prevalence of cancer
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

206
(FIVE YEARS 72)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 3)

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Johan S. Sitanggang ◽  
Kamal B. Siregar ◽  
Henry H. Sitanggang ◽  
Noverita Sprinse Vinolina

Background: Cancer patients are considered susceptible to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) due to an immunosuppressive state. This study determined the prevalence of cancer in COVID-19 patients, severe events, case fatality rate, history of anticancer therapy associated with severe events, and type of cancer in cancer patients with COVID-19 in the world. Methods: This study used a meta-analysis study approach, sourcing studies from various countries related to cancer and COVID-19. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to select studies. A PRISMA flowchart was presented to assess the selection process. Data from inclusion studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4. Results: The prevalence of cancer in COVID-19 patients was 4.63% (95% CI, 3.78-5.49%) worldwide. The lowest prevalence was the Asian study group with 2.36% (95% CI, 1.86-2.87%) and the highest prevalence was the European study group with 10.93% (95% CI, 6.62-15.24%). About 43.26% (95% CI, 34.71-51.80%) of cancer patients with COVID-19 experienced severe events of COVID-19. In total, 58.13% (95% CI, 42.79-73.48%) of cancer patients with COVID-19 who in the last month had a history of anticancer therapy experienced severe events. The prevalence of lung cancer in cancer patients with COVID-19 was 20.23% (95% CI, 7.67-32.78%). Forest plots are also presented related to the results of meta-analysis research. Conclusions: High prevalence of cancer among COVID-19 patients indicates the susceptibility of cancer patients to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cancer in COVID-19 patients and use of anticancer therapy increase severe events of COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S1236
Author(s):  
A. Chidharla ◽  
R. Rabbani ◽  
K. Agarwal ◽  
S. Abdelwahed ◽  
R. Bhandari ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Vikas Pal ◽  
Dheerendra Kumar Sachan ◽  
Akshay Kumar Nigam ◽  
Sumit Gupta ◽  
Ruchita Sachan

Background: Complications due to cancer arise at any stage of treatment. May it be prior, during or after the treatment. Cachexia is one such complication, which is multifactorial and has a debilitating effect. The initial presentation is anorexia, followed by weight loss and then muscle wasting. It is associated with reduced quality of life, lower tolerance to treatments such as chemotherapy and thereby reducing the chances of survival. It is more severe in cancers of non-gastrointestinal tract. In this study we evaluated the prevalence of cancer induced cachexia in non-gastrointestinal tract cancers. Methodology: We had included 203 patients of age more than 18 years of either sex, with histopathologically conrmed cancer of different sites in the body other than gastrointestinal tract, who presented with sudden onset weight loss. Descriptive statistics was used for the assessment of cancer induced cachexia. All the data was presented in the form of numbers and percentages. Results: There was a male predominance (56.7%) with non-gastrointestinal tract cancer. Of these 203 patients, 69% had head and neck cancer, 13.7% had breast cancer, 6.4% had lung cancer, 4.9% had ovarian cancer, 3.9% had cervical cancer and 2.0% patients had lymphoma. 100 Patients with cancer induce cachexia consist of 49.3% of the total number of cases. Lung cancer is the most common cancer after gastrointestinal cancer presented with cachexia. Cachexia highest with lung cancer 46.1%, head and neck cancer 45.7%, carcinoma of ovary 40%, cervical cancer 25.3%, carcinoma of breast 28.5%, and lymphoma presented with 25%. Conclusion: The patients with non-gastrointestinal tract cancer should be made aware that on seeing any untoward changes prior, during or after their treatment, they should immediately seek appropriate support so as to prevent debilitating condition such as cancer induced cachexia. Preventive measures help in improving the quality of life with better treatment outcome.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e048144
Author(s):  
Teresa Marsden ◽  
Derek J Lomas ◽  
Neil McCartan ◽  
Joanna Hadley ◽  
Steve Tuck ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe primary objective of the ReIMAGINE Prostate Cancer Screening Study is to explore the uptake of an invitation to prostate cancer screening using MRI.Methods and analysisThe ReIMAGINE Prostate Cancer Screening Study is a prospective single-centre feasibility study. Eligible men aged 50–75 years with no prior prostate cancer diagnosis or treatment will be identified through general practitioner practices and randomly selected for invitation. Those invited will be offered an MRI scan and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test. The screening MRI scan consists of T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted and research-specific sequences, without the use of intravenous contrast agents. Men who screen positive on either MRI or PSA density will be recommended to have standard of care (National Health Service) tests for prostate cancer assessment, which includes multiparametric MRI. The study will assess the acceptability of an MRI-based prostate screening assessment and the prevalence of cancer detected in MRI-screened men. Summary statistics will be used to explore baseline characteristics in relation to acceptance rates and prevalence of cancer.Ethics and disseminationReIMAGINE Prostate Cancer Screening is a single-site screening study to assess the feasibility of MRI as a screening tool for prostate cancer. Ethical approval was granted by London–Stanmore Research Ethics Committee Heath Research Authority (reference 19/LO/1129). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals after completion of data analysis and used to inform the design of a multicentre screening study in the UK.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04063566).


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Young Choi ◽  
Su-Jin Shin ◽  
Jae Eun Lee ◽  
Lisa Madlensky ◽  
Seung-Tae Lee ◽  
...  

AbstractAlong with early-onset cancers, multiple primary cancers (MPCs) are likely resulting from increased genetic susceptibility; however, the associated predisposition genes or prevalence of the pathogenic variants genes in MPC patients are often unknown. We screened 71 patients with MPC of the stomach, colorectal, and endometrium, sequencing 65 cancer predisposition genes. A subset of 19 patients with early-onset MPC of stomach and colorectum were further evaluated for variants in cancer related genes using both normal and tumor whole exome sequencing. Among 71 patients with MPCs, variants classified to be pathogenic were observed in 15 (21.1%) patients and affected Lynch Syndrome (LS) genes: MLH1 (n = 10), MSH6 (n = 2), PMS2 (n = 2), and MSH2 (n = 1). All carriers had tumors with high microsatellite instability and 13 of them (86.7%) were early-onset, consistent with LS. In 19 patients with early-onset MPCs, loss of function (LoF) variants in RECQL5 were more prevalent in non-LS MPC than in matched sporadic cancer patients (OR = 31.6, 2.73–1700.6, p = 0.001). Additionally, there were high-confidence LoF variants at FANCG and CASP8 in two patients accompanied by somatic loss of heterozygosity in tumor, respectively. The results suggest that genetic screening should be considered for synchronous cancers and metachronous MPCs of the LS tumor spectrum, particularly in early-onset. Susceptibility variants in non-LS genes for MPC patients may exist, but evidence for their role is more elusive than for LS patients.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3514
Author(s):  
Cynthia Filteau ◽  
Arnaud Simeone ◽  
Christine Ravot ◽  
David Dayde ◽  
Claire Falandry

(1) Background: The aging of the population, the increase in the incidence of cancer with age, and effective chronic oncological treatments all lead to an increased prevalence of cancer in nursing homes. The aim of the present study was to map the cultural and ethical barriers associated with the treatment of cancer and educational strategies in this setting. (2) Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted until April 2021 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. All articles assessing continuum of care, paramedical education, and continuing education in the context of older cancer patients in nursing homes were reviewed. (3) Results: A total of 666 articles were analyzed, of which 65 studies were included. Many factors interfering with the decision to investigate and treat, leading to late- or unstaged disease, palliative-oriented care instead of curative, and a higher risk of unjustified transfers to acute care settings, were identified. The educational strategies explored in this context were generally based on training programs. (4) Conclusions: These results will allow the co-construction of educational tools intended to develop knowledge and skills to improve diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, the consistency of care, and, ultimately, the quality of life of older cancer patients in nursing homes.


Author(s):  
Luca Valerio ◽  
Ugo Fedeli ◽  
Elena Schievano ◽  
Francesco Avossa ◽  
Stefano Barco

Background. Despite evidence of ongoing epidemiological changes in deaths from venous thromboembolism in high-income countries, little recent information is available on the time trends in mortality related to PE as underlying or concomitant cause of death in Europe. Methods. We accessed the regional database of death certificates of Veneto Region (Northern Italy, population 4,900,000) from 2008 to 2019. We analysed the trends in crude and age-adjusted annual rates of mortality related to PE (reported either as underlying cause or in any position in the death certificate) using Joinpoint regression; in the contribution of PE to mortality (proportionate mortality); and, using logistic regression, in the association between PE and cancer at death. Results. Between 2008 and 2019, the age-standardized mortality rate related to PE in Veneto decreased from 20.7 to 12.6 annual deaths per 100,000 population for PE in any position of the death certificate, and from 4.6 to 2.2 annual deaths per 100,000 population for PE as underlying cause of death. PE-related proportionate mortality remained up to twice as high in women. The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio for cancer in deaths with (vs. without) PE constantly increased from 1.01 (95% CI 0.88-1.16) in 2008 to 1.58 (95% CI 1.35-1.83) in 2019. Conclusions. The descending trend in PE-related mortality reported for Europe up to 2015 for both sexes continued thereafter in Northern Italy. However, sex differences in proportionate mortality persist, and the increasing association between PE and cancer at death may reflect changes in risk factor distribution or diagnostic practices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 236-240
Author(s):  
Anuj Kapoor ◽  
Kamna Singh

Introduction: Cancer can affect all living cells in the body, at all ages and both genders are affected with Cancer. There is a multifactorial causation and the disease process differs at different sites. The World Cancer Report documents that cancer rates are set to increase at an alarming rate globally. Aim and objectives: To assess the cancer scenario in a tertiary care setting, GMC Kathua Methodology: This was a hospital-based retrospective study undertaken in the tertiary care center Kathua. GMC, Kathua is one among the five new medical colleges established in Jammu & Kashmir. The records of cancer patients generated from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2020 were analyzed. All the cancer cases who reported either for diagnosis in any of the hospital OPD or for the treatment (radiotherapy/ chemotherapy/ surgery) were included. Data was entered in the MS Excel for analysis Results: A total 254 patients were registered during this 1 year period. Females accounted for 56.2% and males for 43.07% .Majority of the cases (114) were found in the age group 41-60. CA breast was the common (16.54%) reported cancer among females followed by CA cervix whereas in males, CA lung (9.92%) was the most common reported cancer among males Conclusion: The prevalence of cancer cases was found to be higher in females as compared to males. The major age group fell in between 41-60 years. The lung was a leading site of cancer among males and breast was a leading site of the cancer among the females. Key words: Cancer, Breast cancer, Lung cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18510-e18510
Author(s):  
Noha Soror ◽  
Amany Keruakous

e18510 Background: Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. It continues to be the second leading cause of death in the United States despite all national efforts aiming to reduce cancer burden and mortality. Delays in medical care and subsequently age-appropriate screening leads to increased cancer burden which reflect on the overall prognosis. Medical care accessibility has been a challenge that is reported by approximately one third of the USA adult population. We aimed to identify health care disparities and its correlation with prevalence of cancer as well as delays in medical care due to financial challenges among Texas residents. Methods: We analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2017. We measured specific health care disparities including patient’s gender, age, race/ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), annual income, alcohol consumption, history of cancer, and delays in medical care due to financial burden, among respondents to the 2017 BRFSS survey from Texas. We computed the difference between our comparison groups using chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Results: We analyzed the differences in health care disparities among respondents with and without history of cancer. We report results from 11,165 adult respondents who reside in Texas, among which nine percent were diagnosed with cancer. We noticed a higher proportion of females than males among participants with a history of cancer (64% females p < 0.0001). Age did differ between both groups, with the majority of participants with cancer are aged 50 years and older. Interestingly, BMI did not differ between both groups (p-value = 0.6930). Although annual income did not differ between both groups, twelve percent of participants with cancer diagnosis suffered from delays in medical care due to financial burden. Racial disparities were statistically different between participants with or without cancer (p < .0001). Seventy seven percent of patients with cancer diagnosis were White and non-Hispanic with a cancer prevalence rate of 12% in that racial group. On a stratified analysis to compute the relationship between delayed medical care due to financial burden and cancer diagnosis among all ethnic groups, it was not statistically different (p-value = 0.1063). We showed that prevalence of cancer among multiracial participants and other racial minorities was higher in the group of participants who reported delays in medical care due to financial burden (11% versus 7%). Conclusions: Racial and ethnic disparities could affect accessibility to medical services. Race is a significant variable that is associated with cancer, with higher prevalence of cancer in White and non-Hispanic. Delayed medical care due to financial burden is more pronounced in multiracial population and racial minorities and should be targeted in future quality improvement projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document