scholarly journals Sex Disparities of Genomic Determinants in Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuyan Shi ◽  
Wenjing Zhang ◽  
Yichen Yang ◽  
Yitao Yang ◽  
Junyi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mutational Signatures ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Immune Resistance ◽  
Sex Disparities ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Melanoma Patients

BackgroundDespite the acknowledged sex-related differences in immune response and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy, little is known about the sex disparities in melanoma of novel genomic determinants for ICI therapies.MethodsPretreatment genomic profiles and clinical characteristics of 631 melanoma patients treated with ICIs (i.e., inhibitors of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, or both) were comprehensively curated. Genomic factors, i.e., significantly mutated genes (SMGs), mutational signatures, and molecular subtypes were identified, and their associations with ICI treatment efficacy in male and female patients were evaluated.ResultsOf the 15 SMGs identified in this study, three genes (i.e., CFH, DGKG, and PPP6C) were found to exhibit sex differences with respect to ICI efficacy. Among these, CFH mutations exhibited both response rate and survival benefits in male, but not in female patients. A total of four mutational signatures (i.e., signatures 1, 4, 7, and 11) were extracted. Male patients with signature 4 (also known as smoking-related signature) had an inferior ICI response rate and overall survival. However, this association was not significant in females. An immune subtype based on mutational activities was found to be significantly associated with poor ICI survival in female patients.ConclusionWe uncovered several sex-dependent genomic correlates of response to ICI treatment, such as male-biased CFH mutations and signature 4 and the female-biased immune resistance subtype. The findings derived from this research provide clues for exploring different immunotherapeutic approaches in male and female patients with melanoma.

scholarly journals Novel Molecular Determinants of Response or Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies in Melanoma

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjing Zhang ◽  
Yujia Kong ◽  
Yuting Li ◽  
Fuyan Shi ◽  
Juncheng Lyu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Mutational Signatures ◽  
Driver Genes ◽  
Immune Resistance ◽  
Melanoma Patients

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy dramatically prolongs melanoma survival. Currently, the identified ICI markers are sometimes ineffective. The objective of this study was to identify novel determinants of ICI efficacy.MethodsWe comprehensively curated pretreatment somatic mutational profiles and clinical information from 631 melanoma patients who received blockade therapy of immune checkpoints (i.e., CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, or a combination). Significantly mutated genes (SMGs), mutational signatures, and potential molecular subtypes were determined. Their association with ICI responses was assessed simultaneously.ResultsWe identified 27 SMGs, including four novel SMGs (COL3A1, NRAS, NARS2, and DCC) that are associated with ICI efficacy and well-known driver genes. COL3A1 mutations were associated with improved ICI overall survival (hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45–0.91, p = 0.012), whereas immune resistance was observed in patients with NRAS mutations (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.10–1.82, p = 0.006). The presence of the tobacco smoking-related signature was significantly correlated with inferior prognoses (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.11–1.82, p = 0.005). In addition, the signature resembling that of alkylating agents and a newly discovered signature both exhibited extended prognoses (both HR < 1, p < 0.05). Based on the activities of the extracted 6 mutational signatures, we identified one immune subtype that was significantly associated with better ICI outcomes (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23–0.87, p = 0.017).ConclusionWe uncovered several novel SMGs and re-annotated mutational signatures that are linked to immunotherapy response or resistance. In addition, an immune subtype was found to exhibit favorable prognoses. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the modified immune prognostic index to prognosticate outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2618-2626
Author(s):  
Michael S. Sander ◽  
Igor Stukalin ◽  
Isabelle A. Vallerand ◽  
Siddhartha Goutam ◽  
Benjamin W. Ewanchuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Melanoma Patients

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Anti-PD-L1 Treatment in Melanoma Is Associated with the Expression of the ECM Molecule EMILIN2

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7511
Author(s):  
Albina Fejza ◽  
Maurizio Polano ◽  
Lucrezia Camicia ◽  
Evelina Poletto ◽  
Greta Carobolante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Hypoxia ◽  
Melanoma Cells ◽  
Vessel Normalization ◽  
Melanoma Patients

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma patients, leading to remarkable improvements in the cure. However, to ensure a safe and effective treatment, there is the need to develop markers to identify the patients that would most likely respond to the therapies. The microenvironment is gaining attention in this context, since it can regulate both the immunotherapy efficacyand angiogenesis, which is known to be affected by treatment. Here, we investigated the putative role of the ECM molecule EMILIN-2, a tumor suppressive and pro-angiogenic molecule. We verified that the EMILIN2 expression is variable among melanoma patients and is associated with the response to PD-L1 inhibitors. Consistently, in preclinical settings,the absence of EMILIN-2 is associated with higher PD-L1 expression and increased immunotherapy efficacy. We verified that EMILIN-2 modulates PD-L1 expression in melanoma cells through indirect immune-dependent mechanisms. Notably, upon PD-L1 blockage, Emilin2−/− mice displayed improved intra-tumoral vessel normalization and decreased tumor hypoxia. Finally, we provide evidence indicating that the inclusion of EMILIN2 in a number of gene expression signatures improves their predictive potential, a further indication that the analysis of this molecule may be key for the development of new markers to predict immunotherapy efficacy.

778 Preclinical study using a glutamatergic signaling and immune-checkpoint inhibitors in a spontaneous melanoma prone mouse model

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A828-A828
Author(s):  
Kevinn Eddy ◽  
Christina Marinaro ◽  
Maryam Rasheed ◽  
Joseph Campagnolo ◽  
Xiaoxuan Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mouse Model ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Glutamatergic Signaling ◽  
Melanoma Patients

BackgroundMuch progress has been made in understanding melanoma pathogenesis within the last few years through targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, resistance to small molecule inhibitors remains an obstacle. Immunotherapies such as checkpoint inhibitors against PD-1/PD-L1 lead to durable responses but only in a subset of melanoma patients. Mouse models reflecting human cancers provide invaluable tools towards the translation of basic science discoveries to clinical therapies, but many of these in vivo studies are short-term and do not accurately mimic patient circumstances. Our lab has a melanoma-prone transgenic mouse model which is driven by ectopic expression of a normal neuronal receptor, metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (GRM1). This mouse model recapitulates melanoma development and progression frequently associated with melanoma patients, where aberrant GRM1 expression is detected. We have shown that in >90% of late-stage melanoma patients, there is atypical GRM1 mediated signaling and expression.MethodsIn this study, we are using these mice, TGS, to determine the long-term, 18-week, therapeutic consequences of troriluzole, a prodrug for riluzole, which is an inhibitor of glutamatergic signaling plus anti-PD-1, an immune-checkpoint inhibitor. Tumor burden is monitored every 6 weeks for 18 weeks using a small imaging system, IVIS and tumor burden is quantified using ImageJ software. Blood, lymphoid, and tumor samples were collected at several time points during the study for molecular, and immune analyses.ResultsPreliminary results suggest a gender-biased treatment response and that the combination of troriluzole and anti-PD-1 is more efficacious than either agent alone. In males, a 43.9% reduction in tumor burden was observed while in females there was a 29.6% increase in tumor burden in the combination group compared to vehicle. In concordance, after the removal of the treatment modality, the male mice in the combinatorial group survived 42 days longer compared to vehicle controls with sustained tumor reduction by 68.3%. In female mice no significant advantage in survival or reduction in tumor burden was noted.ConclusionsN/A

scholarly journals 363 Vactosertib and durvalumab as second or later line treatment for PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer: interim result

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A388-A388
Author(s):  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Byoung Yong Shim ◽  
Hye Ryun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

BackgroundTargeting transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is reported to augment the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) through either enhanced anti-tumor immunity or the correction of tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, the combination of vactosertib, a highly selective TGF-β RI kinase inhibitor, and durvalumab is anticipated to improve anti-tumor activity of the ICI. A phase 1b/2a study was conducted to evaluate the combination of vactosertib and durvalumab in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.MethodsPatients were treated with vactosertib at a dose of 200 mg twice daily (five days on and two days off) and durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg every four weeks. Eligible patients were ≥19 years old with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) and have no prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors or other TGF- β R1 kinase inhibitors. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety, antitumor activity including objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to response (TTR) as well as circulating pharmacodynamic biomarkers related to TGF-β signaling. Response was assessed per RECIST (v1.1).ResultsBy August 4 2020, twenty-six PD-L1 positive (SP263 assay) patients were analyzed. Median age was 61.5 years (range 48–83), 69.2% were male, median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 1–4), and all patients were PD-L1 positive (15 patients with PD-L1≥25% and 11 patients with PD-L1 1–24%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were itching (38.5%) and skin rash (34.6%), but no Gr≥3 itching and rash were observed. Each case of the following was reported as Grade 3 TRAEs: adrenal insufficiency, anemia, and pneumonitis; Grade 4 TRAE, CPK increase, was observed in one patient. Objective response rate was 30.8% and 40.0% in patients with PD-L1≥1% and ≥25% respectively. Circulating PAI-1 and CTGF evaluated in 15 patients decreased significantly on Cycle 1 day 5. Ongoing biomarker results will be presented.ConclusionsThe combination of vactosertib and durvalumab has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity as a potential therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The efficacy outcomes of this combination in a larger number of patients with advanced NSCLC will be followed.Trial RegistrationNCT03732274Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Ethics Board of Severance Hospital (4-2018-0892), National Cancer Center (NCC2019-0057), St. Vincent’s Hospital (VC19MDDF0205), and Chungbuk National University Hospital (2019-08-015).

Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TITAN-TCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 446-446
Author(s):  
Marc-Oliver Grimm ◽  
Bernd Schmitz-Dräger ◽  
Uwe Zimmermann ◽  
Barbara Grün ◽  
Gustavo Bruno Baretton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Third Line

446 Background: Several PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors including Nivolumab (Nivo) are approved in urothelial cancer. Recently, in the front line setting, improved activity of combined PD-L1 and CTLA4 immune-checkpoint inhibition has been reported and a phase III trial with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) is ongoing. Here we report a response-based tailored approach starting treatment with Nivo monotherapy using Nivo+Ipi as immunotherapeutic “boost”. Methods: Between July 2017 and April 2019 86 patients were enrolled and treated according to protocol version 3 (cohort 1). Patients started with Nivo 240 mg Q2W induction. After 4 dosings and tumor assessment at week 8 (i) responders (PR/CR) to Nivo monotherapy continued with maintenance while (ii) patients with stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) received 2 cycles Nivo3+Ipi1 followed by another 2 cycles Nivo1+Ipi3 if not responding. Median follow-up is 8.7 months. The primary endpoint is confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints include activity of Nivo monotherapy at week 8, remission rate with Nivo+Ipi “boosts”, safety, overall survival and quality of life. Results: Of the patients 42, 39 and 5 were first, second and third line, respectively. Median age was 67 years (range 45-84), 61 patients (71 %) were male and 25 female. ORR with Nivo monotherapy at first assessment (week 8) was 29 % and 23 % in first and second/third line, respectively. Of the patients 41 received Nivo+Ipi “boosts” after week 8 while 12 received later “boosts”. Best overall response (BOR) rate with Nivo induction ± Nivo+Ipi “boosts” was 48 % and 27 % in first and second/third line, respectively. In first line 7/17 (41 %) patients receiving Nivo+Ipi after week 8 had an improved response compared to 2/24 (8.3 %) in second/third line. Of the patients who continued with Nivo maintenance after week 8 and received later “boosts” 2/12 (17 %) had a PR and 2/12 (17 %) improved to SD. Treatment-related AEs will be presented. Conclusions: TITAN–TCC explores a response-driven use of Nivo+Ipi as an immunotherapeutic “boost”. In first line, this significantly improved ORR compared to the expected response rate of Nivo monotherapy, providing further evidence to the added value of Ipi in combination with Nivo. Further follow-up is ongoing to characterize duration and depth of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03219775 . Research Sponsor: Bristol-Myers Squibb[Table: see text]

The Current Role of Immunotherapy in mCRPC: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalibey H ◽  
◽  
Hansen TF ◽  
Zedan AH ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The development of immunotherapy has shown promising results in several malignant diseases, including prostate cancer, calling for a systematic review of the current literature. This review aims to evaluate the present data and prospects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Articles were identified via a systematic search of the electronic database Pubmed, in accordance with the PICO process and following the PRISMA guidelines. Articles in English studying immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mCRPC published between March 2010 and March 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Endpoints of interest were Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), clinical Overall Response Rate (ORR), and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response rate. Results: Ten articles were identified as eligible for inclusion. The studies primarily explored the use of Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, and Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor. These drugs were both used either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities. The largest trial included in the review demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between the intervention and placebo. However, two studies presented promising data combing immunotherapy and immune vaccines. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events ranging from 10.1% to 82.3%, whit diarrhea, rash, and fatigue were the most frequently reported. Forty relevant ongoing trials were identified exploring immunotherapy with or without a parallel treatment modality. Conclusion: Overall, the current data shows that the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy may have limited impact on mCRPC, and the results from ongoing combinational trials are eagerly awaited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document