scholarly journals Ideal Execution of Civil, Cases Based on Principles of Justice to create a Simple and Low-cost Judiciary

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
Irma Garwan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
Discovery Method ◽  
The Ideal

Execution of civil case decision at the normative and implementative levels often causes juridical, sociological, and philosophical problems. The juridical problems may arise since the norms that regulate execution are often too short, simple, and not detailed; this could also cause problems at the implementative level. On top of that, the problems may be caused by a non-executable legally-binding decision (inkracht van gewijs de zaak). The objectives of the study are to investigate the ideal implementation of execution for the winning party to be in accordance with the provisions in Article 2 para. (4) and Article 4 para. (2) of Law No. 48/2009 concerning Judicial Power. The study employs a juridical, normative, and historical approach, as well as an in-concreto law discovery method. The study involved secondary data acquired from the review of relevant legal literatures. The data were analyzed and presented qualitatively. The results reveal that the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost judiciary is actualized if, in practice, the District Court Chief does not have to wait for the High Court Chief’s approval. Therefore, the Supreme Court shall prepare personnel (who have been appointed as Civil Servants) as the instruments to carry out the execution of legally-binding decisions.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Surat yang Tidak Dapat Dicocokkan dengan Aslinya dalam Perkara Perdata

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-352
Author(s):  
Devina Puspita Sari
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
District Court ◽  
Witness Testimony ◽  
High Court ◽  
Original Letter ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Opposing Party ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence

The photocopy acceptable in the court if it matched with the original letter and the strength of that photocopy is the same as the original letter. However, sometimes the original letter has been lost so that it cannot be shown at trial. This paper discusses whether a photocopy that cannot be matched with the original letter can be accepted in the civil procedural law and if it can be accepted how the strength of it, then the discussion will look at the judge’s consideration in two cases related to the issue. The results of discussions are that photocopies that cannot be matched with the original letter can be accepted as evidence if the photocopy matches or is strengthened with other evidence, as the jurisprudence of Decision Nr. 112 K/Pdt/1996 and Decision Nr. 410 K/pdt/2004. The jurisprudence has been followed by similar cases, which is the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Nr. 164/Pdt.G/2004/PN.Jkt.Pst jo. Decision of The Jakarta High Court Nr. 234/Pdt/2005/PT.DKI jo. Decision of The Supreme Court Nr. 1498 K/Pdt/2006 which in this case a photocopy can be accepted because it is strengthened by the recognition of the opposing party and The Pontianak District Court Nr.52/Pdt.G/2003/PN.Ptk which received a photocopy because it was strengthened with  witness testimony. The photocopy has a free power of proof (depends on the judge’s assessment). The use and assessment of the strength of the photocopy cannot be independent, but must be linked to other valid evidence. Abstrak Fotokopi surat dapat diterima dalam persidangan apabila dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya, dan kekuatan pembuktiannya sama seperti surat aslinya. Tulisan ini membahas, dalam hal surat aslinya tidak dapat ditunjukkan di persidangan, apakah fotokopi surat dapat diterima dalam pembuktian hukum acara perdata, dan, apabila dapat diterima, bagaimanakah kekuatan pembuktiannya. Artikel ini menunjukkan, fotokopi surat yang tidak dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya dapat diterima sebagai alat bukti surat jika bersesuaian atau dikuatkan dengan alat bukti lain, sebagaimana Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 112 K/Pdt/1996 dan Putusan Nomor 410 K/pdt/2004 yang telah menjadi yurisprudensi. Yurisprudensi ini telah diikuti dalam perkara serupa, yaitu dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 164/Pdt.G/2004/PN.Jkt.Pst jo. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 234/Pdt/2005/PT.DKI jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1498 K/Pdt/2006, di mana dalam perkara ini fotokopi surat dapat diterima karena dikuatkan dengan pengakuan pihak lawan. Demikian juga dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak Nomor 52/Pdt.G/2003/PN.Ptk, yang menerima fotokopi surat yang tidak dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya karena dikuatkan dengan alat bukti keterangan saksi. Dengan demikian, fotokopi surat memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang bebas, artinya diserahkan kepada penilaian hakim. Penggunaan dan penilaian kekuatan pembuktian fotokopi tersebut tidak dapat berdiri sendiri, tetapi harus dikaitkan dengan alat bukti lainnya yang sah.  

scholarly journals Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu dalam rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Iwan Rois ◽  
Ratna Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
District Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Provincial Level ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
General Elections

This study aims to analyze the need to establish a special election court which has the authority to solve various election law cases in order to realize elections with integrity; and analyzing the formulation of election special justice in order to realize the integrity of the election. The research method used is the method of normative legal research and the implementation of this research collects data from various sources in order to get an answer to the issues that have been formulated. The results of the study shows that  the purpose of the need for the formation of special judicial elections; First, to meet the growing demands of increasingly complex justice in society and more election law enforcement so as to realize the integrity of the elections; Second, To handle the election law cases quickly and simply so as to obey the integrity of the election. Formulation; First, the election special justice to be able to work quickly and simply in handling election law cases, domiciled at the central and provincial level, then entering the District Court or the High Court; Secondly, the Guidelines for the election special judicial law shall be based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2017 on Procedures for the Settlement of Administrative Offenses of the General Elections in the Supreme Court. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlunya membentuk peradilan khusus pemilu yang mempunyai kewenangan menyelesaikan berbagai perkara hukum pemilu agar terwujud pemilu yang berintegritas; dan menganalisis formulasi pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu dalam rangka mewujudkan integritas pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pelaksanaan dari penelitian ini mengumpulkan bahan hukum dari berbagai sumber guna mendapatkan suatu jawaban atas pokok-pokok permasalahan yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan perlunya pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu; Pertama, Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perkembangan akan keadilan yang semakin kompleks dalam masyarakat dan lebih penegakan hukum pemilu sehingga mewujudkan integritas pemilu; Kedua, Untuk menangani perkara hukum pemilu dengan cepat dan sederhana sehingga mewudkan integritas pemilu. Formulasi; Pertama, Peradilan khusus pemilu agar bisa bekerja cepat dan sederhana dalam menangani perkara hukum pemilu, berkedudukan di tingkat pusat dan provinsi, selanjutnya masuk pada Pengadilan Negeri atau Pengadilan Tinggi; Kedua, Pedoman beracara pada peradilan khusus pemilu berdasarkan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum Di Mahkamah Agung.

scholarly journals CONSIDERATION OF THE MATARAM RELIGION JUDGES IN DETERMINING THE LEVEL OF MUT'AH AND NAFKAH IDDAH IN DIVORCE (TALAK) CASE, (Case Analysis No. 0041/Pdt.G/2018/Pta.Mtr and No. 0081/Pdt.G/2018/Pta.Mtr)

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-120
Author(s):  
Samsudin Samsudin
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Judges' considerations often do not provide satisfaction and do not provide a sense of justice to the parties. The decision of the judge of the Religious High Court is considered the final place, although it can submit an appeal to the Supreme Court which is the highest institution in the area of ​​the religious court, so the researcher raises this title and formulates the problem that is the direction of the research. This study aims to find out how the judge's judgment and whether the judges of the Mataram High Court in determining the level of mut’ah and livelihood in the divorce case have fulfilled the principles of justice, usefulness, and legal certainty. The type of research used is qualitative research. Data collection techniques use study decisions, documentation, and interviews. In addition, the data obtained are informants' information, documentation, and are not numbers. Based on the results of the study, the results obtained are as follows: 1) The consideration of the judges of the Mataram High Court in determining mut’ah levels and iddah livelihoods on divorce cases is observing from work, income, wife who is not incoherent and also to the old wife accompany her husband in fostering a family. 2) whereas regarding the decision of the judges of the Mataram High Court in determining the level of mut’ah and livelihood of the iddah in divorce cases the principles of justice and legal usefulness has not yet been fulfilled, the judge is more focused on the principle of legal certainty and the fulfillment of rights and obligations. However, the amount determined is not in accordance with the sense of justice and certainly will not be fulfilled. In its decision, the judge saw the Law, Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), Islamic Sharia (Al-Qur'an and Hadith), Perma Number 03 of 2017, and Circular of the Supreme Court of Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2017.

scholarly journals Legal Efforts for Notary Who Becomes a Defendant in Civil Cases Regarding the Deed He/She Made

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 576
Author(s):  
Frana Busrizal ◽  
Yuslim Yuslim ◽  
Khairani Khairani
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Formal Proof ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Written Form ◽  
Civil Sector ◽  
Made In

In Indonesia, a notary is one of the positions that provides services to the public in the inclusion of their wishes in written form. However, in reality, the role of the notary, in providing services in the civil sector, also often places them as a defendant or co-defendant in a case between the parties to the dispute. Thus, it raises the presumption that the notary is a party to the deed. The formulation of the problems in this study include: a) How is the legal effort for the notary who became a defendant in a civil case related to the deed he/she made? b) How is the strength of proof on the deed that the notary made? c) What efforts have been made by the notary to defend the deed he made? This study applies a sociological juridical approach. In addition, this study uses primary and secondary data in which they are analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that: 1) In the case of a notary who is also a defendant in a civil case, the provisions of Article 66 of the Law of Notary Position do not apply to him/her. So, in order to protect themselves and their positions in court, the notary may make several legal efforts. The first, before the verification phase in the court, is to make a claim of reconciliation. The second, after the decision of the panel of judges, is to make an ordinary legal effort; i.e. appeal to the High Court, appeal to the Supreme Court and review. Then, the effort of the resistance law (verzet) was carried out on the decision of the verstek. 2) The strength of proof of the notarial deed is divided into 3 (three) types, i.e. the strength of outward proof, the strength of formal proof, the strength of material proof. 3) Efforts made by the notary to defend the deed that he/she made are divided into 2 (two) types: first is before a lawsuit takes place in the court and second after a claim is made in court.

scholarly journals REMODELLING AND REPOSITIONING OF COURT’S MEDIATION IN INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Benny Riyanto
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Ideal Model ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Court ◽  
Legal Factor ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Ideal

This article is intended to explain the failure of the use of mediation in Indonesia, particularly mediation which is integrated with the court (court connected mediation). The focus of the problem in this study is about the ideal model of court connected mediation as a strategy to achieve the hope of strengthening and to maximize the function of judiciary institutions in resolving dispute in Indonesia. A method of socio-legal research is used to reveal things that make mediation has not worked effectively in resolving civil case in court. This study resulted that the practice of mediation in civil court is very limited, especially dealing with a model applied by mediators, so it is not always appropriate to the situation faced by the parties in disputes. Moreover, although the Supreme Court Regulation allows co-mediation, in practice, it is never implemented. Even court connected mediation has become part of the dispute because it has been registered and published to public. So that it becomes a non-legal factor that influence the parties to reach agreement.  Keywords : mediation, mediator, civil case, model, court.

Singapore

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire van Overdijk ◽  
Terence Seah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
State Courts ◽  
District Court ◽  
District Courts ◽  
Court Order ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Singapore is a common law country. Judicial power is vested in the Supreme Court (High Court and Court of Appeal) and the State Courts (District Courts and Magistrates’ Courts). Pursuant to the Supreme Court of Judicature (Transfer of Mental Capacity Proceedings to District Court) Order 2010, proceedings under the Mental Capacity Act (cap 177A, 2010 Rev Ed) (‘MCA’) are now first heard by the District Court.

scholarly journals THE PROBLEMATICS OF EXECUTION LAW AGAINST NON-EXECUTABLE JUDGMENTS AND COMPARISONS WITH MALAYSIAN LAW

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono ◽  
Ghansham Anand
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Laws

<p>In public courts, the litigation of civil case is under civil law procedure. This is a legal regulation to maintain material civil laws. The procedural law is also a way to file a particular civil case to civil court and to organize judges’ ways in making judgment toward legal subject. Civil law procedure prevents any vigilante actions that creates public legal order. Judiciaries provide protection for legal subject in preserving their rights and prevent any arbitrary actions. After case investigation process set under procedural law, a court judgment is made to judge and solve case. Legal actions are subsequently conducted to reach fixed legal judgment (inkracht van gewijsde). Some executions for civil cases in Indonesia is suspended since the object is different from reality or non-executable. Furthermore, civil case judgment is sometimes contradictory to criminal cases, although the objects are similar. Either litigant and/or defendant files request to the Supreme Court to have a legal protection or the chairman of district court requests for an instruction from the Supreme Court, may suspend court judgment. Therefore, the implementation of court judgments with legal power is still undeniably problematic. If the execution is suspended or not allowed, it may disadvantage “the justice seekers”; public society. The suspended or non-executable judgment should be immediately addressed on its implementation, instead of its law.</p><p><br />Di pengadilan umum, proses kasus perdata berada dalam prosedur hukum perdata. Ini adalah peraturan hukum untuk mempertahankan hukum sipil material. Undang-Undang prosedural ialah cara mengajukan kasus perdata ke pengadilan sipil dan mengatur cara hakim memutuskan subjek hukum. Prosedur hukum perdata bertujuan mencegah tindakan hakim-sendiri sehingga tercipta tatanan hukum publik. Peradilan memberikan perlindungan bagi subjek hukum dalam melestarikan haknya dan mencegah kesewenang-wenangan. Setelah proses penyelidikan kasus sebagaimana diatur dalam hukum prosedural, putusan pengadilan dibuat untuk menilai dan memecahkan kasus. Tindakan hukum selanjutnya dilakukan hingga mendapat keputusan hukum tetap (inkracht van gewijsde). Beberapa putusan kasus perdata Indonesia ditangguhkan karena objek berbeda dari kenyataan atau tidak dapat dieksekusi. Selanjutnya, putusan kasus perdata terkadang bertentangan dengan kasus pidana, meskipun objeknya sama. Baik penggugat dan/atau terdakwa mengajukan permintaan ke Mahkamah Agung untuk memiliki perlindungan hukum atau ketua dari pengadilan distrik meminta instruksi dari Mahkamah Agung, bisa menangguhkan keputusan pengadilan. Karenanya, pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan dengan kekuatan hukum masih bermasalah. Jika eksekusi ditangguhkan atau tidak diizinkan, tentu dapat merugikan “para pencari keadilan”; masyarakat umum. Putusan yang ditangguhkan atau tidak dapat dieksekusi harus segera ditangani pada pelaksanaannya, bukan hukumnya.</p>

scholarly journals Determination Of Legal Remedies For Civil Cases To Make The Principles Of Justice Simple, Fast And Lighting Cost

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Andrianantenaina Fanirintsoa Aime ◽  
Zulfikar Dori Ad’ha
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
The Republic

One of the principles in the justice system is justice that is simple, fast and low cost. In this regard, the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) takes this matter seriously and responds to it by issuing a decree, namely TAP MPR No. VIII/MPR/2000 concerning the Annual Report of High State Institutions at the 2000 Annual Session of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia, which one of its substances recommends that the Supreme Court immediately resolve delinquent cases by increasing the number and quality of decisions and that the Supreme Court makes regulations to limit entry cassation case. With this principle, it is necessary to conduct a study regarding the application of these principles.

scholarly journals Deposit of Compensation in Land Acquisition for the Construction of the Padang-Pekanbaru Toll Road in Public Interest

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Debby Khristina ◽  
Kurnia Warman ◽  
Hengki Andora
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Toll Road ◽  
The Supreme Court

Deposit of compensation at the Court which is carried out in land acquisition for the public interest is one of the solutions to accelerate the development process. The disagreement of the parties regarding compensation has made the agency managing the project use a consignment mechanism to solve this compensation problem. Therefore, this research is focused on 3 (three) main problems. First, what is the process of assessing and determining compensation for land acquisition for the construction of the Padang-Pekanbaru toll road on Jalan Padang-Sicincin? Second, what is the process of filing an objection to the determination of the form and / or amount of compensation at the Pariaman District Court? Third, how is the implementation of deposit for compensation in land acquisition for the construction of the Padang-Pekanbaru toll road on the Padang-Sicincin road? This type of research is empirical juridical legal research and to answer the above problems, this study uses primary data and secondary data. Primary data is obtained through field research, while secondary data is obtained from tracing laws and regulations and decisions of Constitutional Court judges. The data analysis was conducted in a descriptive qualitative manner. The results showed that the process of appraising and determining compensation for land acquisition was carried out starting from the process of appointing the appraisal team, the assessment of compensation by the appraisal team, deliberation, and the process of determining the compensation. The appointment of an appraisal team is determined by the Chief Executive of Land Acquisition using the direct procurement method. The appraiser makes an appraisal using the Fair Replacement Value and refers to the SPI 306 Technical Guidelines. The results of the appraisal are used as the basis for deliberations to determine compensation. The fact is that the deliberations are carried out as it should be, but the price set by the Appraiser (Appraisal) is as if only a final price that must be agreed upon by the entitled Party, even though the price recommended by the Appraisal is a price that is the price for negotiating with the community land owner. The process for filing an objection to the determination of the form and / or amount of compensation at the Pariaman District Court is in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation No.3 of 2016 and is a form of legal protection for land rights owners. The implementation of land’s deposit compensation at the Pariaman District Court is carried out in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2016 and in the Compensation of the Damages awaits a court process that has permanent legal force so that the money can be given to the party entitled to receive it

The Maine Rx Prescription Drug Plan and the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine: The Case of the Missing Link[age]

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-30
Author(s):  
Brannon P. Denning
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Prescription Drugs ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Pharmaceutical Research ◽  
Federal District ◽  
District Court ◽  
Commerce Clause ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Prescription Drug Plan ◽  
Drug Sellers

In the 2002 Term, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) v. Concannon, in which PhRMA, the plaintiff-appellant, will argue that the State of Maine's program to supply low-cost prescription drugs to its citizens (the Maine Rx Program) violates the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine. After the Program became law in 2000, PhRMA sought and obtained an injunction from a federal district court preventing the law from going into effect. Shortly thereafter, the First Circuit unanimously reversed the district court and lifted the injunction. In June 2002, the Supreme Court granted certiorari.This Article argues that the Maine Rx Program violates the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine because it links a facially nondiscriminatory tax with a subsidy in a way that, in combination, burdens out-of-state drug sellers. The Supreme Court has found similar programs to be invalid in past cases, most recently in the 1994 case West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document