska Puspitasari Ningrum ◽  
Moses Glorino Rumambo Pandin

The book "Metode Penelitian Fenomenologi" was written to provide knowledge to readers about phenomenological research methods. Phenomenological research itself is conducted by looking at the phenomena that exist around us with the aim of digging awareness in each individual. Usually, this researcher is conducted by conducting interviews with participants. Some of the figures who used this approach in his research were Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, Jean Paul Sartre, Mauriche Marleau-Pounty, Jaques Derrida, Alfred Schutz, Peter Berger and Luckmann. The figures use phenomenological research because they can decipher or obtain clear information from a phenomenon. In addition, it also explains what stages need to be carried out in phenomenological research. The author hopes that with this book, the readers can use it as a guideline in doing real research so that they can get maximum results. For readers who want to know more about phenomenological research methods, it is highly recommended to read this book because this book contains a lot of information about phenomenological research, such as the theory used by the figures, phenomenological methodology, and what steps can be done in conducting research using this approach so that it can increase the reader's knowledge about phenomenological research that will be used in the future.Research using phenomenological methods is not easy because, basically, phenomenology is an indisputable basis of thinking. In this research, science can be scientifically proven by using qualitative phenomenological research. Using qualitative phenomenological research, researchers created a list of questions that became important factors for expressing the feelings and experiences of an informant. So by preparing some questions, researchers will get a lot of information obtained directly from each individual. In qualitative research, logic also plays an important role. Therefore, a researcher must understand what the meaning of facts, concepts, principles, laws, hypotheses, and theories is to facilitate researchers in conducting qualitative research.The book discusses photometric research methods in detail and clearly packaged in several parts. With the book, we become aware of the phenomenological approach in the study of philosophy with science. The book also explains what steps to take before doing research until after doing research. With the book, we become aware of how to do good research in order to obtain the results we expect.


Phainomenon ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-67
Author(s):  
Delia Popa

Abstract This paper explores the role of appearance in Husserl’s theory of knowledge, stressing its importance and its necessity. Far from being an accident that clarity, evidence or reality can evacuate, appearance is constitutive of our experience and of our approach of its grounding principles. In the light of this idea of appearance, the contingent aspects of our lived experience become an expression of the sense-formation process supporting and transforming it. This paper is a contribution to a larger discussion – including, among others, Eugen Fink, Michel Henry and Jean-Paul Sartre – about the relationship between phenomenology and ontology, about the nature of our knowledge and our experience of freedom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document