scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Clinical Manifestations of Chikungunya Virus Disease in Bangladesh

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-77
Author(s):  
Farha Musharrat Noor ◽  
Md Belal Hossain ◽  
Quazi Tarikul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Joint Pain ◽  
Chikungunya Virus ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acute Stage ◽  
P Value ◽  
Subacute Stage ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Co Morbidity

Background: Chikungunya is known as a mosquito-borne viral disease. It is transmitted to the human body by infected mosquitoes and caused different symptoms. The main aim of this study was to investigate the percentage of Chikungunya virus disease (CHIKV) patients who would had different clinical features at the acute or sub-acute stage of this disease in Bangladesh. Methodology: In this meta-analysis, PubMed Central and BanglaJOL had been searched. Total 8 eligible studies had been selected for quantitative analysis. The pooled prevalence (PP) was used as effect measure to find the number of patients who would had different symptoms at acute or subacute stage of CHIKV disease. The pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) had been calculated using random effects model. To measure the presence of heterogeneity Cochran chi-square test was used and I2 was used to quantify the heterogeneity. Result: This meta-analysis indicated significant association between CHIKV disease patients and fever was [PP: 0.99; p-value = 0.00], joint pain [PP: 0.95, p-value = 0.00], rash [PP: 0.55, p-value = 0.00], joint swelling [PP: 0.38, p-value = 0.001], headache [PP: 0.48, p-value = 0.007], pruritus [PP: 0.37, p-value = 0.001], myalgia [PP: 0.62, p-value = 0.00], co-morbidity [PP: 0.56, p-value = 0.001] at the acute stage of the disease and joint pain persists > 1 month [PP: 0.50, p-value = 0.001] at the subacute stage of this disease. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis ever, joint pain were found as most frequently occurred symptoms at the acute stage of CHIKV disease. Bangladesh J Medicine July 2019; 30(2) : 71-77

scholarly journals Association between birth interval and wasting in children under 5 years of age in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e037976
Author(s):  
Mesfin Wudu Kassaw ◽  
Ayele Mamo Abebe ◽  
Biruk Beletew Abate ◽  
Ayelign Mengesha Kassie ◽  
Murat Açık
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Interval ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Geographical Area ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Joint Estimation ◽  
Hard Copy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Debre Berhan

IntroductionAccording to the UNICEF, WHO and World Bank joint estimation, 1 in every 13 children suffered from wasting globally. The highest burden of undernutrition recorded in Asia and Africa. Wasting remains a considerable public health problem in Ethiopia despite the introduction of exhaustive nutritional programmes. As reported in the literature, the prevalence of wasting in Ethiopia has remained high over the last four decades. In Ethiopia, more than one-third of child deaths are associated with malnutrition. The current nutritional interventions implemented in Ethiopia need to be evidence based. For this purpose, systematic review is preferable as it can present a more reliable and precise estimate than individual studies. The aim of this review is to assess the pooled prevalence of wasting and its association with birth interval in Ethiopia.MethodologyStudies published after 20 January 2012 will be retrieved from databases, mainly PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL and HINARI. The articles retrieved from databases will be selected after reading the title, abstract and full text. Three reviewers will independently assess the quality of each study using both the Joanna Briggs Institute and Ottawa Scale critical appraisal checklists. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist will be used to maintain scientific strength. Funnel plots, Egger’s test and Begg’s test will be used to deal with publication bias, and I2, forest plots and Cochrane’s Q square statistics will be used for heterogeneity. Potential causes of heterogeneity will be explored through sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Because heterogeneity among studies is inevitable, given the wide geographical area and variety of study designs, the Der-Simonian and Laird random-effects model will be used. The presence of a statistical association between birth interval and wasting will be declared if the p value is <0.05 with the 95% CI.Ethics and disseminationEthical issues will not be applicable to this review and meta-analysis. This review and meta-analysis will report the pooled prevalence of wasting and its association with birth interval in Ethiopia. Effort will be made to publish the findings in a peer-reviewed journal such as the Ethiopian Journal of Health and Development, and the findings will be presented at national conferences. A hard copy will also be sent to Woldia University and Debre Berhan University.

scholarly journals Sitagliptin and Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Hyder Osman Mirghani ◽  
Salem Ahmed S. Shaman S. Shaman ◽  
Ibrahim Mahmoud Hussain Aljwah
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Peptidase Inhibitor ◽  
Relationship Of

Background and Objectives: Sitagliptin is a dipepidyl peptidase inhibitor (DPP-4i) with gentle antidiabetic effects with a lower risk of hypoglycemia. The association with acute pancreatitis is controversial. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the relationship of sitagliptin and acute pancreatitis. Methods: The literature in PubMed and Google Scholar was searched for relevant articles published in the last ten years up to September 2021. The keywords sitagliptins, DPP-4i, acute pancreatitis were used with the protean AND or OR. Among the 204 articles retrieved, 24 full-texts were assessed for eligibility and only five studies (Three from the USA, one from Asia, and one from Canada) met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The author name, year of publication, country, type of study, number of patients, and the duration of the study were reported. Results: There were five studies. The total number of patients were 729808 with 6459 events. The studies showed no increased rate of acute pancreatitis following sitagliptin use, odd ratio, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.29-2.15, a significant heterogeneity was observer, I2 for heterogeneity=98%, P-value, <001, the P-value for overall effect was 0.65 and the chi-square, 160.15. Interpretation and Conclusion: Sitagliptin use is not associated with acute pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Prevalence and risks of severe events for cancer patients with COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Su ◽  
Jie-xuan Hu ◽  
Hai-shan Lin ◽  
Zheng Zhang ◽  
Emily C. Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Total Prevalence ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Foundation Program ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics ◽  
Prevalence Of Cancer

SummaryBackgroundThe corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a severe challenge to public health, especially to those patients with underlying diseases. In this meta-analysis, we studied the prevalence of cancer among patients with COVID-19 infection and their risks of severe events.MethodsWe searched the Pubmed, Embase and MedRxiv databases for studies between December 2019 and May 3, 2020 using the following key words and terms: sars-cov-2, covid-19, 2019-ncov, 2019 novel coronavirus, corona virus disease-2019, clinical, clinical characteristics, clinical course, epidemiologic features, epidemiology, and epidemiological characteristics. We extracted data following PICO (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome) chart. Statistical analyses were performed with R Studio (version 3.5.1) on the group-level data. We assessed the studies’ risk of bias in accordance to the adjusted Joanna Briggs Institute. We estimated the prevalence or risks for severe events including admission into intensive care unit or death using meta-analysis with random effects.FindingsOut of the 2,551 studies identified, 32 studies comprising 21,248 participants have confirmed COVID-19. The total prevalence of cancer in COVID-19 patients was 3.97% (95% CI, 3.08% to 5.12%), higher than that of the total cancer rate (0.29%) in China. Stratification analysis showed that the overall cancer prevalence of COVID-19 patients in China was 2.59% (95% CI, 1.72% to 3.90%), and the prevalence reached 3.79% in Wuhan (95% CI, 2.51% to 5.70%) and 2.31% (95% CI, 1.16% to 4.57%) in other areas outside Wuhan in China. The incidence of ICU admission in cancer patients with COVID-19 was 26.80% (95% CI, 21.65% to 32.67%) and the mortality was 24.32% (95% CI, 13.95% to 38.91%), much higher than the overall rates of COVID-19 patients in China. The fatality in COVID patients with cancer was lower than those with cardiovascular disease (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.71; p=0.39), but comparable with other comorbidities such as diabetes (OR 1.32; 95% CI, 0.42 to 4.11; p=0.19), hypertension (OR 1.27; 95% CI, 0.35 to 4.62; p=0.13), and respiratory diseases (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.33; p=0.45).InterpretationThis comprehensive meta-analysis on the largest number of patients to date provides solid evidence that COVID-19 infection significantly and negatively affected the disease course and prognosis of cancer patients. Awareness of this could help guide clinicians and health policy makers in combating cancer in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.FundingBeijing Natural Science Foundation Program and Scientific Research Key Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KZ202010025047).

scholarly journals Undernutrition and its determinants among Ethiopian adolescent girls: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e026718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wubet Worku Takele ◽  
Achenef Asmamaw Muche ◽  
Zeleke Abebaw Mekonnen ◽  
Yehualashet Fikadu Ambaw ◽  
Fasil Wagnew
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adolescent Girls ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Trim And Fill ◽  
Meta Analyses

IntroductionIn Ethiopia, undernutrition is the common public health concern, swaying the lives of lots of adolescent girls. Its sequelae are not only limited to them, but rather their upcoming offspring are vulnerable too. Even though some studies have been carried out in different parts of the country, the national pooled prevalence and determinants of undernutrition are not known. Therefore, this study is aimed at determining the pooled prevalence and determinants of undernutrition among adolescent girls in Ethiopia.MethodsPublished articles will be retrieved from databases such as Medline and PubMed. Electronic search engines such as Google Scholar and Google will be used. To identify eligible studies, the Joanna Briggs Institute quality appraisal checklists prepared for different study designs will be used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist will be used to maintain the scientific robustness of the study. The presence of heterogeneity among studies will be examined by forest plot as well as I2heterogeneity test. Potential causes of heterogeneity will be explored by carrying out sensitivity and subgroup analyses. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model will be used provided that heterogeneity is observed. Publication bias will be examined by observing funnel plots, and objectively by Egger’s regression test. If the funnel plot is asymmetric and/or Egger’s test was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05), the trim and fill (Duval and Tweedie’s) analysis will be performed. The presence of a statistical association between independent and dependent variables will be declared if the p value is <0.05 with the 95% CI.Ethics and disseminationSince this is a systematic review and meta-analysis, ethical clearance will not be a concern. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed reputable journal and presented at different scientific research conferences.Trial registration numberCRD42018106180.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Preterm Birth in Pakistan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asif Hanif ◽  
Tahira Ashraf ◽  
Khadija Waheed ◽  
Mirza Rizwan Sajid ◽  
Nesrin Guler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Fixed Effect ◽  
P Value ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Effect Model ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Effect Heterogeneity

Abstract Objective:  This study is designed to systematically review the prevalence of preterm birth from previously published studies of Pakistan and to find pooled prevalence from available local data. Methodology:  Targeted literature was searched with specific key words such as “preterm birth, prematurity, prevalence and mortality in preterm birth in Pakistan”. Studies with copyright and/or permission issues were excluded. A total of 300 studies were found initially that were somewhat related to the topic, after careful screening only 5 studies met inclusion criteria for cur-rent study. To test the null hypothesis for all studies evaluating effect Cochran's Q was used and P-values with a level of significance of 5%were considered significant. Results:  The pooled prevalence of Preterm Birth was found to be 18.89% using fixed effect, 16.81% using random effect and 18.89% using fixed effect heterogeneity. I-squared for each effect model was > 75%. On applying Chi2 test we obtained significant p-value i.e. p-value < 0.01. Conclusion:  Through this meta-analysis we found one of the highest pooled prevalence of preterm birth in Pakistan. Reducing preterm birth can result in improvement of overall neonatal health and significantly reduce neonatal mortality in future.

scholarly journals The current global perspective of the knowledge-attitude-behavior of the general public towards the corona virus disease -19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis on 67,143 participants

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0260240
Author(s):  
Abdulhadi A. AlAmodi ◽  
Khaled Al-Kattan ◽  
Mohammad Abrar Shareef
Keyword(s):  
General Public ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
P Value ◽  
Selective Reporting ◽  
Public Knowledge ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
And Behaviors

Background Determining the success of infectious disease outbreak prevention is dependent mainly on public knowledge and compliance regarding the guidelines of precautionary behaviors and practices. While the current literature about the COVID-19 pandemic extensively addresses clinical and laboratory-based studies, a gap remains still present in terms of evaluating the general public knowledge and behaviors towards the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this review was to form a preliminary and contemporary understanding of the general public knowledge, attitude, and behaviors towards the COVID-19 pandemic globally. Methods A systematic search was conducted in various databases until May 2020. Each study’s characteristics including the sample size, region, and study type were examined individually. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model and pooled prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of all evaluated outcomes such as adequate knowledge, positive feelings, worrisome about the COVID-19 pandemic, and practice were recorded and reported from each study. Parameters such as random distribution, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases were utilized to assess the quality of each retrieved record. Both Begg’s and Egger’s tests were employed to evaluate symmetry of funnel plots for assessment of publication bias. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro software. Results A total of 26 studies with 67,143 participants were analyzed. The overall prevalence of knowledge, positive attitude, worrisome, and practice of precautionary measures were 0.87 (95%CI, 0.84–0.89), 0.85 (95%CI, 0.77–0.92), 0.71 (95%CI, 0.61–0.81), and 0.77 (95%CI, 0.70–0.83), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that social distancing was less practiced in Africa than other regions (p = 0.02), while knowledge of prevention of COVID-19 was reported higher in Asia (p = 0.001). Furthermore, people in developing countries had a higher prevalence of worrisome towards the COVID-19 pandemic with a p-value of less than 0.001. The quality of evidence was noted to be of low certainty in practice domain but moderate in the remaining outcomes. Conclusion Assessing the public’s risk perception and precautionary behaviors is essential in directing future policy and health population research regarding infection control and preventing new airborne disease outbreaks.

scholarly journals Clinical Manifestation and Maternal Complications and Neonatal outcomes in Pregnant Women with COVID 19: An Update a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzieh Soheili ◽  
Ghobad Moradi ◽  
Hamid Reza Baradaran ◽  
Maryam Soheili ◽  
Yousef Moradi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
English Language ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Maternal Complications ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Co Morbidity

Abstract Background Existing evidence indicates that the risk of obstetric and perinatal outcomes is higher in women with coronavirus infection. outbreaks suggest that pregnant women and their fetuses are particularly susceptible to poor outcomes. However, there is little known about pregnancy related complications and co-morbidity in this group of women. Therefore, this, systematic review and meta-analysis performed in order to find out whether COVID-19 may cause different manifestations and outcomes in antepartum and postpartum period or not.Methods We searched databases, including Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of sciences, Cochrane library, Ovid and CINHAL to retrieve all articles reporting the prevalence of maternal and neonatal complications, in addition clinical manifestations, in pregnant women with COVID 19 that published with English language from January to April 2020. Results 11 studies with total 177 pregnant women included in this systematic review.Results show that the pooled prevalence of neonatal mortality, lower birth weight, stillbirth, premature birth, and intrauterine fetal distress in women with COVID 19 were 4% (95% Cl: 1 - 9%), 21% (95% Cl: 11 – 31%), 2% (95% Cl: 1 - 6%), 28% (95% Cl: 12 - 44%), and 15% (95% Cl: 4 - 26%); respectively. Also the pooled prevalence of fever, cough, diarrhea and dyspnea were 56% (95% Cl: 30 - 83%), 30% (95% Cl: 21 - 39%), 9% (95% Cl: 2 - 16%), and 3% (95% Cl: 1 - 6%) in the pregnant women with COVID-19.Conclusion According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, the pregnant women with COVID-19 with or without pneumonia, are at a higher risk of pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, miscarriage and cesarean delivery. Furthermore, the risk of LBW and intrauterine fetal distress seems increased in neonates.

scholarly journals Time to negative PCR in various disease categories of COVID-19 infection in Pakistani population

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaleem Ullah Toori ◽  
Asma Chaudhry ◽  
Muhammad Arsalan Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Disease Severity ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
World Health ◽  
P Value ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pakistani Population ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics

Objectives: To identify association of epidemiological characteristics, presence of underlying pre-morbidities and disease severity with time to first negative PCR in Corona virus disease 2019. Methods: Total 842 Corona Virus Real Time Polymerase-Chain-Reaction positive patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Patients were admitted to Department of Medicine at KRL Hospital Islamabad from April to August 2020. Age, gender, symptoms, pre-morbidities and disease severity were recorded. Outcome (recovered versus died) was documented. World Health Organization categories to classify disease severity (asymptomatic, mild, moderate and severe) were used. Time to negative PCR was documented as time between first positive PCR to first negative PCR. Results: The mean age of patients was 39.04 ± 11.32 years with 99.8% being males. Majority of patients (78.4%) were asymptomatic. Amongst symptoms, fever was the most common symptom. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension were the most commonly recorded co-morbidity. Mean time to negative PCR was 8.8 ± 3.1 days. A large proportion of patients recovered (99.9%). Significant positive correlation (p value < 0.05) was found between age, gender, presence of underlying pre-morbidities and disease severity categories with time to first negative PCR. Conclusion: The underlying epidemiological factors, pre-morbidities and disease severity are associated with time to negative PCR and hence affect frequency of recovery samples. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4476 How to cite this:Toori KU, Chaudhry A, Qureshi MA. Time to negative PCR in various disease categories of COVID-19 infection in Pakistani population. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(1):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4476 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Impaired Diffusion Capacity and Pulmonary Fibrosis after Recovery from COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Hyuk Lee ◽  
Jae-Joon Yim ◽  
Jimyung Park
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Diffusion Capacity ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background: The medium- to long-term pulmonary consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after recovery from acute infection remain unclear. Several studies have examined this issue and reported heterogeneous results. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence of pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19, namely impaired diffusion capacity and pulmonary fibrosis, at least 1 month after the initial infection. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2020, to February 15, 2021 to identify related studies. We also assessed whether the initial severity of infection was associated with impaired diffusion capacity in the recovery phase. Results: Of the 8159 studies identified, 29 met our eligibility criteria. Among these studies, 25 and 20 had data on follow-up pulmonary function testing and chest computed tomography (CT), respectively. Impaired diffusion capacity (<80% of predicted values or lower limit of normal) was the most common pulmonary abnormality (pooled prevalence 34%, 95% CI 27%–41%). When classified according to the severity of index infection, patients with severe COVID-19 were more likely to display impaired diffusion capacity than those with non-severe COVID-19 (pooled odds ratio 2.97, 95% CI 2.10–4.20). On follow-up chest CT, pulmonary fibrosis was found in 26% (95% CI 17%–36%) of the patients. Conclusions: A substantial number of patients recovering from COVID-19 displayed impaired diffusion capacity and pulmonary fibrosis. The severity of index COVID-19 was associated with impaired diffusion capacity, highlighting the importance of respiratory follow-up in patients recovering from severe COVID-19.Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42021234357

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document