scholarly journals New Diagnostic Assays for Differential Diagnosis Between the Two Distinct Lineages of Bovine Influenza D Viruses and Human Influenza C Viruses

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faten A. Okda ◽  
Elizabeth Griffith ◽  
Ahmed Sakr ◽  
Eric Nelson ◽  
Richard Webby
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Human Influenza ◽  
Zoonotic Risk ◽  
Influenza C Virus

Influenza D virus (IDV), a novel orthomyxovirus, is currently emerging in cattle worldwide. It shares >50% sequence similarity with the human influenza C virus (HICV). Two clades of IDV are currently co-circulating in cattle herds in the U.S. New assays specific for each lineage are needed for accurate surveillance. Also, differential diagnosis between zoonotic human influenza C virus and the two clades of IDV are important to assess the zoonotic potential of IDV. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on two different epitopes HEF and NP and four peptides, and fluorescent focus neutralization assay to differentiate between IDV bovine and swine clades. Calf sera were obtained, and bovine samples underwent surveillance. Our results highlight the importance of position 215 with 212 in determining the heterogeneity between the two lineages. We needed IFA and FFN for tissue culture–based analysis and a BSL2 facility for analyzing virus interactions. Unfortunately, these are not available in many veterinary centers. Hence, our second aim was to develop an iELISA using specific epitopes to detect two lineages of IDVs simultaneously. Epitope-iELISA accurately detects neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies against the IDV in non-BSL2 laboratories and veterinary clinics and is cost-effective and sensitive. To differentiate between IDVs and HICVs, whole antigen blocking, polypeptides, and single-peptide ELISAs were developed. A panel of ferret sera against both viruses was used. Results suggested that both IDV and ICV had a common ancestor, and IDV poses a zoonotic risk to individuals with prior or current exposure to cattle. IDV peptides IANAGVK (286–292 aa), KTDSGR (423–428 aa), and RTLTPAT (448–455 aa) could differentiate between the two viruses, whereas peptide AESSVNPGAKPQV (203–215 aa) detected the presence of IDV in human sera but could not deny that it could be ICV, because the only two conserved influenza C peptides shared 52% sequence similarity with IDV and cross-reacted with IDV. However, blocking ELISAs differentiated between the two viruses. Diagnostic tools and assays to differentiate between ICV and IDV are required for serological and epidemiological analysis to clarify the complexity and evolution and eliminate misdiagnosis between ICV and IDV in human samples.

scholarly journals Detection of Human Papillomavirus Type 31-Neutralizing Antibodies from Naturally Infected Patients by an Assay Based on Intracellular Assembly of Luciferase-Expressing Pseudovirions

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime J. J. Fleury ◽  
Antoine Touzé ◽  
Silvia de Sanjosé ◽  
F. Xavier Bosch ◽  
Joellen Klaustermeiyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Highly Sensitive

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to develop a highly sensitive human papillomavirus type 31 (HPV31) neutralization assay based on the production of pseudovirions carrying luciferase. Neutralizing antibodies against HPV31 were investigated in a set of HPV31 monoclonal antibodies and in women with evidence of HPV31 infection. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in 78% of subjects with a positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

scholarly journals Mucosal but Not Parenteral Immunization with Purified Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Virus-Like Particles Induces Neutralizing Titers of Antibodies throughout the Estrous Cycle of Mice

1999 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 9609-9613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Nardelli-Haefliger ◽  
Richard Roden ◽  
Carole Balmelli ◽  
Alexandra Potts ◽  
John Schiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Estrous Cycle ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Female Genital Tract ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Virus Like Particles ◽  
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 ◽  
Parenteral Immunization

ABSTRACT We have recently shown that nasal immunization of anesthetized mice with human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) virus-like particles (VLPs) is highly effective at inducing both neutralizing immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG in genital secretions, while parenteral immunization induced only neutralizing IgG. Our data also demonstrated that both isotypes are similarly neutralizing according to an in vitro pseudotyped neutralization assay. However, it is known that various amounts of IgA and IgG are produced in genital secretions along the estrous cycle. Therefore, we have investigated how this variation influences the amount of HPV16 neutralizing antibodies induced after immunization with VLPs. We have compared parenteral and nasal protocols of vaccination with daily samplings of genital secretions of mice. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis showed that total IgA and IgG inversely varied along the estrous cycle, with the largest amounts of IgA in proestrus-estrus and the largest amount of IgG in diestrus. This resulted in HPV16 neutralizing titers of IgG only being achieved during diestrus upon parenteral immunization. In contrast, nasal vaccination induced neutralizing titers of IgA plus IgG throughout the estrous cycle, as confirmed by in vitro pseudotyped neutralization assays. Our data suggest that mucosal immunization might be more efficient than parenteral immunization at inducing continuous protection of the female genital tract.

Egg Yolk Antibodies for Detection and Neutralization of Clostridium botulinum Type A Neurotoxin

2009 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. TROTT ◽  
M. YANG ◽  
J. GONZALEZ ◽  
A. E. LARSON ◽  
W. H. TEPP ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Specific Antibody ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Egg Production ◽  
Egg Yolk ◽  
Type A ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Botulinum Type ◽  
Lethal Doses

The objective of this research project was to determine the usefulness of an egg antibody platform for producing materials for the detection and neutralization of botulinum type A neurotoxin. Yield estimates for detection and neutralizing antibodies produced using methods described were calculated. Antibody specific to botulinum toxoid A (aToxoid) and toxin A (aBoNT/A) was produced by immunizing hens with botulinum toxoid A (toxoid) followed by increasing amounts of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) in Freund incomplete adjuvant. Egg yolks were extracted with polyethylene glycol (PEG) for antibody detection and neutralization experiments. A model aToxoid/toxoid immunoassay using only egg yolk antibody was developed and had a detection limit of 1 pg/ml of toxoid. In an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of BoNT/A-specific antibody, the aBoNT/A contained more BoNT/A-specific antibody than did the aToxoid, and aBoNT/A was as effective as commercial rabbit antibody. The aToxoid provided no protection against BoNT/A in a standard mouse neutralization assay; however, 1 mg of PEG-extracted aBoNT/A neutralized 4,000 lethal doses of BoNT/A injected intraperitoneally. Based on these results, we calculated that in 1 month one hen could produce more than 100 liters of antibody detection reagents or enough antibody to neutralize approximately 11.6 million mouse lethal doses of botulinum toxin. Utilization of an egg antibody platform is potentially rapid (28 to 70 days) and scalable to kilogram quantities using current egg production facilities with as few as 1,000 hens.

scholarly journals Neutralizing Antibody Responses to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Inpatients and Convalescent Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 2688-2694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoli Wang ◽  
Xianghua Guo ◽  
Qianqian Xin ◽  
Yang Pan ◽  
Yaling Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Antibody Level ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Estimating Equation ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic with no specific antiviral treatments or vaccines. There is an urgent need for exploring the neutralizing antibodies from patients with different clinical characteristics. Methods A total of 117 blood samples were collected from 70 COVID-19 inpatients and convalescent patients. Antibodies were determined with a modified cytopathogenic neutralization assay (NA) based on live severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The dynamics of neutralizing antibody levels at different time points with different clinical characteristics were analyzed. Results The seropositivity rate reached up to 100.0% within 20 days since onset, and remained 100.0% till days 41–53. The total geometric mean titer was 1:163.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 128.5–208.6) by NA and 1:12 441.7 (95% CI, 9754.5–15 869.2) by ELISA. The antibody level by NA and ELISA peaked on days 31–40 since onset, and then decreased slightly. In multivariate generalized estimating equation analysis, patients aged 31–45, 46–60, and 61–84 years had a higher neutralizing antibody level than those aged 16–30 years (β = 1.0470, P = .0125; β = 1.0613, P = .0307; β = 1.3713, P = .0020). Patients with a worse clinical classification had a higher neutralizing antibody titer (β = 0.4639, P = .0227). Conclusions The neutralizing antibodies were detected even at the early stage of disease, and a significant response was shown in convalescent patients.

scholarly journals Clinical Utility of a Highly Sensitive Lateral Flow Immunoassay as determined by Titer Analysis for the Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies at the Point-of-Care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Haymond ◽  
Claudius Mueller ◽  
Hannah Steinberg ◽  
K. Alex Hodge ◽  
Caitlin W Lehman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Lateral Flow Immunoassay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Viral Neutralization

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), became a pandemic in early 2020. Lateral flow immunoassays for antibody testing have been viewed as a cheap and rapidly deployable method for determining previous infection with SARS-CoV-2; however, these assays have shown unacceptably low sensitivity. We report on nine lateral flow immunoassays currently available and compare their titer sensitivity in serum to a best-practice enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and viral neutralization assay. For a small group of PCR-positive, we found two lateral flow immunoassay devices with titer sensitivity roughly equal to the ELISA; these devices were positive for all PCR-positive patients harboring SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. One of these devices was deployed in Northern Italy to test its sensitivity and specificity in a real-world clinical setting. Using the device with fingerstick blood on a cohort of 27 hospitalized PCR-positive patients and seven hospitalized controls, ROC curve analysis gave AUC values of 0.7646 for IgG. For comparison, this assay was also tested with saliva from the same patient population and showed reduced discrimination between cases and controls with AUC values of 0.6841 for IgG. Furthermore, during viral neutralization testing, one patient was discovered to harbor autoantibodies to ACE2, with implications for how immune responses are profiled. We show here through a proof-of-concept study that these lateral flow devices can be as analytically sensitive as ELISAs and adopted into hospital protocols; however, additional improvements to these devices remain necessary before their clinical deployment.

scholarly journals Rapid and accurate point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV2 antibodies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Esmail ◽  
Michael J. Knauer ◽  
Husam Abdoh ◽  
Benjamin Chin-Yee ◽  
Peter Stogios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Influenza Pandemic ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Agglutination Assay ◽  
N Protein ◽  
1918 Influenza

ABSTRACTThe COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has grown into worst public health crisis since the 1918 influenza pandemic. As COVID-19 continues to spread around the world, there is urgent need for a rapid, yet accurate antibody test to identify infected individuals in populations to inform health decisions. We have developed a rapid, accurate and cost-effective serologic test based on antibody-dependent agglutination of antigen-coated latex particles, which uses ∼5 µl plasma and takes <5 min to complete with no instrument required. The simplicity of this test makes it ideal for point-of-care (POC) use at the community level. When validated using plasma samples that are positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2, the agglutination assay detected antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the spike (S-RBD) or the nucleocapsid (N) protein of SARS-CoV-2 with 100% specificity and ∼98% sensitivity. Furthermore, we found that the strength of the S-RBD antibody response measured by the agglutination assay correlated with the efficiency of the plasma in blocking RBD binding to the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in a surrogate neutralization assay, suggesting that the agglutination assay may be used to identify individuals with virus-neutralizing antibodies. Intriguingly, we found that >92% of patients had detectable antibodies on the day of positive viral RNA test, suggesting that seroconversion may occur earlier than previously thought and that the agglutination antibody test may complement RNA testing for POC diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Performance of Assays for the Detection of Anti-Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Antibodies in Serum and Muscle Transudate (“Meat Juice”) Based on Samples Collected under Experimental Conditions

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 735-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon M. Molina ◽  
Wayne Chittick ◽  
Eric A. Nelson ◽  
Jane Christopher-Hennings ◽  
Raymond R. R. Rowland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Fluorescent Antibody ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Meat Juice

Three assays were evaluated for their ability to detect antibodies against Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in porcine muscle transudate (“meat juice”) samples. Samples were derived from 91 pigs inoculated with PRRSV isolate VR-2332 and 46 age-matched controls. Serum and muscle ( Musculus longissimus dorsi) samples were collected from randomly selected animals euthanized at ∼14-day intervals from 28 to 202 days postinoculation. Serum samples were assayed at a dilution of 1:40, and muscle transudate samples were assayed at 5 dilutions (1:2, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:40) using a commercial PRRSV antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, muscle transudate samples were tested using an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) at 5 dilutions (1:2, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:40). Attempts to assay muscle transudate samples for neutralizing antibodies using a modified fluorescent focus neutralization assay were unsuccessful. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to estimate cutoff thresholds and the associated diagnostic sensitivities and specificities for ELISA and IFAT at each dilution. For ELISA, muscle transudate samples at the ROC-optimized cutoffs were >95% sensitive and 100% specific at each dilution. At a cutoff dilution of ≥1:5, the IFAT diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of muscle transudate was estimated at 63.3% and 100%, respectively. These findings validated the use of muscle transudate samples in PRRSV surveillance programs based on ELISA antibody testing.

scholarly journals A simple protein-based surrogate neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kento T. Abe ◽  
Zhijie Li ◽  
Reuben Samson ◽  
Payman Samavarchi-Tehrani ◽  
Emelissa J. Valcourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Viral Vector ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Plasma Therapy ◽  
Public Health Decision ◽  
Humoral Immune ◽  
Immune Correlates ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Health Decision

AbstractMost of the patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mount a humoral immune response to the virus within a few weeks of infection, but the duration of this response and how it correlates with clinical outcomes has not been completely characterized. Of particular importance is the identification of immune correlates of infection that would support public health decision-making on treatment approaches, vaccination strategies, and convalescent plasma therapy. While ELISA-based assays to detect and quantitate antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in patient samples have been developed, the detection of neutralizing antibodies typically requires more demanding cell-based viral assays. Here, we present a safe and efficient protein-based assay for the detection of serum and plasma antibodies that block the interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) with its receptor, angiotensin converting-enzyme 2 (ACE2). The assay serves as a surrogate neutralization assay and is performed on the same platform and in parallel with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies against the RBD, enabling a direct comparison. The results obtained with our assay correlate with those of two viral based assays, a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) that uses live SARS-CoV-2 virus, and a spike pseudotyped viral-vector-based assay.

scholarly journals A Simple and High-Throughput ELISA-Based Neutralization Assay for the Determination of Anti-Flavivirus Neutralizing Antibodies

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Jean Claude Balingit ◽  
Minh Huong Phu Ly ◽  
Mami Matsuda ◽  
Ryosuke Suzuki ◽  
Futoshi Hasebe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Antibody Activity ◽  
Vaccine Trials ◽  
Antibody Levels ◽  
Flavivirus Infection

Mosquito-borne flavivirus infections, including dengue virus and Zika virus, are major public health threats globally. While the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is considered the gold standard for determining neutralizing antibody levels to flaviviruses, the assay is time-consuming and laborious. This study, therefore, aimed to develop an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based microneutralization test (EMNT) for the detection of neutralizing antibodies to mosquito-borne flaviviruses. The inhibition of viral growth due to neutralizing antibodies was determined colorimetrically by using EMNT. Given the significance of Fcγ-receptors (FcγR) in antibody-mediated neutralization and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of flavivirus infection, non-FcγR and FcγR-expressing cell lines were used in the EMNT to allow the detection of the sum of neutralizing and immune-enhancing antibody activity as the neutralizing titer. Using anti-flavivirus monoclonal antibodies and clinical samples, the utility of EMNT was evaluated by comparing the end-point titers of the EMNT and the PRNT. The correlation between EMNT and PRNT titers was strong, indicating that EMNT was robust and reproducible. The new EMNT assay combines the biological functional assessment of virus neutralization activity and the technical advantages of ELISA and, is simple, reliable, practical, and could be automated for high-throughput implementation in flavivirus surveillance studies and vaccine trials.

scholarly journals Hyperimmunized Chickens Produce Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J. Aston ◽  
Daria Mochly-Rosen ◽  
Aarthi Narayanan ◽  
Sofia Egaña-Labrin ◽  
Michael G. Wallach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Egg Yolk ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Multiple Strategies ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Antibody Titers

Abstract The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, is responsible for the global COVID-19 pandemic. Effective interventions are urgently needed to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 and likely require multiple strategies. Egg-extracted antibody therapies are a low-cost and scalable strategy to protect at-risk individuals from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Commercial laying hens were hyperimmunized against the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein using three different S1 recombinant proteins and three different doses. Sera and egg yolk were collected at three and six weeks after the second immunization for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and plaque reduction neutralization assay to determine antigen-specific antibody titers and neutralizing antibody titers, respectively. In this study we demonstrate that hens hyperimmunized against the SARS-CoV-2 recombinant S1 and receptor binding domain (RBD) proteins produced neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. We further demonstrate that antibody production was dependent on the dose and type of antigen administered. Our data suggest that antibodies purified from the egg yolk of hyperimmunized hens can be used as immunoprophylaxis in humans at risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document