scholarly journals ERROR ANALYSIS OF ELEVENTH GRADE ODD MIDTERM EVALUATION IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL MUHAMMADIYAH 2, TANGERANG

JURNAL BASIS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Woro Endah Sitoresmi ◽  
Velma Alicia
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
Vocational School ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Present Tense ◽  
Context Of Learning ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

The objective of this study is to know the grammatical errors and to elaborate the sources of errors in odd midterm evaluation of eleventh grade for the academic year 2018/2019 in Vocational School, Muhammadiyah 2, Parung Serab, Kota Tangerang, Banten. It belongs to descriptive qualitative study which used document analysis to proceed the data. The findings showed that there are five error grammatical items which include tenses (present tense & past continuous tense), preposition, object pronoun, article and quantifier. In addition, there are three sources of errors in the study; error related to context of learning, intralingual error and interlingual error.

scholarly journals An Analysis of Students’ Grammatical Errors in Arranging Jumbled Words into Meaningful Sentences of the Einght Grade at SMP Negeri 4 Banyuwangi in the Academic Year 2016/2017

LUNAR ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Dilla Ayuning Pangestu
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Past Tense ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Present Tense ◽  
Academic Year

Writing cannot be separated from sentences. Constructing sentences is astart to write a composition since it has levels of difficulties starting from wordsto sentences, sentences to paragraph and paragraph to longer composition.Jumbled words is a method of teaching. There are some words or sentenceswhich are jumbled by teacher and the students must arrange them intocorrect sentences. This research is a descriptive quantitative one that focusedon the data analysis with form description with the scoring of the eight gradestudents’ grammatical errors in arranging jumbled words into meaningfulsentences at SMP Negeri 4Banyuwangi in the Academic Year 2016/2017. Purposive method was used todetermine the research area. The number of respondent were 30 students.The result of the data analysis showed that compose sentences was difficultfor the eight year students of SMP Negeri 4 Banyuwangi. (1) There are 126miordering of using adjective followed by noun with the percentage 23,37%.(2) There are 46 misordering of using verb followed byadverb with the percentage 8,53%. (3) There are 98 misordering of usingauxiliary verb ( do, do es and did )with the percentage 18,18%, (4) There are 95 misordering of using to be pasttense (was and were) with the percentage 17,62%. (5) There are75misordering of using Simple Present Tense with the percentage 13,91%. (6)There are 99 misordering of using Simple Past Tense with the percentage18,36%

scholarly journals AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT STRATEGY IN COMPLETING TOEFL READING COMPREHENSION TEST

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-91
Author(s):  
Dede Rohadi Fajri
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Standardize Test ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Comprehension Test ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Interview Questionnaire ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

This research aimed to find out the strategies used by students in completing TOEFL reading comprehension test, types of reading comprehension in TOEFL test that was difficult to be answered by students, the greatest challenges factor for students in completing reading comprehension in TOEFL test, and the score of the 2nd semester students of STTIKOM Insan Unggul Cilegon-Banten. This is a descriptive qualitative study based on observation, interview, questionnaire and test as the instruments of collecting data.The sample is 20 advanced STTIKOM undergraduate students at Cilegon-Banten in Academic year 2018/2019 who were asked to do a PBT TOEFL reading comprehension test.The result showed that inference (33%), vocabulary (40%) and unstated details (50%) questions are the most difficult types to be answered by students. Related to the strategy, three of the strategies (skimming and scanning, top down and guess meaning ) are used by students in answering reading comprehension in TOEFL test. The greatest challenges for students in answering TOEFL reading comprehension in TOEFL test are less motivation in reading a text, less practice and they did not mastering vocabulary well. In addition, the TOEFL score of STTIKOM Insan Unggul Cilegon-Banten was insufficient to achieve standardize test or low.

scholarly journals Grammatical Errors of Analysis in Writing E-Mail Committed by Reservation Staff at PT. Destination Asia Bali 2015/2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratna Shuandari
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Travel Agent ◽  
Analytical Error ◽  
Incomplete Knowledge ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Intensive Course ◽  
E Mail

This study aimed at (i) To analyze the compatibility of the emails written by the staffs of PT. Destination Asia Tour & Travel with the format of formal email, (2) to analyze the types of errors committed by the reservation staff at PT. Destination Asia Tour & Travel, (3) to find out the sources of errors committed by the reservation staff at PT. Destination Asia Tour & Travel. This study was designed as a descriptive qualitative study. The data were collected by using research instruments such as analytical error analysis rubric, interview and observation sheet. The collected data were analyzed descriptively. From the data analysis it was found that (i) most of the emails have been written formally, almost all of the staff violated the element of formal email regarding to the non-contraction use in the email; (ii) all of the staff committed 16 (19%) errors of omission, 12 (14%) errors of addition, 47 (55%) errors of malformation and 10 (12%) errors of disordering; and (iii) the errors made by the staffs are caused by some factors namely staff’s incomplete knowledge, absence of knowledge, forgetting, language interference, over generalization and false concept hypothesized. Based on the conclusion of this study, it was suggested to the travel agent to provide their staffs an intensive course especially to improve their competence in writing formal email. 

scholarly journals ERROR ANALYSIS IN THE TRAVEL WRITING MADE BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vika Agustina ◽  
Esti Junining
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
Travel Writing ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
English Department ◽  
State University ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Dominant Type ◽  
Verb Inflection ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Written Materials

This study was conducted to identify the kinds of errors in surface strategy taxonomy and to know the dominant type of errors made by the fifth semester students of English Department of one State University in Malang-Indonesia in producing their travel writing. The type of research of this study is document analysis since it analyses written materials, in this case travel writing texts. The analysis finds that the grammatical errors made by the students based on surface strategy taxonomy theory consist of four types. They are (1) omission, (2) addition, (3) misformation and (4) misordering. The most frequent errors occuring in misformation are in the use of tense form. Secondly, the errors are in omission of noun/verb inflection. The next error, there are many clauses that contain unnecessary phrase added there.Keywords: Error, Error Analysis, Surface Strategy Taxonomy, Travel Writing

scholarly journals an Analysis of Students’ Error in Constructing the Negative and Interrogative Sentence by Using Simple Present Tense

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-307
Author(s):  
Diana Adinda Shafira ◽  
Rabbayani Mawaddah ◽  
Lidya Br Aritonang ◽  
Elianti Nainggolan ◽  
Natalia Widya Pasca Tarigan
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Present Tense ◽  
Interrogative Sentence ◽  
Essay Test ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

This research aims to find out the errors made by the students in constructing the negative and interrogative sentences by using the simple present tense. Those errors were classified into four types, namely omission, addition, misformation, and misordering based on surface strategy taxonomy from Daulay. The researchers used a descriptive qualitative method to find the result. The subject of this research was the VIII-A class of SMP Negeri 40 Medan that consisted of 30 students. The instrument for gathering the data was the essay test, which included 20 affirmative sentences, which asked to form those sentences into the negative and interrogative sentences. The findings indicated that the students' errors in this study were 318 (50,4%) case of mistakes on misformation; 175 (27,8%) case of errors on addition; 100 (15,9%) case of errors on misordering; and 37 (5,9%) case of errors on omission. It can be concluded that misformation in the most frequent errors, while failure is the rarest error in this research. Keywords: error analysis, constructing negative and interrogative sentence

ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE STUDENTS WRITING OF SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE IN A DESCRIPTIVE TEXT

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Bara Vera ◽  
Acep Haryudin ◽  
Windy Herdiyanti
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
Seventh Grade ◽  
Qualitative Design ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Present Tense ◽  
Types Of Error

One of English skills which is important to be mastered by the students’ is writing skill. Writing is a creative and expressive process. Students need to explore their ideas and compose into a good text. The objectives of this research is to find out types of error and the most dominant error writing using simple present tenses in a descriptive text made by the seventh grade students of MTs Asih Putera. The research design is qualitative design. The data were gathered from students’ test as a document analysis. Then, the researcher analyzed, classifying errors the students’ work based on types of errors by Dulay (1982). For calcuting the data, the researcher used one formula to know percentages errors. The result of this research, showed that there are 73 items of errors which occur in students’ sentence. It is found that 42 items or 57,53% errors are omission, 10 items or 13,70% are addition, 16 items or 21,92% are misformation, and 5 items or 6,85% are disordering. The conclusion based on the research result data, most student were made error in using simple present tense in a descriptive text, especially was ommision errors.

scholarly journals An Analysis of the Grammatical Errors in Narrative Writing Made by Eleventh-grade Students of One Private Islamic Senior High School Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia

Ta dib ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-210
Author(s):  
MURDIYANA MURDIYANA
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Senior High School ◽  
Narrative Writing ◽  
Frequent Type ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Writing Errors ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

This study was aimed at finding out: (1) the types of grammatical errors in narrative writing made by eleventh-grade students of one private Islamic senior high school Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia and (2) the most frequent type of grammatical errors in narrative writing made by eleventh-grade students of private Islamic senior high school Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia. This study was a descriptive qualitative research. The data were collected from narrative writing written by the 32 eleventh grade students. In this study, grammatical items analyzed were covering noun, pronoun, verb, conjunction, adjective, adverb and preposition. In analyzing students’ errors, some procedures of error analysis were applied. They were identification, description, and explanation. The frequencies of errors were calculated in percentages. Based on the result of the analysis, there were 621 grammatical errors found in students’ narrative writing. Errors in using verb became the most frequent type of errors with 308 errors (49.59%), followed by errors in pronoun with 136 errors (21.90%), in adjective with 87 errors (14.00%), in preposition with 61 errors (9.82%), in noun with 13 errors (2.09%), in conjunction with 10 errors (1.61%) and the last errors in adverb with 6 errors (0.96%).

scholarly journals An Analysis of Grammatical Errors Committed by the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Baturiti in Writing Recount Text in Academic Year 2014/2015

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
L A Purnayatri ◽  
I Ketut Seken ◽  
L D.S. Adnyani
Keyword(s):  
Document Analysis ◽  
Analysis Theory ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Interview Guide ◽  
Combination Of Theories ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The One ◽  
Academic Year

The present study aimed at 1) finding the types of grammatical errors committed by the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Baturiti in writing recount text in academic year 2014/2015; and 2) finding the sources of the errors committed by the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Baturiti in writing recount text in academic year 2014/2015. This study was designed as descriptive-qualitative study. The methods used to collectdata were document analysis and interview. The instruments used were project and interview guide. The data in this study were analyzed by using data analysis theory proposed by Miles and Hubarman. The types of grammatical errors used in this study were based on the surface strategy taxonomy proposed by Dulayat alwhile the sources of the errors were based on the combination of theories proposed by Richards and Brown. Model of error analysis used in this study was the one proposed by Gass and Selinker. The result of the study showed that the subject committed 167 errors in their writing, namely misformation (29.94%), addition (27.54%), omission (24.55%), and misordering (17.96%).

scholarly journals Error Analysis on Classroom Language Made by Pre-service Teachers of English Education Program UNP

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Mir-atul Aufa ◽  
Hermawati Syarif
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
High Schools ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Education Program ◽  
English Education ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Field Practice ◽  
Classroom Language ◽  
Lexical Errors ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

This study aimed to analyse the errors on pre-service teachers’ classroom language while having field practice in senior high schools. The analysis was conducted by adapting James (1998) Target Modification Taxonomy. Classroom language including the simple instructions and the questions given by pre-service teachers. The participants of this research are five pre-service teachers from four different schools. This study was descriptive qualitative research. The instrumentation of this research were observation, document and interview. The study analyzed pre-service teachers’ classroom language by categorizing the errors into types followed by the causes of each error. Some problems related to pre-service teachers’ classroom language were also found. The problems found hindered the optimal use of classroom language. The findings of the research showed that there were grammatical and lexical errors occured. The grammatical errors were omission (50%), overinclusion (21.73%), misselection (8.70%) and misplacement (4.34%). Some ellipsis (15.21%) were also detected.  

scholarly journals ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE USING BE OF SIMPLE PRESENT AND SIMPLE PAST TENSES AMONG THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 NAINGGOLAN

2020 ◽  
pp. 208-223
Author(s):  
Beriman Sinaga ◽  
Viator Lumban Raja ◽  
Fiber Yun Almanda Ginting
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Past Tense ◽  
Seventh Grade ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Causes Of Errors ◽  
Present Tense ◽  
Past Tenses ◽  
Omission Errors ◽  
Academic Year

Grammar is the rules in a language for changing the form of words and joining them into sentences to create meaning. This research is focused on error analysis  on the using BE in Simple Present and Simple Past Tenses. The purpose of this study is to find out the grammatical errors in using BE in students’ composition. In this study the writer took the the seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Nainggolan in the Academic Year of 2017/2018 consisting 25 students as the sample. The data are analyzed with descriptive qualitative method. The data were identified based on kinds of errors. The kinds of errors are omission and misordering. The results of the data analysis show that there are 155 errors made by the students in their compositions. The writer concluded that omission errors 68 or 61,80% in Simple Present Tense and  49 or 51% in Simple Past Tense, misordering errors 16 or 14,60% in Simple Present Tense and 22 or 23% in Simple Past Tense. But out of category there are 28 or 23,60 redundant sentences in Simple Present Tense and 25 or 26% redundant sentences in Simple Past Tense. The writer also concluded that there are two causes of errors, namely Translation and Carelesssness. Based on the result of the research, it is suggested that the students should learn and memorize grammatical rules an teachers should give clearer explanation on grammatical rules in English.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document